1 – 2 of 2
Blogger Tara Rabeumdeay said...

Say - you remember writing this?

http://www.kirkdorffer.com/ontheroadto2008/2005/01/wave-of-compassion.shtml

Specifically (you were referring to the tsunami disaster at the end of 2004):

"Until yesterday's ten-fold increase of monetary aid, we were pledging less money that George Bush planned to spend on his own (totally unnecessary) re-inauguration, expected to cost tax payers $40 million."

Just wondering - you have any plans to discuss the upcoming $150M inauguration?

Just curious -

1/14/2009 6:13 PM

Blogger Daniel Kirkdorffer said...

The short answer is yes.

If this is a roundabout way of suggesting that Bush's re-election inauguration equates to Obama's inauguration in excess, while the number is definitely high, my question was why do we need a re-inauguration event of any magnitude.

Today, for example was Chris Gregoire's re-inauguration event as Governor of Washington State. The cost is being paid for mainly from the tickets sold to attend. But re-inauguration events don't need to be such a big deal IMO.

You tell me what part of the cost you don't think is warranted in this case, and what part would be.

1/14/2009 6:23 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

This blog does not allow anonymous comments.

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot