The 2016 tennis season was all about two men – Andy Murray and Novak Djokovic. Both have now fallen at the Australian Open, leaving the rest of the field – including a surging Roger Federer – to start dreaming about the prize they have left unguarded.
The Norman Brookes Challenge Cup usually feels like it is locked up in a triple-security bank vault. But this year it might as well be standing in plain sight. The tournament is more open than it has been since 2002, the famously unpredictable year when Thomas Johansson claimed the title.
More Tennis Videos
Viviani disqualified for hitting a ball kid
Junior tennis player Maria Vittoria Viviani is disqualified from the Australian Open for striking a ball after losing a point and hitting a ball kid despite a quick apology.
Djokovic's dramatic defeat by Denis Istomin on Thursday was followed on Sunday by a similar slip-up by Murray, who can rarely have been more favoured than he was against world No.50 Mischa Zverev. A long-time habitue of the Challenger circuit, Zverev was 15-1 on Sunday morning – long odds for a two-horse race – but used his old-fashioned serve-volley tactics to crowd Murray out of the match.
One potential beneficiary of this latest shock is Federer, who overcame Kei Nishikori in a thrilling five-set struggle on Sunday night. Instead of playing Murray in Tuesday's quarter-final, he will find himself facing a bolter who has never previously been past the third round of a grand slam.
Federer may be used to seeing the world fall at his feet. But even he can hardly have dreamt of such a cushy return to the men's tour after a six-month lay-off following knee surgery. At the start of this fortnight, the assumption was that he would fail to match last year's run to the semi-finals and thus suffer a rapid slide down the rankings. Now he stands third in the betting to win the thing.
More of Federer later. Because the biggest story of the day was Murray's surprise elimination. Again, the perceived wisdom was wrong. Everyone thought that the left-handed Zverev's net-rushes would play into Murray's strengths: aggressive returns and laser-guided passing shots. We expected him to make an easy target, but what unfolded on Rod Laver Arena felt more like a devastating ambush. Perhaps the rarity of serve-volleyers means the few that remain have the advantage of unfamiliarity.
Like Istomin on Thursday, Zverev was magnificent – never more so than when closing the match out. He just kept charging forward, even when Murray knocked the ball past him, so that he played no fewer than 118 points from the net. He knew that he was not going to win from the baseline – even if his curiously short-swinging, bunted groundstrokes inflicted plenty of damage of their own.
Like Djokovic on Thursday, Murray played at a respectable level without quite clicking into his best rhythm. He was especially sluggish in the opening set, allowing a 3-1 lead to slip away carelessly. Had he realised what a nightmarish afternoon this was going to turn into, he would probably have been more on his mettle. But no one really saw this one coming.
Having struggled with a variety of injuries in his career – a fractured wrist, two fractured ribs, a herniated disc in his lower back, a tendon tear in his knee – the 29-year-old Zverev has had no form until this last few months. Everyone assumed that it would be his super-talented younger brother, Alexander, who would make the headlines, but this match boiled up into a memorable climax as Zverev served for his 7-5, 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 victory.
Murray finally found a burst of adrenaline, moving to 15-30 with a couple of strong returns, then hooking back an overhead so strongly that it seemed a certain winner. Except that Zverev scrambled across the net, catching the ball on the tip of his racket frame so that it just gasped its way onto Murray's side of the court. Two more points and he had completed the finest win of his career, by some distance.
Asked by on-court interviewer Jim Courier how he had got the job done, Zverev replied: "I was like in a little coma, just serve-and-volleying my way through it. I think you should tell me how I did it because, honestly, there were a few points when I don't know how I pulled it off."
Murray credited his opponent with "great, great shots", adding: "You always finish matches you lose with things you maybe could have done a bit better. But he played some really good stuff.
"Did I miss an opportunity?" Murray continued. "Even had I got through this match, [Kei] Nishikori or Roger [Federer] are waiting. Stan [Wawrinka] is still in. Guys like [Jo-Wilfried] Tsonga. There's certainly no guarantees that I would have gone further. I don't feel like this is any more of an opportunity than other years."
This argument was supported by the quality of the Federer-Nishikori match, which saw Federer reel off 83 clean winners on his way to his 6-7, 6-4, 6-1, 4-6, 6-3 victory. Despite a slow start that granted Nishikori a 4-0 first-set lead, Federer gradually cranked up the power until he was even coming out on top in the backhand-to-backhand exchanges, traditionally his weakest suit.
"I guess it's good for tennis that a lot of guys believe stronger now that the top guys are vulnerable," said Federer afterwards. He himself is looking anything but.
The Telegraph, London