Wikipedia:Cambridge
Sign up for free access to Cambridge University Press (Waitlist)
Cambridge University Press |
---|
Pages |
Cambridge University Press is a publisher of academic journals and e-books in a variety of subject areas. They are offering access to two collections: Cambridge Journals Online and Cambridge Books Online. For more information see their website.
There are up to 25 one-year accounts available to Wikipedians through this partnership.
Requirements[edit]
- You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia or on your home wiki linked from your application; (see Special:Preferences)
- You have an account that is a minimum of 6 months old
- You have a minimum of 500 edits to the encyclopedia
- You do not already have access to this resource through another library or institution
If you don't quite meet the experience requirements but think you would still be a strong candidate for access, feel free to apply and you may be considered
Expectations[edit]
Approved editors may
- Search, view, retrieve, and display portions of restricted content;
- Electronically save portions of restricted content;
- Print out single copies of portions of restricted content;
Approved editors will not
- Share their account logins or passwords with others, or sell their access to other parties
- Mass scrape or mass download Cambridge University Press content
- Systematically make printed or electronic copies of multiple extracts of restricted content available for any purpose.
- Datamine metadata without permission, in order, for instance, to use metadata for auto-created stub articles.
- Violate any terms and conditions which appear on the particular pages of the Cambridge University Press website they are accessing.
- Display individual excerpts of content greater than 500 words.
Private and confidential information
- By applying to the Program, you understand and agree that your name and email address may be shared with representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation, The Wikipedia Library, and Cambridge University Press. Wikipedia Library organizers contracted under the Wikimedia Foundation will abide by the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy and associated confidentiality agreements. Volunteer representatives of the Wikipedia Library are neither employees nor contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation (or Cambridge University Press), but they have signed confidentiality agreements with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to the personal information they may handle for the Wikipedia Library.
Citation[edit]
![]() |
- Editors should always provide original citation information in addition to linking to Cambridge University Press resources, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT.
- Editors should not provide bare links to restricted Cambridge University Press pages
- Note (subscription required) in the citation, where appropriate
- Respect the copyright of Cambridge University Press, in accordance with Wikipedia's copyright policy and their terms of use
- Cite resources in line with the citation examples provided below or with the examples provided by Cambridge University Press
- Note that citation styles vary by article; editors can use the style most appropriate to the articles they are working with so long as the citations are complete.
Example
{{cite journal|last1=Fox|first1=Jo|title=Careless Talk: Tensions within British Domestic Propaganda during the Second World War|journal=The Journal of British Studies|date=21 December 2012|volume=51|issue=04|pages=936–966|doi=10.1086/666741|url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8739049&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S002193710000397X}}{{subscription required|via=Cambridge University Press}}
- Fox, Jo (21 December 2012). "Careless Talk: Tensions within British Domestic Propaganda during the Second World War". The Journal of British Studies. 51 (04): 936–966. doi:10.1086/666741. – via Cambridge University Press (subscription required)
Further participation[edit]
You can help The Wikipedia Library share this partnership:
- Add {{Wikipedia:Cambridge/Userbox}} to your user boxes. This helps us share our project with other experienced users.
![]() |
This user has access to Cambridge University Press resources through The Wikipedia Library. |
Waitlist[edit]
What to expect with TWL account processing | |
Make sure to read this before sending emails to account coordinators inquiring about your account status. Our current average account distribution cycle (from sign up to account access), is 27 days. We are working on improving this.
Step 1: Application screening
Step 2: Email and Google Form
Step 3: Waiting for partners to activate accounts
Step 4: Using access
Changes coming soon
|
|
Stuck or need help? Try our IRC channel #wikipedia-library |
Add yourself at the bottom of the list with a line starting with #{{user8|USERNAME|Project=code}} (eg. {{user8|Example|Project=en}}) followed by an explanation of why you would like access to this resource. It is a good idea to include in your application text your editing areas benefited by access and examples of your commitment to content creation.
- BushelCandle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit widely but especially articles relating to Singapore, the Philippines and travel documents and emigration. BushelCandle (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending next round. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update, Nikkimaria. I'll be waiting with baited breath... BushelCandle (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- @BushelCandle:
Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Approved
-
-
- User did not respond. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
-
- Fredericknoronha (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Would help me enhance the quality of my edits on the English wikipedia. Am mostly interested in Goa and India-related content.fredericknoronha (talk) 06:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending as you haven't been very active lately. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Andrew Dalby (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I work across the wikis, English, French and Latin, improving referencing and bibliographies: history, anthropology, literature etc. CUP is a wall on which I often bash my head. Andrew Dalby 09:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)I think some others here need it even more than I do!- Ciridae (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been on Wikipedia for over 7 months now. I'm currently concentrating on fiction literature and other novel articles but I also perform gnomish tasks all around the place. Ciridae (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Pending as you haven't been very active lately. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- First Light (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My editing is mostly in various religion articles, including several new articles, one GA, and DYKs in that area. I've also edited many plant articles in the past. Approx. 21,000 edits at English Wikipedia. I have no access to a library of any kind.
Pending as you haven't been very active lately. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- WarKosign (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm mostly editing articles related to Israel's history and politics, and good sources are always needed. CUP has a lot of material I can use. “WarKosign” 14:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- @WarKosign:
Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- @WarKosign:
- Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Been at Wikipedia about 7 years, edit all kinds of articles, science, politics, language, biographies; some articles I've revamped are here. I have over 100+million pageviews from articles and images.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Gilgamesh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) i am an active editor in the field of history with numerous articles on this subject. some of my articles are featured articles in the hebrew wikipedia. i use academically based research papers to enrich my articles with good quality material and i will use the access granted to me for this purpose. Gilgamesh (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Andreas Werle (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active editor in the german Wikipedia since 10 years, mainly in the field of Medicine and Literature (Shakespeare). CUP is one of my main sources for work about Shakespeare (New Cambridge-Edition). I would appreciate to have an account. -- Andreas Werle (talk) 08:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Thanks for making access to this resource possible, as it has long been on my wish list. Editor of top-500 article English language, for which I would have loved to have more access to Cambridge journals as we collaborating editors won the Million Award in 2015 for bringing that article to good article status. I think it's time now to bring that article up to featured article status, and the Cambridge journals will help. I've also won the Million Award for bringing IQ classification to good article status, and that article and many related articles about psychology are due for improvement now that I could help bring about with the expanded journal access. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (Watch my talk, How I edit) 23:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Johnbod (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)</nowiki> I often encounter this paywall, writing mostly about art history, history, and sometimes medicine. Over 150 K edits, 15 FAs etc. Johnbod (talk) 06:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Farrtj (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi I often encounter this paywall regarding literature and business topics Tom (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Onel5969 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - 85k or so edits... I've written a couple of hundred articles, have a few GA and FA articles, and have recently become interested in saving abandoned or AfD articles. Do a fair bit of bio work, focusing mainly on US cinema folks, as well as on film articles in general. Also do a fair amount of work on geographical articles. Would love to get more into history articles. Feel this could be a very helpful tool. I currently use newspapers.com a fair bit, and think this would be a nice academic complement to that. Onel5969 TT me 23:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- MarshalN20 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) - Three featured articles, one good article. Mostly focus on Latin American history, but I am currently working on a project about the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Access to this resource would be very helpful with this and other future works I plan to complete for Wikipedia. Thanks!--MarshalN20 Talk 02:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) It would be phenomonally useful for my work expanding our coverage of late-medieval English gentry and nobility. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Xender Lourdes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I will find this access useful as I am a content creator on varied topics. This would help me cite and develop articles to GA FA status. I have created 26 articles with one GA and 5 DYKs. I've started upgrading my articles to FAs. One FA nom is pending. I am an auto reviewer too. Thank you. Xender Lourdes (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Alexis Ivanov (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I have made 2,000+ edits, I am focusing primarily on Golden Horde and Crimean Khanate. I also do occasional edits on Ottoman Empire and Mamluk Sultanate, I would benefit greatly from the Cambridge Resources. It will bring variety of high end resources on these subjects. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Rococo1700 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am interested in access to historical and architectural journals to enhance articles having to do with Italian art and architecture.Rococo1700 (talk) 22:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Davidbena (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been active on Wikipedia for 3 years, and have written more than 20 articles, as well as contributed to many others (with nearly 12,000 edits), mostly in the fields of historical-research, as also biographies on important personages, and on Jewish customs. I have the utmost respect for academic journals and the articles they contain, and always strive to cite reliable sources whenever writing about a given topic. Having access to this venue will greatly improve my ability to cite reliable sources and to help make Wikipedia a more credible knowledge base.Davidbena (talk) 23:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Jfhutson (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit religious articles which CUP has lots of great resources for. I have already made significant use of my OUP account. --JFH (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Blue_Mist_1 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active in Ancient Greek Philosophy, with additional interest in Philosophy of Science and the physical sciences. I would like access to the Cambridge Companion series. ~~ BlueMist (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Smallchief (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've been a wikipedia contributor since 2010 and I have created about 100 articles and edited more than 1,000 articles. I am a content creator, focusing on the history and archaeology of North America, military history, especially Vietnam, agriculture, and protected areas. Access to the Cambridge University Press would give me access to a great number of excellent sources related to my interests. Smallchief (talk 21:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Coretheapple (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Active in articles on popular culture and beginning to improve articles on the Third Reich such as Schutzstaffel and Ideology of the SS. Access to the Cambridge University Press would help greatly in work on these areas. Coretheapple (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wasted Time R (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Contributor since 2005, over 67,000 edits, 130 FA/GA/DYK articles. Many of my recent activities have focused on historical, political, economic, and academic subjects that the free online world has poor representation of, and having access to the books and journals of Cambridge University Press would be quite valuable. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Mhhossein (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've created some dozens of articles and have promoted two articles to GA level. My main interest, as shown by my contributions, are political and religious issues. Having access to "Cambridge University Press" would be excellent and will enable me to enhance the quality of those articles I edit. Mhhossein (talk) 07:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Khanate General (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm an experienced editor active since 2013 with over 4000 edits. I've contributed two Featured Articles, one Featured List, and a number of Good Articles. My main area of focus is the military history of Central and East Asia, and there are several CUP journals that I would like to access.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 20:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Patriot1423 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I must have made more than a hundred edits to decentralize the List of Thermal Conductivities and I corrected a couple of errors in the old publications of the National Bureau of Standards and Purdue University. My work is not yet complete and what would help now is the sources of an old (1971) three volume report about the thermophysical properties of matter for the Defense Logistics Agency which used to have its headquarters in Virginia somewhere. That is the TPRC Data Series from Purdue University in Indiana. I would also like access to the sources that I find in the bibliographies of their sources and some of them are from the Royal Society. Thank you Patriot1423
- Apuldram (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Recently I have several times needed to check references to CU Press books summarised on-line, but have been unable to get into the detail as my local library doesn't subscribe. Apuldram (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- TnoXX (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I see that it's almost impossible to get an access, but it's not a crime to try. I'm active in Ukr-Wiki (5 GA, 4 FA, 12 FL). My main work field is medicine and biology. Thank you!--TnoXX (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- SchroCat (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)An experienced editor with 25+ FAs and a few more FLs. CUP access would be an excellent resource to further the research needed to top-level articles. - SchroCat (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Amqui (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wrote several GA on the French Wikipedia and I contribute in a wide variety of topics covered by this resource that would be very helpful to me. More details can be provided if needed. Thank you, Amqui (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Queeste (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active on the Dutch Wikipedia since 2009 - more than 15.000 edits. Very interested in psychology, psychiatry, history and religion. --Queeste (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Melly42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm active on the German and English Wikipedia since 2005 - more than 15.000 edits. Very interested in biology and zoology. Would be also great to have access to archived issues of journals (e.g. The Oryx from the 1950s and 1960s).
- Alexis Ivanov (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I edit in the English wikipedia, I have made 2,000+ edits, I mainly work in Ottoman Empire articles, I also venture into earlier periods in other parts of the world, being subscribed to Cambridge Would help me a lot with top academics books and articles. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 06:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Xover (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Both Cambridge Books and Journals would be highly relevant for maintaining and verifying references, and creating and expanding articles, within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare (e.g. my current long term project: Edmond Malone). --Xover (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Daniele.tampieri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I contribute to Wikipedia by mainly editing entries on engineering, mathematics and physics topics and I currently have been granted access to other similar sources by The Wikipedia Library: even for this important resource, I think I meet all the requirements for applying and that my edits will benefit from access to the Cambridge University Press online resources. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Akhooha (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've created and edited articles for the English Wikipedia as well as for the Arabic Wikipedia and access to Cambridge University Press would greatly enhance my research abilities. I currently have and use JSTOR access. Akhooha (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Haploidavey (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Particularly active in Roman social and religious history, and frustrated on a near-daily basis by CUP's paywall limits; I live way out in the boonies of Derbyshire, UK, with no library access worth the name. Haploidavey (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- LouisAragon (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active for several years, some +- 25.000 edits, mainly in the area of history, for which I have created quite a few articles in a wide array of topics/subjects (mainly Europe/ME). Getting access to CUP would be great, as they have many top notch history-related works and journals. This would aid me alot in my area of activity. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Banjo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 59k+ edits and Sysop at gl.wikipedia. Other than admin dutires, I focus my work both in translations/adaptations and improvement of GA/FA to galician wiki and improving already created content and article referencing in galician wiki. Lately focused on history related articles, but I usually work on a vast array of topics. Access to these resources would be really helpful in these tasks and in improving the general referencing of gl.wiki articles. Banjo (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- InformationvsInjustice (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been contributing more recently as part of a decision to increase my involvement in the community and improve content in the areas in which I have something to offer. I am involved in the Ancient Rome and Greece project. Inadequate sourcing is endemic in many of the pages of interest to the project. I have just finished a complete revision of the Romulus and Remus article and the creation of a separate Romulus article. I have J.D.. I have strong research and writing skills. All too often while editing, I find authorities online that I cannot access. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 05:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)