FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

India Ecstatic Over BRICS Naming Pakistan Terror-Groups

by

It must have been a great day in India yesterday, with the entire nation in a celebratory, ecstatic mood. Probably on par with the Duke of Wellington defeating Napoleon in the battle of Waterloo. It couldn’t have come at a better time for New Delhi, with the economy devastated by Modi’s self-destructive demonetisation, the summer of discontent in Kashmir, Darjeeling and Northeastern India, and withdrawal from the Donglang/Doklam border standoff with China.

No, it’s not a military victory that sent Indians into a frenzy across the land of godman. It’s a self-proclaimed, delusional “diplomatic” victory. Yesterday, the front page news of the Indian printed media was inundated with the following typical battle cry:

“India achieved a major diplomatic victory over Pakistan—and China—when the association of BRICS nations condemned terror by naming several Pakistan-sponsored terror networks such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, the Haqqani network and Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. “

But, what did the BRICS Declaration actually say? Nothing to write home about for a calm, rational person :

“48. We, in this regard, express concern on the security situation in the region and violence caused by the Taliban, ISIL/DAISH, Al-Qaida and its affiliates including Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, TTP and Hizb ut-Tahrir.”

China didn’t sell out or betray its “iron-clad” brother Pakistan in agreeing to include the three Pakistan-based militant groups in the BRICS Declaration. Much less under Indian pressure. The three groups have been banned by Pakistan itself since 2015. If anything, it’s just China and Russia throwing a sop to the delusional and petulant Modi to prevent him from disrupting the BRICS Summit, akin to throwing a piece of bone to a hungry dog to stop the barking.

The following report from the horse’s mouth, Pakistan’s major daily The Nation, confirms what it’s really all about:

“ISLAMABAD/Lahore – Pakistan Monday wondered at India’s celebrations over BRICS’ naming some alleged Pakistan-based terror networks that are already on country’s list of banned outfits.”

“Indian officials and media tried to sell mention of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) among the terrorists groups as a diplomatic defeat for Pakistan, ignoring the fact that Islamabad regards these groups anti-peace entities and had declared them proscribed organizations years ago.”

As in the BRICS Summit in Goa last year, India doesn’t get what it desperately wants this year : Naming Masood Azhar, founder and leader of JeM, as a terrorist and putting him on the UN sanctions list. Nor is there mention of cross-border terrorist attacks allegedly committed by the Pakistan-based groups.

Days earlier, both China and Russia had issued statements supporting Pakistan in its anti-terrorism efforts after Trump scolded Islamabad for not having done  enough. That’s more substantive and meaty than mere mention of the three Pakistan-based militant groups already proscribed by Islamabad.

Both Xi Jinping and Putin are focussed on the big picture, while Modi is still mired in hostility with its neighbor. Once again, it shows clearly the provincial politician in Modi has failed to rise to become a player in geopolitics. He and his Modibob are still stuck at the binary gears of sulking or fits of  exuberance. A classic case of  “Much ado about nothing”!

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine


bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

September 06, 2017
Gerry Brown
India Ecstatic Over BRICS Naming Pakistan Terror-Groups
Martin Billheimer
Scotland Made Me
September 05, 2017
K. Jessica Hsu – Mark Schuller
Dumb and Dumber: Foregrounding Climate Justice From Harvey to Haiti’s Matthew
Miguel A. Cruz-Díaz
Dancing With the Devil
Kevin Young
The Huddled Masses Were Never Welcome
Gary Leupp
Manafort and the Big Nothingburger
Yoav Litvin
Trump’s Trial Balloons – Preludes to Authoritarianism
Stephen Corry
WWF Violating Indigenous Rights – Complaint Abandoned
Eric Mann
The MTA Murder of the Unknown Rider
David Mattson
America’s Grizzly Bears are in Trouble and So is the Nation’s Moral Compass
Mel Gurtov
Echoes of Reagan: Another Nuclear Buildup
Nyla Ali Khan
The Ethnic and Linguistic Tapestry of Kashmir
Stephen Cooper
Celebrating Oktoberfest in Alabama with Executions
Ron Jacobs
Gregor Samsa’s Twentieth Century Blues: Marc Estrin’s Roach Novel
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Climate Breakdown
September 04, 2017
Carl Boggs
The Strange (and Tortured) Legacy of “Free Speech”
Mike Whitney
What the Media isn’t Telling You About North Korea’s Missile Tests
Shamus Cooke
Protest Alone Won’t Stop Fascism
Charles Derber
The State of Labor on Labor Day
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
Language Wars
Ricardo Vaz
Venezuela in the Media: Double Standards and First Impressions
Peter LaVenia
Afghanistan: Why We Won’t Leave
Robert Roth
Haiti in Crisis: What Next After the Stolen Election?
John O’Connor – Louise Williams
Concession Fatigue in Connecticut
Laura Finley
Imploring President Trump to Reconsider Reinstating Program Offering Military Surplus to Police
Binoy Kampmark
Unnerving the Donald: North Korea’s Sixth Nuclear Test
Michael Brinkman
Alex Jones and the War on the Minds of the Working Class
Bill Glahn
Death and the Workplace: How Can a Poor Man Stand Such Times and Live
M. G. Piety
Martin Luther the Man-Devil
Chandra Muzaffar
Rohingyas as Jihadists?
Jesse Jackson
Colin Kaepernick’s Prostest is Part of a Patriotic Tradition
Weekend Edition
September 01, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
If Hillary Had Won
Robert Hunziker
Harvey: Fierce Climate Change at Work
Jeffrey St. Clair
The Plot Sickens: the Death Penalty and American Politics
Andrew Levine
Confederate Symbols
Jonathan Cook
Israel Seeks ‘Jewish’ Non-Jews in Numbers Battle with Palestnians
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up to Nazism
Louis Proyect
Hurricane Harvey and the Dialectics of Nature
Margaret Kimberley
Joe Arpaio is Not an Aberration
Michael Uhl
Ken Burns & Lynn Novick Do Vietnam: a Tale of Two Critics
Terrance MacMullan
Charlottesville, Bacon’s Rebellion and the Miasma of Whiteness
Anthony DiMaggio
Responding to Antifa and Riseup: On Revolutionary Politics and Non-Violence
Andrew Stewart
The Liberal Lockdown in Academia: the Case of Fawzia Afzal-Khan
Norbert Ross – Antonia Ross Sanchez
El Salvador’s Durable Disorder: Low Intensity Postwar Democracy
Dave Lindorff
President Trump’s ‘Arms for Cops’ Program is Just More Militarization of the Police
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail