Baycorp Employee Impersonates Bailiff To Rob WA Home Owners

• Report rights infringement
• published: 13 May 2016
• views: 3069

Dear Australians, Firstly, thanks for tuning in to this channel to watch our videos. Please click 'SHOW MORE' for some background to this Local Government saga of abuse. In this video recording of incredible string of criminal events which transpired on our land on 08 May 2016 as a direct consequence of the actions and failures of the CEO of SHIRE OF NORTHAM, Mr Jason WHITEAKER, to maintain his word in relation to the legal contract he had entered into with us as ratepayers and the patrons of his $235,000 p.a. salary. It is our belief that Mr WHITEAKER is not a fit and proper person to hold down the crucial position of CEO (or any public office) and does not deserve his $235,000 p.a. salary considering the long string of crimes he has committed against us in the very short time-frame of his tenure. This video is of the second visitation that day by the robber, Terence KERR, impersonating a bailiff. The first visitation was unfortunately not video recorded by us but was witnessed by several people. KERR had driven onto the property on his first visit and had been told he was trespassing more than 10 times but refused the order to leave before finally departing of his own volition to garner the support of the dozy WAPOL officers who eventually attended with him on his return. And, for anyone out there thinking, '...but the poor bailiff's only doing his job; he's got to be able to come onto the land…', it may come as a surprise to you that, under the WA Criminal Code, if a person in control of the land revokes the public license to enter and tells a bailiff to leave the land before any paperwork is served, the bailiff MUST leave and cannot even drop the papers on the ground at that point. The bailiff can always apply to the court for an alternative method of service, such as email, for example. So, all of the recorded events were entirely avoidable and should have been avoided if the CEO of SHIRE OF NORTHAM had upheld his promise not to send in the bailiff while we continued to make payments on time, which we were doing. You will see an employee of Baycorp (WA) Pty Ltd, Mr Terence KERR, acting completely outside of his authority as a 'private bailiff' as he commits the crimes of forcible entry onto land, then repeated acts of trespass followed by an attempted home invasion, concluding his spree with an act of aggravated robbery of a vehicle which was not permitted by the PSSO and did not even belong to us; all of which are criminal offences under the WA Criminal Code with each offence bringing a minimum of 2 years jail. KERR was not on our property that day to fulfil his duties as a bailiff; KERR was here under false pretences, intentionally impersonating a bailiff (public officer) with an intent to effect a home invasion, and, to commit aggravated robbery using his ID card as a weapon and a PSSO for LAND as his purported authority. We believe Terence KERR is a most brazen and crafty robber. KERR by attempting to use a court order which he knew was only for seizure of land, but made false statements to WAPOL officers that he had authority to also seize property as well. Unfortunately, the attending WAPOL officers seemed to possess the collective IQ of a wet rag and blindly accepted KERR at his word, despite our firm protestations, and in doing so, those WAPOL officers completely trashed almost every one of our civil and political rights, especially the right to peaceable possession of the land. However, Mr KERR came a cropper when he was caught out by the registered proprietor's demands that KERR read aloud from the PSSO to inform the WAPOL officer exactly where it the PSSO expressly gave him the power to seize personal property, which KERR fumbled with and could not do. KERR then chose to make a quick exit from the property, although managing to seize a vehicle which did not even belong to the home owners. But the real kicker came on 12 May 2016 in a letter from the CEO of SHIRE OF NORTHAM in response to the home owner's written complaint about the attendance of KERR and his criminal behaviour. The CEO alleges that he had instructed BAYCORP (WA) Pty Ltd back on 25 Nov 2015 not to act on the order as a financial arrangement had been reached to satisfy the judgment debt! It's funny that the CEO thinks he can wash his hands clean by simply blaming Baycorp, but fortunately the High Court sees these tortious acts by an agent effecting relations with third parties as imputable to the agent's principal. So let the games begin!