Ford's safety record has been called into question by a "shocking" crash test result for the new Mustang GT.
The nation's most popular sports car received a two-star score following tests released by local ANCAP and European EuroNCAP crash authorities on Wednesday.
James Goodwin, ANCAP chief executive, says the car was found wanting following a series of standardised tests featuring V8-powered coupes.
The iconic sports car lost out in part due to a lack of electronic features such as autonomous emergency braking and lane keeping assistance that will feature in a facelifted version of the car due locally in 2018.
Assessors found its airbags failed to inflate properly and that the car falls short in frontal-offset and side-impact pole tests used in Australia, but not the US - the Mustang's main market.
"This result is simply shocking for such a newly designed and popular vehicle," Goodwin says.
"There's a strong consumer expectation that a new car should be five stars and a sports car is no different.
"Safety should never be compromised."
"The safety of adult occupants, child occupants and the ability to avoid a crash all form the basis of our ratings and the Mustang falls short in each of these areas."
For its part, Ford says the Mustang performed well in US testing, and that many of the current model's shortcomings will be addressed in its successor.
"We are disappointed by the Ford Mustang Euro NCAP rating. Mustang is a safe vehicle meeting, or exceeding, all applicable safety standards globally," a Ford spokesman says. "Mustang's safety credentials are further demonstrated by the five-star NHTSA NCAP rating awarded in the US as well as a 'good' IIHS rating.
"Customers can continue to enjoy their Mustang knowing that it features advanced safety features and a structure designed to manage crash energy under a variety of crash modes.
"Ford is committed to continued improvement in vehicle safety, and the 2018 Mustang in Australia will be equipped with driver assistance features such as AEB and Lane Keeping Aid.
Unlike the majority of passenger cars, many sports cars are not crash-tested as they are too expensive to be bought and smashed in triplicate. Benchmark models such as the Porsche 911, Mercedes-Benz SL do not carry independently assessed safety ratings, but the Mustang's relatively affordable price and global popularity pushed EuroNCAP to put it to the test.
The shock result - which gives the Mustang the same star score as China's first-generation Great Wall ute - is a graphic example of the differences between European and American crash tests programs.
Goodwin says ANCAP tried to crash-test the car locally, but Ford was reluctant to comply with the independent body's requests.
"This car has been on our radar for some time and we've been trying to get a rating for consumers as quickly as we can," he says.
"Unfortunately the brand was not assisting us to get a rating out for the mustang. And it's now quite clear why they weren't assisting us."
For its part, Ford says it "worked proactively with Euro-NCAP who then shared the result with ANCAP to assist in providing a result".
The shock score could bury any chance of the Mustang serving with police forces which shortlisted the Mustang as a potential replacement for Ford Falcon and Holden Commodore highway patrol vehicles.
10 Comments
| 2017-01-25 19:49:35
Oh I wonder how many other new cars sold in Australia to day has scored only 2 stars? Not good Mr Ford.
stevecro | 2017-01-26 00:41:18
no Europeans or Japanese Dale
stevecro | 2017-01-26 00:40:21
aww shucks - but it looks so darn good
stevecro | 2017-01-26 00:40:47
aww shucks - but it looks so darn good
monsteryabby | 2017-01-26 02:40:00
Will poor buggers that have left deposits and waiting for over a year get the deposit refunded ?
| 2017-01-26 04:49:37
I have just cheeked the ANCAP web site, and No other vehicles listed come close to matching the 2 stars the Mustang received. Even the Chinese and Indian utes were given 3 stars. Lets hope that the 2017 updated one will score higher.
Steve 0 | 2017-01-26 16:01:45
I've got five cars. Oldest 1956, newest 1996. Never needed any airbags or crash avoidance or lane monitoring. Two of my cars don't even have seatbelts. But I don't drink and drive and I drive responsibly. As a result after 40 odd years of driving I've never had a serious accident. So this wouldn't deter me from buying a Mustang As long as it's got a V8 and 2 doors I don't need any of that other crap. I can drive O.K. without it!
FairDinkumMate Steve 0 | 2017-01-27 02:14:29
Good on ya Steve. So next time you're responsibly driving sober through an intersection with your 5 year old grandkid in the back, the safety rating of your car as it's hammered from the side by an inattentive driver looking at their mobile phone won't matter??? Absolutely ridiculous to think that you only need a 'safe' car if you don't drive responsibly.
Selector 2 | 2017-01-27 00:52:51
SteveO, the two without seatbelts cannot be legally driven on the road.
ibstltr | 2017-01-27 02:16:02
Selector 2, that's completely wrong. In fact if your vehicle came without seatbelts and you decide to fit some it may FAIL a RWC while PASS without the seatbelts (unless you get a mod plate). This applies for anything made before 1-1-69. As for Steve O, you may be the greatest driver in the world but you just need one idiot in a Ford Ranger or similar (and there's plenty of them on the roads) to run into the side of you and your no star rating vehicle won't save you. That said, given the Mustang build quality the side impact rating won't matter as the door will probably fall off!