Suzanne is on the cusp of a tree change and, with her Honda Accord Euro getting on, keen to move onto another car that will suit her new life.
It needs to be happy on the open road, have a practical boot and – because it's likely to be the last car she buys – be reliable and affordable to run. What should she be looking at?
The budget
Not provided
The shortlist
This scenario isn't altogether straightforward. If Suzanne wants to maximise practicality and open-road calm, she should venture up the size scale. If she wants to minimise ownership hassle and cost, she should go the other way.
Like many things, though, there's a sweet spot, and in this case it's probably the small-car and medium-SUV segments. There, good fuel economy and affordable upkeep are pretty much the rule and – if she picks right – she can unlock plenty of practical and open-road tempters, too.
Another bonus. We don't know exactly what Suzanne wants to spend but contenders from these segments tend to land in the meaty middle of the bell curve, so our recommendations should be within reach.
Hyundai i30, from $20,950
![2017 Hyundai i30 Premium diesel.](http://web.archive.org./web/20171028182246im_/http://www.smh.com.au/content/dam/images/g/v/x/g/q/c/image.imgtype.articleLeadwide.620x349.png/1493866778623.png)
The first question is which i30? Cost no object, it would have to be the literally-just-launched FD hatch. It looks sharper than the old GD, has a nicer cabin, more space and bigger boot.
Even the base $20,950 Active gets sat-nav and a reversing camera, and Hyundai's five-year warranty and lifetime fixed-price servicing combo is a potent attraction.
However, while initial samplings suggest it drives better and builds on the pampering qualities of the GD, we won't know for sure until some serious local seat time is logged.
FD petrol models aren't especially thrifty for a 2017-spec small car. Diesels are but up the minimum spend to $26k-odd.
A wish for a diesel and tight budget, then, could bring a near-new GD Series II into the frame. So could the need for greater load-lugging potential than any small hatch offers (an FD wagon is some time away).
Read Drive's Hyundai i30 reviews:
Mazda CX-5, from $28,690
![2017 Mazda CX-5 Maxx Sport.](http://web.archive.org./web/20171028182246im_/http://www.smh.com.au/content/dam/images/g/v/9/i/e/b/image.imgtype.articleLeadwide.620x349.png/1493186758013.png)
Not long ago this Mazda wouldn't have stood a chance – it was too noisy and too small of boot.
But this recently revitalised model is now acceptably hushed on the open road and its boot is now respectably sized.
Its presentation has taken strides inside and out, as has safety – auto emergency braking, reversing camera and a host of other driver aids are standard on all models.
All drivetrains (2.0-litre and 2.5-litre petrol, 2.2-litre diesel) tick the economy box and service costs are capped for life.
But it asks for more regular attention than an i30 (yearly/10,000km versus yearly/15,000km) and its warranty is inferior (three years). The 2.0-litre models lack the low-rev grunt to be truly relaxing open-road propositions while 2.5-litre and diesels are better but jack the price up into mid-$30k and $40k-plus territory respectively.
Read Drive's Mazda CX-5 reviews:
Subaru Impreza hatch, from $22,600
![Subaru Impreza 2.0i-Premium.](http://web.archive.org./web/20171028182246im_/http://www.smh.com.au/content/dam/images/g/u/d/6/t/i/image.imgtype.articleLeadwide.620x349.png/1487299189440.png)
This Subaru's hushed ride is a big plus on coarse rural roads and the 2.0-litre petrol engine – while no benchmark of thrift – is the thriftiest petrol-powered contender in this contest.
Its cabin is classy, roomy and functional. It drives with flair and has solid safety credentials, with all models featuring a reversing camera and to-the-minute driver aids offered further up the range.
Newly stretched service intervals help it split the Hyundai and Mazda on the convenience front (yearly/12,500km). But the Impreza is the only car here with a use-by date on its fixed-price servicing (three years/37,500km). Its warranty expires after three years, its boot isn't huge and its mandatory petrol drivetrain isn't big on low-rev shove. There are no ways to get around these shortcomings, either (i.e. diesel or wagon options).
Read Drive's Subaru Impreza reviews:
Drive recommends
The Mazda and Subaru are both great examples of their respective breed but they also have question marks that potentially hold them back here, from servicing convenience to price (CX-5), boot space (Impreza) or having the right engine for the job (Impreza again).
Until we fully get to grips with the new i30 locally, its victory inevitably comes with an asterisk. But even at this early stage its robust mix of value, practicality, diesel economy and easy ownership seems bang-on target for Suzanne's needs. In a tight-budget or gotta-have-a-wagon scenario, the GD handily backs it up.
7 Comments
Talk about a Trumpesque piece of automotive journalism! It confirms what many are saying, Drive is out of touch, lacks any journalistic oversight, or capability in the writers. If the only open road cars you can think of are a small hatchback from Korea, one of the most expensive medium SUVs in a Mazda and a another hatch, but from Subaru? Long legs for the open road is either a big (BIG) petrol or a diesel engine. Boot space rules out what you guys suggest. there is no dollar limit, so why think in such a teeny weeny way? Apart from Mazda. Assuming the Mazda has the boot space, then your enquirer would be best served by a top of the line mid size SUV. Go for a longer service interval and you have the answer as a Kia Sportage, in diesel. Or similar Tuscon is you want to sacrifice two years of warranty. Forget any small hatch. Hang on, we have no budget, so why not look at what country folks are driving? It aint' pretty city hatches (if I may harp on). Go for a larger SUV or 4WD, of which there are many and you'l provide a better service for Suzanne!
Have to agree with Andy Del - crap selection of cars! Wondering why no European cars were included. Clearly, the VAG models would make Drive's selection seem downright archaic. And, Holden's (new) Astra has some standing, as does Ford's Focus. Maybe Drive is just doing a brand 'promo'!
Very strange selection of vehicles for the open road. An i30 hatch ... really? Against this lot, I'd be hanging onto the Accord Euro, which was a benchmark for its era. Or update to another of the highly competent mid-size sedans/wagons: Cars like the Liberty - streets ahead of the Impreza for anything beyond suburban driving, and if the treechange includes some unsealed roads, then the Outback would be a great choice. The Mazda 6 - why would you ever choose the CX-5 over the 6 for open road cruising, and if you need practicality, then buy the 6 wagon. The Passat would be a great choice out of the VAG stable, or save a few dollars and go for the Skoda Octavia - the wagon being a brilliant practical choice. The quibbles about the DSG gearbox don't apply out on the open road (and you can have the Octavia in manual for enhanced driver engagement). Or - if you're really putting in the hours on highways and motorways and want effortless cruising with oodles of room, get a good deal on the last of the local Commodore breed. There are so many better choices than the three put forward by Drive.
I am inclined to agree with the first two comments, the vehicles chosen are an odd mix and in my opinion this was a lazy effort to fill space. Readers with a working knowledge of the car industry and products offered would be scratching their collective heads after reading this pathetic summary, and if this was meant to be a sensible guide the writer should seek assistance from people who have a far better feel for the car market.
I am inclined to agree with the first two comments, the vehicles chosen are an odd mix and in my opinion this was a lazy effort to fill space. Readers with a working knowledge of the car industry and products offered would be scratching their collective heads after reading this pathetic summary, and if this was meant to be a sensible guide the writer should seek assistance from people who have a far better feel for the car market.
Pretty clear these people havent even driven any of these cars. The i30 and the Subie can cruise along pretty comfortably at and above highway limits. The article did talk about tree changers, not people driving round Australia. Typically they are just a couple hours from the centres they want to commute to. The world has moved on from needing ponderous big engine cars to cover distance comfortably, if it wasnt so Ford and GM would still have a business in Oz.
Have to agree with other posts. Drive's standard of journalism often rivals Trump for incoherence, waffle and irrelevance.