Monday, June 05, 2017
Ambassador Utaiba's charm?
Royal competition
This is significant
This is what is odd
When did the US learn of the UAE-Saudi scheme?
Israeli analysis of Arab affairs
The code word of Saudi propaganda in the West
Sunday, June 04, 2017
Is Saudi regime almost declaring war on Qatar??
Do you notice that US diplomats and pundits are more protective of House of Saud than...House of Saudi?
US-led coalition admits killing at least 484 civilians in Syria & Iraq
Israelis shot & then taunt dying Palestinian girl
BBC Arabic
There is a full scale revolt in Morocco's rural areas and you would not know it in Western media
The New York Times articles about an Israel plan to drop a nuclear bomb on Arabs
1) It gives a free justification for the use of a nuclear weapon. Can you imagine this justification is given to Iranian plan?
"Israel, fearful for its existence, rushed to complete its first atomic device on the eve of the Arab-Israeli war. But the planned demonstration remained secret in a country where it is taboo to discuss even half-century-old nuclear plans, and where fears persist that Iran will eventually obtain a nuclear weapon, despite its deal with world powers."
2) It even makes it sound like a non-existent Iranian weapon is scarier than an actual Israeli nuclear weapon.
A New York Times writer calls the story of Israeli plan to detonate a nuclear bomb "fascinating"
Are we now reading paid UAE/Saudi advertisement in the Western press?
All kidding aside, is there today a more original thinker than this guy? Serious.
AUB (@AUB_Lebanon) | |
"Follow your dreams, not solely looking into yourself, but look around you" @DrFadloKhuri #AUB #aubgrad17 pic.twitter.com/kt1ztkSffw
|
A new recruit in Saudi regime media
The worst part of the UAE embassy leak?
Saturday, June 03, 2017
zbigniew brzezinski and Jihadi Islam
Wonder Woman
Regarding the controversy (in the Arab world but not in the US) about the new Wonder Woman movie:
It is rather significant that there is no controversy about the movie in the West as there is in the Arab world. It seems to me that had Hollywood recruited a Hizbaullah or Hamas fighter to play the lead female role, there would have been protests in Western capitals. If Hollywood were to have assigned the role to a soldier in the apartheid South African army (a close ally of Israel at the time) there would have been wide protests as well. But this is Israel, which has a special place--in Hollywood and in the rest of the US.
There is little redeeming artistic value in those action movies--there is little artistic value in what comes out of Hollywood.
The feminist enthusiasm about the movie is in explicable to me. I understand that finally the "super hero" is a woman. But is Hollywood the best place to look for gender equity in, when it is a place which represents gender inequity at every level of the business? And if feminists welcome a Hollywood product, would they run the risk of legitimizing the rest of Hollywood production which is invariably sexist and misogynistic?
Let us say that we accept the argument that for once a super action female heroine is the star and that this is delightful: and regarding what Americans call "the role model" thing. Should little girls be looking for role models in Hollywood and in the world of comic action heroes? Would the cause of feminism not be better served if little girls are acquainted with real "wonder women" in real life, and who are real people who do heroic things ever day of their lives--and without having to jump from high building? And those real "wonder women" are rarely if ever portrayed or covered or promoted or featured in Hollywood or in popular culture, and if they are their contributions are rather distorted or minimized.
I think in inculcating little girls and boys with feminist values it should be stressed that Hollywood is the place where patriarchy and misogyny are perpetuated and that girls and boys should be insulated from the messages of those movies, and trained to deconstruct them. For every "Wonder Woman" movie--and I certainly doubt that there is a feminist agenda in the movie--there are many more lousy sexist movies out there.
There is a sinister message in having to recruit--from all the women of the world--an occupation soldier to play the female lead, while they never had to do that for the male action heroes. This tells something rather sexist--and even racist--about the standards employed in the casting of this female lead.
Friday, June 02, 2017
Israel main cause of Palestinian suffering, UN says
Middle East Institute propaganda; ISIS is actually Iranian Shi`ite: here is their evidence
The Zionist-Saudi alliance is so close that it is almost touching
South Korea
Iranian election fraud
"Hard-line Rouhani foe claims election fraud". Why could it not be serious?