Sport
  1. Home
  2. Sport
  3. Cricket
COMMENT

Even New Zealanders have had enough of Australian TV cricket commentary

Cricket commentary in Australia is just not what it used to be - even our friends across the ditch think so. Like many Aussies, the Dominion Post's Hamish Bidwell longs for the good old days, with Benaud, Lawry and Greig at the microphone ...

Bill Lawry loved his cricket.

No doubt still does. Just from the comfort of the lounge room, sadly.

Up Next

Tuqiri, Larkham, Umaga urged to stage comebacks

null
Video duration
00:28

More Sports HQ Videos

null
Video duration
00:28

Tuqiri, Larkham, Umaga urged to stage ...
null
Video duration
00:46

Foley: Wallabies were still getting used ...
null
Video duration
01:30

Plays of the Week
null
Video duration
00:34

Smith explains Maxwell snub
null
Video duration
00:26

Mourinho irritated by reporter
More videos

Smith leads Australia to victory at SCG

Captain Steven Smith led Australia to victory over New Zealand with the record ODI score at the SCG.

As much as cicadas and sizzling sausages, Lawry was the sound of summer. No-one called a play-and-miss – let alone a big six or someone being bowled "neck and crop" – better than Bill. Often regarded as the one-eyed Australian in apotheosis, Lawry was simply a man who loved the game and admired the people who played it with daring.

Every few years we would be lucky enough to hear him calling matches involving New Zealand.

Related Content

Any catch in the cordon off Richard Hadlee's bowling, or Chris Cairns blow that went 10 rows back, seemed that bit more significant when Lawry was at the microphone.

It was about more than the mere theatrics, though. There was gravitas to Lawry and company and their words of praise for visiting captains, such as Stephen Fleming, carried weight.

Advertisement

In Lawry and colleagues Richie Benaud, Ian Chappell and Tony Greig, you had men that were serious cricketing and broadcasting figures. They were prepared and professional and we were all better informed as a result.

Sunday's one-day international between Australia and New Zealand, at the Sydney Cricket Ground, was a good game of cricket that gave us plenty to ponder.

From a Black Caps point of view the bowling lengths and catching, decision not to refer a leg before shout against Australia captain Steve Smith, Lockie Ferguson's pace, Martin Guptill's 114, the curious composition of the batting order and ultimate 68-run defeat in pursuit of 325 were among the many talking points. As was the television commentary.

You have to be pretty blind to your own faults to feel justified in pointing out the inadequacies of others.

But it's arguable whether Lawry and company would've referred to Guptill as "Gooptill" or the team as the All Blacks or Matt Henry as Scott Henry, among other errors.

The tone and and objectivity of a telecast are more a matter of taste, than fact. What's music to some ears will be fingernails down a backboard to others. Neither sensation is right or wrong. 

Maybe the coverage has always been like it was on Sunday.

Maybe the new breed of Australian commentator carries just the same stature the old ones did.

Maybe we can't hear that because we're all a pack of thin-skinned provincial sooks in this country, who smart at the mere suggestion our boys aren't absolute ornaments to the game. 

Maybe we're similarly insufferable when the boot's on the other foot.

I'm pretty sure I preferred my summers the way they used to sound.

Dominion Post/Stuff.co.nz

Advertisement

0 comments