Preskoči na sadržaj

Mar-a-Lago gets promotional blog posts on government websites

Politics 24. travnja 2017.
Much has been made over the President Trump's penchant for conducting government matters at the Florida club he owns, and now the State Department-run Share America site has published a lengthy article on Mar-a-Lago that some believe reads like an advertisement. UPDATE: The Share America post has been removed.

Not 100% sure why today was the day this State Dept post from Apr. 4 on Mar a Lago went viral but boy are folks mad

20 replies 196 proslijeđenih tweetova 327 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
441 reply 3.905 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.315 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci

Update: State Dept. spokesman says he doesn't know why the State Dept. posted this about Trump's for-profit business

90 replies 634 proslijeđena tweeta 658 korisnika označava da im se sviđa

The should not be using their resources―funded by taxpayers―to promote Trump's $25 million vacation home. This is absurd.

69 replies 868 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.535 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci
8 replies 412 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.026 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima
15 replies 45 proslijeđenih tweetova 96 korisnika označava da im se sviđa

Sooo, wrote about how "The State Department Wrote About Mar-A-Lago And People Are Not Happy"

71 proslijeđeni tweet 108 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima

... but this misses the fact that a government website referred to Trump's use of Mar-a-Lago as "a dream deferred."

16 replies 88 proslijeđenih tweetova 179 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci

the fate of Mar-a-Lago is pretty far from what Hughes had in mind when he wrote "a dream deferred"

43 proslijeđena tweeta 123 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
1 reply 19 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci

Share America is meant to explain America to the world. A group of staff writers explain Americana to the world

1 reply 16 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci

These are not "news" items so they aren't reviewed by a press officer who would look out for such concerns.

1 reply 10 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisniku/ci

In a large office the staff are trusted to make decisions and I can see how "let's tell the backstory of Mar-a-lago" seemed like a good idea

12 proslijeđenih tweetova 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima

no evidence that anyone at State is directing Mar-a-lago be promoted & the lack of a leadership to exercise oversight is well documented

14 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima

It was an error in judgement, but the White House has done much more to create this as "normal" than one writer at

1 reply 22 proslijeđena tweeta 55 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima

Attn is important here but more important is not to assign malicious intent to what may just be an error

6 replies 13 proslijeđenih tweetova 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
Odgovor korisnicima

The fact that Trump has put staff in this position is the real problem.

7 replies 31 proslijeđeni tweet 140 korisnika označava da im se sviđa

. article on Mar-A-Lago has been taken down: "The intention of the article was to inform the public..."

626 proslijeđenih tweetova 884 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa