The Economist认证账号

@EconUS

Official posts from The Economist's US correspondents. Subscribe to our podcast on the 2016 presidential election

Washington
加入于2009年4月

@EconUS 已被屏蔽

确定要查看这些推文吗? 查看推文不会取消屏蔽 @EconUS。

  1. With his threats against Clinton, Trump took a step down a dark road that every American should renounce

  2. With his threats against his opponent, Donald Trump reached a lamentable milestone

  3. How would Latin America respond to a President Trump’s blustering and protectionism?

  4. Trump's vote share is sinking (esp.among white women). The debate performance will do little to change that.

  5. This debate wasn't a turning point. The genital-grabbing tape may yet be.

  6. HRC says we need energy independence, climate's a problem, help the miners. And THAT's the best the environ gets in this election. Just dire

  7. Talking up his poss SC nominees, Trump says they've been 'beautifully reviewed'; not that they're conservative. Almost never uses the word.

  8. Election brief: Clinton’s environmental plans are pragmatic. Trump’s are non-existent

  9. This election could determine the shape of the Supreme Court for a generation

  10. It is perilously hard to criticise Donald Trump without seeming to insult his voters

  11. Did Trump just says Russia is a flash new nuclear power with all the latest nuclear gizmos? I really think he did.

  12. Clinton's position almost impossible: respond to every lie or let them stand, get into the gutter or don't--either way, Trump sets the terms

  13. "It's a wonderful charge, I love depreciation--she's given it to us..." Total gibberish

  14. Trump says "I love depreciation" b/c this provision in the tax code is very generous to real-estate investors

  15. Trump: 'She talks about health care, she didn't do anything about it...' Well, to be scrupulously fair, she did try quite hard once

  16. Over half the electorate now have a "very unfavourable" view of Trump.

  17. Trump's finances are the murkiest of any candidate. Our analysis of his $916m loss

  18. The 15% rate Donald Trump would offer partnerships is *lower* that that carried-interest loophole currently allows

  19. Carried interest is a complete smokescreen. Trump tax plan gives huge tax cuts to rich

  20. Our assessment of Clinton and Trump's fiscal policies. One's fiddly, the other absurd

加载推文似乎需要更多时间。

Twitter 可能超载或出现了暂时故障。重试或访问 Twitter 状态以了解更多信息。

    你可能还喜欢

    ·