How Particle Physics Killed The Moon Landing...

• Report rights infringement
• published: 15 Aug 2016
• views: 25824

The sun puts out 10 GEV, this is not filtered or lessened. It can be accelerated and condensed however. https://video.ias.edu/jointastro/2015/0505-AnnikaPeter http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sun.html Cosmic winds put out 20 GEV. Nothing is filtered, again it can be accelerated and condensed to greater. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/solar/cosmicrays.html The bow shock of the magnetosphere curves 99.99% of these particles in deep space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-9Avd__dQ4 There are several belts before the VAB. These belts are still 620 miles up. This ISS is only 250 miles up. The highest mission man has flown into space was 360 miles in 1996. They had neurological failures from the radiation exposure while in the shuttle. ALL THE READINGS PEOPLE USE TO SAY SPACE IS SAFE ARE FROM READINGS WITHIN THE BOW SHOCK. https://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/TM-2016-219278.pdf THERE HAS ONLY BEEN ONE CRAFT TO ATTEMPT TO GET THE RAW REM COUNT OF THE SOLAR/COSMIC WIND: http://genesismission.jpl.nasa.gov/ THE SAME PROBLEMS ORION FACED AND OUR BRAINS FACED CAUSED IT TO FAIL AS ALL ATTEMPTS IN HISTORY HAVE: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/149414main_Genesis_MIB.pdf To go to the moon we will need more than the passive shielding that we are using in atmosphere right now. Passive shielding is lead, titanium and aluminum, polymers and poly carbonate's. Our magnetosphere is not even understood. There is no logical explanation as to how it exists, and that is why there is no active shielding for us to use. The closest example to active shielding is at CERN and GSI particle accelerators and the various accelerators around the world. Until we can make our crafts move the ionized particles in deep space when leaving the magnetosphere, there is no traveling to the moon in deep space. Everything is in near earth orbit. Everything is from telescope, the Keck can see a candle flame on the moon. We are losing time to really learn how to go further than we are currently capable... It is not money, politics or pride. It is not possible because of technology not existing. This technology will not exist until we decide to make it. We will not make it if we think we do not need it... However I am sure you have Wiki links to post and some flag waving and shadow arguments to try to bring up instead of disputing the science in math... Please show me how the Apollo helmet can curve particles shown to be in deep space, if not curve filter from 10 GEV to Infinite GEV down to less than 50 Sieverts. The REM count NASA shows is that they all were in near earth orbit: On the ground......................365 days................................0.30 rem Mercury 9 ................................39 hours..............................0.27 rem Gemini 10.................................70 hours..............................0.84 rem Apollo 14................................... 9 days................................1.14 rem Skylab-4...................................84 days.................................7.81 rem STS-41C.....................................7 days.................................0.69 rem MIR Station............................180 days..............................17.20 rem Space Station ........................90 days.................................9.00 rem Mars (assumed).............................1 day..............................200.00 rem GSI/Deep Space (10,000km+)..........1 sec....................10+ rem 2016 nasa say it is a showstopper for leaving near earth. 2014-2016 GSI says a proton in deep space will instant cell damage. Shown a visual and the results of the only human tissues to have been exposed to the particles in deep space. Imagine a bullet smaller than a germ in your sneeze. Now it is traveling at the speed of light. Now make it as hot and heavy as the sun...Now imagine that one bullet being one of an unfathomable amount that makes up an ocean. This is solar wind. Space is a sea of plasma. Then I will Insult us with our top scientist of television that you all look up to talking about why we are fucked... ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sriaiuWjUHE CERN and GSI say we can not shield ionized protons in solar wind with passive shielding. We need active shielding as they use. NASA says they are right, it is their showstopper for space travel as there is none and we are left waiting for the tech to catch up and leaving everything unmanned to the moon until then. Why do I care and why do I think you should care? Simple. We either continue outwards into space or we breed to a mass, kill each other and then repeat. Hoping the world stays green and wet for us... This matters. More than anything else. Anything.