Devanagari

osho: जो लोग आज्ञाकारी होते है वह लोग हमेशा दूसरो के गुलाम होते है

• Report rights infringement
• published: 10 May 2017
• views: 185

See this video: osho: जो लोग आज्ञाकारी होते है वह लोग हमेशा दूसरो के गुलाम होते है ********************************* Osho: People who are obedient are always slaves of others You call a country with such a big cultural tradition mentally dead?It had once, but for two thousand years - slavery. What happened to the tax case, by the way? Is there any new development?I have no idea because I have never paid any tax. I have no income, either.You have no income?No income.What are you living on then?Just my friends - I am their guest. I have been a guest for thirty-five years continuously - in fact my whole life. In the beginning I was a guest in my family, and after that I have been a guest in other families.Just one more question concerning the motivation of people coming to join you. I have the feeling that principally frustrated Western youth are coming, who seem to be the more obedient kind of customers, who don’t ask too many questions. Aren’t the Indians, for instance, more practically minded?Do you think you are an Indian? You are from the West.No. I don’t feel to be the kind of frustrated Westerner but maybe the percentage of that type of people.Do you see anybody here more frustrated than you?No, no. The love of Rama and Sita is love; it is not marriage. If you have not read Valmiki’s Ramayana - the story of Rama - you must read it. Tulsi and many others have written versions of the Ramayana after Valmiki, but all those Ramayanas have lost the purity of Valmiki’s Ramayana. Valmiki’s version is pure because he is not concerned about morality or religion. Valmiki narrates the Ramayana in the spirit of Rama himself. Tulsi, however, is too preoccupied with preserving Rama’s image, so that whatever he feels to be detrimental to Rama’s moral character he has left out. Tulsi has removed from the Ramayana every detail, however small, that might tarnish Rama’s image. Tulsi is an idealist, Valmiki is a realist. You may find yourself troubled by many features of Valmiki’s narrative because so many of the events surrounding Rama and Sita will defy your imagination. Rama comes to the city where Sita lives and, wandering in a garden, sees Sita and falls in love with her. This is inconceivable to us, this is the kind of thing that any vagrant boy might do - to set eyes on a girl and immediately fall in love with her. Is this any way for a Rama to behave? But so it was! Love happened to Rama before marriage. Marriage came afterwards just as a supplement to love. To Sita too, love happened the moment she saw this young man. Their two hearts met - the essential meeting had already happened - before they married, before society played the part of the formal witness. My understanding is that after what had happened between the two, if Sita had to marry someone else, that would have been merely a superficial marriage. The freshness, the virginity of the meeting of these two hearts would not have been there in any other marriage. It would have been only a business transaction, something just on the body level.This is why, even if Ravana could have been able to marry Sita, he could not have had her; that event had already happened, her giving of herself had already happened. And likewise, had Rama married another woman, he would have missed the music of the meeting of two hearts; what was spontaneous and unplanned would not have been possible in any other marriage.Rama and Sita have never been studied in this dimension, because love is something we do not study - we want to avoid such things. Their falling in love with each other is the very first thing between Rama and Sita, and all that unfolds afterwards between them has to be understood in this light. If we ignore the fact that first and foremost they have fallen in love with each other, then many apparently meaningless issues arise in the lives of Rama and Sita, and to resolve these becomes very difficult.