Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:


Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Draft:David Carlson (artist)[edit]

User:Tonya.howe. Howe 13:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Diffuse Capillary Malformation with Overgrowth (DCMO)[edit]

I, Derm2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Derm2014 (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Didn't have time to finish edits previously, now want a chance to revamp article to make a final submission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derm2014 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Turntablist transcription methodology[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —68.194.62.249 (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC) The Turntablist Transcription Methodology is a notation for dj music that has been recognized by musicians around the world as well as various media outlets. It has been featured on the hit show CSI, BlackBook Magazine, XLR8R Magaizine, as well as the internationally distributed feature film called "Scratch" the movie directed by Doug Pray released in 2001. After having been feature in numerous publications, articles, websites and films over the years, it is tragic that Wikipedia admin "Courcelles" chose to delete the page for being "non-notable". The system was first released in a book format on February 17th 2000 in front of a audience at Symphony Space in New York City.

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
@Plutonium27: since you endorsed the original prod, you may want to propose this at AFD if you are unconvinced by the comment above. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parijat Chandra[edit]

I, Jai0505, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jai0505 (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jai0505: The page has been restored to Draft:Parijat Chandra.
Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Three user pages[edit]

(I'm posting all three here in order not to spam the page - hope you're OK with that).

Hello. A few days ago I requested that my user pages be deleted. Coming to think of it, two (three) of them are actually useful additions to WP that could be finished within a few hours, 2 days max, and posted to readers' benefit. Plus, I wouldn't consider the time that I spent on writing them wasted. Sorry for the inconvenience.

If it's relevant, 'Dutch vowels' and 'Dutch recordings' are meant to massively improve Dutch phonology, which has sourcing problems (and then also Help:IPA for Dutch), whereas 'Differences from other accents' will improve the section on the pronunciation of Cardiff English.

There are also two other articles that were deleted, but there's no point in restoring them. Mr KEBAB (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Mr KEBAB: Yes check.svg Done, those three pages are restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Michieldewit/sandbox/New tab page[edit]

I, Michieldewit, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Michieldewit (talk) 15:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Melanie Williamson[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Redwatermelon (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I am not sure why this page was deleted. I have reached out to the person who deleted it, and I am waiting to hear back. I came to update content about the subject, on current events, with verified links, and the page was gone. Please help me restore this page, it was deleted by error or with-out full consideration. This is my formal request to restore the page.

@Redwatermelon: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
The article has many problems, as indicated by all the notices at the top. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rick G. Nelson[edit]

I, Jessemansfield2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jessemansfield2014 (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jessemansfield2014: This has already been restored twice, without you working on it. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Knowledge acquisition (philosophy)[edit]

Please restore it to Draft:Knowledge acquisition (philosophy). —Fixuture (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Fixuture: Please ask the deleting admin Kurykh if that's OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
@Kurykh: Could you please restore it to draftspace? --Fixuture (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
@Fixuture: Yes check.svg Done. --Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Princeton - Blairstown Center[edit]

I, Tbarnold, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tbarnold (talk) 22:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Lapse in time —Tbarnold (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Ikiebe[edit]

I, 7ru57, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 7ru57 (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Gridware[edit]

It is for a company profile which is completely permissible and accurate content. The grounds for deletion were not sufficiently reasonable in the circumstances. —Gavinmcdowell (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Gavinmcdowell: Wikipedia doesn't include articles that have content merely "permissible" and "accurate". Topics must meet notability criteria for inclusion. Not only did your article fail even to state why the company is significant, but it also include zero evidence of coverage in reliable independent sources of national scope as required by WP:CORP. So yes, the grounds for deletion were reasonable and justified. Therefore:
X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user BigHaz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
@Gavinmcdowell: I suggest you use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit a draft for review, instead of attempting to write the article in main space where it would be quickly deleted. Also see Wikipedia:Golden Rule to get a brief overview of what we expect in articles before they can be accepted in main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

User_talk:121.54.32.0 (2nd request)[edit]

Here's the account like you asked. Nobodycaneverherehimcall (talk) 00:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Nobodycaneverherehimcall: If you get yourself unblocked, you may re-request userfication of that page to your sandbox. As long as you're blocked, though, there isn't much point in restoring it. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Capital Novus[edit]

i am collecting and make proper content of this page so "Save page" button below —Abid2310 (talk) 03:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I, Abid2310, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abid2310 (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. @Abid2310: The article was not deleted under CSD G13, it was deleted under CSD G11 and CSD G12 (unambiguous promotion and copyright infringement, respectively), and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request. Please start over in draft space, at Draft:Capital Novus, and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Celiveo[edit]

No reasoning given. Testagaia (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Open Access in Angola and Benin[edit]

the articles were properly quoted under cc by UNESCO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippo Morsiani (talk • contribs) 08:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Filippo Morsiani: Nothing was quoted with attribution, it was simply copied and pasted. Please point out where the Creative Commons license is stated on the UNESCO website. I don't see it on the pages that were copied, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/africa/angola/ or http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/africa/benin/ . ~Anachronist (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Please refer to this page

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/

just scroll down at the bottom,

Please let me know if this is enough or not ~Filippo Morsiani

User: Patient Zero[edit]

I'm back again. —Patient Zerotalk 09:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Welcome back. Regards SoWhy 09:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, SoWhy. :-) Patient Zerotalk 09:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Bathymodiolus platifrons[edit]

This isn't strictly an undeletion request, I'd just like to know who created the original article which was deleted as G7. I've since recreated it (as I saw the article before it was deleted), but I'd like to know who the author was. Cheers. —Laurdecl talk 11:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Laurdecl: I have restored the contribution history so you can see for yourself. The original author requested that it be deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Todd_Schroeder[edit]

I, Stevenlevine1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenlevine1 (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Wishing Well Pictures[edit]

I, Kent at wwp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kent at wwp (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Better Left Said[edit]

I, Kent at wwp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kent at wwp (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clifford Henry Fitzherbert Plowman[edit]

Heraldic (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thomas London[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Wikibussster (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC) The Author Page for Thomas London was deleted because only one source cited him. I have collected over 25 different news media mentions, as well as an IMDB page and would like the page reinstated to build it back out. Thank you.

@Wikibussster: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
And also nominated for speedy deletion since the subject is definitely not notable, and appears to have produced only self-published works sold on Amazon. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division by zero[edit]

This page should be restored as it was it was tagged with Template:Humorus but was still deleted as a hoax. —-KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I've restored it as a harmless non-mainspace page. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Touriosity Travelmag[edit]

I, Paritoshnandi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paritoshnandi (talk) 07:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry since it was resubmitted and rejected. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Remove kebab[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —49.151.166.122 (talk) 13:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

There was no content, it was just a redirect to Srebrenica massacre but I restored it anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Austrian Aviation Museum[edit]

I, Gert Haussner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gert Haussner (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Gert Haussner: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

User_talk:121.54.32.0 (3rd request)[edit]

How about a different account? Nobodycaneverherehimcall (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Nope. WP:Block evasion, which you are doing now, and would be doing with another account, isn't tolerated here. Get yourself unblocked first. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Insurify[edit]

I would appreciate having a copy of the draft for my personal records. Looks like the page was deleted under G13. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Todkiry (talk • contribs) 21:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Todkiry: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
You have another six months to improve it and resubmit for review, if you like. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thad Roberts[edit]

Thad Roberts Quantum Space Theory is just about to become accepted in the established physics community. His TEDxTalk has almost 1 Mio. views and the deletion of his Wikipedia entry has been premature, most probably by somebody jealous or with negative intent —Soaring (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

  • No, not at all, it was deleted by clear community consensus by our set policies, and so it was closed as delete. It would especially if you show us what substance you'll use for a new article, so we can gauge the chances. "1 million views" is not quite what convinces us. SwisterTwister talk 17:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  • SwisterTwister is correct. X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thad Roberts, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
    Also, if you contact me, please do not start off with unsupported accusations of bad faith towards other editors, thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Scepter Publishers[edit]

Would like historical content to rewrite in adherence to Wikipedia standards using Wizard & 3rd party editor in collaborative manner. Thank you. LesTP 20:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Sjb72 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
@LesTP: I suggest you ask the deleting administrator if he or she would be willing to restore it to draft space for improvement. If it were restored to main space, it would be quickly deleted again, because there is no credible assertion of significance made in the article, and no coverage by independent reliable sources as required by WP:CORP. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist Thank you. I have done as you suggested. Thank you. LesTP 21:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LesTP (talk • contribs)

Shadab Siddiqui[edit]

he is directed 6 short films and now he is going to direct movie so please do not delete this page —Theimagemotion (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Theimagemotion: did you even read the message in the big blue box at the top of this page? The article isn't deleted, and this page isn't for contesting a pending deletion. Go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadab Siddiqui for that. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Blaine Graboyes[edit]

I, AhNjom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AhNjom (talk) 00:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Insonic[edit]

I am learning how to use this system. I just would like to create an entry for my work as musical producer. My website is at http://www.insonicmusic.com and I already released 2 albuns, that is at many stores and spotify too. I stoped writing to assist my childs for 30 minutes, and when I came back the article was removed. Where can I start please ? Some links about me: [1] [2] —Mcezzare (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Mcezzare

References

  1. ^ http://www.insonicmusic
  2. ^ https://open.spotify.com/album/6dcZPsxQmeSTCPrLsfRV0p
@Mcezzare: Because you have a conflict of interest about yourself (see WP:COI for guidance) you should not be writing an article about yourself in main space. You should use your sandbox or draft space, and submit your article for review by someone who doesn't have a conflict, before it can be accepted in to main article space.
A glaring problem is that those links aren't "about" you, they are created by you. We need significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of you. See Wikipedia:Golden Rule for more information.
In the meantime, I have moved your article to Draft:Insonic for you to work on it further. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
@Mcezzare: Furthermore, in addition to the requirement for significant coverage by independent reliable sources, we have additional criteria for inclusion at WP:MUSICBIO. If you don't meet any of them, then we cannot publish an article about you or your work. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Olga Prokopova[edit]

I ask you to revise the deletion of the page Olga Prokopova. I read about copyright infringement, and I can assert that the article I created is original and does not violate copyrights. I wrote to the administrator who deleted the page Olga Prokopova, he did not answer me —Marino Asler (talk) 12:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

@Marino Asler: X mark.svg Not done, because the article exists. Since you have re-created the article, I decline to restore the deleted revisions that were problematic. The article still appears to have some sentences or phrases copied from http://www.volhajewelry.com/info/ although I agree it's minimal. I am not convinced, however, that the topic merits an article here, so I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Prokopova.
Of greater concern is your association with Olga Prokopova, given that your first two attempts at creating this article suggest that you have a conflict of interest. Be aware that you are required to disclose your association; this is mandatory, not negotiable, and you entered in a legal obligation to do so when you created an account here. See WP:PAID for details of disclosure. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Waleed Hassan[edit]

I, Wwhoami, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wwhoami (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Jim gee and the revolution[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jimbogeer (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC) punk band uk swindon Wiltshire to be listed

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Ritchie333 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, @Jimbogeer: since you seem to have an association with the topic, you should really be working on this in your sandbox or in draft space, not main article space. See Wikipedia:Golden Rule and also WP:BAND to get an idea of what's required before the band merits an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Daphne Lantier/sandbox[edit]

This had a list of books I'm planning on reading, some of which need articles. I was concerned that I wouldn't be able to find good sources for these, but I think I'd still like to try after more consideration. Thanks. —Daphne Lantier 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

@Daphne Lantier: Yes check.svg Done, sandbox restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Daphne Lantier/Reading List 2017–2018[edit]

As per the above request for my sandbox being restored, which was done by Anachronist. I just figured out that it was in fact this page I needed restored. The sandbox is useful too so I'd like to keep that. —Daphne Lantier 00:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, page restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi[edit]

Reliable sources has been added for confirmation —47.247.1.28 (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

So? Did you read the blue box at the top of this page? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

SARP Honorary Award[edit]

I originally prodded it 2 years back. Now I have seconds thought and I think this may be a notable award. Awarding of this award has been often covered by the main Polish daily: [1]. This IMHO makes it notable. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

draft article on Confucius Statue[edit]

==[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Frances Di Lauro 11:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

draft article on Confucius Statue[edit]

draft article on Confucius Statue[edit]

I, Fcia0423, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frances Di Lauro 11:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial[edit]

I, Fcia0423, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frances Di Lauro 11:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Vuevent[edit]

==[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jderocher (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=774774550"