Timorese journalists must be set free to protect country’s fledgling media

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 7 years ago

Timorese journalists must be set free to protect country’s fledgling media

By Peter Greste

Press freedom is a fragile thing. Those of us who live in established democracies tend to take it for granted, as if it is always going to be there without thought or defence. It appears deep-rooted, with long-standing traditions and norms.

And although an untrammelled media can look pretty messy and undignified (witness the recent coverage of Schapelle Corby's return to Australia), those who live with it generally recognise that a media free to investigate the powerful, host open debates and arguments and keep public conversations going is essential to a healthy democracy.

Lourenco Vicente Martins and Raimundos Oki.

Lourenco Vicente Martins and Raimundos Oki.Credit: Facebook

It is hard to imagine life without it.

But it turns out free press is a rarity. Earlier this year the pro-democracy group Freedom House found that globally, press freedom is the worst it has been in the past 13 years, and it is continuing to slide in the wrong direction.

Timorese journalists have been supported by public in East Timor.

Timorese journalists have been supported by public in East Timor.Credit: IFJ

It is one reason we need to nurture it wherever it appears to be blossoming, and protect it when it is in danger or being threatened.

On Thursday in Timor-Leste, two journalists, Oki Raymundos and his former boss Lourenco Vicente Martins, will appear in court to learn the outcome of their long-running trial for "slanderous denunciation" of the Prime Minister Rui Aria de Araujo. A more accurate though less literal translation would be "criminal defamation", and it carries a sentence of up to three years in jail.

The case relates to an article Raymundos wrote and Martins published in the Timor Post in 2015, about a government tender for IT services when the Prime Minister was working in his previous capacity as an advisor to the Ministry of Finance. De Araujo recommended an Indonesian company for the work, but the Council of Ministers awarded it to a different company. De Araujo said the Post wrongly reported the company he was supporting.

The error might have been sloppy journalism, but it was hardly defamatory. A few days later, the newspaper published the Prime Minister's reply on the front page and then published a clarification, in line with both professional ethics and Timor-Leste's own media law. Martins then resigned as editor.

Advertisement

Most public officials would have left it at that and moved on. But De Araujo said he presented the facts to the prosecutor "as a Timorese citizen" and the prosecutor then independently chose to proceed with the criminal case.

The Committee to Protect Journalists, Freedom House and the International Federation of Journalists have all written to the Prime Minister and urged him to use his authority to stop the case and protect the country's journalists from judicial and political intimidation.

De Araujo replied, saying that as an offended person, he has no control over the way the prosecutor chooses to proceed. On Tuesday, he wrote a last-minute letter to the judges, calling for them to refrain from issuing prison sentences.

That is a positive step forward, but if the judges are as independent as the Prime Minister says, the letter changes nothing other than giving him an excuse to say he did his best.

Simply by writing though, De Araujo has recognised that neither justice nor press freedom is served by continuing the case. The only way he can guarantee both is by withdrawing the charges all together.

Nobody is disputing the fact the paper made a mistake, but by treating it as a criminal offence, the government appears to be using the law as a cudgel to bludgeon Timor-Leste's fledgling media and avoid the kind of criticism and oversight that a healthy democracy demands.

A free press is a flawed machine, and it will inevitably stumble, but the law is there to keep it in check, rather than intimidate and suppress it.

Loading

Timor-Leste has had a proud and relatively trouble-free birth as a new state, but these kinds of attacks run the risk of unravelling one of the most important institutions in a functioning democracy before it's even had a chance to get working.

Peter Greste is an award-winning foreign correspondent.

Most Viewed in National

Loading