Federal Politics

Save
Print
License article

'Totally unaccountable': Leaked Greens emails shine light on 'faceless' powerbrokers

The civil war inside the Greens is set to escalate with leaked internal emails raising questions about the power of "faceless" party officials to dictate how MPs vote in Parliament.

Fairfax Media revealed last week that all nine of NSW Greens Senator Lee Rhiannon's federal colleagues had signed a letter of complaint about her behaviour during the Gonski 2.0 funding negotiations.

Up Next

Police seriously injured after teen attack

null
Video duration
01:49

More NSW News Videos

Greens senator suspended

Senator Lee Rhiannon will be barred from taking part in some Greens party room decision making until her NSW wing makes a series of reforms.

The Greens party room then decided to exclude Senator Rhiannon from contentious policy debates until the NSW branch relinquishes its power to bind MPs to vote against the will of the federal party.

Even senior Greens figures are confused by how the binding process works and whether Senator Rhiannon was in fact bound to vote against the government's school funding changes.

Emails from the NSW Greens federal parliamentary liaison committee – a six-person group set up to "enhance communication" between the state party and federal MPs – highlight the party's opaque decision-making process.

In the leaked emails, committee members agree to bind Senator Rhiannon to block the government's bill even though the group's own terms of reference state they do not have the power to do so.

Advertisement

Greens activist Eliza Scarpellino wrote to fellow committee members on June 17 expressing alarm at reports the Greens were close to striking a deal with the government on school funding.

"I would like to know what the process is for [the NSW Greens] to bind a federal Senator to vote against anything less than the original Gonski?" Ms Scarpellino asked.

In a follow-up email she wrote: "I understand that Party Room is having a meeting tomorrow to finalise their decision on Gonski and as such I would like to hear thoughts from other members of PLC by 5PM THIS EVENING.

"Having read the constitution and ToR [terms of reference] I believe it is well within the role of Fed PLC to bind Lee to voting against for anything less than the original Gonski."

Committee member Bruce Knobloch replied: "I agree that Lee is bound. I hope that our party room are working closely enough with the [Australian Education Union] leadership so we land safely, but if not Lee needs to have endorsement to vote on policy."

The committee's terms of reference state any advice given to MPs is "not binding".

If a Greens MP is likely to vote against their federal colleagues, the terms of reference say the matter should be referred to the State Delegates Council for consideration.

Senator Rhiannon told Fairfax Media: "The way our state party handled the recent school funding bill was a case for celebration not condemnation.

"I don't think all wisdom lies with MPs and I value my engagement with Greens members."

Asked if she was bound to vote against the government she said: "I felt bound by Australian Greens policy.

"The Greens NSW constitution obliges its MPs to do their best to advance our policies. The various Turnbull packages were a step backwards. My view was confirmed by the Greens NSW Education Working Group and the Parliamentary Liaison Committee."

Factional enemies of Senator Rhiannon describe such committees as "politburos" unrepresentative of the party's broader membership.

"This is all happening in secret," a Greens source said. "These people are totally unaccountable."

NSW Greens MP Justin Field said the state party should maintain the right to bind federal MPs but must cast a "critical eye" on how the process works.

"These sorts of decisions should not be made within small working groups, but should undergo a genuine grassroots process that is broad and transparent," he wrote in a blog post.