- published: 30 Oct 2015
- views: 3124
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (formally the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe, the convention entered into force on 3 September 1953. All Council of Europe member states are party to the Convention and new members are expected to ratify the convention at the earliest opportunity.
The Convention established the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Any person who feels his or her rights have been violated under the Convention by a state party can take a case to the Court. Judgments finding violations are binding on the States concerned and they are obliged to execute them. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe monitors the execution of judgements, particularly to ensure payment of the amounts awarded by the Court to the applicants in compensation for the damage they have sustained. The establishment of a Court to protect individuals from human rights violations is an innovative feature for an international convention on human rights, as it gives the individual an active role on the international arena (traditionally, only states are considered actors in international law). The European Convention is still the only international human rights agreement providing such a high degree of individual protection. State parties can also take cases against other state parties to the Court, although this power is rarely used.
Human rights are moral principles or norms, that describe certain standards of human behavior, and are regularly protected as legal rights in municipal and international law. They are commonly understood as inalienable fundamental rights "to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being," and which are "inherent in all human beings" regardless of their nation, location, language, religion, ethnic origin or any other status. They are applicable everywhere and at every time in the sense of being universal, and they are egalitarian in the sense of being the same for everyone. They require empathy and the rule of law and impose an obligation on persons to respect the human rights of others. They should not be taken away except as a result of due process based on specific circumstances; for example, human rights may include freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture, and execution.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR; French: Cour européenne des droits de l’homme) is a supranational or international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights. It hears applications alleging that a contracting state has breached one or more of the human rights provisions concerning civil and political rights set out in the Convention and its protocols. An application can be lodged by an individual, a group of individuals or one or more of the other contracting states, and, besides judgments, the Court can also issue advisory opinions. The Convention was adopted within the context of the Council of Europe, and all of its 47 member states are contracting parties to the Convention. The Court is based in Strasbourg, France.
The Court was established on the 21 January 1959 on the basis of Article 19 of the European Convention on Human Rights when its first members were elected by the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe. The Convention charges the Court with ensuring the observance of the engagement undertaken by the contracting states in relation to the Convention and its protocols, that is ensuring the enforcement and implementation of the European Convention in the member states of the Council of Europe. The jurisdiction of the Court has been recognised to date by all 47 member states of the Council of Europe. In 1998, the Court became a full-time institution and the European Commission of Human Rights, which used to decide on admissibility of applications, was abolished by Protocol 11.
European Court may refer to:
A court is a tribunal, often as governmental institution, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out the administration of justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the rule of law. In both common law and civil law legal systems, courts are the central means for dispute resolution, and it is generally understood that all persons have an ability to bring their claims before a court. Similarly, the rights of those accused of a crime include the right to present a defense before a court.
The system of courts that interprets and applies the law is collectively known as the judiciary. The place where a court sits is known as a venue. The room where court proceedings occur is known as a courtroom, and the building as a courthouse; court facilities range from simple and very small facilities in rural communities to large buildings in cities.
The practical authority given to the court is known as its jurisdiction (Latin jus dicere) – the court's power to decide certain kinds of questions or petitions put to it. According to William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, a court is constituted by a minimum of three parties: the actor or plaintiff, who complains of an injury done; the reus or defendant, who is called upon to make satisfaction for it, and the judex or judicial power, which is to examine the truth of the fact, to determine the law arising upon that fact, and, if any injury appears to have been done, to ascertain and by its officers to apply a legal remedy. It is also usual in the superior courts to have barristers, and attorneys or counsel, as assistants, though, often, courts consist of additional barristers, bailiffs, reporters, and perhaps a jury.
A video lecture on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This lecture discusses the background to the Convention, the different types of rights (absolute, limited and qualified) as well as many of the key articles contained in the Convention.
After Theresa May says Britain should leave the European convention on human rights, Patrick Stewart, Adrian Scarborough and Sarah Solemani expose the problems in the Conservative plan for a UK bill of rights. Subscribe to The Guardian ► http://is.gd/subscribeguardian This satirical take on the classic Monty Python sketch asks ‘what has the European Convention on Human Rights ever done for us?’ Apart from the right to a fair trial, freedom from slavery, freedom from torture ... Guardian website ► http://is.gd/guardianhome Suggested videos: Exploitation, exploitation, exploitation ► http://bit.ly/ExpExpExp Owen Jones meets Shami Chakrabarti ► http://bit.ly/OwenShami Guardian playlists: Comment is Free ► http://is.gd/cifplaylist Guardian Docs ► http://is.gd/guardiandocs Guardian Feature...
A new film presenting the European Court of Human Rights has just been produced. Aimed at a wide audience, the film explains how the Court works, describes the challenges faced by it and shows the scope of its activity through examples from the case-law. The film is currently available in French and English, but will be issued in other official languages of the member States of the Council of Europe.
The Court has produced a video presenting the main rights and freedoms in the Convention. Aimed at a wide range of viewers, this video-clip is currently available in 38 languages. The Court wishes to encourage initiatives aimed at including this video-clip in civic education programs.
The President of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), Judge Dean Spielmann, has told HARDtalk it would be a "political disaster" if Britain left the European Convention on Human Rights. "We have a unique system of protecting human rights," he said, "Britain should be very careful not to lose its credibility by taking such an important move," he added. UK Conservative Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has said he is working on proposals for a "radical change" to human rights laws which would "curtail" the role of the ECHR in the UK
The Conservative Party have campaigned for change to our human rights laws; Labour and the Liberal Democrats are against it. The Conservatives have proposed giving parliament the right to veto judgments from European Court of Human Rights, curtailing the Court’s authority and allowing parliament to decide whether or not to adopt ECHR decisions. This radical proposal has been driven by the view that the European Convention on Human Rights has become of a ‘charter for criminals’, abused by those convicted of serious offences. The Home Office revealed for example that in 2009, 5,535 foreign prisoners were deported, while 350 individuals succeeded in preventing their removal from the UK because of the ECHR. Those offenders argued that they may be at risk of torture or inhuman or degrading tr...
This video offers a twenty-five-minute talk by a lawyer from the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights (http://www.echr.coe.int) and was recorded in the Court’s main hearing room. It provides an overview of the Court’s jurisprudence in matters related to terrorism. It is principally aimed at legal professionals and civil society organisations. The video was produced by the Court in cooperation with, and with the support of, the Council of Europe’s Programme “Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals” (HELP; http://www.coe.int/help). Entire talk: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/COURTalks_Terr_Talk_ENG.pdf Factsheet on terrorism: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Terrorism_ENG.pdf Table of content: 1. Key notions on terrorism and the ECHR - 00:18 2. Prevention of terrori...
This video offers a fifteen-minute talk by a lawyer from the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights (http://www.echr.coe.int) and was recorded in the Court’s main hearing room. It explains the admissibility criteria that each application must fulfill in order to be examined further by the Court and is principally aimed at legal professionals and civil society organisations. The video was produced by the Court in cooperation with, and with the support of, the Council of Europe’s Programme “Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals” (HELP; http://www.coe.int/help). Entire talk: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/COURTalks_Inad_Talk_ENG.pdf Relevant ECHR Case-Law of the video: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/COURTalks_Inad_CaseLaw_ENG.pdf Guide on the Admissibility Criteria: h...
European Court of Human Rights - Video on Admissibility Conditions The European Court of Human Rights launched a short video in English and French on the criteria for admissibility, produced with the support of the Principality of Monaco. The video, which is approximately three minutes long, is aimed at the general public and sets out the main conditions required in order to apply to the Court; failure to satisfy these conditions is the reason why the vast majority of applications are rejected. In 2011, for instance, the Court finished examining over 50,000 applications, but fewer than 3% of them resulted in a judgment being adopted. The video on admissibility is intended to remind members of the public wishing to apply to the Court that they must first satisfy certain criteria, fai...
assisted paradigm entrusted privately decays
behaving all controlled dependent look alike display
affection for defection when no refuge all the same
dependent never border one world order it away
create a way the mind will have to
find a way in guarding reason alibis
it seems a way defended reasons it seems a way
it seems a way alarming visions it seems a way
a begging man divine instructed shadow poverty
a deeply dirty hiding from too many eaten needs
protection with selection cover all not needing anything
resentment unrelenting change to self destructive means
it seems a way poor execution it seems a way
it seems a way each from a center
it seems a way
addicted horrified abducted outwardly betray
removing all below collective consciousness degrades
ascension from depression which cover chosen all the same
pretend it doesn't matter the world orders it away.
ask as if to find traces out of time back chews on itself a turn that
says it all.
inserting all the tools upon the broken talking dog
if fleeing dirty shadows off of drawings on the wall
a funded self of science from disorder and decay