As an alternative, the Kindle eBook is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app. Want to listen? Try Audible.

Add to List

Added to

Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Share <Embed>

Have one to sell?

Sell on Amazon

Flip to back Flip to front

Listen Playing... Paused You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

See this image

Follow the Author

Stephen Budiansky

The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil War Paperback – Bargain Price, December 30, 2008

by Stephen Budiansky (Author)

75 ratings

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$14.29

—

Audible Audiobook, Unabridged

"Please retry"

$0.00

Free with your Audible trial

Hardcover

"Please retry"

$4.30

$7.43

Paperback

"Please retry"

$7.90

$10.25

$1.95

Paperback, Bargain Price, December 30, 2008

$7.31

$53.04

$3.33

MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged

"Please retry"

$9.99

$8.11

—

A gripping look at terrorist violence during the Reconstruction era

Between 1867, when the defeated South was forced to establish new state governments that fully represented both black and white citizens, and 1877, when the last of these governments was overthrown, more than three thousand African Americans and their white allies were killed by terrorist violence. Drawing on original letters and diaries as well as published racist diatribes of the time, acclaimed historian Stephen Budiansky concentrates his vivid, fast paced narrative on the efforts of five heroic mentwo Union officers, a Confederate general, a Northern entrepreneur, and a former slavewho showed remarkable idealism and courage as they struggled to establish a New South in the face of overwhelming hatred and organized resistance. The Bloody Shirt sheds new light on the violence, racism, division, and heroism of Reconstruction, a largely forgotten but epochal chapter in American history.

Print length

336 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Plume
Publication date

December 30, 2008
Dimensions

5.58 x 0.77 x 8.48 inches
See all details

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Michael Perman
34
Paperback
$56.79
Howard Bahr
157
Paperback
82 offers from $1.15
Isabel Wilkerson
24,358
Hardcover
in Slavery & Emancipation History
$19.02
NICHOLAS LEMANN
64
Paperback
63 offers from $2.86
Catherine Clinton
11
Paperback
$39.39
LeeAnna Keith
44
Paperback
23 offers from $6.06

Customers who bought this item also bought

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

David Zucchino
812
Hardcover
$24.99
Catherine Clinton
11
Paperback
$39.39
Michael Perman
34
Paperback
$56.79
Charles Lane
77
Paperback
$20.05
William A. Darity
483
Hardcover
$20.99
Howard Bahr
157
Paperback
$22.99

Special offers and product promotions

Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account

Editorial Reviews

Review

If Profiles in Courage had not already been taken, it would have made the perfect title for this linked set of portraits honoring five men who risked everything to fight for the principles that had cost so many lives.
The New York Times

About the Author

Stephen Budiansky is a journalist and military historian whose writings frequently appear in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic Monthly. His previous books include Her Majestys Spymaster, Air Power, and Battle of Wits.

Product details

ASIN : B002HREL86
Publisher : Plume; Reprint edition (December 30, 2008)
Language : English
Paperback : 336 pages
Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
Dimensions : 5.58 x 0.77 x 8.48 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #14,802,928 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #15,142 in Terrorism (Books)
- #31,465 in African American Demographic Studies (Books)
- #32,719 in U.S. Civil War History

Customer Reviews:
75 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload video

Customer reviews

5 star		70%
4 star		15%
3 star		10%
2 star		2%
1 star		3%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

earl 's 4th

He almost made it.

Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2018

Verified Purchase

Budiansky gives a thorough and honest account of the post Civil War South, and its obsession with killing and disenfranchising its former slaves, as well as any Republican "carpetbagger" who might have the gall to implement the laws and Constitutional Amendments regarding their Rights.
Then he blunders into the modern fiction that somehow, magically, in the 1960's, everyone switched sides, and the Democrat party became the champion of disaffected black Americans, and the Republicans suddenly found white supremacy the road to power. I shouldn't have to point out to a historian the voting record of Congress regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the cynical, vote grabbing views of Lyndon Johnson regarding black Americans, or the devastating effects of the "Great Society" on black Americans and more specifically, the black family. With friends like these, who needs enemies.
Whether he's being intentionally misleading, or is simply wrong, Budiansky should be better than that.

11 people found this helpful

Helpful

Bryan

An uneven tale of one of the darkest periods of American history

Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2019

Verified Purchase

It's really hard to come up with a darker period of American history than Reconstruction, a brief spell of actual political progress that was brutally cut short by a wave of white supremacist violence. And the true story of that time has literally been whitewashed from history. The author looks at a handful of men and women who did their best to fight back against the forces of repression, but I just felt like it didn't all hang together as a narrative.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Robert Horn

An esseintial read about the aftermath of the Civil War

Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2015

Verified Purchase

This is a vividly written book that sheds a lot of light on some events and tactics used by many white Southerners after the Civil War to defeat civil rights, defy Federal authority, essentially re-enslave former slaves and rewrite history. We focus a lot on the Civil War and battles and heroism when we are taught about that era in our schools. Less attention is paid to the aftermath and how mistakes then affected us for another century or more. This essential is reading but it should not be read in isolation. It does not provide, nor is it meant to provide a real look at what was happening at the national level in politics, the military, security and social attitudes to give the stories in this book their proper context. Nonetheless, I highly recommend it.

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Joshua Rosenblum

Ultimately - The Union Lost The Civil War

Reviewed in the United States on June 11, 2009

Verified Purchase

Stephen Budiansky has written an interesting account of the post-Civil War Reconstruction era. Budiansky reminds us that from 1865 until 1877 the United States essentially fought an insurgency in the American South. And the sad fact is, that the United States lost the insurgency to the Confederacy.

The Bloody Shirt is not a straightforward history of the era but rather follows the lives and careers of several people involved in this insurgency. Through these people's stories we gain an understanding of the wider insurgency and the mistakes made by the Union which allowed the Confederacy to overturn the gains won in the Civil War and continue on their way of life.

The book focuses on people like; Albert Morgan, who was assigned as a soldier to police the Reconstruction South and later became a state senator from Mississippi, Lewis Merrill who commanded troops in reconstruction South Carolina, Adelbert Ames, also a soldier, who became the appointed governor of Mississippi, and Prince Rivers, a former slave who fought for the Union and became a county magistrate in South Carolina. Also making an appearance is General James Longstreet, the brilliant Confederate commander who later became a Republican and advocated the Union cause.

These men confront the enormously difficult challenge of trying to change a hostile culture. This culture, which could not bring itself to admit wrongdoing or guilt in any of its activities, resisted the attempt to enfranchise the black population with the rights of citizenship granted to them under the 14th 15th and 16th amendments to the Constitution.

What is lost to most modern Americans is the fact that this was truly a violent insurgency. Over 3000 people were killed after the United States raised the "Mission Accomplished" banner at Appomattox. Any black who attempted to assert their citizenship or white Republican who sought to enforce the law was a target. Arrayed against them were wide variety of terroristic paramilitary groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, who killed elected legislators, executives, newspaper people and ordinary men and women. They stole elections by the grossest and basest means possible and did not even try to hide the fact. They shot and hung people with abandon, and openly threatened the rest.

The descriptions of the activities of these terror groups shocks the conscience.

All the while, the heroic figures charged with rebuilding the culture had neither enough men, arms or authority to accomplish their mission. After four years of civil war, popular support for the reconstruction effort dwindled precipitously. The people of the United States were tired and they wanted it to be *over.* They wanted things to go back to *normal.*

Does any of this sound familiar?

Tragically instead of doubling down and developing new strategies to enforce cultural change in the American South and allocating the proper amount of resources needed for the task - the Union eventually withdrew, leaving the people left behind, blacks and white Republicans, to their own devices. They did not last long. The long night of despotism continued into the 20th century, up until the 1950s and 60s.

Of particular interest is the fact that Budiansky notes that the Confederacy not only won the insurgency in the South but completely rewrote the history of the Civil War and Reconstruction. The one thing the Southerners could not accept was that their culture had been fatally flawed. This is a common trait of pre-modern cultures and is well exemplified in a letter written by General Longstreet to the New Orleans Times that got him in hot water with his compatriots and generally considered a traitor to his tribe for 100 years:

He began by saying he was speaking with the plain and honest convictions of a soldier he said that as he thought, the South had fought, and fought well, but had lost; they were a conquered people. It was accordingly their duty to accept the terms of the victor. Even if they were in a position to resist, it would be wrong to do so. He himself had lost his rights of citizenship under the Reconstruction acts, as someone who had sworn an oath of allegiance to the union and then engaged in rebellion, "but that was one of the hazards of revolution, and I have no better cause of complaint and those who have lost their slaves." To claim now that Southerners need not concede anything to the victor was tantamount to claiming they had not known what they were fighting for in the first place. He hoped he might be forgiven the "bluntness of the soldier" to remind his fellow Southerners what had been decided at Appomattox. "The surrender of the Confederate armies in 1865," he wrote, "involved; 1. the surrender of the claim to the right of secession. 2. the surrender of the former political relations of the Negro. 3. the surrender of the Southern Confederacy. These issues expired upon the fields last occupied by the Confederate armies and there tthey should have been buried. The soldier prefers to have the sod that receives him when he falls cover his remains. The political questions of the war should have been buried upon the fields that marked their end."

In this, Longstreet was remarkable man for his time and culture. And it points out an interesting question. Why is it that modern cultures promote the concept of settlement? The feelings prevalent in the Confederate culture are the norm for humanity. All pre-modern cultures do not privilege settlement. Meaning that there is never a settlement to any particular issue - there is only a standing status quo. And the status quo will hold until the correlation of forces shifts and privileges another party. In the pre-modern world, the negotiation is never over. Once a position has been reached, it is merely a stepping off point for the next round of negotiations. But in the modern culture, the Enlightenment-based cultures, high-priority is given to final settlement of contentious issues. How is it that we have evolved this trait?

19 people found this helpful

Helpful

Frank J. Konopka

Was Reconstruction a failure?

Reviewed in the United States on October 13, 2009

Verified Purchase

The author appears to believe that the Federal Government's Reconstruction policy after the Civil War was a failure, and a close reading of this book would tend to have the reader agree.

Once the war ended and Abraham Lincoln was killed, his idea of reintegrating the South into the country died along with him and the Northern politicians used the military to control what was happening in the defeated states. Whether or not this was a good idea it does not appear to have worked. Military occupation only tended to harden the anti-black prejudice in the South with consequences that lasted almost 100 years.

Blacks were routinely frightened, tortured and murdered, in additon to the white Republicans who came South to aid in the rejuvenation of the countryside. This book does not paint a very pretty picture of the Southern mentality or of those white Southerners who led the resistance to black civil rights.

The book is somewhat one-sided, but perhaps that is because what the author writes about is actually the way things were then. I don't know, because there are always two different ways of looking at events, and I'm sure that those from the south have an entirely different view. Facts are facts, however, so until and unless I can read something with evidence that refutes what is in this book, I will accept its conclusions.

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

Follow the Author

Similar authors to follow

The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil War Paperback – Bargain Price, December 30, 2008

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Customers who bought this item also bought

Special offers and product promotions