Peters
Here is the link to a lovely conversation with Dr Danielle Peters, who is a member of the Secular Institute of the Schoenstatt Sisters of Mary, and a research fellow at the Institute for Church Life at Notre Dame University, IN. She obtained her MA in theology from Sacred Heart Seminary in Wisconsin and her STL and STD from the International Marian Research Institute (IMRI) in Dayton OH. Her former assignments include professor and coordinator of academic programs at the Pontifical International Marian Research Institute (IMRI) in Dayton, OH, the Athenaeum in Cincinnati, OH, and employment at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in the Vatican.
The Schoenstatt prayer to the Blessed Mother that she recited is as follows:
Let us walk like you through life
Let us mirror you forever
Strong and noble; meek and mild
Peace and love be our endeavor
Walk in us through our world
Make it ready for the Lord
She is the author of Ecce educatrix tua: the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary for a pedagogy of holiness in the thought of John Paul II and Father Joseph Kentenich, numerous articles, and is a regular contributor to the Church Life Journal. She currently serves as the vice president of the Mariological Society of America (2014-16). Or after May 20: She serves as president of the Mariological Society of America (2016-18).
I referred to the following resources:
The Mary Page; Secular Institute of the Schoenstatt Sisters of Mary: and the image of the Mother thrice admirable, Queen and Victress of Schoenstatt (above).
As for the Protoevangelium of James, she explains:
writings such as the Protoevangelium of St. James are non-canonical writings from the early church. From this piece the Catholic tradition accepts the names of Mary's parents and her Presentation in the Temple (celebrated on November 21). It also includes stories about the person of St. Joseph and of Mary's midwife, Salome, who doubted her virginity after birth (and when she wanted to have a physical examination her right hand withered .... Some of these episodes (including the two step Annunciation at the well and then in Mary's house) made it into iconography. I guess, as with everything we love, we want to know more details and this writing wanted to fill the gap.
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.