Advertisement
In the toilet: Texas unveils its “bathroom bill”
Democracy in America
Daily chart: Singing the praises of a musical at the Golden Globes
Graphic detail
The great pragmatist: The death of a former president tilts the balance of...
Middle East and Africa
Air strike: British Airways crew walk out over “poverty” pay
Gulliver
The weigh forward: MasterCard could estimate passengers’ weight for...
Gulliver
Some rare good news: Berlin’s unique new music academy
Prospero
The Economist explains: Why the “WTO option” for Brexit will prove...
The Economist explains
Most commented
Advertisement
Test your EQ
Take our weekly news quiz to stay on top of the headlines
Want more from The Economist?
Visit The Economist e-store and you’ll find a range of carefully selected products for business and pleasure, Economist books and diaries, and much more
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in to your account.
Don't have an account? Register
Sort:
My boyfriend is a huge fan of MMA and wrestling. We often watch different fight matches together. He started to go to the gym almost every day and even started to buy sustanon (some info about it here http://www.athletespharmacy.org/injectable-steroids-361/sustaxyl-350-162... ) to increase strength and to gain the muscle mass. His trainer says he is in a pretty good shape now. I think MMA inspires him for regular trainings.
I'm just waiting for those crazy Russian "Knight Fights" where they wear full plate armour and whack each other in the head with blunted swords to make it to the mainstream...
The Society for Creative Anachronism has been doing this since 1966. They have created whole new medieval kingdoms and societies through out the USA. They have kings, dukes, knights, courts and even wars between kingdoms. They strive to accurately recreate the best of medieval life while ignoring the worst. Sort of a cross between serious historical recreation research and Monty Python.
Gladiatorial combat is coming. Rules are for wimps.
According to an article in Forbes, when MMA first started the belief was blood and guts was what attracted people to MMA over other sports such as boxing. Then the analysis of box office sales showed that what attracted people to MMA was the same reason as boxing, wrestling, etc. People want to see their favorite fighter win. This meant that if he was unable to fight due to injuries, his fans stopped watching until the was able to fight again. So stricter rules were imposed to minimize serious injuries.
BTW historians believe that 70% of gladiatorial fights ended with both sides walking out of the arena. They have found historical records of free Romans becoming gladiators under contract to fight for a certain number of years and then retiring with a big pay out. So gladiatorial fights were no where as deadly as Hollywood portrays since free Romans chose it as a profession.
Indeed, and gladiators had big fan followings, if the various portrayals in 'Age of Treason' and 'Spartacus' (TV series) are at all accurate historically. I believe the original author of 'Age of Treason' did make a big effort to be so.
.
There may have been a difference in the way gladiators were treated before the Spartacus Rebellion ('Third Servile war') in 71 BC and after. But what I'm reading about Gladiators in Wikipedia seem to confirm this, big money was tied up in ownership of gladiators and they had substantial followings, both individually and in respect of their gladiatorial training houses.It all sounds a lot like Premier league football to-day, not to mention what MMA aspires to.
.
The adoption of Christianity put an end to it all, of course, so it's a test of the fidelity of a nation as to whether they will revive it or not. I suspect that restoration and the consequent race to the bottom is inevitable with to-day's jaded tastes, saturated as they are by choice. You can imagine what television would do with it. Who will be first?
MMA's original attempt at pro fighting was to duplicate gladiatorial fighting as closely as possible within the law. As the Forbes article showed, that was a money loser. People did not want blood and guts. They want well fought competition. That was why historians believe 70% of gladiatorial fights were bloodless. They were contests of skill and well fought contests resulted in both fighters walking off alive.
So this whole notion of people wanting real gladiatorial fights is basically Hollywood nonsense. The secret fight to the death martial arts competition is something that only exists in the movies. Unregulated boxing matches do exist but they are few, attract small audiences and fighters are more likely to die in a bar fight because the promoters want good fighters to live to fight again.
The race to the bottom is an idea promoted by con artists. They want people to think they are to see a real fight to the death. In reality they are just being overcharged for a standard controlled fight.
Yawn.
Another creation of GenXcess and GenYners.
Do they sell espressos and craft beers at these events, or is this for the lower classes, you know...
the ones that claim to live "paycheck to paycheck."
NSFTL
Regards
Oddly enough, they only sell Budweiser. Must be because it's their sponsor.
There's a bit of a mistake in the article which could give a negative impression of the sport: eye gouging has never been legal in the UFC from the first event.
Unfortunately such mistakes are becoming all too common in TE articles about America. They seem to have hired a new bunch of inexperienced Brits to write about America.
Does seem awfully inefficient that the venue took in only $17m when tickets are selling for 15x the price on the secondary market.
Surely they could have jacked up the prices a lot and still filled it out?
They DID jack up the prices - this was already the most expensive UFC event in history, even before the secondary market got in on the act.