Eric Trump Says Democrats Are "Not Even People"

[Content Note: Dehumanization; violent rhetoric; disablist language.]

Appearing on Fox News with Sean Hannity last night, Eric Trump, the son of Donald Trump, went off on an angry rant against Democrats, calling Tom Perez a "whack job" and engaging in rank dehumanization, saying that people who oppose his father's administration are "not even people."

ERIC TRUMP: Hey, Sean, how are you?

SEAN HANNITY: Don't you wish you went to Washington, so you could be dealing with this every second of every day?

TRUMP: You know, I've never seen hatred like this. I mean, to me, they're not even people. It's—it's so, so sad. I mean, morality's just gone. Morals have flown out the window. We deserve so much better than this as a country, and, you know, it's so sad. You see the Democratic Party—they're imploding. They're imploding. They have no message; you see the head of the DNC, who is a total whack job; there's no leadership there. And so what do they do? They become obstructionists, because they have no message of their own; they have no solid candidates of their own; they lost the election that they should've won because they spent seven times the amount of money that my father spent. They have no message! So what do they try and do? They try and obstruct a great man; they try and obstruct his family; they come after us viciously—

HANNITY: Eric, I gotta tell ya something—

TRUMP: —and it's truly, truly horrible.
Wow.

So, there's a lot to unpack there, starting with the fact that 90 percent of it is projection, accusing opponents of Trump with precisely the lack of morality and coherent messaging that is plaguing his father's administration.

Then there's the issue that Eric Trump, who has repeatedly insisted there's a firewall between his father's administration and his father's business, over which he and his brother Don Jr. have ostensibly taken full control, is making a political defense in which he includes a resentful complaint about Democrats obstructing "a great man" and "his family."

Finally, and most importantly, there's Trump saying that opponents of his father's administration are "not even people." This is not just some innocuous hyperbole. This is the son of the president, in the middle of an appearance in which he has positioned himself as a spokesperson for the administration, saying that people who oppose the president aren't even human.

That is the rhetoric of despots.

And it has consequences. Here are just two things I pulled out of my mentions from the last 12 hours:

screencap of a tweeted response to me reading: 'You're idiots. You can't stand the man elected so you'll overthrow the legitimate government. I hope you try it and get put down like dogs.'
screencap of a tweeted response to me reading: 'You mean the legally binding, democratic election? I wake up everyday and wonder why collectively,we don't euthanize morons like you!!'

Eliminationist language is the inevitable result of casual dehumanization. When the president's son goes on television to say that people like me aren't human, eliminationism directed at me increases. And I am hardly alone.

This is deeply irresponsible and dangerous. Which, I regret to say, is precisely the fucking point.

Open Wide...

Trump Nominates Christopher Wray as FBI Director

So, in an announcement clearly timed to distract from James Comey's Senate testimony tomorrow, Donald Trump has nominated Christopher Wray as FBI Director.

Here are a few things to know about Wray:

1. He was New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's personal lawyer during the Bridgegate scandal. To be clear, it's not like Wray was a public defender or legal aid lawyer being assigned cases. He is a high-powered private attorney who chose to take a case defending a state executive in a matter concerning an egregious abuse of power.

2. His law firm advises the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, which holds his business assets. Another partner at the firm is the ethics adviser to the trust. This presents a potential conflict of interest, which would need to be closely examined during his nomination hearing.

3. He worked for the Bush administration, and Marcy Wheeler notes a few things about Wray's time there: The ACLU's torture database has a number of entirely redacted documents involving Wray, and Wray was inappropriately briefing then-Attorney General John Ashcroft during the investigation into outing Valerie Plame, which is what ultimately "led to Ashcroft's recusal and the appointment, by Deputy Attorney General Jim Comey, of Patrick Fitzgerald as special counsel."

A lot of folks are saying this is a good, solid pick. Suffice it to say, I have concerns.

Open Wide...

Open Thread

image of a red couch

Hosted by a red sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker IrishUp: "If you could be transformed into any critter to live like it lives for a week (like young Wart in 'The Sword and the Stone'), what would it be?"

An eagle. I would love to experience what it feels like to soar.

Open Wide...

An Observation


I will never, ever, stop being incandescently angry at journalists who covered themselves in wicked disgrace during the election having the unmitigated temerity to pretend that one of the reasons that the Democrats lost is because they can't articulate what they stand for.

Open Wide...

Shaker Gardens

Shaker Gardens is usually Aphra_Behn's beat, and there's a darn good reason for that—because, unlike Aphra, I have the ungreenest thumb that has ever thumbed! But here are a few things going on in my garden at the moment.

As always, you are welcome and encouraged to share stories and pix of what's happening in your garden!

image of some small light pink flowers from a flowering bush
image of some drops of rain on the leaf of a hosta plant
image of some medium-sized dark pink flowers on another flowering bush
image of some white flowers on a flowering tree
image of a deep purple iris

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Jared's actually become much more famous than me. I'm a little bit upset about that."—Donald Trump.

TRUMP (sitting at a conference table surrounded by members of his administration and the media): I'd like to thank the leadership for being with us. Mike Pence, you've been great. I appreciate you being here. Steve—great. I appreciate every— Jared. Jared's actually become much more famous than me. [everyone in the room laughs] I'm a little bit upset about that. [more chuckles] So, I want to thank everybody very much for being here. And let's get to work. We're gonna get to work and get it done. Thank you all very much.
If anyone else said this, you would presume they were joking. I'm sure Trump would like us to believe he was joking, too, but.

Open Wide...

Former FBI Director James Comey's Testimony "Will Make the White House Uncomfortable"

And probably not much more than that (which is why I've warned about approaching his testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee with tempered expectations).

Anyway [Content Note: Video may autoplay at link]:

There will be much in former FBI Director James Comey's upcoming congressional testimony that will make the White House uncomfortable, but he will stop short of saying the president interfered with the agency's probe into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, a source familiar with Comey's thinking told ABC News.

Although Comey has told associates he will not accuse the President of obstructing justice, he will dispute the president's contention that Comey told him three times he is not under investigation.
In my estimation, it would be fairly unreasonable to expect Comey to straightforwardly assert that Donald Trump had attempted to obstruct justice, as opposed to offering testimony that investigators can subsequently conclude does (or does not) meet the definition of obstruction. So it makes sense Comey would flatly contradict Trump, but not flatly accuse him of obstruction. The former is stating a fact; the latter is drawing a legal conclusion.

And yes, even that expected testimony "will make the White House uncomfortable." Whether they are obliged to experience something rather more significant than discomfort will be left to Congressional investigators or, more likely, Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

In related news, a pro-Trump nonprofit has purchased airtime to run anti-Comey adverts during his testimony on Thursday:
Comey "put politics over protecting America," a narrator says in the 30-second spot, titled "Showboat," which was shared with The Associated Press. It accuses him of being "consumed with election meddling" even as "terror attacks were on the rise."

Great America Alliance has paid for the ad, which is slated to run digitally Wednesday and appear the next day on CNN and Fox News. The group, formed after [Donald] Trump's election to advocate for his administration, is not required to disclose its donors.

The message of the ad reflects a strategy by Trump and his advocates to erode Comey's credibility. ..."James Comey: just another DC insider only in it for himself," the ad concludes.

Eric Beach, head of Great America Alliance, said no one from the White House asked his group to do the ad.
Irrespective of the veracity of that claim, the fact is that the ad borrows the precise language that Trump used in his interview with Lester Holt two days after he fired Comey.

TRUMP: Look, he's a showboat. He's a grandstander. The FBI has been in turmoil—you know that; I know that; everybody knows that.
You take a look at the FBI a year ago, it was in virtual turmoil. Less than a year ago. It hasn't recovered from that.

HOLT: Monday, you met with the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

TRUMP: Right.

HOLT: Did you ask for a recommendation?

TRUMP: What I did is—I was going to fire Comey. My decision. It was not—

HOLT: You had made the decision before they came in the room?

TRUMP: I—I was going to fire Comey. I— There's no good time to do it, by the way.
Thought I'd include that little reminder of Trump admitting he'd decided to fire Comey on his own, regardless of what was contained in Rosenstein's report. A fun little reminder before Comey testifies. Ahem.

Even if there was no official coordination between the White House and Great America Alliance (which frankly I find difficult to believe, given that this White House has zero regard for ethics or laws), the White House message on Comey is front and center in their ad. And it's remarkable that such an ad is going to run while Comey is testifying.

This is beyond playing to the base. This is an administration at war with every democratic norm in the nation.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

image of Sophie the Torbie Cat sitting in a pile of plushy toys
Sophie does her best E.T. impression.

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 138

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: We Need a Patriot. And by Fannie: Dispatches From the Queer Resistance (No. 3).

Kimberly Dozier at the Daily Beast: White House Looked to Drop Russia Sanctions—Even After Firing Michael Flynn. "The White House explored unilaterally easing sanctions on Russia's oil industry as recently as late March, arguing that decreased Russian oil production could harm the American economy, according to former U.S. officials. ...The continued discussion of unilaterally lifting sanctions on Russia came after the dismissal of retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as White House national security adviser." Trump has boasted endlessly about making "the best deals," but keeps trying to make the worst fucking deals for the U.S. with Russia. Curious, that.

Josh Marshall at TPM: Trump's Saudi Arms Deal Is Actually Fake.
Remember [Donald] Trump's big, triumphant arms deal in Saudi Arabia? It turns out it didn't really happen. ...The story comes from Bruce Riedel, a longtime CIA and national security official, now at Brookings. The Potemkin deal turns out to be remarkably similar to the Trump jobs announcements we've grown accustomed to. Trump takes a bunch of jobs or investments which either already exist or have already been announced and rebrands them as new economic growth driven by Trump Power. In this he usually has a compliant and complicit CEO, happy to go along with the charade to curry favor with the US President.

Here's what Riedel discovered:
I've spoken to contacts in the defense business and on the Hill, and all of them say the same thing: There is no $110 billion deal. Instead, there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many are offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday. So far nothing has been notified to the Senate for review. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the arms sales wing of the Pentagon, calls them "intended sales." None of the deals identified so far are new, all began in the Obama administration.
As I said, this turns out to be remarkably similar. The $110 price tag advertised by the Trump White House includes no actual contracts, no actual sales. Instead it is made up of a bundle of letters of intent, statements of interest, and agreements to think about it. In other words, rather than a contract, it's more like a wishlist: an itemized list of things the Saudis might be interested in if the price of oil ever recovers, if they start more wars and things the US would like to sell the Saudis.

...Let's note for the record that the underlying reality here isn't necessarily bad news. It's quite debatable whether we should be selling massive amounts of new arms to Saudi Arabia. But we should know whether or not it happened.
JFC. The lies from this administration are relentless. They lie about everything. Which puts the American people in a terrible predicament: We have no ability at this point, none, to assess whether they are giving us reliable and truthful information. Our best bet is to assume they are lying, and surely even the most partisan fools must understand how dangerous that will be in an emergency situation.

Brandon Carter at the Hill: London Mayor Calls for Cancellation of Trump Visit to UK. "London Mayor Sadiq Khan is calling on the British government to cancel a state visit from [Donald] Trump after Trump criticized his response to this weekend's terror attacks in London. 'I don't think we should roll out the red carpet to the president of the USA in the circumstances where his policies go against everything we stand for,' Khan said in an interview with Britain's Channel 4 News. 'When you have a special relationship it is no different from when you have got a close mate. You stand with them in times of adversity but you call them out when they are wrong. There are many things about which Donald Trump is wrong.'"

Absolutely right. Which gives me no joy to say, since the fact that my country's president is so hateful and toxic that it's reasonable that he'd be disinvited from a state visit by our closest ally.

Philip Bump at the Washington Post: The Trump Administration Has a Recruiting Problem. "It's been almost a month since [Donald] Trump fired James B. Comey on May 9, leaving the FBI without a director. Under normal circumstances, a president planning to fire the head of the nation's top law-enforcement agency might do so only once he had a replacement lined up. (The only other time an FBI director was fired, President Bill Clinton announced his replacement the next day.) Trump didn't do that, pledging instead that a new director would be identified quickly. Shortly before he left on his overseas trip last month, he promised that he was 'very close' to picking a new director. That was almost three weeks ago. There have been a number of people who were identified as being in the running to get the job. And of that group, most have publicly withdrawn their names from contention."

As you may recall, I was saying even before the election that, were Trump elected, he would have trouble filling his administration with qualified people—because any career bureaucrat with any sense wouldn't want to work for such a toxic and incompetent president. And now here we are. This was eminently foreseeable.

Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News: Four Top Law Firms Turned Down Requests to Represent Trump. "Top lawyers with at least four major law firms rebuffed White House overtures to represent [Donald] Trump in the Russia investigations, in part over concerns that the president would be unwilling to listen to their advice, according to five sources familiar with discussions about the matter. The unwillingness of some of the country's most prestigious attorneys and their law firms to represent Trump has complicated the administration's efforts to mount a coherent defense strategy to deal with probes being conducted by four congressional committees as well as Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller." Welp!

Speaking of Robert Muller and Trump's lack of qualified staff...


Hahahahahaha that sounds like a very bad idea! I'm sure there will be a monumental effort in the White House to convince Trump not to do this, because everyone knows that he will spill some bullshit that could be used against him in the course of these investigations.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Alexander Mallin at ABC News: Trump Sons' Expansion of Mid-Market Hotel Chain 'Has Nothing to Do with Politics'. "The Trump Organization has announced plans to expand its signature hotel chain with mid-market properties it's calling the American Idea. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump — who took over management of the Trump Organization from their father, [Donald] Trump — announced the move at an event for industry executives at Trump Tower on Monday. ...'We don't talk about the activities of the business. We don't talk about what we're doing in the business,' Eric Trump said. 'It doesn't blur the lines. You're allowed to show that. And remember, the president of the United States has zero conflicts of interest. Zero.'" LOL okay player.


What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Hello

I see you. The things you are feeling right now are valid, no matter how much Donald Trump, his administration of vandals, and large swaths of the corporate media try to gaslight you.

Whether you feel angry, scared, confused, hopeless, resolved to fight, or any combination thereof, those feelings are legitimate.

And you are not alone.

Open Wide...

We Need a Patriot

Once upon a time, I worked in a building on Chicago's Magnificent Mile. By virtue of its proximity to the beautiful views of the Chicago River and glorious architecture of the Wrigley Building and Tribune Tower, it was a popular location for film sets. It wasn't unusual to see actors from television shows or movies set in Chicago filming exterior scenes, with two characters having a stroll and a chat along the riverwalk, or a character having a dramatic moment on the DuSable Bridge.

One day, I was heading out at lunchtime to pick up some antibiotics. I had a devilish and persistent case of bronchitis, and my doctor had called in a prescription for me. In the lobby, I was met and stopped by a muscled security guard in a black t-shirt. A film set had materialized just outside the windows and rotating doors of the building's entrance, and he told me it would be five minutes while they shot the scene.

Five minutes passed. People began to gather. The building has 36 floors, serving as workspace for thousands of employees, so people were always coming and going. As each new person arrived, the security guard told them it would be about five minutes, as ten minutes passed since I'd arrived on the scene, and then fifteen, and then twenty.

"You told me it was going to be five minutes twenty minutes ago," I said. "This is unreasonable."

It was an important movie, we were told, starring an important dude. We could all see the A-list actor through the glass. If anyone was impressed, the luster of adjacency to stardom was quickly tarnished by the annoyance of inconvenience.

This was before the ubiquity of mobile phones. People had important meetings to get to. Just five more minutes.

A crowd had amassed in the lobby. Everyone was sighing and shifting their weight from foot to foot with impatience, but no one was saying anything.

Everyone was angry, but simultaneously seemed to accept that this was just our new collective reality—waiting endlessly for Mr. Bigshot to film his scene, no matter what it cost any of us.

I began to wonder if we were all just going to live in this lobby forever.

* * *

This is how life in the United States feels to me now—like we're all trapped in a lobby, waiting for someone to let us go on with our lives.

Every day, I wake up and wonder why the hell we are collectively (if not individually) just agreeing to uphold the results of this election. I wonder, angrily, why powerbrokers have decided to allow Donald Trump to do so much damage, when it's clear his win was completely illegitimate.

I know there is no precedent or guide for vacating election results, but extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures.

It's not like Trump was fairly elected and is now just doing terrible things. He wasn't. That is clear. It becomes clearer every day, with each piece of breaking news, including the latest: The arrest of a contractor who leaked an NSA document detailing "Russian efforts to hack voting systems in the U.S a week prior to the 2016 presidential election."

It is just mindblowing to me, every minute of every day, that we're indulging this grand farce, especially when the president who assumed his office with zero legitimacy or credibility, is endangering this nation and its people.

I understand the reasons, intellectually. I have both the capacity and willingness to comprehend why this is happening, why there are so many people, including and especially the people with the power to alter this course, who are intransigently committed to trying to force this deeply abnormal square peg into a round hole of normalcy.

But I resent it. And I resist it.

I refuse to participate in the normalization of a presidency that simply should not be. And I reject the notion that there's some worthy objective to abet a national gaslighting, as a majority of us try to convince ourselves and each other that all of this makes sense.

It does not make sense. We have a colossally dangerous president doing reckless and hateful things, from a position he attained by nefarious means. And the only thing that makes sense is to stop that. To stop him.

Someone, from either party, who has the power to change the national conversation, to break this sickening spell, must step forward and say the thing that no one of prominence wants to say. Someone has to have the courage and the patriotism to be extraordinary in this extraordinary moment.

Someone has to get us all the fuck out of this lobby.

* * *

It had been a half hour, and still we were trapped. Still we were hearing it would just be five minutes: Be patient.

Maybe it was because I was sick, or maybe it's just who I am at my indelible core, but I refused to stand like a corralled sheep any longer. I pushed past the security guard and walked out the front door, straight onto the set, to the immediate sound of someone yelling, "Cut!"

The actor's face contorted into a scowl. "We're trying to shoot a film here!" he yelled at me.

I turned on my heel to face him. "I'm trying to live my life here!" I yelled back. I pivoted quickly and walked down the sidewalk toward my long-delayed destination.

My heart was pumping so hard I could hear my pulse in my ears. I expected someone to grab my shoulder from behind. But the only footsteps that came after me were those of the people pouring out of the lobby, leaving on their way to get on with the business of living their own lives.

Sometimes, all it takes to break a spell is one person refusing to be enchanted by it.

We need a patriot. Who is it going to be?

Open Wide...

Dispatches From the Queer Resistance (No. 3)

[Content Note: Homophobia, transbigotry, torture, terrorism.]

It's Pride Month, y'all. Was it only 150 days ago when we had a President who officially recognized Pride Month, and could speak coherently about this and other issues? Feels like a decade ago!

1) This is a periodic reminder that exit polls showed that 77% of LGBT people voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

2) Five years ago during Pride Month, prominent opponent of marriage equality David Blankenhorn publicly changed his opinion on same-sex marriage. In his New York Times reversal, he acknowledged that his side had failed to win public opinion on the issue and that much of the opposition to marriage equality stemmed from anti-gay animus, a fact that marriage equality advocates had been observing for years. Meanwhile, same-sex marriage advocates, at both the individual and organizational level, continued to battle onward and resist this animus.

Three years later in 2015, also during Pride Month, the US Supreme Court issued a decision effectively legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide (PDF). Two years have passed since that decision and many social conservative believe they have lost the so-called culture war on same-sex marriage, a loss they widely seem to experience as widespread acknowledgement that opposing marriage equality is bigotry. Most heterosexual Americans likely also understand that same-sex marriage has little tangible impact on their lives. The world is not ending! (Well.... maybe it is, but for other reasons).

However, I note two potential synergies that could swing the pendulum back in their favor. One, some anti-LGBT groups remain convinced that if they can get the right Supreme Court composition, SCOTUS will overturn the marriage equality precedent. For instance, this June, the anti-LGBT National Organization for Marriage (NOM) will hold a "March for Marriage" (which I'm intentionally not linking to) and the organization has vowed to not rest until same-sex marriage is repealed.

Secondly, Team Trump/Pence have shown a willingness to appoint radical conservatives to SCOTUS, and I believe that's largely Pence's doing. The Republican-controlled legislature has shown that they will rubber-stamp these picks no matter how out touch they might be with the mainstream.

Meanwhile, 64% of those in the US believe same-sex marriage should be legal, the highest percentage since Gallup began this tracking in 1998. Donald Trump's popularity has been hovering at under 40% since his inauguration. These numbers are a reminder that a deeply-unpopular President who lost the popular vote is in a position to play a key role in overturning a precedent that most people in the US support. With Republicans willing to use the "nuclear option" to confirm Trump Supreme Court picks with only a simply majority vote, Democrats must take back the Senate in 2018 - because of this issue and so many more.

3) Speaking of NOM, earlier this year, the organization launched a tour of its so-called Free Speech Bus. This bus was decorated with anti-trans, gender-essentialist messaging which seems to have been inspired by Kindergarten Cop-approved boys-have-a-penis, girls-have-a-vagina logic.

The messaging was provocative and, accordingly, NOM tracked every real and perceived act of counter-protest, which they spun into their usual narrative of how LGBT advocates are the real bullies. For instance, during the course of its tour, the bus was allegedly vandalized. On Twitter, NOM then asked "prominent LGBT leaders" to "condemn" the vandalism.

I'm not prominent, but I tweeted why I passed on issuing a condemnation. (Spoiler alert: I believe NOM's messaging contributes to an overall climate of hostility, which leads to violence toward and murder of trans people).

4)  Multiple news outlets have reported that gay men are being detained, tortured, and killed in Chechnya. Via The New York Times:

"A spokesman for Chechnya's leader, Ramzan Kadyrov, denied the report in a statement to Interfax on Saturday, calling the article 'absolute lies and disinformation."

'You cannot arrest or repress people who don't exist in the republic," the spokesman, Alvi Karimov, told the news agency.

'If such people existed in Chechnya, law enforcement would not have to worry about them, as their own relatives would have sent them to where they could never return,' Mr. Karimov said."
It's not exactly reassuring when a spokesman can't hide his eliminationist homobigotry during the course of denying that eliminationist homobigotry is occurring in his country.

In response, some countries - Lithuania and France among them - are opening their doors to gay men from Chechnya. The US has not. Ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, has called on Chechen authorities to investigate the allegations, ostensibly the same authorities who believe gay men don't exist and/or should be killed.

In fact, it's reported that these abuses are done under the auspices of the Chechen leader, with PinkNews reporting that Kadyrov wants gay men eliminated by the start of Ramadan, which was May 26th. (Note: Some media reports that these atrocities are committed on "LGBT people" without clarifying whether queer women and trans people are also being targeted. However, if gay men are targeted, it's likely that other LGBT people are as well.)

Donald Trump himself has not addressed these reports. Possibly related: Chechnya's leader is a close ally to Vladimir Putin. Here I note that a President Hillary Clinton and her administration might have offered more assistance in this situation. In fact, she has issued a condemnation. (But her emails, the misogyny, "establishment," etc.)

5) The first anniversary of the Pulse nightclub shooting will be next Monday, June 12. This terror attack was the deadliest hate crime against LGBT people in the US, killing 49 people, and the deadliest since 9/11. My thoughts are with the victims, their friends, and their families. I stand in solidarity with them, and with anyone who remains outraged, scared, and wounded by this tragedy

6) Ehhhh:

7) Via the National Center for Transgender Equality, Trump has appointed anti-LGBT activist Roger Severino as Director of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), in the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Severino was previously at the Heritage Foundation, where he "authored a report opposing OCR's implementation of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex in federally funded health programs."

Just another example of a Trump appointment placed in a position to enforce an agency's work who seems to fundamentally disagree with that work.

8) This weekend, instead of a Pride Parade, a Resist March will be held in LA:
"We are calling on everyone to peacefully march with us on June 11th from Hollywood and Highland to West Hollywood. Instead of a Pride Parade meant to celebrate our past progress, we are going to march to ensure all our futures. Just as we did in 1970's first LGBTQ+ Pride, we are going to march in unity with those who believe that America's strength is its diversity. Not just LGBTQ+ people but all Americans and dreamers will be wrapped in the Rainbow Flag and our unique, diverse, intersectional voices will come together in one harmonized proclamation."
In conclusion, Donald Trump and Shadow President Mike Pence are scary fucking dudes. If you're attending or marching in a Pride Parade this year, we have a lot to protest and resist!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Hosted by a turquoise sofa. Have a seat and chat.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What was your last home improvement project, and what is next on your list?

Over the weekend, we got a few prints hung, and we put together a shoe rack for the front entryway, to organize the tumble of shoes that resides there. Next on the list is organizing the garage. UGH.

Open Wide...

The Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by ice cream cones.

Recommended Reading:

Marilee Talkington: "Let. Her. Speak. Please!"

Emily Q. Hazzard: [Content Note: Racism; racist slur; Islamophobia; transphobia; misogyny] Bill Maher Has Been a Public Racist for a Long Time. Here Are the Receipts.

Vivian Kane: [CN: Sexual violence] As Bill Cosby's Trial Begins, Let's Remember That Rape Should Not Have a Statute of Limitations

Ciaran Thapar: [CN: Racism; discussion of racial slur] "What's the Word P*ki Between Friends?"

Dr. Chanda Prescod-Weinstein: [CN: Misogyny; white and cis centrism; erasure] Curiosity and the End of Discrimination

Monica Roberts: Pittsburgh (and Philadelphia) Voted For Hillary, Not 45

Kaitlyn Tiffany: Wonder Woman Is a Box Office Giant

Leave your links and recommendations in comments. Self-promotion welcome and encouraged!

Open Wide...

Trump Is Toxic: Ambassador Quits Over Climate Policy

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link.]

Elise Labott, Zachary Cohen, and Michelle Kosinski at CNN: Acting US Ambassador to China Quit Over Trump Climate Decision.

Acting US ambassador to China David Rank resigned from his post in Beijing over [Donald] Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, several sources familiar with the decision told CNN.

A career foreign service officer since 1990, Rank assumed the position of deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Beijing in January 2016 and had been serving until the arrival of Trump's pick for the job, former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who was confirmed by Congress late last month.

Rank has served in several senior positions within the US State Department including time as the director of the office of Afghanistan affairs and as a senior adviser to the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"Mr. Rank made a personal decision," a senior State Department official told CNN, stopping short of citing the climate deal developments as the reason. "We appreciate his years of dedicated service to the State Department."

But sources familiar with the decision indicated that Rank's departure is directly tied to Trump's controversial move to pull out of the accord.
Whether he's actively warring with members of his own administration, or alienating career bureaucrats who will not be associated with his extremist policies, the long and the short of it is that Trump is toxic, and it's a big problem for all of us that principled people want nothing to do with his presidency.

Open Wide...

Fatsronauts 101: Gaslighting the Mocked

[Content Note: Fat hatred; body shaming; invasion of privacy; threats.]

As you may recall, last year, a woman named Dani Mathers, who had a large social media following by virtue of having been a Playboy model, took a photo of a naked 70-year-old woman in the locker room of a gym, then posted it on Snapchat next to a photo of herself giggling with the caption, "If I can't unsee this then neither can you."

After massive blowback, Mathers claimed she had only meant to send it privately to a friend and shared it publicly by mistake. Oh.

This public fat-shaming was not only profoundly unethical and cruel, but it was also illegal—and Mathers recently pleaded no contest to invasion of privacy charges, for which she'll have to complete 30 days of community service. She also received three years probation.

Now Mathers is doing a round of media, because of course she is, to talk about how she's been victimized (she has gotten death threats, which I condemn without qualification) and also to whine about how she never intended to hurt the woman that she victimized.

"I didn't have an intention of breaking a law. I just wasn't thinking, to be honest," she said, noting that she meant to send the photo privately to a friend. "My intention was to reply to the conversation I was having with my friend. I know the difference between right and wrong and I chose wrong."

Mathers told ABC that she has never met the woman involved, although she has wanted to apologize in person.

"I never meant to hurt her," she said. "I never ever intended on showing the world this photo … I hope that she could forgive me."

"I just want her to be able to move on and move forward in her life and not feel judged or that she what she was doing was being ridiculed, because it had nothing to do with that and I'm so sorry," Mathers told ABC.
This is the same sad refrain we've heard from thin people getting caught fat-shaming over and over. That they didn't intend to hurt anyone; that what they were doing didn't have anything to do with judgment or ridicule.

Bullshit it didn't.

Time and again, people who are fat-shamed are revictimized by their abusers, who insist that what they were doing wasn't really what it seemed. As if we don't know. As if we haven't been subjected to the same disgusting fat-hatred and shaming our entire fat lives.

They abuse us, then gaslight us—trading on the ubiquitous narrative that fat people aren't that bright.

I cannot begin to sufficiently convey the profundity of my contempt for people who fat-shame and then implicitly accuse the fat people who call that shit out of being too stupid to understand what really happened, trying to convince us they're not actually fat-haters, even as they leverage the cultural fat hatred that marks fat people as stupid in order to get away with harming us.

Suffice it to say, if your play after getting caught fat-shaming is to claim that "no judgment or ridicule was intended," I'm not convinced that you care about harming fat people.

If you want me to believe that, then the place to start is admitting what you did, and frankly addressing that it was intended to harm, and forthrightly discussing your own anti-fat biases.

Because, I gotta tell ya: Not only are fat people not as stupid as you think, but y'all fat-haters aren't as clever as you think. We are well aware of all the judgment and ridicule that has happened at our backs.

We know what it looks like and what it sounds like. We recognize it clear as day, even if you won't.

Open Wide...

I'm with Stacey

Hey, remember how I mentioned that Georgia House Democratic minority leader Stacey Abrams was exploring a bid to run for governor of Georgia? Well, this weekend she made it official! She's running!


There is a nice write-up of Abrams by Vanessa Williams in the Washington Post: Georgia Democrat Aims to Be Nation's First Female African American Governor.
Abrams, a Yale-trained lawyer and business executive who writes romance novels on the side, has an army of supporters across the country eager to prove Democrats can win if the party puts its energy into expanding its base among the increasingly diverse state population rather than fretting over white swing voters. That is what Abrams has tried to do as founder of an organization that says it has registered 200,000 new voters in Georgia — along with her work in the state's House, often while cooperating with Republicans on key legislation and policies — has made her popular with progressives who say the party should rebuild and strengthen the coalition that elected and reelected President Barack Obama.

..."Democrats in the South have to reject the notion that our geography requires that politicians soften our commitment to equality and opportunity and that you have to look a certain way," Abrams said in an interview Friday. "We have to be architects of progressive solutions, and that means leadership that believes we can defy the odds. I believe Democrats have the ability to win, because we have the votes."
Emphasis mine.

I don't have any personal connection to Georgia (aside from friends who live there); I just really like Stacey Abrams and I am going to support her in any way I can! She is exactly the sort of politician we all need to support, no matter where we live, to build national leadership for the future we want to see.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose of Cute

Ms. Zelda McEwan had an especially cute few days this weekend.


[If you can't view the images embedded in the tweets, they are, respectively: 1. Zelda the Black and Tan Mutt running toward me in the garden with a big grin on her face; 2. Zelda snuggling with Deeky; 3. Zelda sitting in the grass. The image of Deeks shared with his permission.]

As always, please feel welcome and encouraged to share pix of the fuzzy, feathered, or scaled members of your family in comments.

Open Wide...

Back |