-
Composer:
Paul Hindemith (
16 November 1895 --
28 December 1963)
-
Performer:
Sviatoslav Richter (piano)
- Year of recording:
1985 (live at “Fêtes Musicales en
Touraine”,
France)
Ludus tonalis, cycle of 25 pieces for piano, written in
1942.
00:00 - 01. Praludium
04:45 - 02.
Fuga 1. in
C major (
Slow)
07:49 - 03. Interludium (Moderate, with energy)
09:13 - 04. Fuga 2, in
G major (
Gay)
10:50 - 05. Interludium (
Pastorale)
11:52 - 06. Fuga 3, in
F major (
Andante)
15:33 - 07. Interludium (Scherzando)
16:46 - 08. Fuga 4, in
A major (With energy)
20:05 - 09. Interludium (
Fast)
21:14 - 10. Fuga 5, in
E major (Fast)
22:36 - 11. Interludium (Moderato)
23:53 - 12. Fuga 6, in
E flat major (
Quiet)
25:57 - 13. Interludium (March)
28:04 - 14. Fuga 7, in
A flat major (Moderato)
30:35 - 15. Interludium (Very broad)
33:12 - 16. Fuga 8, in
D major (With strength)
34:09 - 17. Interludium (Very fast)
35:46 - 18. Fuga 9, in
B flat major (Moderato)
37:58 - 19. Interludium (Very quiet)
40:37 - 20. Fuga 10, in
D flat major (Moderately fast
42:24 - 21. Interludium (
Allegro pesante)
44:30 - 22. Fuga 11, in
B major (Slow)
47:33 - 23. Interludium (Valse)
49:39 - 24. Fuga 12, in
F sharp major (Very Quiet)
52:45 - 25. Postludium
The role of the composer in modern society had been a concern for
Hindemith even before he explored it dramatically in the operas
Cardillac (1926) and
Mathis der Maler (
1938). Hindemith’s “Gebrauchsmusik” (“utility music,” a term the composer disliked), written to fill a need for high-quality music that could be performed by talented amateurs, was one manifestation of his concerns; another was his interest in the teaching of music, as evidenced in his efforts toward the organization of music education in
Turkey, at the behest of that country’s government, in
1937. Hindemith demonstrated his beliefs regarding the politico-ethical responsibilities of the composer when he chose to leave
Nazi Germany at the end of the
1930s, eventually settling in the
United States as a professor of music at
Yale University.
In Ludus tonalis (“Tonal
Games”, or "
Game of Tones" as NorseGodFimbulthulr1 calls it in the comment section) for solo piano, Hindemith wove together the varied strands of his professional and artistic life up to that
point. Hindemith’s subtitle for the work, “Studies in
Counterpoint, Tonal
Organization and
Piano Playing,” perhaps carries a deceptive connotation of dryness or academicism. But Ludus tonalis ranges well beyond the stated intent of its heading, exploring matters of technique, theory, inspiration, and communication. It is in effect, a veritable catalogue of the composer’s mature style, expressed in lively, imaginative, compact vignettes. While a complete performance requires nearly an hour, none of individual parts is longer than four minutes.
Ludus tonalis is ingeniously arranged, its 12 fugues connected by interludes that modulate from the key of one fugue to that of the next. The interludes also serve as a means of thematic modulation; each propagates thematic “cells” that anticipate the material of the succeeding fugue. While the fugues are entirely contrapuntal — often ingeniously so, as when Hindemith creates the effect of three-part polyphony with just two voices — the interludes are homophonic, taking harmony and variety of expression as their major concerns.
Framing the whole is a Praeludium and a Postludium; in keeping with the playful suggestion of the title, the latter is a retrograde inversion of the former
.
In the Praeludium Hindemith “signs in” with cascading toccata figurations, followed by a meditative arioso and a solemn conclusion of imposing chords over a bell-like descending figure in the bass. This introduction is also a bank of the work’s thematic material, which Hindemith explores throughout with great inventiveness and facility. The
Interludes, virtually character pieces, are marked by individual, distinctive personalities. The third, a scherzo, is a funny promenade with a prominent, cheeky
Scotch snap; the eighth is notable for its fast, chordal, hand-over-hand pianism; the ninth is quiet and introspective, recalling the composer’s works of mourning. There is also a noteworthy resourcefulness in the fugues, a restrictive form that poses challenges in creating variety. The second fugue is based on an insistent repeated note from which the theme suddenly launches upward, while the jaunty ninth fugue juxtaposes an assertive grace note figure with a motive of four thirty-second notes.
- published: 06 Oct 2015
- views: 5814