ASK FATHER: “Disposing” of the Eucharist and the Sacrarium

Typical sacrarium in an American sacristy with a sign warning never to pour away the Precious Blood.

Typical sacrarium in an American sacristy with a sign warning never to pour away the Precious Blood.

From a reader…

It is my understanding that if a Communion host or the precious blood has to be disposed, it is to be poured into water to dissolve/mix with the water, then poured into a sacrarium or into the earth. My question is, what if there is an underground perforated pipe (such as for water drainage) that leads to a sewer? The contents poured into the ground could get into a perforated pipe and drain to an unwanted area. I’m not sure of any cases were this occurs, but i suppose it is a possibility. Thanks.

For those of you in Columbia Heights, the sacrarium is a special sink in a sacristy whose pipe drain goes down into the earth rather than into a septic or sewage system.   Anything that has to do with the Eucharist or other blessed objects shouldn’t be put into the sewage system.  Rather, it should be put onto or into the ground.  Hence, priests would themselves rinse sacred linens for Mass (because their hands are consecrated).  After they are rinsed then others can take care of them.  The water for the first rinsing would go down the sacrarium or, sacrarium lacking, onto the ground.

There are a couple things to consider.

First and foremost, the Eucharist must never never never be “thrown away”, simply disposed of.  That crime incurs an automatic excommunication, the lifting of which is reserved to the Holy See or those confessors to whom the Holy See grants the faculty.

In the Latin Code of Canon Law we find:

can. 1367: Qui species consecratas abicit aut in sacrilegum finem abducit vel retinet in excommunicationem latae sententiae Sedi Apostolicae reservatam incurrit; clericus praeterea alia poena, non exclusa dimissione e statu clericali, puniri potest … A person who throws away the consecrated species or takes or retains them for a sacrilegious purpose incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; moreover, a cleric can be punished with another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state..

The word abicit, abicere, means here “throw away”, and this was clarified by the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, at their plenary session on 4 June 1999, as not … not… being restricted to “throw away” in a spirit of contempt, or intent to do dishonor.  It really does mean “throw away”, which is what happens when you put a consecrated Host or the Precious Blood down a sacrarium without first making sure that the substance of the same is first broken down (by dissolving).  Precious Blood, of course, should be consumed.

That said, in the case of any objectively sinful act which incurs an excommunication (e.g. throwing away the Eucharist), there are always the circumstances to be considered (e.g., the person’s will and knowledge, external compulsion, fear, etc.).

Redemptionis Sacramentum distinguished different levels of liturgical abuses.  The worst are in the category graviora delicata (graver crimes).  Among the graviora delicta is throwing away the Eucharist (cf. RS 172).   This grave crime is reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

To the question.

You have to trust that the sacrarium was made properly and that it is functioning in the intended way.

We are not obliged to tear the church building apart and excavate to verify that the sacrarium pipe is doing its job.  Nor do we have to send optics down the pipe.  If there is a sacrarium, we can be morally certain that it is doing its work.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

LENTCAzT 2017 14 – Tuesday 2nd Week of Lent: Why should we evangelize? People deserve it!

17_02_28_LENTCAzT_2017These daily 5 minute podcasts for Lent are intended to give you a small boost every day, a little encouragement in your own use of this holy season and to thank the benefactors who help me and this blog.

Today is Tuesday in the 2nd Week of Lent.  The Roman Station is the St. Balbina.

GO TO CONFESSION!

You often hear hear in these podcasts Lent at Ephesus by the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles in Missouri.  UK dwellers can get it HERE.

Posted in LENTCAzT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can the pastor force me, a priest, to wash women’s feet on Holy Thursday?

B16 foot washingFrom a priest…

QUAERITUR (edited):

Emboldened by the Pope’s new legislation last year, my pastor is determined to force the small parish which I primarily serve  in the cluster to introduce women into the Holy Thursday footwashing rite.  [This old thing again… sigh.]

As the celebrant of the small parish’s Triduum, I have wrestled with what to do: Should I quietly omit the mandatum? Or maybe I might refuse vocally and on principle. The bishop himself cannot compel or forbid me from legitimate options, yet, I truly love my bishop and honestly do not want to grieve him.

Or should I grudgingly obey

Please advise.

This is the plight of the assistants.  Assistants, or “parochial vicars” as they are sometimes called, have the right to a Christian burial and that is about it.

I ran this by a some trusted priests, one a canonist, a pastor, a vicar general whom I know.  They are rock solid and celebrate the TLM.   We concur.

You are right: you can’t be “forced” to wash women’s feet. It’s sad that the pastor is trying to push this through onto a community that seems not to want it, and especially through the instrumentality of his assistant who is also opposed to it.

The cleanest option is to drop the optional mandatum rite.  That will no doubt get back to the pastor. The effect will be: you “disobeyed,” you are rigid, disobedient, backwards.  The pastor, during the last few weeks of your assignmment, might treat you with disdain and talk about you at future clergy gatherings.  You could be a faithful hero in some circles, trad scum in others.

Talk to the pastor first.

“Listen Dick, I know you want me to wash ladies’ feet at St. Amphilocius on Holy Thursday, but in conscience I just can’t do it, and here’s why: … I know we disagree on this, and you probably think I’m a horrible, rigid person for sticking to my beliefs, but I hope that you can at least respect my disagreement with you on this matter. Please, respect the integrity of my beliefs and allow me the decency of letting my actions be in conformity with my beliefs. More scotch?”

Respectfully voice your concern and objection privately to the pastor and perhaps also the bishop.  State your preference to omit the optional foot washing.  Don’t make a public issue of this, however.

If the pastor or bishops insists that you do it, then I think you have to go along with what the pastor decides.

Hang on and be prudent.  You will be a pastor of your own parish one day.  Learn from this how not to be a pastor, how to be a good pastor, and how to work well with assistants.

Finally, thanks for wanting to do the right thing and in the right way.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests | Tagged , | 43 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z is sore tempted – UPDATE

UPDATE 13 March:

I am delighted that one of my priest friends is able to come to help with our Triduum!  However, I really would like to have one more priest come.

So, I’ll give in to the temptation.  Fathers?

___

Originally Published on: Mar 7, 2017

I am having a temptation.   I am tempted to put out a notice to any priests out there who would like to have an experience of serving as a sacred ministers (deacon, subdeacon) in the Triduum in the traditional rite.

Were I to do so, I would probably put out a note on this blog and ask priests to write to me.  Such a priest would, of course, have to have traditional interests, strong singing skills and would need to be able to work with Latin… and he would have to come to Madison, of course.  That would mean suitability letter, etc.

HA!  What a thought.   As if there would be any priests not already engaged.

 

 

Posted in Mail from priests | Tagged | Leave a comment

“O you who come to this abode of pain…”, thoughts on ‘Amoris laetitia’

“O you who come to this abode of pain. . .beware how you come in and whom you trust. Don’t let the easy entrance fool you.”

Today at The Catholic Thing Robert Royal has a short and suggestive piece about sex and deception. Dante – Il Poeta  – gives him a lift.

Royal recounts teaching Dante’s Inferno, the first part of the Divine Comedy,  to students.

One of the more famous bits in Inferno is the hellish plight of Paolo and Francesca, adulterers, destined eternally to lash about twisting in the whirlwind as they cling to each other.  Oh, the pathos!  Oh, the sympathy as they recount their deeds, which lead to their deaths and this doom!

How unfair it all seems for such a little transgression, right?  After all what’s adultery in the face of eternal punishment.  Right?

Royal makes an important point. Before we – with Virgil and poetic Dante – reach Paolo and Francesca, we are warned against deception.  Minos, judge of the underworld…

“…  tells them: “O you who come to this abode of pain. . .beware how you come in and whom you trust. Don’t let the easy entrance fool you.”  [Because in Hell, the damned will lie to you.  Don’t believe everything you here.]

Virgil, a smart pagan, thinks Minos is just trying to block their way. But that’s not what he said or did. He’s warning them about infernal deception, especially how easy it is to find yourself entangled in it. It may, thus, be something that even Virgil’s pagan wisdom doesn’t see clearly on its own. And since what follows is two adulterers presenting a touching and almost beautiful picture of their sin, maybe the pagan poet, for all his wisdom, is not the best guide in this particular case.”

I turn now the reader’s attention to the arguments that have been offered for giving absolution to those who do not have a firm purpose of amendment and then admitting them to the reception of Holy Communion.

For example, stories as plaintive and touching as the tale of Paolo Malatesta and Francesca da Rimini are described in defense of admitting the divorced and civilly remarried to the sacraments of penance and the Eucharist, even though they do not intend to amend their lives.   Oh, the pathos!  Such dire circumstances these (adulterers) are in!  Is it really so bad what they are doing?  After all, they are in love.

Can the warning of Minos serve to sober us up a bit?

I’m sure it never entered Prof. Royal’s mind to suggest a link between the scenario of Inferno Canto V and Amoris laetitia.

Read the whole thing over there.

Anthony Esolen, by the way, translated Dante’s Divine Comedy into English and did a great job of it.

If you have never read the Divine Comedy, you should.  It is perhaps the greatest work ever written, saving Holy Writ.  You could start with Esolen (Part 1, Inferno- US HERE – UK HERE) or perhaps with the late, great Inkling Dorothy Sayer’s fine version (Part 1, Inferno, US HERE – UK HERE).  There are many renderings to choose from.  I would very much like to teach on Dante someday.  Maybe it’ll happen.

When you make the excellent choice to read the Divine Comedy, here are a couple tips.  First and foremost, make the decision that you will read the whole thing.  Don’t read just the Inferno.  The really great stuff comes in Purgatorio and Paradiso.  Also, be smart in your approach to Dante.  Read straight through a canto to get the line of thought and story and then go back over it looking at the notes in your edition.  Sayers has good notes.  Dante was, I think, the last guy who knew everything.  Hence, every Canto is dense with references.  You will need notes to help with the history, philosophy, cosmology, poetic theory, politics, theology, etc.  Really.  You will need help.  Take it.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , | 19 Comments

Book recommendations as things fall apart

US CLICK!

I suspect that many of us are acutely aware that things are not going well in the world and in the Church.   Structures are toppling, literally.  What to do?

I bring to the attention of the readership a couple of books I am presently into.  I alternate for the sake of variety.   My Kindle is getting a work out.  US HERE – UK HERE for an entry level option.

Strangers in a Strange Land: Living the Catholic Faith in a Post-Christian World by Archbp. Charles J. Chaput of Philadelphia. US HERE – UK HERE

I’ll have more to say about this one in the future. And, no, it isn’t a science fiction book. (Some of you will get that reference.)

Along the same line … which goes to show that great minds think alike…

Anthony Esolen’s Out of the Ashes: Rebuilding American Culture  US HERE – UK HERE

What to do?

Do we rebuild?  Do we walk away from the wreckage and withdraw?  Do we engage?  De we retreat?

I’ll be attending soon a talk about this very matters with Rod Dreher, who will spark some conversation about these matters in The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation– US HERE – UK HERE  This is to be released on 14 March (tomorrow, as I write), and so it is available now, today, at a greatly reduced pre-order price.   I’m putting it on my Kindle Wishlist.

BTW… “Benedict” here refers to St. Benedict, the 6th c. abbot.

Meanwhile, let’s have some Yeats:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Posted in REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

‘Monday Vatican’ analysis of the state of the pontificate

In the wake of last week’s cover of the Rolling Stone, Andrea Gagliarducci in his Monday Vatican offering does some analysis of the status quaestionis, the present state, of the pontificate of Pope Francis, especially in view of the MSM.

Read the whole thing, which is well reasoned.   Here are some tidbits:

Is Pope Francis really a “pop Pope”?

[…]

After four years, however, things might have changed. The Italian Rolling Stone cover is perhaps why some say that Pope Francis’s honeymoon with the media is coming to an end, or at least that his image is undergoing decline. But at the very least, the cover shows the secular world’s determination not to see what really happens around Pope Francis.

[…]

Likewise, the several commissions established during this pontificate came about out of sentiment. Joking (but not too much), Pope Francis once said that when someone does not want to accomplish something, he establishes a commission.  [Right.  Like the deaconette commission.]

Commissions and external consultants represent a risk: that they use their position to collect information and later destroy the Vatican system from within.

But the biggest risk that lies behind the appointment of commissions comes from a certain mentality. The risk is that people will eventually think that “new is good, old is bad,” without making any judgment between the harvesting of fruits and the ability to produce them. This is the risk of this pontificate, and the media helps to emphasize the “new is good” issue.  [That’s an important point.]

It is noteworthy that media pervasiveness and the continual flow of news prevent a lucid and detached analysis. Reading back the articles published at the beginning of the pontificate, it becomes evident that the words most used are “revolution”, “Pope Francis’s style” and “new Church”. These formulas are used by the media to generate readership, but also to give the readers the notion of a Church that is going to change completely. The Church, however, does not change suddenly, and Pope Francis is always a priest with a traditional deposit of faith – no matter how he eventually denies it.

So, there probably was an agenda at work behind Pope Francis’s back, but the fact is that this effect was also a media invention to sell more newspapers and to attract readership. That is part of how the market works.

[…]

This is his way of doing things. And it is typically Jesuit: no possibility is excluded a priori, everything must be discussed, reasoned, in a never-ending dialogue with the world that the Pope wants to develop within the Church.

Even within the Church, Pope Francis shows his traditional roots, yet they are filled with the notion of pueblo, and this Latin American populism has some hidden Marxist categories in it. The Pope is traditional when he speaks about “Holy Mother Hierarchical Church.” He is also traditional when he centralizes powers: Pope Francis listens to everyone, and then makes his decision, sometimes without regard to any particular suggestion he had been given. This behavior underscores the fact that Pope Francis is often alone in command. Simply put, people wait for clarity, with the understanding that a different opinion can be argued by opponents.  [Yes, Gagliarducci mentions the Five Dubia of the Four Cardinals™.]

This entire situation must be carefully addressed, because any claim of normality in Pope Francis’s pontificate is strongly targeted. The Pope is the Pope: he places trust in the people he wants, he has his personal spoils system, and he also has an inner circle of counsellors that counts more than the Curia. That is normal. But the narrative wants the Pope to be collegial, open to the world, synodal. Above all, the narrative wants the Pope to be “pop”, and any time this image is debated, the reaction is harsh. In his biography of Pope Francis, Paul Vallely recalls that after the years of his provincialate in Argentina, Bergoglio left a Society of Jesus divided in “pro Bergoglio” and “anti Bergoglio” camps. The same is happening in the Church.

[NB] How much Pope Francis is intentionally creating this division is yet to be assessed. Looking attentively at his moves, it seems that he does not opt simply for the right or the left. The final goal seems to be a sort of revenge of the South and of the pueblo, that is, the people in the positive sense in which Pope Francis interprets the term. This revenge is attested by an increased representation of the globe in the College of Cardinals, by his meetings with popular movements, by his insistence on the profile of priests with the smell of sheep.  [Pope Francis seems to ascribe to a special brand of “liberation theology” that stems from the pueblo and popular devotions, etc.]

[…]

There is quite a bit more. Read the whole thing there. These are just a few samples intended to hook you.

Andrea’s Monday offerings can be longish, but, as he states in this week’s piece: media pervasiveness and the continual flow of news prevent a lucid and detached analysis.

Posted in Pope Francis, The Drill | Tagged , | 11 Comments

LENTCAzT 2017 13 – Monday 2nd Week of Lent: Learned in the school of suffering

17_02_28_LENTCAzT_2017These daily 5 minute podcasts for Lent are intended to give you a small boost every day, a little encouragement in your own use of this holy season and to thank the benefactors who help me and this blog.

Today is Monday in the 2nd Week of Lent.  The Roman Station is the amazing San Clemente.

GO TO CONFESSION!

You often hear hear in these podcasts Lent at Ephesus by the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles in Missouri.  UK dwellers can get it HERE.

Posted in LENTCAzT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | 2 Comments

ASK FATHER: Uncle married his niece… is that okay?

From a reader…

My mother in law married her much older uncle after abandoning her children. Why does the Catholic Church approve of this?

Hang on.  Before you make all sorts of assumptions, let’s drill in.

The Code of Canon Law is clear, except where it isn’t.

Canon 1091 establishes that marriage is invalid between persons related in the direct line and in the collateral line up to and including the fourth degree. Canon 1078 declares that dispensations are never given for marriage in the direct line or the second degree of the collateral line. There. That clears it up. So, much for your accusation.

Holy Church has long been interested in parsing the family tree for marriage purposes. Early in the life of the Church, we faced a world where incest was rife. The famous Cleopatra (Cleopatra VII) was married, sequentially, to her two brothers, Ptolemy XIII and XIV, before putting the moves on Julius Ceasar. On the Roman side of things, I, Claudius is a good place to start in trying to figure out the complexities of marriage and family in the Roman upper classes. To all of this, the Church, drawing on Her Jewish roots and divine revelation, said, “Hold on a minu

Breaking relations in consanguinity (blood relations) and affinity (relatives by marriage) and then into the direct line (grandparent, parent, child, grandchild) and the collateral line (sibling, aunt, uncle, cousin), the Church has always forbidden marriage between those related in the direct line, no matter how many degrees (generations) separate them. In the collateral line, degrees have been counted in different manners. Today, the best way to count degrees is to count up the relatives and subtract the common ancestor – thus a brother and sister are in the second degree of consanguinity – brother, sister, parent, minus the parent gives us two. Cousins are in the fourth degree – cousin, cousin, parent, uncle, grandparent, minus the grandparent. Uncle and niece are in the third degree – niece, parent, uncle, grandparent, minus grandparent.

Now, the Church is clear that the prohibition of marriage in the direct line is divine law – the divine law is not dispensed. In the collateral line, especially beyond the second degree, it’s understood that this is ecclesiastical law, and therefore subject to a possible dispensation.

On occasion, in those jurisdictions where it is civilly legal, I have heard of cases of bishops dispensing from the prohibition against the fourth degree of consanguinity – first cousins marrying. Usually, care is taken to make sure that there is no danger of children being born with debilitating birth defects, and that the marriage will not cause problems in the family or scandal among the faithful. I can’t say that I have ever heard of a bishop dispensing from the impediment of consanguinity in the third degree. It’s difficult to comment on a situation without knowing all the particulars, but this situation certainly does seem highly unusual. Ask either the priest who married this couple, or the local bishop for clarification.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Canon Law, One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , , | 28 Comments

Tinkeritis: Screwing around with, screwing up, liturgical translations

Christine Mohrmann

You may have heard that there is an initiative underway to “review” or “study” vernacular translations of the texts of Mass and the norms according to which they are to be prepared as given in Liturgiam authenticam.   This would be nuts, of course, and, hence, I think they will do it.   Tinkeritis is rampant these days.  This is one reason why the older, traditional form of the Roman Rite must be expanded as much as humanly possible.

I suspect that, while this “study” initiative is an attack on the norms of LA and the translations it has already produced, it’s really an attack on Pope Benedict’s determination that all vernacular translations of the consecration for the Precious Blood had to say “for many” for Latin pro multis.

We Catholics ought to believe that, while Christ died for all, not all will be saved.  Some will not be saved.  Apart from that, pro multis in Latin means “for many” and not “for all”.  Spectacular and risible philological fan dances have been done in the past to force “multis” to mean something that it has never meant in the history of the Latin language.  This will return in spades now.  If the attack on LA goes forward, and I think it will, it may result not in a total overturning of the present translation.  Rather, even more options will be introduced: alternative translations, the option to say “for all” rather than “for many”.   As you have already figured out, this will produce even more confusion and disunity than there is now… among Catholics, that is.

It might make what liberal priests do more promote unity with the teachings you hear in Protestant churches, although they might express them better.

Over at Mutual Enrichment, Fr. John Hunwicke has rightly invoked the name of the great scholar Christine Mohrmann.   She demonstrated that the Latin used for liturgical worship in the early Church was not the lowest common denominator speech of the man on the street.  Rather, it is stylized and elevated.

For 12 years I wrote a weekly column for The Wanderer in which I drilled into the translations of the orations of Holy Mass both before and after the introduction of the current ICEL version.  Week after week I showed how the Latin reflected technical terminology and specialized vocabulary (i.e., military, agricultural, mercantile) and concepts from Neo-Platonic and Stoic philosophy.  The man in the street would have had to stretch for the content, much as these days Joe Bagofdonuts would have to work hard to follow the first scenes of a play by Shakespeare.   Mind you, Shakespeare is not out of reach!  Most people these days must stretch.  However, the unaccustomed ear eventually adjusts to the Shakespearean sound, especially when the novice is at the play and not just listening to a recording.  With repetition, it becomes easier and you become – let it be said – smarter.   The same applies to liturgical language: it must not be pedestrian.  Our faith is shaped by how we pray.

We must resist every effort to make our faith ambiguous, indifferent and dumb.

Fr Hunwicke has a good post.  Check it out HERE.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, New Translation, Pò sì jiù, PRO MULTIS, WDTPRS | Tagged , , , , , | 33 Comments

LENTCAzT 2017 12 – 2nd Sunday of Lent: A lesson on the Mass, a figure of the Mass

17_02_28_LENTCAzT_2017These daily 5 minute podcasts for Lent are intended to give you a small boost every day, a little encouragement in your own use of this holy season and to thank the benefactors who help me and this blog.

Today is the 2nd Sunday of Lent.  The Roman Station is Santa Maria in Domnica.

GO TO CONFESSION!

You often hear hear in these podcasts Lent at Ephesus by the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles in Missouri.  UK dwellers can get it HERE.

Posted in LENTCAzT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

USA: Daylight Savings begins tonight – set clocks, don’t miss Mass

In these USA Daylight Savings begins with repercussions for Sunday Mass. We “spring forward”, and so we lose an hour.

Reset your clocks before going to bed. Don’t miss Mass.

spring forward daylight savings

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | 4 Comments

My View For Awhile: Intersect Edition

Other than the fact that in order to enjoy a really early morning you first have to get up really early, it’s a really nice morning.  

Nasty weather comes later in the week.  It is, of course, March.

It seems like a long time since I’ve been in an airport.  In itself, that’s not a bad thing.


UPDATE

This is always a welcome message.  


Back in the day you had to wonder. 

UPDATE

And now we just sit here.  And wait… and wait… and wait….

When you can’t be in Casablanca, just fly … wait with Delta.

UPDATE 

After a curtailed layover, on my way again.  They were offering $500 for a volunteer, and I almost got it.  My penchant for avoid crowds put me a little farther from the gate agent than I needed to be.   In any case, that’ll give me addition time at my Intersect Point.

It’s Kindle time.

UPDATE

Even better than the text verification that followed immediately …

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | 16 Comments

LENTCAzT 2017 11 – Ember Saturday – 1st Week of Lent: Beware The Rust of External Formalism

17_02_28_LENTCAzT_2017LINK CORRECTED

These daily 5 minute podcasts for Lent are intended to give you a small boost every day, a little encouragement in your own use of this holy season and to thank the benefactors who help me and this blog.

Today is Saturday in the 1st Week of Lent.  The Roman Station is the Basilica of St. Peter on the Vatican Hill.

GO TO CONFESSION!

Today you will hear something from Lent at Ephesus by the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles in Missouri.  UK dwellers can get it HERE.

Posted in Benedict XVI, LENTCAzT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

Please use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

Registered or not, will you in your charity please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Many requests are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below.

You have to be registered here to be able to post.

I still have two pressings personal petitions.  No, I actually have THREE now.  I can’t get a break, it seems.  Ut Deus….

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | 25 Comments