Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

Episode 19, 19 June 2017 

Comments

No loss of shock jock energy

No loss of shock jock energy

2GB presenters in a funk over the Finkel review

But now to another long-running saga, which some hope is finally nearing a conclusion. And that is the national energy debate.

MELINDA NUCIFORA: After a decade-long policy blackout this man could be the political circuit breaker.

JOURNALIST: Will this end the climate wars, professor?

ALAN FINKEL: I’m looking forward to briefing the Prime Minister and ministers.

MELINDA NUCIFORA: Chief Scientist Alan Finkel has been charged with creating a national blueprint, to provide electricity, reliability, sustainability and affordability…

— Channel Ten News, 9 June, 2017


Ten days ago, the country’s chief scientist came up with a plan to end the stalemate on Australia’s energy policy. And last Monday he had high hopes for his report telling Q and A.

ALAN FINKEL: I just deeply hope that this is used for constructive purposes. Our report shouldn't be used as a battering ram or a cricket bat to score political points …

— ABC Q&A;, 12 June, 2017


So, how’s it shaping up?

Well, let’s tune into the shock jocks on Sydney’s top talk station 2GB.

Starting with Alan Jones, who dismissed Finkel before his report was even released.

ALAN JONES: Oh dear, this review of the future security of Australia’s electricity market by the chief scientist. I have no faith in this bloke at all. Finkel claims his new scheme will not only reduce CO2 emissions but drive down power prices. Is this bloke living in some dream world? Drive down power prices?... Forget it. This is another unbelievable mess. I would scrap the lot of it.

— 2GB, The Alan Jones Breakfast Show, 9 June, 2017


By Monday, former PM Tony Abbott was also in position to deliver his verdict, along similar lines. He told Ray Hadley that a clean energy target was:

TONY ABBOTT: … effectively a tax on coal and that’s the last thing we want.

— 2GB, The Ray Hadley Morning Show, 12 June, 2017


On Tuesday, midday presenter Luke Grant added his voice to what passes for debate on Macquarie radio, saying the thinking behind Finkel’s low emissions target was:

LUKE GRANT: … to jack prices up forever and to hell with the coal industry and it’s all right if elderly people can’t afford to run a fridge, well that’s, you know, part of the deal with climate change. I mean that’s crap. Someone’s got to call this mob out, rather than just go on, ‘yeah go the environment’. That’s rubbish.

— 2GB, The Chris Smith Show, 13 June, 2017


The next day, to provide some balance from another expert, Grant followed up with some insights from regular commentator Prue MacSween.

PRUE MACSWEEN: … I mean it’s a ship of fools leading us down the gangplank and plunging us further into the depths of depth, of debt. You know we, we’re paying these exorbitant energy bills because we’ve got this feel good climate change wank and let’s face it, that’s what it is.

— 2GB, The Chris Smith Show, 14 June, 2017


Meanwhile, Chris Smith, filling in for Alan Jones on the breakfast shift, was in such a funk over Finkel that he reckoned it was time for another people’s revolt.

CHRIS SMITH: Now, if you cast your mind back, you’ll remember the rallies that took place against the proposed carbon tax, rallies that I helped engineer and attended. Well, they could be back on the agenda again this time in relation to low emission targets.

— 2GB, The Alan Jones Breakfast Show, 13 June, 2017


Yes. Who could forget?

Back in 2011, Smith junked any notion of journalistic impartiality and became a cheerleader for demos against Julie Gillard’s carbon tax.

And here he is back in 2011 rallying the troops behind a joint 2GB attack.

CHRIS SMITH: … I’ve had a discussion personally with Alan Jones. I’ve had a discussion personally with Ray Hadley. I’ve had a discussion personally with Ben Fordham. They are all keen. If we can organise logistics, for the four of us to broadcast that day, at that rally, outside Parliament House …

… send the message around. It’s ‘stop carbon lies dot com’ that is where you can book to jump on a bus in your neck of the woods to get to Canberra …

— 2GB, The Chris Smith Afternoon Show, 13 July, 2011


In the end, 2GB management tried to stop its stars from taking part and Smith was the only one who did, but six years on it’s clear the climate at the station has not changed one bit.

So why does it need to?

Well, almost all the world’s climate scientists say we need to slow down global warming.

And that’s why Australia is one of 148 nations that has ratified the Paris Climate Agreement, in which we have promised to reduce our emissions.

Australian business leaders are also overwhelmingly behind a low-emissions policy.

And Australian energy providers say ten years of inaction and climate war is a key reason why power prices keep rising.

But why believe any of them when you’ve got the shock jock geniuses at 2GB ignoring all the evidence and telling Australia what we need to do?

And you can read more about tonight’s stories on our Facebook page or our website, where you can get a transcript and download the program.

You can also catch up with us on iview and contact me or Media Watch on Twitter.

And don’t miss Media Bites, every Thursday on Facebook, Twitter and our website. And also on iview.

But for now until next week, that’s all from us. Goodbye

 

YOUR COMMENTS

Comments (5)

Add your comment

  • clive hoskin :

    22 Jun 2017 8:10:46am

    What does a"Neurologist"know about the weather.Why are we talking about using "Gas"when we have about 400 years worth of coal ready to go NOW.Gas costs about 1 third more than coal and produces less electricity than coal.

  • richard le sarcophage :

    20 Jun 2017 8:28:03pm

    Today, 200 years after the first insights into the greenhouse effect, and after the three hottest years successively in recorded history, and the bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef two years in a row, and with ALL the Academies of Science of the planet concurring with the science, you can only really come to one conclusion. That those on the Right (and the Murdoch machine is just as viciously fanatic in attacking Finkel)without the intelligence required are just being driven by Pavlovian Rightwing Groupthink, and those with some nous must surely want to see humanity go extinct. No other conceivable conclusion makes any sense.

  • Adam Rope :

    20 Jun 2017 7:34:29am

    2GB, keeping the elderly & fearful; ill-informed & more fearful since forever?

  • John G :

    20 Jun 2017 7:23:25am

    Can Paul please supply his evidence to back his claim of almost "all climate scientists" otherwise its just spin that has been proven wrong time and time again.

  • Brian Thompson :

    20 Jun 2017 12:52:15am

    Media shock jocks like Jones, Hadley and Bolt etc looking more ignorant than ever, preaching to the already converted but so out of touch they are looked apon by the public at large as irrelevant fools. They will never get behind a cause for the greater good as that gives them no point of difference which generates publicity. Now they are seen as a sad, crazed group of thugs who should be be 'put in a chaf bag' as Jones would say!