Heading - New Scientist Environment Blog

An environment blog from  Heading - NewScientist Blogs

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Fred's Footprint: The cost of cleaner air

Greenhouse gas emissions may be going up but most of us, most of the time, are breathing cleaner air than we did 20 years ago. Why? Because cars are now fitted with catalytic converters to strip out a range of noxious nasties that once created acid smogs in our cities.

But up in the Arctic, they are feeling a nasty blowback from cleaning up our urban air.

Catalytic converters filter our pollutants from exhausts using two metals: palladium and platinum. World demand for both has soared as a result, with catalytic converters taking almost half of current product from mines.

Most of the palladium comes from Siberian mines and is refined at the world’s biggest, and most notoriously polluting, metals smelters at a godforsaken spot called Norilsk, a closed Russian city on the edge of the Arctic Circle.

The Norilsk smelters are the biggest concentrated source of sulphur dioxide pollution on the planet.

Sulphur dioxide makes acid rain. And for hundreds of kilometres round Norilsk, the trees of the tundra are dead because of the acid fallout. In effect we are destroying huge areas of Arctic tundra with acid rain, so the rest of the world can keep its city air clean.

The smelters are so spectacularly inefficient that they also release large amounts of palladium up the stacks. One recent study suggests the metals fallout onto the tundra is so great it may soon be worth mining the soils!

And what about the other metal essential for catalytic converters, platinum? Winning this from the Earth is not so environmentally damaging, but it takes a big toll in human lives.

Three-quarters of the world's platinum is mined in South Africa, where it is now a bigger business than gold mining. South Africa's mines have always been dangerous places. That is partly a result of their often great depth, as I discovered in a trip down a gold mine there last year.

But the death toll is now turning into a major scandal, as people wake up to the fact that the end of apartheid did little to make the mines safer places to work.

Miners went on strike in December in protest at a death toll that rose to over 200 last year. And the conglomerate Anglo Platinum recently shut down its biggest platinum mine, the world’s largest, and fired its CEO in an effort to address the problem.

My lungs, and yours, are cleaner and healthier as a result of all this. But I can’t say that it helps me breathe more easily.

Fred Pearce, senior environment correspondent

Labels:

Comments:
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.
Air pollution will kill us all!

......Preventing air pollution will kill us all!
By Anonymous Anonymous on January 02, 2008 5:59 PM  
Environmental issues are like so 2007.
By Anonymous Anonymous on January 02, 2008 9:02 PM  
Cats never were a good idea. The motivation to make their fitting mandatory was political and possibly criminal (the precious metals involved are supplied by a monopoly with strong links to figures in the US administration) and yet another case of the US imposing legislation on the rest of the world.

At the time Japanese car manufacturers were making huge advances in 'Lean Burn' technology, which not only produced cleaner exhaust than cat-fitted engines but also reduced fuel consumption significantly.

Cats reduce the efficiency of engines thereby increasing their fuel consumption, clearly something 'Big Oil' was in favour of...

The final nail in lean burn's coffin was the realisation by certain vehicle manufacturers that the high cost of replacement converters would be sufficient to force the scrapping of older but otherwise viable cars.

In conclusion, surely now is the time to reconsider 'Lean Burn' technology from an ethical perspective.
By Anonymous Anonymous on January 04, 2008 1:03 PM  
From Wikipedia.
The main drawback of lean burning is the large amount of NOx being generated, so a complex catalytic converter system is required.

And a bit of research indicates that Honda at least is still researching and using lean-burn.
CO2 emissions can be cut in half by permenently mixing petrol and water using an ultrasonic dibber. All that is then needed is to adjust the carburettor. The engine should run cooler so would maker aero engines cheaper. The vehicle travels just as far on a tank of mixed fuel.
By Anonymous Anonymous on January 04, 2008 4:39 PM  
There's clearly no quick win nor any method that doesn't seem to have some adverse side effect with regards to cleaning up our act.

It's time is it not that some sort of grown up approach is taken to this, and an overall system of accounting applied, rather than this type of finger pointing exercise that selectively looks at one approach in isolation.

Perhaps it ain't so bad if a smelting plant pumps out a few noxious fumes providing the ends they met were on balance worth it.

The problem this post is trying to shine a spotlight on is a badly run smelting plant. So why not clean up that plant and the reason for the post in the first place goes away?

Mark.
treboona@googlemail.com
Yeah, sorry, but this post was kind of too pointing and mostly in one direction. Meaning, what is your side in this? What do you want to say with what you wrote?

To me, the problem is very obvious- we have countries where human life and environment mean something, and countries where they don't. Why? Because we never required that from them. Why? Because we won't be able to buy their cheap production otherwise. As simple as this.

And to me the solution is simple- decrease the use of cars to the minimum. Buy greener cars. Stimulate with your money the green technologies.
For me this is not an option, I'll have to buy a second hand car and accept its terrible exhaust. That's why I'll use it only when it's absolutely necessary. That's what I'll do. Not much, but with all my heart. :)
Ethics has no place in $$$$$$$.
Until it does, we are screwed.

The people with all the $$$, will be able to survive the outfall of their action...

And people are worried about HIV, what a joke...
By Anonymous Steve - South Africa on January 10, 2008 10:34 AM  
Welcome to our game world, my friend asks me to buy some knight gold . I do not know how to use the knight noah ; my friend tells me how to use. I will thank for my friends bringing me in this world. I am not regret to buy knight online gold . We all love game, if you want to play it, please buy knight online noah and join us. Please do not hesitate to have cheap knight gold . It is funny.
By Anonymous Anonymous on January 10, 2009 6:10 AM  
I always heard something from my neighbor that he sometimes goes to the internet bar to play the game which will use him some runescape gold
he usually can win a lot of rs gold
then he let his friends all have some runescape money
his friends thank him very much for introducing them the cheap rs gold. they usually buy runescape together.