Is American democracy still "by the people, for the people?"
According to recent research, it may not be. Martin Gilens at Princeton University confirms that the wishes of the American working and middle class play essentially no role in our nation's policy making. A BBC story rightly summarized this with the headline: US Is an Oligarchy, Not a Democracy.
However new research by Benjamin Radcliff and Gregory Shufeldt suggests a ray of hope.
Ballot initiatives, they argue, may better serve the interests of ordinary Americans than laws passed by elected officials.
Busy Ballot Initiative Year
Today, 24 states allow citizens to directly vote on policy matters. This year, more than 42 initiatives already are approved for the ballot in 18 states.
Voters in California will decide diverse questions including banning plastic bags, voter approval of state expenses greater than US$2 billion dollars, improving school funding, and the future of bilingual education.
The people of Colorado will vote on replacing their current medical insurance programs with a single payer system, and in Massachusetts people may consider legalizing recreational marijuana.
'By the People' – or Not So Much?
Our founders would have been ambivalent about so much direct democracy. Although the country was founded on the notion that people are happier when they have a say in government, the founders were not optimistic about the ability of people to govern themselves too directly. James Madison, the "father" of the Constitution, famously argued the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves.
By the late nineteenth century, average Americans felt excluded from a representative system they saw as becoming a plutocracy. Much like today, Americans then saw government controlled by the rich and corporate. This gave rise to the Populist Era in which citizens demanded government be more responsive to their needs. Most Populist Era reforms were expansions of direct democracy. Examples include the popular election of Senators, a primary system for picking party candidates, and woman's suffrage.
South Dakota adopted a system of "initiative, referendum, and recall" in 1898. Oregon and California quickly followed, and the system was adopted by another dozen states in under 10 years.
It's been a slow build ever since. Most recently, Mississippi gave citizens the initiative in 1992. That brings us to a total of 24 states, plus the District of Columbia, now recognizing some form of direct democracy.
Truly Democratic?
However, many have pointed to problems with direct democracy in the form of ballot initiatives.
Maxwell Sterns at the University of Maryland, for example, writes that legislatures are better because initiatives are the tools of special interests and minorities. In the end, initiatives are voted upon by an unrepresentative subset of the population, Sterns concludes.
Others like Richard Ellis of Willamette University argue that the time-consuming process of gathering signatures introduces a bias toward moneyed interests. Some suggest this has damaged direct democracy in California, where professional petition writers and paid signature gatherers dominate the process. Moneyed interests also enjoy a natural advantage in having the resources that ordinary people lack to mount media campaigns to support their narrow interests.
To curb this kind of problem, bans on paying people per signature are proposed in many states, but have not yet passed any legislature. However, because Californians like direct democracy in principle, they have recently amended the process to allow for a review and revision, and they require mandatory disclosures about the funding and origins of ballot initiatives.
Finally, some say initiatives can be confusing for voters, like the two recent Ohio propositions concerning marijuana, where one ballot proposition essentially canceled out the other. Similarly, Mississippi's Initiative 42 required marking the ballot in two places for approval but only one for disapproval, resulting in numerous nullified "yes" votes.
Routes to Happiness
Despite these flaws, our research shows that direct democracy might improve happiness in two ways. One is through its psychological effect on voters, making them feel they have a direct impact on policy outcomes. This holds even if they may not like, and thus vote against, a particular proposition. The second is that it may indeed produce policies more consistent with human well being.
The psychological benefits are obvious. By allowing people literally to be the government, just as in ancient Athens, people develop higher levels of political efficacy. In short, they may feel they have some control over their lives. Direct democracy can give people political capital because it offers a means by which citizens may place issues on the ballot for popular vote, giving them an opportunity both to set the agenda and to vote on the outcome.
We think this is important today given America's declining faith in government. Overall today only 19 percent believe the government is run for all citizens. The same percentage trusts government to mostly do what is right. The poor and working classes are even more alienated.
The Survey Says
Our evidence comes from surveys of the American public large enough to allow comparisons across states.
Specifically, we used DDB-Needham Advertising's Life Style Studies. Beginning in 1975, this study annually asks large numbers of Americans about trends, behaviors, beliefs and opinions. The study uses such large samples we can directly examine the impact of initiatives on satisfaction in spite of the fact that it has multiple state and individual level causes.
The statistical evidence is clear.
Life satisfaction is higher in states that allow initiatives than in those that do not. This holds even when controlling for other factors. Satisfaction also increases as the cumulative use of initiatives increases over time. In other words, the more frequently a state has used initiatives to create its current policies, the happier people are.
States that use the initiative tend to have policies that help protect citizen prosperity, health, and security, all of which contribute to greater happiness.
This may be because citizens themselves use the initiative process to implement laws that directly aid them. Or it could be that legislators are more attentive to citizen well being in states that have mechanisms for initiative, referendum, and recall. Either way, the net impact on both satisfaction and well being is positive.
Perhaps more importantly, the study finds that lower and middle income people benefit most from initiatives. Simply put, the happiness of the rich and powerful in a state increases less (or even declines slightly) relative to happiness boost that ordinary citizens receive.
In other words, the greatest increase goes to those who are the least happy to begin with, effectively reducing the "satisfaction inequality" between the rich and poor.
This article was written by Benjamin Radcliff, professor of political science, University of Notre Dame, and Michael Krassa, chair, human dimensions of environmental systems and professor emeritus of political science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, for The Conversation . It is republished here with permission.
Recommended Articles
The 10 Worst Presidents
Dec. 31, 2014
Not all U.S. presidents are missed once they leave the White House.
Editorial Cartoons on Donald Trump
June 14, 2012
Photos: Obama Behind the Scenes
Sept. 10, 2014
A collection of moments subtle and grand of the 44th president of the United States.
Spicer: Trump Wiretapping Claims Will Be Vindicated
March 14, 2017
The White House press secretary said it was clear surveillance had occurred during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Reagan's Chief Economist: The U.S. Is Already Great
March 14, 2017
Martin Feldstein, who headed Reagan's Council of Economic Advisers, says America's economic growth and environment eclipse much of the industrialized world's.
11 Numbers to Know About Scott Gottlieb
March 14, 2017
Here are 11 things to know about President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Food and Drug Administration.
CBO Takeaways for Dems, GOP
March 14, 2017
Republicans are likely to use aspects of the report to try and sway conservatives and moderates.
College Basketball Championship Bonus: More Applications
March 14, 2017
Some universities find that when their athletes bring home big wins, more students apply for admission.
Report: Tillerson Balked at Large State Cuts
March 14, 2017
The U.N. is still poised to face massive cuts from the U.S., however.
King Continues Racially Charged Comments
March 14, 2017
After tweeting about the shortcomings of ‘someone else’s babies,’ the Iowa congressman predicts future conflict between ‘Hispanics and the blacks.’
CEOs Bullish on Trump's Pro-Business Agenda
March 14, 2017
A new Business Roundtable survey shows employers are optimistic about Trump's policies.
Ryan Said He Would Never Defend Trump Again
March 14, 2017
The House speaker expressed his disappointment with the now-president following the ‘Access Hollywood’ scandal.
Whose Votes Count Least in the Electoral College?
March 14, 2017
The 2016 election made clear that the Electoral College does not weigh votes from all states equally.
Report: Trump Gives CIA Authority for Drone Strikes
March 14, 2017
Secretive form of killing drew heavy controversy under the Barack Obama administration.
Winter Storm to Drag on U.S. GDP
March 14, 2017
The snow and ice blanketing the Northeast could put a freeze on positive economic expectations for the first quarter of 2017.
Tillerson Used Email Alias at Exxon Mobil
March 14, 2017
The New York attorney general’s office says Exxon did not disclose to its office that the emails were coming from the company’s former CEO, who is now U.S. secretary of state.
DOJ Gets Extension on Trump Wiretapping Claim
March 14, 2017
The House Intelligence Committee, which asked the Justice Department to provide any material that might support the accusation by Monday, gave the agency until March 20 to follow through.
North Korea Promises ‘Merciless’ Strikes
March 14, 2017
The comments from Pyongyang come in response to joint U.S., Japanese and South Korean actions against the country.
CBO Assesses GOP's Obamacare Replacement
March 13, 2017
The Congressional Budget Office also projects the Republican-led health care plan will cut the federal deficit.
Senate Confirms CMS Chief
March 13, 2017
Seema Verma will be involved in overseeing health care reform efforts by the Trump administration.