Can capitalism do sustainable development? OK, let's ask that question again without the jargon. Can I really help save the planet by buying products from all these big companies "going green" and selling
Fairtrade products?
I have been thinking about this a lot while researching my newly published book,
Confessions of an Eco Sinner. You will have seen some of my travel notes here at
Fred's Footprint over the past year. Here is where I have got to.
Many companies are making a real effort to cut their carbon emissions and fight climate change. Whether it is
Richard Branson's biofuels plane or Rupert Murdoch's
carbon-neutral media empire, they mean business.
Some of this is down to emissions caps imposed by the Kyoto protocol, some to consumer and shareholder pressure, and some is real executive interest in long-term sustainability of both their companies and the planet.
The bottom line is they believe they can make money out of cutting carbon emissions. Hardly surprising, when
trading in carbon emissions permits and voluntary offsets is now a business worth more than a hundred billion dollars a year. And no wonder major US corporations are leaning on this year's
Presidential candidates to sign the Kyoto protocol, so they can join in the new brand of carbon capitalism.
And in my own small way, I am part of this, whether it is offsetting my flights, turning down the thermostat, taking the train or buying an energy-efficient fridge. The potential is so great that capitalism really could save the planet. But will it make a fairer world?
Here my optimism gives out. I don't yet see a way in which companies can make bigger profits by making the world's poorest people wealthier. Rather, we of the rich world seem increasingly to demonise the poor for daring to want a better life.
Sure, some of us buy Fairtrade tea, coffee, socks and bananas. But what I discovered during my book researches was that, though genuinely worth supporting, Fairtrade is a misnomer. Call it: slightly less unfair.
The premium price I pay for my coffee does not reflect what the farmer on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro or wherever should receive. Rather it reflects how much Western consumers like me can be encouraged to pay for feeling a virtuous glow as we stand in the checkout queue on a Saturday morning. And that's a different matter.
Some clothes companies would like to treat workers in sweatshops on the other side of the planet rather better. They have corporate social responsibility (CSR) departments devoted to the task.
But in the factories of sub-contractors in Bangladesh, India and China, I heard endless stories of what really happens. The day after the CSR inspectors come to read the riot act over workers' conditions, the buyers from the same companies show up and threaten to cancel contracts unless they get cheaper prices. Guess who wins.
And we are partly to blame. We may weep crocodile tears over the sweatshops, but we still buy the $10 jeans that create them.
I fear that, in coming decades, a combination of Western consumerism and corporate muscle will conspire to save the planet and starve the poor. Unless we are careful, we will unleash a new green and global fascism.
Fred Pearce, senior environment correspondentLabels: climate change, freds-footprint
The world is running out of wheat because too many farmers have switched to growing corn for ethanol production. United States Department of Agriculture statistics show that US wheat supplies fell in February, 2008, to lower levels than at any time since 1958, when America only had 175 million people to feed. The "LONDON TIMES" claims that the world has only a 10 week supply of wheat left.
The highly respected journal SCIENCE recently published the "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land Use Change," which states that the production of biofuels from grains or switchgrass greatly increases the release of greenhouse gases and is far worse for the environment than using ordinary gasoline.
SEE http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1151861
SEE confirming second study from Europe, "Biofuels: an unfolding disaster" (pdf 514kb) at: http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/docs/ECOS-6-5.pdf
Biofuel production is causing food price hyperinflation by shrinking the human food supply. According to the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization, global food prices rose 40% in 2007 alone, and thus United Nations food official Jean Ziegler called biofuels a "crime against humanity." Food prices in America rose .7% in January, 2008, and will continue their upward spiral. Poor people in Haiti are now resorting to eating mud because American biofuel mandates have made grains unaffordable. As we heartlessly starve the world's poor, pressure for illegal immigration to the USA continues to rise. Growing switchgrass to make biofuels will not stop this trend, as land, water, fertilizer, farm equipment, and labor will still be diverted from food production with soaring food prices the result. When Americans foolishly turn their food into fuel, we raise food prices globally which gives other countries a financial incentive to burn down rainforests in order to grow more food. Biofuel production aggravates water shortages, and it takes 9,000 gallons of water to create just 1 gallon of biodiesel.
Global biofuel production will dangerously heat up earth's atmosphere because farming contributes more to global warming each year than all land, sea, and air transportation combined. This destruction makes no sense strategically because by 2015 it is estimated that oil from American shale will cost only $30 a barrel to manufacture, and there is more oil potential in Colorado shale than in the entire Middle East before drilling began in 1908. It is also obviously better to drill in ANWR for energy than in our own food!
The "energy independence" argument for biofuels is a hoax because American biodiesel made out of soybeans costs the equivalent of making regular diesel out of oil at $232 a barrel. Making ethanol from corn costs the equivalent of oil at $81 a barrel and uses 28% more fossil fuels than gasoline. Only massive government subsides makes biofuels affordable at the pump.