Angry constituent gives Mitch McConnell the what forpic.twitter.com/tyHseJVtqd
-
-
-
Crowd erupts at Joni Ernst event in rural Iowapic.twitter.com/cSd829Q4YC
-
Crowd asks Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR) to investigate Trump/Russia. Wait for it...pic.twitter.com/4siV7A0cOR
-
Handy! Video generator—Pick a politician, watch them get yelled at by average Joes/Janes http://wapo.st/2m7Qgan via
@pbump includes GOP/DEM -
Spicer says angry town halls are partly “professional” protesters: “Just because they’re loud doesn’t necessarily mean there are many”pic.twitter.com/CxIQ0IIwh6
-
Angry crowd shouts down GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy at Louisiana town hallpic.twitter.com/wnl76Jm5yu
-
Woman at Tom Cotton's town hall just asked anyone affected by Obamacare to stand up. Basically the whole crowd got up.pic.twitter.com/gL4p7DH9Qf
-
Woman at Tom Cotton town hall: “We’re going Medicare MY way. Not your way. My way. I’ve got a husband DYING.”pic.twitter.com/fHF9nbyqiB
- 8 ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು
-
-
-
#EconomicTerrorismIsRepealingACA Repealing Obamacare Would Add $353 billion 2 Deficit. TREASONOUS-GOPhttp://fortune.com/2015/06/19/obamacare-repeal-cost/ … -
TreasonousTrump hasn't paid taxes over 19yrs. How much insurance would 3 million: https://twitter.com/rajoro/status/
-
#TraitorsTrump & Republican politicians wallets are full of rushing cash. WTF Dare to repeal ObamaCare.https://twitter.com/funder/status/833824650706690048 … -
Congress should be on
#Obamacare - watch it get full support REAL FAST!pic.twitter.com/MU66Hm5ytT -
The very idea that we pay for Congress to be insured, but they deny constituents the same coverage is wrong
-
The most wretched idea GOP receive money from lobbyists, Russia, oil companies & NRA. Want to repeal ACA. WTF
-
-
-
@Darla_Mercado Soooo making it unaffordable for the rest of us is the answer? Didn't we learn two wrongs don't make a right -
A solution that gives you lower premiums in return for even higher deductibles isn’t necessarily the answer either.
-
Disagree. Hi-deduct plans bring consumer accountability to smaller costs while still covering catastrophic loss
-
In theory. In reality, people go to the doctor less often under these plans. And shopping for lower cost is tough in emergencies.
-
perhaps they should go less often. Part of problem with old $50 co-pay plan was too many running to Doctor with a sniffle
-
I'm a bigger fan of having other resources for those folks with more immediate needs: clinics and remote access to nurses.
-
As in, not all medical needs are pressing. There are svcs that a nurse practitioner can handle w/o a doctor.
-
and at lower cost to consumer. I see nurse practitioner more than my Doctor for wellness etc
- 2 ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು
-
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.