05 April 2017

A published review

This morning's mail brought the current issues of Arthuriana, the journal of the North American Branch of the International Arthurian Society, and of Amon Hen, the bulletin of The Tolkien Society two items that delight me whenever I receive them.


Regrettably, I do not have time today to read either them, but I did have a chance to flip through their pages and was both surprised and pleased to see my review of David Rowe's The Proverbs of Middle-earth published in Amon Hen. If you missed my review, you can find it on pages 18 and 19, or you can read it as I first published it here.

If you haven't yet picked up a copy of The Proverbs of Middle-earth, let me again recommend you do so.

02 April 2017

On the triple binding of Lazaurs

And it should be noted that Lazarus, who had been resuscitated and came forth was bound with a triple chain, for a threefold difficulty remains in a person after the remission of sin. Thus the face tied up with a cloth refers to the difficulty in knowing. The bound feet refers to the difficulty in willing the good. The bound hands refers to the difficulty in doing good. 
- Saint Bonaventure

01 April 2017

New priestly assignments are not April Fool's jokes

This weekend, priests across the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois - myself included - are announcing the new assignments they have received from His Excellency the Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, most of which will take effect July 1, 2017.

The decree of appointment I have received from His Excellency reads as follows:
Reverend Daren J. Zehnle is appointed Pastor of Saint Augustine Parish, Ashland, Illinois, and Adjutant Judicial Vicar, while retaining duties as Judge of the Diocesan Tribunal, and as Bishop’s Delegate for Matrimonial Concerns, from Parochial Vicar of Saint Agnes Parish, Springfield, Illinois, and Chief Master of Ceremonies to the Bishop, effective August 1, 2017. He is also appointed Director of the Office for Divine Worship and the Catechumenate, and to post-graduate studies in the summer program for the degree of Master of Arts in Liturgy at theLiturgical Institute of the University of St. Mary of the Lake, Mundelein, Illinois, effective May 1, 2017.
Included in this weekend's bulletin at St. Agnes Parish where I presently serve as Parochial Vicar is a letter I wrote to the parishioners, the text of which follows:
Dear brothers and sisters in Christ, 
Shortly after I arrived here among you at St. Agnes Parish, a number of you asked how long I would serve as your Parochial Vicar. I answered honestly when I said I did not know because my assignment came with no expiration date, but that I hoped it would be for a long time. 
I have enjoyed my time among you and ministering alongside Father Bob, but the needs of the Diocese will soon require me to leave St. Agnes Parish to take up the Pastorate of St. Augustine Parish in Ashland, effective August 1, 2017. At that time, I will also become Adjutant Judicial Vicar while remaining Judge of the Diocesan Tribunal and the Bishop’s Delegate for Matrimonial Concerns. 
Beginning May 1, 2017, I will become the Director of the Office for Divine Worship and the Catechumenate and no longer serve as Chief Master of Ceremonies to the Bishop. In order to facilitate my work in the Office for Divine Worship and the Catechumenate, Bishop Paprocki has asked me to return to The Liturgical Institute in Mundelein, Illinois over the course of the next five summers to obtain a Master of Arts in Liturgy (M.A.L.). These studies will require me to be away from St. Agnes Parish from June 9 through July 21. 
I am grateful for the welcome you have extended to me and for the many kindnesses you have shown me these past many months, and look forward to my remaining time among you. Please remember me in your prayers in these coming weeks, as I will continue to remember you in mine. May our heavenly patroness, Saint Agnes, intercede for each of us, that with her we might be faithful lambs of the Good Shepherd and counted among his flock.
Attentive readers may note what might, at first glance, appear to be something of an April Fool's joke (which, I assure you, is unintentional). Not all of the effective dates I provide in my letter match those given in the Bishop's decree. The original text of the decree was altered after my letter was written and printed; I was unaware of the new dates until it was too late. I regret the error, small though it might seem.

Please, in the charity of your prayers, remember me as I seek to fulfill the tasks entrusted to me. 

Homily - 2 April 2017 - Imitating the warm devotion of Mary

The Fifth Sunday of Lent (A)

Dear brothers and sisters,

Throughout much of the Gospel of Saint John, those who engage Jesus in conversation address him using the title “Rabbi,” a Hebrew word meaning “teacher.” Among those who address him this way are the two disciples of John the Baptist, Nathanael, Nicodemus, Jesus’ own disciples, the crowd after the feeding of the five thousand, and, as we heard last Sunday, the man born blind (John 1:38, 1:45, 3:2, 4:31, 6:25, and 9:2). The two exceptions to this are the Samaritan woman at the well and the official at Capernaum who both simply call him “Sir” (John4:11 and 4:49). When they learned of Lazarus’ illness, the disciples of Jesus again addressed him as “Rabbi.” If we think about these two forms of address, both rabbi and sir are polite salutations, titles denoting a certain respect.

Today, though, we hear something different, for neither Martha nor Mary addressed Jesus as “Rabbi” or as “Sir” when they spoke to him; rather, they addressed him as “Lord,” a title that clearly means something more than a polite greeting (John 11:8, 11:21, 11:27, 11:32, and 11:39). Why this sudden change of title? What does it signify?

We live within a society and a culture that places little value on titles and postures. In this, we are very different from the many generations who have gone before us. We no longer greet each other as Mister or Misses, as Doctor or Captain, and men no longer tip their hats or stand when a woman or a person of authority enters the room. We even refuse a simple gesture of kindness by refusing to allow someone else to hold the door open for us. What was once expected is now surprising and we, as a whole, suffer for it. In our pursuit of lesser formality, we strove for a deeper familiarity with each other but have instead grown more distant and frequently no longer recognize one another’s humanity. We even went so far as to extend this desire for less formality into the spiritual life and in our pursuit of a deeper familiarity with the Lord we have instead grown more distant from him and too frequently fail to recognize his divinity.

Martha and Mary, however, recognized both Jesus’ humanity and his divinity and were not concerned about a lesser formality; they were instead concerned with the truth. They counted Jesus among their friends and yet addressed him as Lord. “They call[ed] him Lord and not teacher, for they were requesting a miracle, not teaching.”[1] Yet even when making their request, they did not presume to impose their own wills upon Jesus. “They revered his majesty, and therefore did not dare to ask that he issue a command [from] where he was that would be fulfilled where they were, as was the case with the centurion. They hoped in his goodness, and so they hinted and suggested.”[2] All of this is signified in their use of the title, “Lord.”

Given Jesus’ friendship with Lazarus and his sisters, we might be surprised by this, but that is only because we do not know Jesus as well as Martha and Mary knew him. We seek to treat Jesus as we would treat anyone else, but those two sisters knew that Jesus is not like anyone else. They greeted him with a greater respect and honor than we do because their love for him was greater than our love for him.


Just as we are surprised at the way in which they greeted their friend, we might also be surprised at Mary’s posture in the presence of Jesus. Saint John tells us that “when Mary came to where Jesus was and saw him, she fell at his feet” (John 11:32). This, however, should not surprise us because Mary “is always at the feet of the Lord” (cf. Luke 7:38 and 10:39).[3] Whereas we might walk right up to Jesus and embrace him or give him a fist bump, Mary, in her humble and loving devotion, a devotion warmer than that of Martha, shows us a more right and just posture. Her external posture gave physical expression to the interior sentiments of her heart. What does our posture in the presence of Jesus say about the sentiments of our hearts?

When the Lord visited their house on another occasion, Martha “was distracted with much serving” and complained to the Lord, asking, “do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone” (Luke 10:40)? He answered her with those words we know so well: “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things; one thing is needful. Mary has chosen the good portion, which shall not be taken away from her” (Luke 10:41-42). Mary was content to embrace the feet of Jesus as a devoted servant or a loving child and whereas Martha often spoke much with Jesus, Mary spoke little with him and remained quiet, though she remained always near to him in order to listen to him.

When Jesus came to them, after waiting two days after receiving their message of Lazarus’ illness, Martha and Mary did not rebuke Jesus for his delay, nor did they blame him for Lazarus’ death or ask why he delayed because they trusted in his goodness. Would we remain so quiet, or would we instead demand answers to our questions. Lest we be tempted to think Jesus a poor friend, the reason he did not go to Lazarus until after his death is because it was more important that Jesus show his power over death than that he show his power over illness.

In all of this, Mary’s grief was no less than that of her sister, for they both said to Jesus, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died” (John 11:21 and 32). They made this statement of fact because they knew Jesus’ power and because they knew his love. Hidden within this statement is an implicit request Martha and Mary asked of the Lord. Jesus, though, did not go to Lazarus’ tomb because of the words of Martha, but because of the tears of Mary (cf. John 11:33-34). Moreover, he himself was moved to tears and shared in their grief over the death of their brother and his friend (cf. John 11:35). In this, we see that “the Lord more readily hears a groan from the heart than a sound from the mouth.”[4]

Soon we will enter into Holy Week when Holy Mother Church urges us to imitate Martha’s profession of faith in Jesus’ power and to imitate Mary’s devotion to his love. It will be a time for us to silence our words and to allow our hearts to groan. Let us, then, not be afraid to fall down at the feet of Jesus, there to weep over our sins and to trust in his power and love and so be counted among his true and faithful friends. Amen.



[1] Saint Bonaventure, Commentary on the Gospel of John, 11.4. Robert J. Karris, trans. (Saint Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2007), 587.
[2] Ibid., 11.13.
[3] Ibid., 11.43.
[4] Ibid.

Islamic State Ongoing Updates - April 2017

Previous Updates: March 2017 | February 2017January 2017 | December 2016 | November 2016 | September 2016 | August 2016 | July 2016 | June 2016 | May 2016 | April 2016 | March 2016 | February 2016January 2016 | December 2015 | November 2015 | October 2015 | September 2015 | August 2015 | July 2015June 2015 | May 2015 | April 2015 | March 2015 | February 2015 | January 2015 | December 2014 | November 2014 | October 2014 | April - November 2014

2 April 2017


1 April 2017

Happy birthday, Father Gus!


The Servant of God Father Augustus Tolton was born on this day in 1854. May he intercede for us and show us the way to love even in the most painful of situations.

Islamic State in West Africa (formerly Boko Haram) Ongoing Updates - April 2017

Previous Updates: January 2017 | November 2016 | September 2016 | August 2016 | July 2016 | June 2016 | May 2016 | April 2016 | March 2016 | February 2016January 2016 | December 2015 | November 2015 | October 2015 | September 2015 | August 2015 | July 2015  | June 2015 | May 2015 | April 2015  March 2015 | February 2015

1 April 2017

19 March 2017

Homily - 19 March - The Third Sunday of Lent - Consider what would happen if Jesus spoke to an American woman like he did the Samaritan woman

The Third Sunday of Lent (A)

Dear brothers and sisters,

The more I consider the Lord’s encounter with the Samaritan woman at the well, the more I wonder how such an encounter with Jesus might take place in the context of our present American culture. It seems today as if many Americans – if not most – are constantly searching for something by which to be offended. It seems a majority of the American people presume the worst of intentions in each other and read more into the words and actions of others than may be warranted.

As but one simple illustration of what I mean, consider what would happen today if the Lord Jesus said to an American woman, “you have had five husbands, and the one you have now is not your husband” (John 4:18). Would she answer, “Sir, I can see that you are a prophet,” or would she instead yell back, insisting, “Don’t judge me” (John 4:19)? And lest I be accused of sexism, the situation would be much the same if Jesus said to an American man, “you have had five wives, and the one you have now is not your wife.” In either case, would there be an acceptance of the truthfulness of his words, or would there instead be shouts of protest and a string of excuses?

Why did Jesus’ encounter with the Samaritan woman unfold so differently than would likely be the case in our society today? The difference lies in the woman’s honesty; it can be found in her confession of her sinful situation. Whereas most Americans today feign contentment by saying such things as “I’m okay, you’re okay” and “God loves me the way I am,” the Samaritan woman recognized the restlessness in her heart and knew something must change if she was to find the happiness she desired. She knew the Lord called her to something greater, to something that would satisfy the deepest desires of her heart. She knew she could not satisfy these desires on her own; she had tried, and failed, five times over. She did not push away this necessary conversion, nor did she grumble against it (cf. Exodus 17:3); rather, she recognized that the love of God had been poured into her heart at that moment and she accepted his love (cf. Romans 5:5). This is why she could say of Jesus, “He told me everything I have done,” and could say so without taking offense at him (John 4:39). Can we say the same? Would we take offense at Jesus if he spoke so honestly about the situations of our lives (cf. Matthew 13:57)?

Saint Bonaventure saw in the woman’s five husbands “the five heavy cravings of the senses,” “the five carnal senses, who ruled over her like a husband.”[1] The first husband, he said, represented taste or gluttony. The second husband represented touch or lust. The third, smell, by which he meant a life of ease and comfort which leads to sloth. The fourth husband represented sight or greed because of envy. The fifth husband represented hearing or lying and gossiping. But what of that sixth man, the man with whom she lived who was not her husband? In this man Saint Bonaventure saw “error, which seduces and leads the soul astray.”[2] We might not all live in adulterous relationships, but we surely have all been seduced by error and yielded to the sins of gluttony, lust, sloth, greed, lying, and gossiping.

When the Lord Jesus approaches us in the silence of our hearts, in the Sacred Scriptures, or even in the words of another to reveal the secret of our sin, what is our response to him? Do we reject him? Do close our ears and our hearts to him? Do we honestly confess our sinfulness and reject the error of our ways so that his love might well up within our hearts through his forgiveness?

When the Samaritan woman heard the voice of Jesus, she did not harden her heart, but allowed her heart to be softened by his words of truth, painful though it surely was (cf. Psalm 95:8). She was not so proud as to presume he spoke to offend her; she was not so proud as to take offense at him. Instead, she perceived in his words a summons to happiness and healing.

In the example of this woman we see that “preaching does not bring about faith without the consent of the will and the will does not give its consent unless God kindles a spark in it.”[3] As it was with the woman at the well, so it is with us. In the waters of baptism, each of us has received, as it were, that spark of God’s love; his love and the gift of faith were enkindled in our hearts through the Holy Spirit. Now it remains for us to fan that spark into flame and to call upon his gifts.

Jesus first “enkindles a spark in [the Samaritan woman] by asking her to serve him by giving him a drink of water. This is something that the woman could minister to him since she had come to draw water.”[4] What is it that the Lord Jesus asks of us? What does he ask us to do for him that we are capable of doing?

In his last moments upon the Cross, Jesus said, “I thirst” (John 19:28). He made this cry to each one of us, but he does not ask us for physical water; rather, he asks for the water of our love so that we might quench his thirst. Jesus then “continues to kindle a spark in the woman by promising or offering her a gift,”[5] by promising to give her “living water” which will become in those who drink of it “a spring of water welling up to eternal life” (John 4:10, 14). The water he desired to give to her – the water he desires to give to each of us – is the water of his love which poured forth from his pierced heart into the Sacraments (cf. John 19:34). If he so opened his heart to us, let us not be afraid to open our hearts to him in the sacraments so that his love might be poured into our hearts.

Then, filled with his love, we, like that woman, can share our life’s story, the story of encounter with the Lord’s love and so lead our family, our friends, and even strangers to drink from the water of Jesus’ love. If we drink freely from his waters, we can take up Pope Francis’ invitation to discover “the joy of becoming artisans of reconciliation and instruments of peace in our daily lives.”[6] By living as artisans or reconciliation and as instruments of peace, may we bring healing to our lives and to our society. Amen.




[1] Saint Bonaventure, Commentary on the Gospel of John, 4.33. Robert J. Karris, trans. (Saint Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2007), 237.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid., 4.14.
[4] Ibid., 4.15.
[5] Ibid., 4.17.
[6] Pope Francis, Angelus Address, 19 March 2017.

16 March 2017

The Oxford comma wins its day in court

I've been a strong supporter of the Oxford comma for many years now and have often attempted to sway its detractors toward favoring its use, sometimes through memes such as this:


As you can see, the clarity added by the inclusion of the Oxford comma - sometimes called the serial comma - can be rather helpful. The use of the Oxford comma can also be of great importance, as the Honorable David J. Barron, a Judge for the United States Court of Appeals of the First Circuit - recently decided.

Boston Magazine reports the comma controversy as follows:
Delivery drivers for Oakhurst Dairy won their suit against the Portland milk and cream company, after a U.S. court of appeals found that the wording of Maine’s overtime rules were written ambiguously. Per state law, the following activities are not eligible for overtime pay: 
The canning, processing, preserving,freezing, drying, marketing, storing,packing for shipment or distribution of:(1) Agricultural produce;(2) Meat and fish products; and(3) Perishable foods. 
Oakhurst argued that “distribution of” was separate from “packing for shipment,” which would allow the company to claim exemption from paying its delivery drivers over time.

Clearly, Oakhurst's interpretation is incorrect, as even the civil courts now recognize. Long live the Oxford comma!

12 March 2017

"Of you my heart has spoken, Seek his face" (Psalm 26:8).


O God, who have commanded us to listen to your beloved Son,
be pleased, we pray,
to nourish us inwardly by your word,
that, with spiritual sight made pure,
we may rejoice to behold your glory.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son,
who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever.
- Roman Missal, Collect for the Third Sunday of Lent