Earlier, during prime minister’s questions, Cameron said it was important to “learn the lessons of the report”.
The SNP’s Angus Robertson had asked about planning, citing not just Iraq, but Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and for the UK post-Brexit. “When will the UK government actually start learning from the mistakes of the past rather than condemned to repeat them in the future?” he asked.
Cameron said it was not possible for planning to be fool-proof. “What John Chilcot says about the failure to plan is very, very clear,” Cameron said said, citing the new national security council set up by the coalition government after the 2010 election as an example of new methods of decision-making.
“There is actually no set of arrangements and plans that can provide perfection in any of these cases,’ he went on.
“We can argue whether military intervention is ever justified and I think it is, but planning for the aftermath is always difficult. I don’t think in this House we should be naive in any way that there’s a perfect set of plans that can solve these problems in perpetuity – there aren’t.”
Cameron says Chilcot report should not rule out further military interventions
Updated
Another of our stories on the report, this one about criticisms of the foreign secretary in 2003, Jack Straw:
Jack Straw signed up to plans for an invasion in Iraq, despite fearing there could be ‘a long and unsuccessful war’, the Chilcot report finds.
The report states the then foreign secretary raised the question in response to a briefing in March 2003 of what would happen in the event of a protracted conflict, but ‘Mr Straw’s question was not put to officials and there is no indication that it was considered further’.
It also criticises Straw’s role in the deeply flawed process of preparing for post-crisis Iraq, with the UK failing to win over Washington to its preferred plan for the UN to take the lead. ‘It was Mr Straw’s responsibility as foreign secretary to give due consideration to the range of options available to the UK’ should it fail to convince the US that the UN should take charge, it says.
‘These included making UK participation in military action conditional on a satisfactory post-conflict plan … Mr Straw did not do so in January 2003,’ it says.
Read the full story:
Updated
Cameron's statement on the Chilcot report
Updated
View all comments >