Template talk:Hacking in the 2010s

Hackers only?

Would Stuxnet would fit in here or is the intention to have the template solely focus on hackers and hacker groups? Gobonobo ^{T C} 08:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I guess you could add a group named 'worms', 'malware' or something along the lines of that. SalfEnergy 22:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

GNAA

I would like for this template to use GNAA instead of its expletive full naming, I am currently in an edit war with another user regarding this Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 00:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

You give absolutely no reason for why you want it that way. Mythpage88 (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Why do we have to use that horrible N word? I think GNAA suffices --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 22:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Since when is Wikipedia censored? ("'being objectionable' is generally not sufficient grounds for removal or inclusion of content.") Mythpage88 (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

cupco

youre citing evidence that does not exist. I have proof yoyu are selery — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basedircrory (talk • contribs) 21:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Guardians of Peace / Bureau 121

Shouldn't the GoP/North Korea be listed under groups? (ie. Sony) -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

{{main other}}

Why does this template automatically categorize pages that transclude it? (the includeonly statement with {{main other}} placed within in) That seems against the practices of not categorizing pages that translcude navbox templates, since those navboxes may appear on pages outside the scope of the category. The categories should be directly placed into the pages themselves to make it obvious they are being categorized, instead of making it difficult to determine why something is being categorized. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 22:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)