World
  1. Home
  2. World
Save
Print

'Unconscionable': Trumpcare would reduce health insured numbers by 24 million, says forecast

Washington: The Trump administration's proposal to revise Obamacare, would lower the number of Americans with health insurance by 24 million.

It would also reduce the federal deficit by $US337 billion ($445 billion) by 2026, according to a congressional budget analysis.

Up Next

BBC viral spoofed using multitasking woman

null
Video duration
00:55

More World News Videos

null
Video duration
01:00

14 million to lose insurance by 2018
null
Video duration
00:55

BBC viral spoofed using multitasking woman
null
Video duration
00:57

Trump ignores Merkel's handshake offer
null
Video duration
01:27

Fear, hunger and destruction as IS ...
Protest sign of Donald Trump
Video duration
01:44

Making a killing on Trump
null
Video duration
00:42

Massive 706 carat diamond discovered in ...
More videos

14 million to lose insurance by 2018

The Congressional Budget Office released its projection for the Republicans' health care plan on Monday, revealing that while the plan would cut about $337 billion from the budget deficit through 2026, it would also lead to 24 million fewer people having health insurance.

According to a Congressional Budget Office projection, 14 million fewer people would have health insurance next year alone. Premiums would be 15 per cent to 20 per cent higher in the first year compared with the Obama administration's signature Affordable Care Act and 10 per cent lower on average after 2026. By and large, older Americans would pay "substantially" more and younger Americans less, the report said.

The proposal - now nicknamed Trumpcare - was too much for one US Senator, Democrat Ron Wyden, who labelled it "unconscionable" because "There are fellow Americans - human beings - who because they exhaust savings or lose their health will lack access to health care in America".

Related Content

The officially titled American Health Care Act, proposed by House Speaker Paul Ryan, was "completely contrary to every promise Trump made," Senator Wyden said.

Advertisement

The report from the Congressional Budget Office fuelled concerns that the GOP health-care plan would prompt a dramatic loss in health-insurance coverage, potentially contradicting US President Donald Trump's vow that healthcare reform would provide "insurance for everybody" and threatening support from moderate Republican lawmakers.

Yet it also boosted House leaders' efforts to persuade sceptical conservatives, who felt that the measure did not go far enough in repealing Obamacare, to support what the CBO now predicts will be deficit-reducing legislation.

The analysis immediately prompted a clash of reactions between the White House and Republican leaders. Trump's budget director, Mick Mulvaney, said the report is "just absurd", and Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said: "We disagree strenuously" with it.

Ryan defended the report, saying that it proves that the proposal will "dramatically" reduce the deficit and usher in "the most fundamental entitlement reform in a generation".

"Our plan is not about forcing people to buy expensive, one-size-fits-all coverage," he said. "It is about giving people more choices and better access to a plan they want and can afford. When people have more choices, costs go down. That's what this report shows."

The release of the CBO's report marks the beginning of a new phase in the debate over the week-old healthcare bill, which is moving through the House on an accelerated timetable despite opposition from Republicans, Democrats and virtually every sector of the US health-care industry. Conservative Republicans, in particular, have demanded changes to the measure in exchange for their support.

The CBO report offered conclusions that might neutralise some conservative concerns, perhaps softening those members' opposition to the measure.

The conservative House Freedom Caucus did not immediately provide a response to the report.

At the same time, some moderate Republicans expressed concerns about the number of people who would lose coverage.

"These kinds of estimates are going to cause revisions in the bill, almost certainly," said Senator Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine.

"I don't think that the bill that is being considered now is the bill that ultimately will be the one that we vote on in the Senate."

Democrats cited the CBO numbers to support their flat-out opposition to the plan.

"The CBO score shows just how empty the President's promises, that everyone will be covered and costs will go down, have been," said Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer. "This should be a looming stop sign for the Republicans repeal effort."

"I would hope that this would make the Republicans say 'we can't do this," said Senator Patty Murray, also a member of Democratic leadership.

"Twenty-four million people lose their coverage, it is total chaos to the country and I hope they pause, say 'this is not what we should be doing' and move on."

The White House has spent the past week engaged in a charm offensive aimed at bringing conservatives on board, as well as an effort to discredit the CBO before it released numbers that might cast the plan in a negative light.

"If you're looking to the CBO for accuracy, you're looking in the wrong place," White House spokesman Sean Spicer said last week.

Ryan had predicted that the CBO would forecast a loss in coverage, but he had also suggested that those affected would be exercising their choice not to buy health plans, a choice that is penalised under the Affordable Care Act.

"CBO will say, 'Well, gosh, not as many people will get coverage,' " Ryan said Sunday in an appearance on CBS's Face the Nation. "You know why? Because this isn't a government mandate."

"It's up to people," he said. "People are going to do what they want to do with their lives because we believe in individual freedom in this country."

The Affordable Care Act has increased coverage by 20 million to 22 million - almost half of those through the insurance markets the law created for people who cannot get affordable coverage through a job, and the rest through an expansion of Medicaid in 31 states and the District of Columbia.

According to the report, an estimated 52 million people would be uninsured in 2026, compared with 28 million who would lack insurance that year under the current law.

"Obviously, we want to improve those coverage numbers," said Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn. "But when you don't punish people for their refusal to buy a government-approved insurance [plan], some people are going to make the decision not to buy it".

This reasoning would only account for the immediate increase in the uninsured, according to the CBO.

Eventually, many people would lose health insurance because the legislation's tax credits would be less generous than those in the current law and because some states might undo the expansion of their Medicaid programs.

"All I can tell you it is a work in progress," Cornyn said of the bill.

The Trump administration led a broad effort to undercut the Congressional Budget Office over the weekend, including pointing out flaws in its forecasts for the original Affordable Care Act.

"If the CBO was right about Obamacare to begin with, there'd be 8 million more people on Obamacare today than there actually are," said Mulvaney, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. "Sometimes we ask them to do stuff they're not capable of doing, and estimating the impact of a bill of this size probably isn't the best use of their time."

"The CBO estimate five, six, seven years ago when this started, they estimated that over 20 million people would have coverage at the end of the ten-year window," Price said on NBC's Meet the Press. "In fact, it's about half of that right now. So CBO has been very adept in not providing appropriate coverage statistics."

Price, the former chairman of the House Budget Committee, had previously celebrated the selection of CBO Director Keith Hall in 2015, saying he would bring an "impressive level of economic expertise and experience."

In private meetings last week, Trump suggested he was open to significant changes to the bill to appease skeptical hardliners. By the end of the week, however, the White House clarified it was siding with House Republican leaders on at least one request from the hardliners: speeding up cuts to Medicaid eligibility.

"Right now, the date that's in the bill is what the president supports," Spicer told reporters. "It's not a question of negotiation," he added.

On Friday, members of the House Freedom Caucus remained split over which elements more urgently needed change. Some called for changing the Medicaid timetable, while others urged the elimination of basic benefit requirements for health plans.

That same day, Trump put his own spin on the split, saying despite press coverage, all was well.

On Sunday, a growing group of conservatives was still threatening to kill the plan unless GOP leaders agreed to renegotiate parts of it.

"He will not have the votes," Republican Senator Rand Paul, said of Ryan on CBS' Face the Nation. "Everybody is being nice to everybody because they want us to vote for this, but we're not going to vote for it."

In January, Trump had promised to replace the ACA with a plan that provided "insurance for everybody."

"There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us," Trump said in a January 15 interview with The Washington Post.

"It's not going to be their plan," Trump said of people covered under the Affordable Care Act. "It'll be another plan. But they'll be beautifully covered. I don't want single-payer. What I do want is to be able to take care of people."

Washington Post

Related Content

9 comments