Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.

Administrator instructions

Requests for permissions
This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access.
Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".
Requests for permissions are archived regularly, please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.
Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 11:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


Permissions

Handled here

User groups

  • Account creator (add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
  • Autopatrolled (add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
  • AutoWikiBrowser (add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the quick guide on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You only need to give a reason for wanting AWB access if you do not meet these qualifications.
  • Confirmed (add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
  • Extended confirmed (add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
  • File mover (add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
  • Mass message sender (add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have had made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
  • New page reviewer (add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation hoverbar.
  • Page mover (add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history.
  • Pending changes reviewer (add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
  • Rollback (add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
  • Template editor (add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Removal of permissions

If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

Note: The bureaucrat, checkuser and oversight flags cannot be removed using this process page; those need to be posted at Steward requests/permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they come from members of the Arbitration Committee or a user who is requesting their own access be removed.

Process

Requestors

To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

Administrators

Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, mass message sender, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Current requests

Account creator


Autopatrolled

User:Cayelr

Over 400 articles created and only a single article deleted ever. Been editing for three years now with a clean block log. Recent article creations seem to tick all the right boxes: sources, cats, talk pages, images with proper fair use, appropriate formatting, etc. TimothyJosephWood 16:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Schwede66 01:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Silver Master

Hello...I wish to get New Auto Patrolled rights because there are above 18,000 unreviewed pages and the oldest is from 4640 days ago so i can reduce this big review load. i have created 26 article and 26 templates excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. S!lVER M. (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Silver Master, I've tagged a couple of your recent articles – 1 and 2. Can you please report back when you've tidied up those articles and let us know where you found the relevant guidance in the manual of style? Also, you can get into real trouble over something like this. Schwede66 02:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Schwede It is done dear respected!i have kept the tags of you do not want to me to remove :)..and regarding this like this....I have contacted directly with reviewer as i made some advertisement text their by mistake while making article [1]S!lVER M. (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done You can remove the two maintenance tags. Schwede66 00:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

R96Skinner

I'd like to recommend R96Skinner for autopatrolled permissions. User has created in excess of 150 mainspace articles and all but 14 of their edits are live edits (there are also in excess of 2000 total edits). —Frosty 01:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Semmendinger

I have 34 pages created, which is more than needed for requesting permissions, but still on the low side. I make a lot of similar pages of the same topic; library systems. Formatting I keep the same across all pages for ease of reading and uniformity across a subject on the site. Each page is always properly referenced and has inherent notability. I re-visit pages fairly often when I stumble across a news article about them so I can add to the pages over time. I'd say my best-made recent page is Bartram Trail Regional Library System, which is a good representation of what I'm capable of given enough information. A good amount of my other pages are on the same level as that page. Many recent pages are stubs (I classify them as such) because of a lack of information at the time of creation. I say this because I notice you're looking at the 10 most recently created pages, so while there is nothing wrong with stubs I felt it important to let you know anyway. Overall, 0 page deletions, clean block log, pretty easy pages which have all been accepted thus far. Thanks for taking a look! SEMMENDINGER (talk) 04:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Beeblebrox (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Melcous

Editor principally creates articles on notable non-Western women. Although recent articles, identified through the Women in Red project, have been translated cleanly and with credit from other wikipedias, she also appears to have created a fair few articles from scratch that meet relevant requirements. There's self-tagged BLPSources on a few stubby articles, but that's a good thing. Recent pages (at least) listed as deleted are as a result of deletion of redirect after gnoming page moves. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 07:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Beeblebrox (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

User:Hrse12

To improve my editing and contributions in general. I only edit non-league football pages. Hrse12 (talk) 12:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has approximately 441 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
@Hrse12: What would you like to use AWB for, specifically? The software will not by itself improve your editing. Instead, it is used to make repetitive tasks easier MusikAnimal talk 19:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Eno Lirpa

In particular for efficiently removing orphan template tags on articles after I have deorphaned the article. I would use AWB then to go through a list of articles I have worked on during that session. Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done MusikAnimal talk 19:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Quasar G.

I'd just like to use AWB here and there, wherever I can, to make minor fixes to articles. Most of this will be fixing typos, as well as cleaning up links to disambiguation pages. Quasar G t - c 21:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Catrìona

Fixing typos on articles that I edit and practice for using on another wiki Catrìona (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Sic19

For repetitive find and replace tasks to improve {wikidata} links. Also to add lists to articles. Sic19 (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Sulthan90

I found much backlog in wiki projects Underlined section as well as in wikijournals. Will use AWB to reduce backlogs in this section and look fo further where it is necessary. Thank you in advance. Sulthan90 (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Impru20

In order to improve my editing efficiency, given that I usually have to fix similar sections by hand throughout a large number of election articles, and this tool could be of help. Impru20 (talk) 12:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Upstatelee18

want to do as much as i can to help out. think this would help do that. thanks Upstatelee18 (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has approximately 291 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 06:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Yashovardhan Dhanania

I think it'll help me contribute more to Wikipedia Yashovardhan (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 20:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has approximately 126 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 20:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed

User:Davidfleischmann

Wanting to upload logo for company info page David Fleischmann (talk) 05:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 05:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. MusikAnimal talk 19:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Pens444444

Despite being a user for years and having certainly more than 10 edits I am not confirmed yet?! Pens444444 (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. MusikBot talk 23:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Already done - You are already autoconfirmed. per the bot. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Uptownspecial

I would like my account to be confirmed, so I can upload the official singles covers on the twenty one pilots page. I tried to modify the fan made single covers to the official single covers, but as it was by Commons they were quickly removed. In other words, I would like the permission to upload non-free / fair use images. Thank you! Uptownspecial (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Thomediter

I have made a page, and it's almost done, but I need a picture for it to be done. I've used a lot time on it, and I wanna get the page finished, so I would really appreciate if I got confirmed. Thomediter (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 22:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Shenelle Mohammed

I would like to upload a file to Wikipedia as a requirement for a school assignment. Four days would be too long to fulfill this assignment. Shenelle Mohammed (talk) 22:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - If the file you want to upload is available under a free license, it should be uploaded to our free media repository, the Commons. You do not need any special permissions to upload there, and you can use the same username and password you use here. If it is not available under a free license, it should be requested using the Files for Upload process, which does not require any special permissions. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Venkatesh vnky

Venkatesh vnky (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I want to join Wikipedia to add my thoughts and pains, feelings of a common farmer Because i am also son of a farmer

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 16:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Extended confirmed

User:Gary "Roach" Sanderson

I have been a veteran Wikipedian with over a year of experience, I also know all the major policies. I will continue to help the entire Wikipedia project including pages protected with 30/500 protection. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done Because this permissions is automatically granted at a certain threshold, we don't really consider requests to grant it early unless there is a very compelling reason to do so, and none is presented here. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
I know, I could keep editing the mainspace. Okay, I will try again in 90 days if I don't have it and won'y do it if im almost to being it. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

File mover


Mass message sender

User:Mr. Zabej

Hello,

I develop user group in Belarus. We need to make 3-4 mass messages per year (to active user) for getting a feedback about current activities and upcoming community events such as a wikicamp. Yes, we can use a bot for the issue as well but it will be better if it is possible to use more suitable interface. Mr. Zabej (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


New page reviewer

User:Jamietw

Was formally involved in AfC and New Page Patrols, just returned from a (rather lengthy) WP:WikiBreak and am keen to get back into my old work, but it appears I now need this right (probably not a bad idea), have read the new tutorial. Jamietw (talk) 17:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Jamietw: This right isn't "needed" persay. All it does is remove pages from the new pages queue. You can patrol without the right (and do everything at AfC without the right), but a new page reviewer will just check over your work before any pages are considered patrolled. Since you're returning from a WikiBreak, it may be best for you to do this for a while before receiving the right so you can be brought up to date on changes in policies, etc. Does that seem fair? ~ Rob13Talk 16:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. Admin question not answered. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

User:J947

I would like to request NPR due to the fact that I often tag new pages. I confirm that I have read the tutorial. I was declined a month ago and told to come back in 90 days' time, but I think that I have gained enough experience. CSD log and PROD log. My PROD log is half-blue due to rescued BLP PRODs. I also sometimes review AfC drafts. Please consider carefully. J947 00:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 00:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Laurdecl

I'd like to help reduce the (immense) backlog and mark pages I know are acceptable as patrolled. I have a good track record with AfD nominations and as far as I can tell, I've never had a speedy declined. I've created a number of articles myself and believe I'm well-versed with inclusion and notability guidelines. According to the guideline I'm supposed to have knowledge of the page moving guidelines and I think I do, having moved ~200 pages and closed a few RMs. I try to improve articles which I believe have potential rather than tagging them, mostly by adding sources, an infobox and MOS fixes. Thanks for your time. Laurdecl talk 12:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
@Laurdecl:, please confirm that you have read and understood the tutorial.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: I have (the one at WP:NPP). Laurdecl talk 12:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Exemplo347

I've been dealing with Recent Changes (specifically from New Editors) for over a year now, and adding the N. P. Reviewer right will enable me to use the Page Curation tool to assist in this. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
And yes, I've read the tutorial. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 15:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment For what it's worth (it may indeed be worth absolutely nothing), I am here to voice my support for this. —Frosty 09:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Ymblanter (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Silver Master

Hello...I wish to get New page reviewer rights because there are above 18,000 unreviewed pages and the oldest is from 4640 days ago so i can reduce this big review load

I do the following in my day to day tasks:

  • I check new created articles creator if their account is new to welcome them
  • I check new created articles for WP:CSD Criteria and place a tag if applicable and send notice to their page, i may nominated between 10-15 deleted articles.
  • I check new created articles for adhering to Wikipedia's layout guidelines and place tag if applicable. I may do some layout fixes.
  • I check new created articles for adhering to Wikipedia's BLP sources and verification and place tag if applicable. I may get sources to assist creator also.
  • I check new created articles if orphan and place a tag if applicable.
  • I check new created articles if referenced or single-reference and place a tag if applicable. I may get sources to assist creator also.
  • I check new created articles if categorized and try to fix buy hot cat and improve categories tag.
  • I check new created articles if non English, i detect language place tag and translate it if its Arabic, french or Spanish as i know some!
  • I check new created articles for dead end and may add links or place a tag .
  • I may use refill to fill bare URL.
  • I Check notability or advertising and place a tag if not notable .
  • I Check https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ for plagiarism and and place a tag if needed.
  • I may to split articles to section if needed.
  • I try to deal friendly with newcomers and learn them with guides if they needed.

Others tasks include:

  • I welcome some IP users and encourage them to create account
  • I redo un-sourced edits and notify, warn and caution from IP and registered users
  • I report admins in case of repeated vandalism
  • I create articles when have some time to research.

It is not a big problem if you declined this request, Thanks S!lVER M. (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

It seems some concerns people have had with this user haven't made it into the archives, I'd advise a look at Silver Master's talk page history. Kharkiv07 (T) 15:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Kharkiv07

User:Kharkiv07 Yes i had some good-faith, miscommunication or other reasons edits. I removed it from archived but now returned for you. Is that OK?I have not blocked since my creation of account in 2007. I had never left Wikipedia more than one month.S!lVER M. (talk) 16:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
one was for some notices of templates and fixed, one for over tag and explained, one was regarding Zamalek SC and i have fixed and added correct sources and explained in talk page after discovering that there was a similar try two years ago to do the contested edits but there is no reliable sources and one was regarding page move and there is no issues...all fixedS!lVER M. (talk) 16:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Note that this page Zamalek SC is being vandalized now and i am waiting the suitable time to take action! as the vandaliser is not reponding to communication!S!lVER M. (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Recently created CSD and PROD logs User:Silver Master/PROD, User:Silver Master/CSD--S!lVER M. (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Ymblanter could this you handle this please!S!lVER M. (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Bojo1498

My previous request was denied because it seemed too close to me getting rollback and pending changes reviewer permissions. I think I have done a lot since then to justify gaining this ability. I have started spending a lot of time in AfD and I have continued to spend time reviewing pending changes. bojo | talk 18:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 18:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Gwendy

The ability to work on a variety of tasks keeps me editing obsessively. What I like about New Page Reviewer is the impact that can be made to the quality of topics included, and the opportunity to educate new editors on what Wikipedia is and is-not. I am particularly interested in reviewing new BLP pages. We need more quality articles about women, and we need them to be notable. I'm hoping to move along the review of BLP articles that are appropriate to Wikipedia and encourage their editors. As a Review Pending Changes editor, I often spend a few minutes in Google making a quick verification of a change. I see that same process working well for notability vetting in the role of New Page Reviewer. Thanks for your consideration! gwendy (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 363 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 03:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn I will follow recommendations given to another applicant and patrol without the right. Thank you! – gwendy (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Page mover

User:97198

I've moved many pages over the years (mostly fixing spelling, punctuation and capitalisation) and have made numerous requests at WP:RM when I've been unable to perform uncontroversial moves myself. 97198 (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done NeilN talk to me 04:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Frosty

Whilst I dont take part in page move discussions, my work in new pages patrolling does occasionally require pages to be moved for various reasons. A small amount of the time, the redirect is not needed so I would find this handy. I am aware that most of the time the redirect should be kept and have read under what circumstances redirects should be surpressed. —Frosty 04:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC) —Frosty 04:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done NeilN talk to me 04:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Seth Whales

My reason for requesting page mover rights is that I have moved many pages (without any edit war), and where I feel it may be a controversial move due to a previous oppose result, I always request a move the the Talk Page as I have done yesterday (3 April) with The Boat Race. SethWhales talk 16:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

User:Philip J Fry

I would like to be able to contribute with this flag, I am frequent user of Wikipedia, thank you. Philip J Fry Talk to me 12:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Beeblebrox (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Rollback


Template editor