Joint Russian & Turkish bombing campaign in Syria deepens NATO crisis
Bill Van Auken, WSWS, Jan 20 2017
The launching of coordinated air strikes by Russian and Turkish warplanes against Daesh targets in northern Syria Wednesday has further exposed the crisis gripping Washington’s intervention in Syria, as well as the deepening contradictions plaguing the NATO alliance on the eve of Donald Trump’s inauguration as president. The bombing campaign struck targets around the Syrian town of al-Bab, the scene of bloody fighting between Turkish troops and Daesh over the past several weeks. From a political standpoint, the joint action by Russia and Turkey, a member of the NATO alliance for the past 65 years, is unprecedented. It stands in stark contradiction to the anti-Moscow campaign being waged by Washington and its principal NATO vassals, which has seen the cutting off of military-to-military ties, the imposition of sanctions, and the increasingly provocative deployment of thousands of Pindosi and other NATO troops on Russia’s western borders. Just last week, Pindostan sent 3,000 soldiers into Poland, backed by tanks and artillery, while hundreds more US Marines have been dispatched to Norway. Turkey’s collaboration with Russia represents a further challenge to the Pindo-led alliance under conditions in which Trump has severely rattled its European members with recent statements describing NATO as “obsolete” and charging its members with not “taking care of terror” and not “paying what they’re supposed to pay.” Lt-Gen Sergei Rudoskoy of the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement:
The joint air attack was carried out under the terms of a memorandum reached between the Russian and Turkish militaries last week. The document, signed on Jan 12, was designed to prevent incidents as well as to prepare joint operations in Syria to destroy international terrorist groups.
Russian-Turkish relations reached their nadir in Nov 2015 when Turkish fighter jets ambushed and shot down a Russian warplane carrying out airstrikes against Islamist fighters near the border between Turkey and Syria. The incident brought Turkey, and with it NATO, to the brink of war with nuclear-armed Russia. At that point, Turkey was serving as the main conduit for foreign fighters, weapons and other resources being poured into Syria to wage the Pindo-orchestrated war for regime change, while Russia was intervening to prop up Assad. In June of last year, Ankara sought to mend relations with Moscow, which had retaliated to the shoot-down with economic sanctions. Relations grew closer in the wake of the abortive Jul 2016 military coup against Erdogan, which he blamed on Pindostan and its vassals.
The turning point in bilateral relations between Turkey and Russia came at the end of last year, with the Russian-backed Syrian army’s routing of Nusra from their last urban stronghold of eastern Aleppo. Turkey joined with Russia in brokering a withdrawal of the last “rebels” from the area and a nationwide ceasefire, which continues to prevail in much of the country. Faschingstein was pointedly excluded from the negotiations surrounding both Aleppo and the ceasefire. Only at the last moment has Moscow invited the incoming Trump administration, despite the objections of Iran, to participate in talks aimed at reaching a political settlement over the six-year-old war that are to convene in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, next week. The joint Russian-Turkish airstrikes around al-Bab came in the wake of bitter protests by the Turkish government over the refusal of the Pentagon to provide similar air support for Ankara’s troops in the area. The Pentagon’s reluctance stemmed from the conflicting aims pursued by Turkey, which sent its troops into Syria last August in what the Erdogan government dubbed “Operation Euphrates Shield.” Ostensibly directed against Daesh, Ankara’s primary target was really the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its military wing, the People’s Protection Unit (YPG). The Turkish government views these groups as affiliates of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), against which it has waged a protracted counter-insurgency campaign within Turkey itself. The offensive against Daesh-controlled al-Bab is aimed principally at preventing it from falling to the YPG and at blocking the linking-up of eastern and western Kurdish enclaves along Turkey’s border. For its part, Faschingstein has utilized the YPG as its principal proxy ground force in the Pindo attack on Daesh, sending in SOF to arm, train and direct these Kurdish fighters.
The Pindosi refusal to back Turkish forces around al-Bab with airstrikes led to angry denunciations of Faschingstein by Erdogan, who charged that Pindostan was supporting “terrorists” instead of its NATO vassal. Ankara also began delaying approval for Pindo flights out of Incirlik, and threatened to deny Faschingstein and its vassals access to the base altogether. It was likely these threats, combined with the Turkish-Russian agreement to conduct joint strikes, that led the Pentagon to reverse its previous refusal to support Turkish forces and launch limited bombing runs around al-Bab as well this week. This crowded and geostrategically tense battlefield is likely to grow even more dangerous following Trump’s ascension to the White House. Trump has reportedly called for the Pentagon to come up with proposals to deal a decisive defeat to Daesh in Syria and Iraq within 90 days. JCoS Dunford said on Wednesday that he would “present options to accelerate the campaign” against Daesh to ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis, Trump’s incoming Sec Def. Citing unnamed Pentagon boxtops, CNN reports:
The Pentagon is prepared to provide the new administration with military options to accelerate the war against Daesh in Syria that could send additional Pindosi troops into direct combat. One option would put hundreds if not thousands of additional Pindosi troops into a combat role as part of the fight to take Raqqa … In the coming months, the Pentagon could put several brigade-sized combat teams on the ground, each team perhaps as many as 4,000 troops.
Plans are also reportedly being drawn up to escalate military provocations against Iran, which ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis described in testimony before the Senate, as the “biggest destabilizing force in the Middle East.” He said the Trump administration must “checkmate Iran’s goal of regional hegemony.” There is every indication, despite Trump’s rhetoric about improving relations with Moscow, that Pindo imperialism is preparing for another eruption of militarism in the Middle East that will pose an ever greater threat of spilling over into a new world war.