I just saw another of those endless inane articles about how Austen could never have imagined that Pride and Prejudice would be super famous, nobody could have imagined it!!!! humble little Aunt Jane, scribbling away, and now she’s—
Sure, the meek and/or acerbic spinster aunt working quietly away, underappreciated by the world, consumed by the Art, is a nice romantic story. But it’s not … you know, what actually happened.
The most mindboggling thing I learned about USAmericans during my two-week stay in Minnesotta was the fact that in their menus they call the main dishes “entrées” ????
AS AN AMERICAN I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY THIS IS CONFUSING???
also you went to Minnesota omg THE UPPER MIDWEST. YOU WERE AMONG MY PEOPLE. I HOPE THEY WERE NICE TO YOU
nice is what Minnesota is known for so if they were not they have failed at their One JobDunno about anyone else but in Australia “ entrées” means first course, then main, then dessert. If you’re calling your mains entrees, that explains quite a lot…
Literally, the ENTRY to your meal. How it ended up meaning the main, middle bit of the meal in the US baffles me.
I did not know this was a thing.
Ah. That makes sense. Basically: dining habits changed, and American and British English changed in different ways to describe them.
(Acknowledgement: everything that follows is just me summarising Wikipedia.)
The entrée used to be the first substantial course(s) served after the warm-up dishes but before the main roast. As meals shrank from lots of courses down to just three, Americans kept the term to mean ‘the substantial course” whereas the English kept the term to mean “the course before the really substantial course”.
And it’s called the entrée because this dish used to make a grand entry from the kitchen and be paraded in front of the all the diners.