Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement

The AFR View

Making better use of school funds

The Financial Review’s take on the principles at stake in major domestic and global stories.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

In 2013, Julia Gillard promised that no individual school would be worse off in order to sell her government's four-year funding deal – carving in stone the idea that school funding can only ever go upwards. With serious discussion to start next year on the next funding agreement, a new Grattan Institute report has found that the system has spare cash that could be better spent on other educational objectives – most critically in better teaching skills.

The money is hidden in an inflation allowance that has turned out to be unneeded, and cash the Gillard government gave to schools that were already overfunded. Reversing the latter would mean axing the idea that no one can ever lose out – even when they are already well provided. But doing so could free up the $3.5 billion needed to bring needy schools up to scratch without spending any more money than already allocated in the 2016 budget.

Loading...

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Health & education

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Policy