Details, details....
Sometimes we're lucky, and someone has published books with BIG pictures of paternoster beads -- like the book with the St. Anthony pictures I was talking about awhile back. But when we're not so lucky, about the only way we can really study depictions of beads in detail is to travel to where the original paintings are and take some closeup photos ourselves. (Then again.... maybe that's a GOOD thing? {grin})
Anyway, since I had the opportunity, I've extracted and enlarged some of the photos I took recently that show details of beads. These are especially for my friends who do reproduction metalwork, some of whom I know (hope?) are contemplating making some of the types of beads and rosary parts that are not to be found on today's market. (Hint, hint!)
I've had an especially hard time finding on the modern market anything like the large, pierced, silver or gold beads, the originals of which were probably pomanders, filled with some fragrance-producing substance. Judging by how common it is to see one of these rosaries with one very large metal bead, these must have been very popular historically. Unfortunately for us, most of them were probably melted down for their precious-metal content when they went out of fashion. Surviving large beads are more likely to have been carved of boxwood or ivory, which don't melt.
But most of what's on the market right now in the way of pierced metal beads is either (1) too small to stand out as gauds on a string of 10mm to 14mm beads, or (2) of some Victorian or Art-Nouveau design that just doesn't look right.
Once in awhile, I'll find some large pierced-metal balls -- especially around Christmas -- but the only difference is that instead of being too small and of the wrong design, those tend to be too big and of the wrong design. They seem to start at about 3 inches in diameter and go up from there. The pomanders I see in paintings seem to be between about an inch and two inches in diameter. (And while I'm at it, I'd wish for reproduction pomanders that were plated base metal rather than solid silver, so they would be somewhat affordable.)
So without further ado, here are some nice details.
This one is from a painting I didn't get a good photo of overall, because the lighting kept creating spots of glare where it reflected off the varnish. (My detail photo isn't completely sharp, either.) Her identity is unknown and so is the name of the artist, but this was clearly half of a pair of marriage portraits. Note that her beads are black, possibly jet.
(As always, click on these photos to enlarge them.)
![0080-detail](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/BG8VvuY8Fb1feLtIJ6IcywoZM_PwQWSgj64sh59kd5fDdhkjj619LmoHoGfFz-IsIyl529PrEmatyy7O-s4vY0-PD7Bh2rsT0vR9Mn0cumas=s0-d)
I've mentioned this one earlier, but here it is enlarged as far as I can:
![0082-detail](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Fvbw-pDzv9PBduAfKlKrFnT8miG08voZvxc5rOxewmWgieWtEfW954e3D8mBU0i5wLtrxAakK8CPRWrvi7f_jXSyioL9-3PexiPu1C20wmJV=s0-d)
The by-now-very-familiar-to-me artist Bartholomäus Bruyn the Elder painted another pair of these marriage portraits in 1528, this time of a Mr. and Mrs. Pilgrum -- Gerhard Pilgrum and his wife Anna Strauss Pilgrum. (They can easily be identified because their coats of arms are part of the picture.)
I am somewhat embarrassed by this photo. The online photos of these portraits that I was able to find are all extremely dark or very "off" on the colors. I took this in daylight, so the colors are much better. Unfortunately, this pair of portraits is displayed inside a glass case -- which reflects -- and directly facing a large wall of windows, which provides a lot of light to be reflected. I've managed to fade the impression a bit, but you can clearly see a reflection of me taking the photo -- especially since I happened to be wearing a nice, bright white shirt that day. {blush}
![Ehepaar](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/1Xe2-FKYg7iVryntU76fsiqqKah7WcK6a1Z-iQ83CpUHUKz1gAIBDAShNa1uQ3wtz-_5K777pkKKDMbwInhChlQN-Xy8SClqZ_h7LraQPnZy=s0-d)
I was almost equally embarrassed to suddenly realize while I was there that Bartholomäus Bruyn actually lived and worked in Cologne -- I've seen a number of other "rosary portraits" that he painted, but I hadn't noticed where exactly they were from, since I found them on the Marburg Foto Index, which has things from all over Germany and beyond.
In this case, we get a bonus: not just one, but both members of the pair are holding beads. Here is a closeup of Gerhard's rosary:
![0110-detail](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/PY-bBCbbsOskd-a_-GtqZHESvSR4H7nXfYrLTdIMU8VQVuzr4AMMewb6kmueVwmncq7x0rNxdydRbpbk26O0R0nKfjrROQUfn60HjbSGQDav=s0-d)
And Anna's:
![0113-detail](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/81Eeqx4FhA1LyWa5UybfYJJiB4snoLFEi2kI1ZzmlYJBHmkScEOsMgn1yTTsWGXvMQhajG8mTKaUZqM2ST8IkhYSb9hXIxad6qJwbYb4c0cL=s0-d)
The closeup photos were actually easier to take, because I was able to move in close and block the light from the window behind me.
And finally, another rosary of red coral beads with a gold pomander. Sorry about the blur on this one too. (I've definitely decided after this trip, I hate my camera. I need a different one.)
![0127-detail](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/-eJlODi502qYEyOS1KwFc8owK8UpiwhBzVIeJ7rAIhQXJhwPwDfeuL7H8FCZZFIXw9i2BXQn9kS8WKex5auBUBSSXCTASXvYCSwXe04l8YaZ=s0-d)
This is from a portrait thought to be that of Maria Pastoir. Whoever the subject was, she was painted at age 45 in 1538. (Oh, and this photo isn't mine. It's good. ;)
![Portrait of a 45-year-old woman](http://web.archive.org./web/20201125020431im_/https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/Ywgv3ZHdyiTSGLzdbOGCTWjtQWiohpTUevHUgeD9Wqz9VGQUuAip8bWl1BBy4ngCvR5rrRAafhMwmYM9tznRZyX_kao0YwIdwvBFzRl7RqIjadE=s0-d)
Anyone studying German women's headdresses is going to want to collect all of Bruyn's portraits, because they have very good views of the folded and draped linen constructions popular on respectable heads at the time.
In living color
More living color
A Joos van Cleve altarpiece
Details, details
Anyway, since I had the opportunity, I've extracted and enlarged some of the photos I took recently that show details of beads. These are especially for my friends who do reproduction metalwork, some of whom I know (hope?) are contemplating making some of the types of beads and rosary parts that are not to be found on today's market. (Hint, hint!)
I've had an especially hard time finding on the modern market anything like the large, pierced, silver or gold beads, the originals of which were probably pomanders, filled with some fragrance-producing substance. Judging by how common it is to see one of these rosaries with one very large metal bead, these must have been very popular historically. Unfortunately for us, most of them were probably melted down for their precious-metal content when they went out of fashion. Surviving large beads are more likely to have been carved of boxwood or ivory, which don't melt.
But most of what's on the market right now in the way of pierced metal beads is either (1) too small to stand out as gauds on a string of 10mm to 14mm beads, or (2) of some Victorian or Art-Nouveau design that just doesn't look right.
Once in awhile, I'll find some large pierced-metal balls -- especially around Christmas -- but the only difference is that instead of being too small and of the wrong design, those tend to be too big and of the wrong design. They seem to start at about 3 inches in diameter and go up from there. The pomanders I see in paintings seem to be between about an inch and two inches in diameter. (And while I'm at it, I'd wish for reproduction pomanders that were plated base metal rather than solid silver, so they would be somewhat affordable.)
So without further ado, here are some nice details.
This one is from a painting I didn't get a good photo of overall, because the lighting kept creating spots of glare where it reflected off the varnish. (My detail photo isn't completely sharp, either.) Her identity is unknown and so is the name of the artist, but this was clearly half of a pair of marriage portraits. Note that her beads are black, possibly jet.
(As always, click on these photos to enlarge them.)
I've mentioned this one earlier, but here it is enlarged as far as I can:
The by-now-very-familiar-to-me artist Bartholomäus Bruyn the Elder painted another pair of these marriage portraits in 1528, this time of a Mr. and Mrs. Pilgrum -- Gerhard Pilgrum and his wife Anna Strauss Pilgrum. (They can easily be identified because their coats of arms are part of the picture.)
I am somewhat embarrassed by this photo. The online photos of these portraits that I was able to find are all extremely dark or very "off" on the colors. I took this in daylight, so the colors are much better. Unfortunately, this pair of portraits is displayed inside a glass case -- which reflects -- and directly facing a large wall of windows, which provides a lot of light to be reflected. I've managed to fade the impression a bit, but you can clearly see a reflection of me taking the photo -- especially since I happened to be wearing a nice, bright white shirt that day. {blush}
I was almost equally embarrassed to suddenly realize while I was there that Bartholomäus Bruyn actually lived and worked in Cologne -- I've seen a number of other "rosary portraits" that he painted, but I hadn't noticed where exactly they were from, since I found them on the Marburg Foto Index, which has things from all over Germany and beyond.
In this case, we get a bonus: not just one, but both members of the pair are holding beads. Here is a closeup of Gerhard's rosary:
And Anna's:
The closeup photos were actually easier to take, because I was able to move in close and block the light from the window behind me.
And finally, another rosary of red coral beads with a gold pomander. Sorry about the blur on this one too. (I've definitely decided after this trip, I hate my camera. I need a different one.)
This is from a portrait thought to be that of Maria Pastoir. Whoever the subject was, she was painted at age 45 in 1538. (Oh, and this photo isn't mine. It's good. ;)
Anyone studying German women's headdresses is going to want to collect all of Bruyn's portraits, because they have very good views of the folded and draped linen constructions popular on respectable heads at the time.
Pictures from Köln:
In living color
More living color
A Joos van Cleve altarpiece
Details, details