Please pass this link to all your networks and think about planning an action in support of hunger strikers demands to end long term solitary confinement and other forms of torture - forced feeding, gang snitch protocols, among others.
Yesterday, Monday, July 8, 2013 prisoners resumed their hunger strike. Conditions in prison generally amount to torture in some form. USA prisons ramp methods of torture up several notches compared to most Canadian prisons (which are themselves horrendous human rights violations to be sure!). SHU units throughout the USA and particularly in California which hold prisoners indefinitely (often meaning -life) are some of the most inhumane, torture chambers in existence in western nations! Speak up, Speak loud!
https://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com/
Resisting the Oppressive Arm of the Canadian State and Seeking Out Human Rights Based Alternatives
Showing posts with label Hunger Strike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hunger Strike. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Prison News this Week August 21-28 - Hunger Strike Needs Support - Overcrowding Women
Please check back through the week for links to analysis on issues of overcrowding and the use of hunger strikes as a means of prisoner protest.
Here's one the mainstream press is ignoring. Its important that prisoners know the public has heard their protest for help and that we show support however we can. If anyone knows anyone imprisoned here or have other suggestions about how to connect with prisoners at Prince Albert facility please share them here!
Prince Albert Prisoner Hunger Strike
And more overcrowding issues sure to lead to increased violence and abuse of prisoners.
New women's jail already overcrowded
CBC – Tue, 14 Aug, 2012
CBC News has learned the women's prison in Headingley, which opened 7 months ago, is already over capacity.
There are 212 inmates at the Women's Correctional Centre, but capacity is 168.Critics say the facility has been overcrowded since it opened in January and the reason is the backlog in the court system.
142 of the prisoners are on remand awaiting trial.
Tracy Booth, who delivers anger management counselling for the Elizabeth Fry Society to inmates at the centre, blamed the overcrowding on the number of inmates on remand.
Booth said most of the women shouldn't be there and the space should be used for more violent criminals.
"They are in limbo," she said.
The province said it was addressing the number of inmates on remand by adding Saturdays to the court schedule and planned for it in the budget.
But that was over a year ago and there have been no changes.
Progressive Conservative justice critic Kelvin Goertzen said there's more to it than just the numbers.
"Why are people just going out of the prison system and causing another crime (often) within two to eight months," he said.
"There's nothing that's happening within our corrections system that corrects behaviour," he added.
The Headingley facility is supposed to offer more programs than were available in the former Portage Correctional Centre.
But Darren Sawchuk president of Criminal Defence Lawyers Association (Manitoba) doubts the value of more programming, given the overcrowding.
"How are they going to be able to cure the problem now with the capacity problems they are having?" he said.
Sawchuk also said security is a concern.
"When you start to double-bunk then you have a more difficult time managing. There's safety not only for the inmates but the staff," he added.
The province said double-bunking is not unique to Manitoba and happens across the country.
Sunday, April 8, 2012
3 Weeks Into the C10 Hunger Strike
Obert Modando is one brave soul! I can't imagine what it must feel like to be without food for 3 weeks, but it must be very painful. Clearly protecting his freedom and the freedom of all persons on Canadian soil is deeply, intensely important to Obert. Please see below for Oberts demands to Parliament and law enforcement. And please take some time to support Obert by spreading his message far and wide, talk about it with those in your life, on facebook, in your blogs, etc. Maybe stop by Obert's Facebook page and express some words of support.
By Natalia Crowe
Retrieved from http://groups.google.com/group/prisonersjusticetoronto/browse_thread/thread/7d5646357c9552f2#
Obert Modando is a Zimbabwe brother who was injured by police during his
arrest at Occupy Ottawa. More info about his demands and his open letter to
Parliament, delivered by MP Paul Dewar, below and at
http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-mcaeD16ro&feature=player_embedded#>
Obert has 5 demands:
1. The Parliament of Canada should repeal the Safe Streets and Communities
Act in its entirety.
2. Former Ottawa Police chief and newly-appointed Senator, Vernon White,
should immediately resign.
3. The federal government should make a commitment to invest 100 times the
cost of monitoring and dismantling Occupy encampments across Canada last
fall to institute a national inquiry into the case of 600+ missing and
murdered aboriginal women and girls.
4. The House of Commons should immediately institute measures to improve
accountability and transparency. The measures should include limitations on
the governing party’s power to a) manipulate Standing Orders; b) evade
opposition scrutiny; c) shut down debate d) silence critics; and e) run
committees behind closed doors and prevent Canadians from participating.
5. The Conservative government must immediately stop its campaign against
Canadians and Canadian democracy. This campaign currently manifests through
a) the criminalization of dissent; b) promotion of a divisive agenda and
attitude; c) whipping up of unnecessary moral panic; and d) using
incendiary labels to stifle debate and criticism on its actions.
Links:
Canadian Progressive World: http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/
Obert's Facebook Profile: http://www.facebook.com/obie.mad
Obert on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/Obiemad
C10 Hunger Striker
On Day Six of Indefinite Bill C-10 Hunger Strike, Obert Madondo Addresses Canadian MPs
Honorable MP, what is happening to Canada?
At 12:01am on Wednesday, March 14, I embarked on an indefinite hunger
strike whose demand is: the Parliament of Canada immediately repeal the
new Safe Streets and Communities Act (omnibus crime Bill C-10).
Earlier, I had appealed to the Governor General, The Right Honourable
David Johnston, to use the Crown’s reserve powers to either withhold or
reserve Royal Assent to Bill C-10. But Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s
tyrannical will prevailed, just as it did when the Conservative
majorities in the House of Commons and Senate brushed aside the diverse
input of the opposition, experts and victims and passed crime Bill C-10.
The bill reportedly received royal assent Tuesday afternoon. I will now
continue the hunger strike until the Act is repealed in its entirety.
I am an activist, progressive political blogger and Permanent Resident of Canada. Canada embraced me as a political refugee from Zimbabwe in 2003.
Honorable MP, the inconvenient truth about Harper’s Canada is that we’re already living our own Nixonian moment. All kinds of dirty tricks, including Gobbels-style propaganda, McCarthyism and cold-war-style red–baiting, are party of the political game. Additionally, the Conservatives stand accused of tampering with the May 2011 federal election. This is not democracy.”
The Conservatives are at war with Canadians. Since Harper came to power in 2006, our democracy has been hurtling toward the Intensive Care Unit. He has daily sought our democratic institutions with heat-seeking missiles. He prorogued Parliament twice, in 2008 and 2009. Harper is the first prime minister to be found in contempt of parliament. The list is endless.
The Safe Streets and Communities Act is the foremost of the Conservatives’ draconian agenda and posturing. Our unduly elected prime minister, seeks to radically engineer Canadian society – socially and politically – to impose an insidious, divisive, pro-punishment, poverty-ignoring and anti-minority right-wing worldview. The Act will expand state power, weaken the judiciary, divide society, take away Canadians’ rights and freedoms, create resentment of the “other”, and punish the weak and marginalized. Harper’s new Canada will obliterate these Canadian values: compassion, multiculturalism, inclusion, diversity, fairness, democratic governance, respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, and accommodation of difference.
Furthermore, the Act was birthed in an environment of tyranny where all Canadians were treated as potential enemies of the state. Dissenters, aboriginal groups, activists and civil society organizations opposed to official policy or dedicated to issues are targeted, demonized, marginalized, dehumanized and labeled “enemies of the state”. In the House of Commons, the Official Opposition is accused of being “anti-Canada”. Gun-control advocates are compared to Nazis. Opponents of the long gun registry are likened to Adolf Hitler. MPs opposed to the Conservatives’ new online surveillance bill are “with the child pornographers”.
A few weeks ago, we learned that the Harper government supports torture as a way to gather intelligence. Potential targets will include Canadians. The Conservatives new anti-terrorism strategy labels Canadians dedicated to causes such as animal rights, environmentalism and anti-capitalism “issue-based terrorists”, implacable adversaries to be monitored and battled.
To cap the Conservatives’ war on Canadians, now the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) detachment officers on Parliament Hill will start carrying the rapid-and-accurate-fire Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine guns as “secondary weapons” to their standard-issue semi-automatic 9mm pistols. Fear and terror, creates an intellectual and moral void. It disarms society of its power to question.
We do not discuss race as much as we should and the Conservatives seem take full advantage to practice a covert racism. I hope I’m wrong. But the Act will send to jail more racialized minorities, especially Aboriginals, who are already over-represented in our jails. During Bill C-10 hearings in the House of Commons and Senate, First Nations leaders crawled before our lawmakers and begged them to understand that the Act would “punish” First Nations communities, most of which already live under 4th World and colonialism conditions. It would perpetuate the legacy of residential schools, they said. But the Conservatives showed these voices the political middle finger.
Harper is slowly handing Canada over to corporations which: ravage our environment and First Nations communities, exploit and abuse Canadian workers, demand more and more tax cuts, and hoard billions of dollars in profits without creating jobs. In the search for markets for these corporations, the Conservatives are negating our moral fabric and hard earned values. Recently, Harper crawled before authoritarian China, the new colonizer, without questioning the country’s appalling human right record.
Honorable MP, on November 23, 2011, I tasted the wrath of the Canada that the Safe Streets and Communities Act proposes. I was forcibly removed from Confederation Park as one of the eight unarmed Occupy Ottawa protesters peacefully resisting the politically-motivated eviction carried out by the Ottawa Police. The 100 to 150 officers sent in the hours following midnight applied excessive and unnecessary force. I was subjected to cruel and unusual treatment. The police hurt my back, legs and left arm. I ended up in hospital and still suffer physical pain because of their actions. Senator Vernon White was in charge of the Ottawa Police that morning, and that’s why I’m demanding his resignation. I’ve nothing personal against the Senator as a fellow human being, but that morning, a failure of judgment and Canadian leadership occurred. I strongly question the Senator’s judgment in a situation that demanded the utmost in sobriety and a quick glance at the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Why did the four police officers who carried me to the makeshift detention centre drop me three times during the trip? Why was I treated differently than my two white colleagues? One was also carried by police officers but was not hurt. The other was driven to the centre in a police cruiser. At the centre why did the officers drop me to the floor and leave me lying my stomach, a position that further acerbated my injured back and arm? Why did they ignore my plea for immediate medical attention?
This is not what democracy looks like. It’s and an inverted totalitarianism presided over by a tyrannical petro-prime minister. No other Canadian citizen or resident should have to go through what I went through on the morning of November 23, and the pain I live with now.
I arrived at the decision to protest after months of agonizing soul-searching. My conscience and lived experience has compelled me to resist our elected dictator, Stephen Harper. At the personal level, my hunger strike is an act of civil disobedience. It is also a last stand on behalf of the progressive voice that the Conservatives showed nothing but disdain for during the making of the Act.
I’ll carry out the peaceful action in my apartment here in Ottawa, and will undertake public actions, including regular visits to Parliament Hill. I humbly submit the following demands:
1. The Parliament of Canada should repeal the Safe Streets and Communities Act in its entirety.
2. Former Ottawa Police chief and newly-appointed Senator, Vernon White, should immediately resign.
3. The federal government should make a commitment to invest 100 times the cost of monitoring and dismantling Occupy encampments across Canada last fall to institute a national inquiry into the case of 600+ missing and murdered aboriginal women and girls.
4. The House of Commons should immediately institute measures to improve accountability and transparency. The measures should include limitations on the governing party’s power to a) manipulate Standing Orders; b) evade opposition scrutiny; c) shut down debate d) silence critics; and e) run committees behind closed doors and prevent Canadians from participating.
5. The Conservative government must immediately stop its campaign against Canadians and Canadian democracy. This campaign currently manifests through a) the criminalization of dissent; b) promotion of a divisive agenda and attitude; c) whipping up of unnecessary moral panic; and d) using incendiary labels to stifle debate and criticism on its actions.
On May 2, 2011, Canada experienced a thing of extraordinary beauty. The election validated our multiculturalism both in fact and its official commitment. Canadians extracted our politics from the octopus grip of the privileged class, and delivered them into the progressive arms of our youth, women and minorities. They set Canada on a path to a politics that embraces our diversity. That day, 39,9 percent of the Canadian electorate voted Conservative majority to continue on that path and to serve all Canadians. But the Conservatives interpreted their electoral mandate as an opportunity to implement a grant project of both social engineering and political engineering to shake up our institutions, traditions and value systems.
But even more shameful is the fact that the Act now carries the preamble: NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows. In essence, Queen Elizabeth II’s esteemed name, and the Great Seal of Canada, is now appended to a law that will inflict a great injustice on Canadians.
I sincerely believe that Her Majesty would disagree with the tyrannical and undemocratic manner which accompanied the making of the Act. From the first reading of Bill C-10 in the House of Commons, through to the final vote in both houses, a one-party-state tyrannical abuse of Canadian parliamentary process and democratic practice prevailed. The process was a triumph of spin over substance and deliberative democracy. Rather than explaining the straight facts to Canadians, the Harper government took a propaganda approach. It showed neither respected nor accommodated difference as is required in a democracy. At every turn, opposition MPs, elected by 60% of Canadians, and expert witnesses who attempted to input into the bills’ 208 clauses and hundreds of amendments, were shown the political middle finger.
In the Senate, senators mounted an expensive, taxpayer-funded charade; they invited hundreds of witnesses and collected mountains of evidence, but made only a few terrorism-related changes to Bill C-10. Our senators chose to abandon their role as providers of the sober second thought that this bill deserved. They simply rubberstamped it.
Minimum sentences undermine our court system; they send the wrong message to society. They give the impression that our courts and judges don’t know how to do their jobs. Furthermore, the Act will cost Canadian taxpayers an estimated $15 billion. Surely, how can we agree to partake in the daylight robbery our education, healthcare and other social services to finance a law that will oppress us all and turn our jails into training schools for hardcore criminals?
Both crime Bill C-10 and the Safe Streets and Communities Act are the epitome of state abuse of power, the law and resources. We’re being called upon to defend Canadian democracy at its greatest hour of need. Democracy should never yield to tyranny. Indeed, it never has, never will.
Honorable MP, now is the hour to build a society that nurtures hope instead of extinguishing it. It’s a moment to remind ourselves that an injustice visited on a single Canadian or community, is an injustice visited on all of us. We must insist on a united and caring Canada that without apology encourages all to set aside differences and prescribed labels, and come together to create a strong national identity based on these Canadian values: compassion, respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, multiculturalism, inclusion, diversity, fairness, democratic governance and accommodation of difference.
Therein, not the Safe Streets and Communities Act, lies our collective security.
This is the Canada I experienced the day I washed up on Canada’s shores as a political refugee from Zimbabwe in the summer of 2003. The violence I’d experienced and witnessed in the Southern African country had mutilated me. But Canada embraced, nursed and healed me. Canada restored that which Zimbabwe – and the US denied me – dignity.
Canada believed in me as an equal member of the human race, and encouraged me to unleash my passions in the service of my adopted country. In 2004, I volunteered for the late NDP leader Jack Layton’s successful run for Parliamentary office. Over the years, I’ve carved a unique Canadian identity as a globally-conscious activism-oriented progressive political blogger, with a passion for Canadian federal politics, diversity, social issues and movements, progressive politics and Canadian foreign policy. I contributed to Canada’s contribution to the global HIV/AIDS pandemic through my seven years of loyal service to the Canada Africa Partnership on AIDS (CAP AIDS), a CIDA-funded registered Canadian charity that supports HIV/AIDS work in Africa.
But I’ve also tasted the wrath of a Canada hostile to both accountability and the “other”. In December, 2003, I signed up to volunteer for CAP AIDS. By April 2008, I’d become the charity’s executive director and sole employee, working a punishing 60-80 hours a week. In May, 2010, I attempted to pursue accountability for part of the more than $130 000 in Canadians’ donations the charity misused. The board of the charity harassed me and tossed me under the bus. It blocked my access to employment insurance and torpedoed my support systems as a new immigrant. I lost most of what I’d worked for all these years and ended up on the streets of Toronto.
From June 15 to June 23, I walked almost 400 km from Toronto to Ottawa in protest. I demanded that the charity account for the donations received as required under the Income Tax Act. But I learned that when those of us on the margins of society challenge the wrongdoings of the privileged, it takes more than a 400km solitary walk to be heard.
In Ottawa, I ended up on the streets. From June 23 to October 14, 2011, I slept in a crevice at Laurier and Bank Street. I ate from soup kitchens. I bathed and did my laundry on the Ottawa River. On October 15, 2011, Occupy Ottawa showed up in town and rescued me from the streets. The movement gave me a tent, a family and a platform to discuss, in the spirit of equality and deliberative democracy, the issues of our time. The movement helped me to overcome my immigrant innocence, and stand up for Canada and her unparalleled values.
Honorable MP, my indefinite hunger strike is a call on you, our elected representative, to side with and defend Canadians against Stephen Harper. I’m demanding only the minimum of what Canadians should rightly be demanding of their leaders right now. Canada today faces a situation that calls on all to reign in an authoritarian petro-prime minister who has become a serious threat to both our parliamentary democracy and to Canadians. Now is the hour for Canadian leadership, a return by parliament to sanity and respect for our democratic and legislative processes. It’s the hour for our MPs to listen to and value the concerns of all Canadians.
I do not underestimate the odds I face. I’m a self-identified anti-capitalism activist in a moment the distinction between terrorist and legitimate protester is more than more than ever before blurred in Canada. Nevertheless, I’ll fight for a Canada I believe in.
Honorable MP, I leave you with the words of Grand Chief Derek Nepinak of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, whose voice, like many others, was ignored during the crime Bill C-10 hearings: “Are we going to be a compassionate Canada and look out for one another, or are we going to criminalize one another and send each other to jail? That’s the fundamental question that has to be answered.”
We must love and look after each other.
Respectfully,
Obert Madondo
Activist and Progressive Political Blogger
retrieved from: http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2012/03/19/on-day-six-of-indefinite-bill-c10-hunger-strike-obert-madondo-addresses-canadian-mps/
Obert is currently undertaking an indefinite hunger strike in Ottawa to demand that the Parliament of Canada immediately repeal the new Safe Streets and Communities Act (formerly omnibus crime Bill C-10). He is a fearless and passionate activist, progressive political blogger and permanent resident of Canada. Obert is the founder and editor of the Canadian Progressive World blog. He volunteers as webmaster, online content editor, blogger and editorial team member for the official Occupy Ottawa website.
I am an activist, progressive political blogger and Permanent Resident of Canada. Canada embraced me as a political refugee from Zimbabwe in 2003.
Honorable MP, the inconvenient truth about Harper’s Canada is that we’re already living our own Nixonian moment. All kinds of dirty tricks, including Gobbels-style propaganda, McCarthyism and cold-war-style red–baiting, are party of the political game. Additionally, the Conservatives stand accused of tampering with the May 2011 federal election. This is not democracy.”
The Conservatives are at war with Canadians. Since Harper came to power in 2006, our democracy has been hurtling toward the Intensive Care Unit. He has daily sought our democratic institutions with heat-seeking missiles. He prorogued Parliament twice, in 2008 and 2009. Harper is the first prime minister to be found in contempt of parliament. The list is endless.
The Safe Streets and Communities Act is the foremost of the Conservatives’ draconian agenda and posturing. Our unduly elected prime minister, seeks to radically engineer Canadian society – socially and politically – to impose an insidious, divisive, pro-punishment, poverty-ignoring and anti-minority right-wing worldview. The Act will expand state power, weaken the judiciary, divide society, take away Canadians’ rights and freedoms, create resentment of the “other”, and punish the weak and marginalized. Harper’s new Canada will obliterate these Canadian values: compassion, multiculturalism, inclusion, diversity, fairness, democratic governance, respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, and accommodation of difference.
Furthermore, the Act was birthed in an environment of tyranny where all Canadians were treated as potential enemies of the state. Dissenters, aboriginal groups, activists and civil society organizations opposed to official policy or dedicated to issues are targeted, demonized, marginalized, dehumanized and labeled “enemies of the state”. In the House of Commons, the Official Opposition is accused of being “anti-Canada”. Gun-control advocates are compared to Nazis. Opponents of the long gun registry are likened to Adolf Hitler. MPs opposed to the Conservatives’ new online surveillance bill are “with the child pornographers”.
A few weeks ago, we learned that the Harper government supports torture as a way to gather intelligence. Potential targets will include Canadians. The Conservatives new anti-terrorism strategy labels Canadians dedicated to causes such as animal rights, environmentalism and anti-capitalism “issue-based terrorists”, implacable adversaries to be monitored and battled.
To cap the Conservatives’ war on Canadians, now the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) detachment officers on Parliament Hill will start carrying the rapid-and-accurate-fire Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine guns as “secondary weapons” to their standard-issue semi-automatic 9mm pistols. Fear and terror, creates an intellectual and moral void. It disarms society of its power to question.
We do not discuss race as much as we should and the Conservatives seem take full advantage to practice a covert racism. I hope I’m wrong. But the Act will send to jail more racialized minorities, especially Aboriginals, who are already over-represented in our jails. During Bill C-10 hearings in the House of Commons and Senate, First Nations leaders crawled before our lawmakers and begged them to understand that the Act would “punish” First Nations communities, most of which already live under 4th World and colonialism conditions. It would perpetuate the legacy of residential schools, they said. But the Conservatives showed these voices the political middle finger.
Harper is slowly handing Canada over to corporations which: ravage our environment and First Nations communities, exploit and abuse Canadian workers, demand more and more tax cuts, and hoard billions of dollars in profits without creating jobs. In the search for markets for these corporations, the Conservatives are negating our moral fabric and hard earned values. Recently, Harper crawled before authoritarian China, the new colonizer, without questioning the country’s appalling human right record.
Honorable MP, on November 23, 2011, I tasted the wrath of the Canada that the Safe Streets and Communities Act proposes. I was forcibly removed from Confederation Park as one of the eight unarmed Occupy Ottawa protesters peacefully resisting the politically-motivated eviction carried out by the Ottawa Police. The 100 to 150 officers sent in the hours following midnight applied excessive and unnecessary force. I was subjected to cruel and unusual treatment. The police hurt my back, legs and left arm. I ended up in hospital and still suffer physical pain because of their actions. Senator Vernon White was in charge of the Ottawa Police that morning, and that’s why I’m demanding his resignation. I’ve nothing personal against the Senator as a fellow human being, but that morning, a failure of judgment and Canadian leadership occurred. I strongly question the Senator’s judgment in a situation that demanded the utmost in sobriety and a quick glance at the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Why did the four police officers who carried me to the makeshift detention centre drop me three times during the trip? Why was I treated differently than my two white colleagues? One was also carried by police officers but was not hurt. The other was driven to the centre in a police cruiser. At the centre why did the officers drop me to the floor and leave me lying my stomach, a position that further acerbated my injured back and arm? Why did they ignore my plea for immediate medical attention?
This is not what democracy looks like. It’s and an inverted totalitarianism presided over by a tyrannical petro-prime minister. No other Canadian citizen or resident should have to go through what I went through on the morning of November 23, and the pain I live with now.
I arrived at the decision to protest after months of agonizing soul-searching. My conscience and lived experience has compelled me to resist our elected dictator, Stephen Harper. At the personal level, my hunger strike is an act of civil disobedience. It is also a last stand on behalf of the progressive voice that the Conservatives showed nothing but disdain for during the making of the Act.
I’ll carry out the peaceful action in my apartment here in Ottawa, and will undertake public actions, including regular visits to Parliament Hill. I humbly submit the following demands:
1. The Parliament of Canada should repeal the Safe Streets and Communities Act in its entirety.
2. Former Ottawa Police chief and newly-appointed Senator, Vernon White, should immediately resign.
3. The federal government should make a commitment to invest 100 times the cost of monitoring and dismantling Occupy encampments across Canada last fall to institute a national inquiry into the case of 600+ missing and murdered aboriginal women and girls.
4. The House of Commons should immediately institute measures to improve accountability and transparency. The measures should include limitations on the governing party’s power to a) manipulate Standing Orders; b) evade opposition scrutiny; c) shut down debate d) silence critics; and e) run committees behind closed doors and prevent Canadians from participating.
5. The Conservative government must immediately stop its campaign against Canadians and Canadian democracy. This campaign currently manifests through a) the criminalization of dissent; b) promotion of a divisive agenda and attitude; c) whipping up of unnecessary moral panic; and d) using incendiary labels to stifle debate and criticism on its actions.
On May 2, 2011, Canada experienced a thing of extraordinary beauty. The election validated our multiculturalism both in fact and its official commitment. Canadians extracted our politics from the octopus grip of the privileged class, and delivered them into the progressive arms of our youth, women and minorities. They set Canada on a path to a politics that embraces our diversity. That day, 39,9 percent of the Canadian electorate voted Conservative majority to continue on that path and to serve all Canadians. But the Conservatives interpreted their electoral mandate as an opportunity to implement a grant project of both social engineering and political engineering to shake up our institutions, traditions and value systems.
But even more shameful is the fact that the Act now carries the preamble: NOW, THEREFORE, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows. In essence, Queen Elizabeth II’s esteemed name, and the Great Seal of Canada, is now appended to a law that will inflict a great injustice on Canadians.
I sincerely believe that Her Majesty would disagree with the tyrannical and undemocratic manner which accompanied the making of the Act. From the first reading of Bill C-10 in the House of Commons, through to the final vote in both houses, a one-party-state tyrannical abuse of Canadian parliamentary process and democratic practice prevailed. The process was a triumph of spin over substance and deliberative democracy. Rather than explaining the straight facts to Canadians, the Harper government took a propaganda approach. It showed neither respected nor accommodated difference as is required in a democracy. At every turn, opposition MPs, elected by 60% of Canadians, and expert witnesses who attempted to input into the bills’ 208 clauses and hundreds of amendments, were shown the political middle finger.
In the Senate, senators mounted an expensive, taxpayer-funded charade; they invited hundreds of witnesses and collected mountains of evidence, but made only a few terrorism-related changes to Bill C-10. Our senators chose to abandon their role as providers of the sober second thought that this bill deserved. They simply rubberstamped it.
Minimum sentences undermine our court system; they send the wrong message to society. They give the impression that our courts and judges don’t know how to do their jobs. Furthermore, the Act will cost Canadian taxpayers an estimated $15 billion. Surely, how can we agree to partake in the daylight robbery our education, healthcare and other social services to finance a law that will oppress us all and turn our jails into training schools for hardcore criminals?
Both crime Bill C-10 and the Safe Streets and Communities Act are the epitome of state abuse of power, the law and resources. We’re being called upon to defend Canadian democracy at its greatest hour of need. Democracy should never yield to tyranny. Indeed, it never has, never will.
Honorable MP, now is the hour to build a society that nurtures hope instead of extinguishing it. It’s a moment to remind ourselves that an injustice visited on a single Canadian or community, is an injustice visited on all of us. We must insist on a united and caring Canada that without apology encourages all to set aside differences and prescribed labels, and come together to create a strong national identity based on these Canadian values: compassion, respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, multiculturalism, inclusion, diversity, fairness, democratic governance and accommodation of difference.
Therein, not the Safe Streets and Communities Act, lies our collective security.
This is the Canada I experienced the day I washed up on Canada’s shores as a political refugee from Zimbabwe in the summer of 2003. The violence I’d experienced and witnessed in the Southern African country had mutilated me. But Canada embraced, nursed and healed me. Canada restored that which Zimbabwe – and the US denied me – dignity.
Canada believed in me as an equal member of the human race, and encouraged me to unleash my passions in the service of my adopted country. In 2004, I volunteered for the late NDP leader Jack Layton’s successful run for Parliamentary office. Over the years, I’ve carved a unique Canadian identity as a globally-conscious activism-oriented progressive political blogger, with a passion for Canadian federal politics, diversity, social issues and movements, progressive politics and Canadian foreign policy. I contributed to Canada’s contribution to the global HIV/AIDS pandemic through my seven years of loyal service to the Canada Africa Partnership on AIDS (CAP AIDS), a CIDA-funded registered Canadian charity that supports HIV/AIDS work in Africa.
But I’ve also tasted the wrath of a Canada hostile to both accountability and the “other”. In December, 2003, I signed up to volunteer for CAP AIDS. By April 2008, I’d become the charity’s executive director and sole employee, working a punishing 60-80 hours a week. In May, 2010, I attempted to pursue accountability for part of the more than $130 000 in Canadians’ donations the charity misused. The board of the charity harassed me and tossed me under the bus. It blocked my access to employment insurance and torpedoed my support systems as a new immigrant. I lost most of what I’d worked for all these years and ended up on the streets of Toronto.
From June 15 to June 23, I walked almost 400 km from Toronto to Ottawa in protest. I demanded that the charity account for the donations received as required under the Income Tax Act. But I learned that when those of us on the margins of society challenge the wrongdoings of the privileged, it takes more than a 400km solitary walk to be heard.
In Ottawa, I ended up on the streets. From June 23 to October 14, 2011, I slept in a crevice at Laurier and Bank Street. I ate from soup kitchens. I bathed and did my laundry on the Ottawa River. On October 15, 2011, Occupy Ottawa showed up in town and rescued me from the streets. The movement gave me a tent, a family and a platform to discuss, in the spirit of equality and deliberative democracy, the issues of our time. The movement helped me to overcome my immigrant innocence, and stand up for Canada and her unparalleled values.
Honorable MP, my indefinite hunger strike is a call on you, our elected representative, to side with and defend Canadians against Stephen Harper. I’m demanding only the minimum of what Canadians should rightly be demanding of their leaders right now. Canada today faces a situation that calls on all to reign in an authoritarian petro-prime minister who has become a serious threat to both our parliamentary democracy and to Canadians. Now is the hour for Canadian leadership, a return by parliament to sanity and respect for our democratic and legislative processes. It’s the hour for our MPs to listen to and value the concerns of all Canadians.
I do not underestimate the odds I face. I’m a self-identified anti-capitalism activist in a moment the distinction between terrorist and legitimate protester is more than more than ever before blurred in Canada. Nevertheless, I’ll fight for a Canada I believe in.
Honorable MP, I leave you with the words of Grand Chief Derek Nepinak of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, whose voice, like many others, was ignored during the crime Bill C-10 hearings: “Are we going to be a compassionate Canada and look out for one another, or are we going to criminalize one another and send each other to jail? That’s the fundamental question that has to be answered.”
We must love and look after each other.
Respectfully,
Obert Madondo
Activist and Progressive Political Blogger
retrieved from: http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2012/03/19/on-day-six-of-indefinite-bill-c10-hunger-strike-obert-madondo-addresses-canadian-mps/
Obert is currently undertaking an indefinite hunger strike in Ottawa to demand that the Parliament of Canada immediately repeal the new Safe Streets and Communities Act (formerly omnibus crime Bill C-10). He is a fearless and passionate activist, progressive political blogger and permanent resident of Canada. Obert is the founder and editor of the Canadian Progressive World blog. He volunteers as webmaster, online content editor, blogger and editorial team member for the official Occupy Ottawa website.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Peter Collins Drawing - Pelican Bay Hunger Strike
Pete Collins, who is imprisoned at Bath Prison in Ontario, Canada, drew
this censored pelican to support the 2011 hunger strikes called by
Mutope and his comrades in the Pelican Bay SHU. When 12,000 California
prisoners joined in starving themselves simultaneously last year, CDCR
could no longer hide its barbaric and widespread use of solitary
confinement.
We’ve taken their power away by uniting as one
March 22, 2012
by Mutope Duguma, s/n James Crawford
We should at all times reject the logic from any local, state and
federal courts who oversee the enforcement of the law to compromise
objective law by allowing these judicial institutions to use discretion
when applying the law.
Subjective law set the stage for judges to apply the law unjustly:
Subjective law has allowed the courts to give the CDCR (California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) jurisdiction over all
California prisons even when the law says otherwise.
Judges continue to say that they will not interfere with prison affairs regardless if the prison officials continue to blatantly break the law. The judges have gone so far as to say, straight out, the prison officials will have outright discretion over how they run their prisons.
The reason prisoners are dying from medical neglect, inadequate and inedible food servings, indefinite solitary confinement, group punishment, lack of programs and privileges, and now hunger strikes is that the California courts for the most part have turned a blind eye to the law where prison officials have held prisoners in solitary confinement indefinitely. It is no way in hell any prison official or any court can justify holding a man or woman in solitary confinement with no end in sight to getting out, when they are held for nothing.
Therefore, the courts are excusing their inaction by enforcing the law by using subjective law to avoid applying objective law, which validates the whole criminal act against prisoners held in solitary confinement throughout California prisons.
Many say Amerika is a nation of laws. This may be true for some, but when these laws are supposed to work to protect the interests of the poor people of this nation, they become nothing of the sort.
We are, as I’ve always said, an “obsolete people” to those who are supposed to uphold the law in this nation. This is why we must stay committed to putting our human face before the world. Because our keepers, CDCR and PBSP (Pelican Bay State Prison) officials, are master deceptors and they will deceive their courts, legislators etc., we prisoners have evidence that shows how the CDCR and PBSP officials outright and knowingly lied to the courts, legislators etc. Yet they are given carte blanche over our lives … without any oversight.
I am glad that the four principle groups behind these prison walls have agreed to the fundamental principles of “each one, teach one” with the open hand of natural humanity from the north to the south to the east to the west. We are united as one, a Prison Movement of the 21st century.
Prison gang investigation officers constantly feel the need to lie to the public about how sinister we are or that we are the infamous “worst of the worst,” but they say nothing about how they continue to open doors on prisoners in solitary confinement in order to try to provoke violence, thinking that we are robots and all they’ve got to do is pit us against one another and, like wild animals, we’re supposed to go at it.
Those of us in the short corridor have taken the power away from the PBSP officers and officials because we are in control of ourselves, and under no circumstances will we destroy one another to further the interests of CDCR. Those days are over. The four principle groups must cease the violence if we are to create an environment that will be in the interest of prisoners.
“If you take everything away from a person, you also take away their ability to influence their behavior,” he said. “I think, ultimately, I’d like to get to a place where there are MP3 players to Xbox to cable TV. I don’t care; they can have (all the) goodies you can possibly get, great, as long as they follow the rules … and our guards are safe.”
Now the problem with this statement is that Secretary Cate has created in his mind a false reality, because 99 percent of the prison population, whether in solitary confinement or in general population, are well behaved prisoners. It has nothing to do with the prison administration whatsoever. Prisoners are human beings who are more civilized than prison guards.
What CDCR is doing is going around saying a bunch of stuff, but actually doing nothing, when they could already have changed some of the cruelest policies under the Warden’s Operational Procedures. Wardens get to put programs in place for their prisons and every warden throughout CDCR has implemented OPs that are anti-prisoner programs, and these they can suspend with a simple memorandum.
When we get to the truth of the matter, prisoners have nothing to lose. The programs and privileges they have lost, this is something the administration did outright to politicize the whole prison environment, which left many prisoners helpless and hopeless.
The prison guards have a responsibility in all this because in my 27 years of being incarcerated, it’s been my experience when a prisoner gets into it with a guard, which is very rare, that prison guard has done something very bad to that prisoner that forces that action. Prison guards should be held to the standard of objective law and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for their criminal activity, in which the officers nine times out of 10 are allowed to perpetrate foul acts against prisoners.
When we all got together and decided enough was enough based on the fact that we was being subjected to constant attacks by prison guards because we wouldn’t debrief – emasculate ourselves – the prison administration just continued to attack us ruthlessly. We realized that prison violence was a weapon CDCR propagated against us in order to justify torturing us.
And for 22 years not one staff has been reported injured. If so, it came by way of them jumping on one prisoner and one to two of them will say they were injured, which is a joke. So when CDCR Secretary Cate talks about treating prisoners with goodies for behaving, then my question would be, why have his prison guards subjected us here in PBSP SHU, Corcoran SHU, Tehachapi SHU and New Folsom SHU and all Ad Segs to violence when we all for the most part have been behaving. He’s been CDCR secretary for two years now and he hasn’t changed nothing. And how do you go from “you’re going to hammer us” to “if we behave, we will be afforded goodies for that good behavior.” I am seeing two faces here. We should have had our programs and privileges re-instated yester-year:
1. Release from solitary confinement, 2. Adequate food, 3. Phone calls, 4. Educational programs, 5. Typewriters and computers, 6. Adequate clothing, 7. Food sales, 8. Furlough (general population only), 9. Transferring prisoners closer to their homes, 10. Weights, 11. MP3 players, Xbox and cable TV etc. So if the CDCR secretary is serious, he would begin by putting these programs into effect because 99 percent of prisoners are already on their best behavior and all your officers are safe, so what are you waiting for?
We have to stay committed to our struggle to be liberated from solitary confinement while making sure prisoners who are being placed here for legitimate offenses are treated humanely and have programs and privileges to sustain them during their brief stay, instead of just being isolated in a cell.
Objective law don’t allow deviation from the law!
One Love, One Struggle, Mutope
Send our brother some love and light: Mutope Duguma (James Crawford), D-05996, PBSP SHU D1-117, P.O. Box 7500, Crescent City CA 95532. This letter was transcribed by Penny Schoner.
http://sfbayview.com/2012/weve-taken-their-power-away-by-uniting-as-one/
Judges continue to say that they will not interfere with prison affairs regardless if the prison officials continue to blatantly break the law. The judges have gone so far as to say, straight out, the prison officials will have outright discretion over how they run their prisons.
The reason prisoners are dying from medical neglect, inadequate and inedible food servings, indefinite solitary confinement, group punishment, lack of programs and privileges, and now hunger strikes is that the California courts for the most part have turned a blind eye to the law where prison officials have held prisoners in solitary confinement indefinitely. It is no way in hell any prison official or any court can justify holding a man or woman in solitary confinement with no end in sight to getting out, when they are held for nothing.
Therefore, the courts are excusing their inaction by enforcing the law by using subjective law to avoid applying objective law, which validates the whole criminal act against prisoners held in solitary confinement throughout California prisons.
Many say Amerika is a nation of laws. This may be true for some, but when these laws are supposed to work to protect the interests of the poor people of this nation, they become nothing of the sort.
We are, as I’ve always said, an “obsolete people” to those who are supposed to uphold the law in this nation. This is why we must stay committed to putting our human face before the world. Because our keepers, CDCR and PBSP (Pelican Bay State Prison) officials, are master deceptors and they will deceive their courts, legislators etc., we prisoners have evidence that shows how the CDCR and PBSP officials outright and knowingly lied to the courts, legislators etc. Yet they are given carte blanche over our lives … without any oversight.
I am glad that the four principle groups behind these prison walls have agreed to the fundamental principles of “each one, teach one” with the open hand of natural humanity from the north to the south to the east to the west. We are united as one, a Prison Movement of the 21st century.
We are united as one, a Prison Movement of the 21st century.
Which is why, on Feb. 4, 2012, me and a Mexican prisoner were let out on the tier together. On Feb. 11, 2012, Todd Ashker, a white prisoner, and Sitawa Nantambu Jamaa (Dewberry), a New African prisoner, were also let out on the tier together, courtesy of our keepers in the PBSP gun tower. The officers say these incidents were honest mistakes. Yeah, right!Prison gang investigation officers constantly feel the need to lie to the public about how sinister we are or that we are the infamous “worst of the worst,” but they say nothing about how they continue to open doors on prisoners in solitary confinement in order to try to provoke violence, thinking that we are robots and all they’ve got to do is pit us against one another and, like wild animals, we’re supposed to go at it.
Those of us in the short corridor have taken the power away from the PBSP officers and officials because we are in control of ourselves, and under no circumstances will we destroy one another to further the interests of CDCR. Those days are over. The four principle groups must cease the violence if we are to create an environment that will be in the interest of prisoners.
The four principle groups must cease the violence if we are to create an environment that will be in the interest of prisoners.
We can only look to the words of CDCR Secretary Matthew Cate, who recently went out to New York City, where he was speaking on a panel at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and said that state prisons have become so punitive there is “very little benefit in obeying the rules.”“If you take everything away from a person, you also take away their ability to influence their behavior,” he said. “I think, ultimately, I’d like to get to a place where there are MP3 players to Xbox to cable TV. I don’t care; they can have (all the) goodies you can possibly get, great, as long as they follow the rules … and our guards are safe.”
Now the problem with this statement is that Secretary Cate has created in his mind a false reality, because 99 percent of the prison population, whether in solitary confinement or in general population, are well behaved prisoners. It has nothing to do with the prison administration whatsoever. Prisoners are human beings who are more civilized than prison guards.
Prisoners are human beings who are more civilized than prison guards.
The irony in what Secretary Cate said is he would like to get to a place where 95 percent of our prisons are places where inmates have everything from MP3 players to Xbox to cable TV. I know that Secretary Cate has executive power to do many things other than “mind control” devices. These are the same devices that got young minds today in a trance and if he was even sincere about implementing that of which he speaks, he would have already done so.What CDCR is doing is going around saying a bunch of stuff, but actually doing nothing, when they could already have changed some of the cruelest policies under the Warden’s Operational Procedures. Wardens get to put programs in place for their prisons and every warden throughout CDCR has implemented OPs that are anti-prisoner programs, and these they can suspend with a simple memorandum.
When we get to the truth of the matter, prisoners have nothing to lose. The programs and privileges they have lost, this is something the administration did outright to politicize the whole prison environment, which left many prisoners helpless and hopeless.
The prison guards have a responsibility in all this because in my 27 years of being incarcerated, it’s been my experience when a prisoner gets into it with a guard, which is very rare, that prison guard has done something very bad to that prisoner that forces that action. Prison guards should be held to the standard of objective law and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for their criminal activity, in which the officers nine times out of 10 are allowed to perpetrate foul acts against prisoners.
When we all got together and decided enough was enough based on the fact that we was being subjected to constant attacks by prison guards because we wouldn’t debrief – emasculate ourselves – the prison administration just continued to attack us ruthlessly. We realized that prison violence was a weapon CDCR propagated against us in order to justify torturing us.
We realized that prison violence was a weapon CDCR propagated against us in order to justify torturing us in solitary confinement.
But what CDCR don’t say is that solitary confined prisoners are the most well behaved. Our CDCR 115 rule violation report (RVR) did not come until we went on hunger strikes and the PBSP officers started manufacturing RVRs against us. Prior to that, prisoners in solitary confinement who been held anywhere from one to 40 years for the most part have been disciplinary free.And for 22 years not one staff has been reported injured. If so, it came by way of them jumping on one prisoner and one to two of them will say they were injured, which is a joke. So when CDCR Secretary Cate talks about treating prisoners with goodies for behaving, then my question would be, why have his prison guards subjected us here in PBSP SHU, Corcoran SHU, Tehachapi SHU and New Folsom SHU and all Ad Segs to violence when we all for the most part have been behaving. He’s been CDCR secretary for two years now and he hasn’t changed nothing. And how do you go from “you’re going to hammer us” to “if we behave, we will be afforded goodies for that good behavior.” I am seeing two faces here. We should have had our programs and privileges re-instated yester-year:
1. Release from solitary confinement, 2. Adequate food, 3. Phone calls, 4. Educational programs, 5. Typewriters and computers, 6. Adequate clothing, 7. Food sales, 8. Furlough (general population only), 9. Transferring prisoners closer to their homes, 10. Weights, 11. MP3 players, Xbox and cable TV etc. So if the CDCR secretary is serious, he would begin by putting these programs into effect because 99 percent of prisoners are already on their best behavior and all your officers are safe, so what are you waiting for?
If the CDCR secretary is serious, he would begin by putting these programs into effect because 99 percent of prisoners are already on their best behavior and all your officers are safe, so what are you waiting for?
Plus, there was a Warden’s Advisory Group (WAG) assembled to review SHU procedural guidelines and operational manual. Now, wardens have executive power over operational procedures (OP) where they establish policy within their prisons. We have to call them out on the OPs which they implemented that are anti-prisoners’ interests.We have to stay committed to our struggle to be liberated from solitary confinement while making sure prisoners who are being placed here for legitimate offenses are treated humanely and have programs and privileges to sustain them during their brief stay, instead of just being isolated in a cell.
Objective law don’t allow deviation from the law!
One Love, One Struggle, Mutope
Send our brother some love and light: Mutope Duguma (James Crawford), D-05996, PBSP SHU D1-117, P.O. Box 7500, Crescent City CA 95532. This letter was transcribed by Penny Schoner.
http://sfbayview.com/2012/weve-taken-their-power-away-by-uniting-as-one/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)