Search results
  1. Sep 5

    6 factors to consider when assessing proportionality of monitoring workplace e-comms.

  2. Sep 5

    : says employer’s monitoring of an employee’s electronic communications breached H. Rights law.

  3. 3 hours ago
  4. 17 hours ago

    BCR's relevant for the Barbulascu-case (par.51)??? Somebody in the is in need of a and class. 😂😂😂

  5. 8 hours ago

    Twelve rights organisations request leave to make third party submissions to in the cases of imprisoned journalists

  6. Sep 5

    Restrictions on journalists accessing parliament violates free expression: MLDI files intervention to

  7. Aug 30
  8. Sep 5

    The 7 requirements for justifying employee communications monitoring (e-mail, internet, phone, etc).

  9. Sep 5

    : "Enforcing employee against private employer is positive obligation State." Ergo, DPA's not independent from .

  10. 14 hours ago

    Read the Factsheet about Work-related rights:

  11. 14 hours ago
  12. Sep 5

    : "An employer’s instructions cannot reduce private social life in the workplace to zero.

  13. Sep 5

    Exciting, yet tumultuous time to be researching the - on Russian/UK refusal to implement judgments & future of the Court.

  14. Sep 5
  15. Sep 5

    Important judgment regarding the right to of employees

  16. Sep 5
  17. Sep 5

    BREAKING: in Bărbulescu v Romania: Breach of art 8 found in monitoring employer messaging app w/o informing.

  18. Sep 5

    GC: Monitoring of an employee’s e-communications amounted to a breach of Article 8

  19. Sep 5

    expected to set legal precedent on online in workplaces

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.