Why horses shouldn't be on Killarney Beach. It's a community stupid!

Living in community is arguably the very best thing about being human. Our ability to live side by side in peace, to welcome newcomers, to look out for each other and to fight for the places we call home, are really what being human is all about. This is what we mean when we use the term ' shared humanity'.

In SW Victoria, we have some very impressive communities, like the Portland Glenelg Gasfield Free group who were instrumental in securing a ban on unconventional and Coal Seam Gas throughout Victoria, the Merrivale Residents Association who fought so hard to stop the industrialisation of their wetland and residential area and of course the amazing community effort of Peter's Project which was responsible for Warrnambool's new cancer center.

Shane Howard, who was quoted in The Warrnambool Standard on Wednesday, knows a thing or two about community as his family was involved in the fight to Save St Brigid's church at Crossley, which has now been turned into a successful neighbourhood hub. And the power of community is being demonstrated again as the Belfast Coastal Reserve Action Group fights to protect their beautiful, wild beach and coastal environment from the ominous overcrowding, hard hooves and waste of the ever present racing industry.

There are so many reasons why horses should not be on beaches and especially in the few wild places we have left. The hard hoofed and heavy horses of government and industry should leave the Coastal Reserve and its wonderful community in peace to look after the land and each other. Please help BCRAG to protect its flora and fauna from heavy, hard hoofed animals.

A still from a video showing a horse galloping past a beach user at Killarney. There've been a lot of close calls on Killarney Beach.

Horse galloping in sand dunes where the endangered Hooded Plover builds its nest.

We need strong, caring, gentle, good men to role model a new world.

Here is my response to a man calling Miley Cyrus a hypocrite for condemning Trump for bragging about assaulting women, when she herself has performed lewd acts at her concerts, on stage with a giant penis.

Maybe her actions are a symptom of the sexist world she's been surrounded by all her young life. Maybe she's playing up to it. Maybe she's exploiting it....for fame and fortune. Maybe she's breaking down barriers....not that I condone such exploitation. Nevertheless, the fact that she portrays herself riding on an enormous penis for all the world to see....does not give men the right to grab her genitalia without her permission...to grope...to assault....to rape. ....
 

In an ideal world we would not blame the victims....Men need to teach each other respect....how to respect all the women of this world....no matter what strange erotic public dances they perform, or how seductive or demeaning their behaviour or clothing or language.

As I said....I believe such behaviour is a part of the overall symptom of the objectification of women by the entire world....except maybe Bhutan & Nepal. It's a symptom of the fact that women are the underclass and men are the dominant sex. It's bad for all of us....women and men alike!

So maybe instead of 'hypocrisy' we can see it in a more informed, mature and enlightened way, as a symptom of a broken society that needs healing...fixing. To fix it we need many more strong, caring, aware, gentle and good men to help role model a new world for all young men and women. Please.

Fending off weird, untrue accusations from Labor & strange wishful thinking from Liberals.

                           
What a month it's been in Green politics and... it ain't over yet! The Senate Voting Reform Bill that's been Green policy for 20 years and that the Greens have been working on for years, has received a huge response from Labor... in all the wrong ways. I'm pretty sure I've never seen such a reaction from Labor towards the Greens.

We've been accused of making a preference deal with the Liberals among other crazy, untrue things. So many lies are being told. It's very disappointing and very dirty politics. I've tried to explain some of it in a response to an email I received today. If it wasn't so concerning, it would be really funny.

AND now from recent reports LABOR IS making a preference  DEAL with the LIBERALS in not one but two seats in Melbourne.

 The Greens are right to call them Laboral or LIBLAB.



https://www.facebook.com/senatordinatale/videos/964387573652837/?pnref=story

Here's my response. Feel free to quote, reproduce and send. I hope it firmly sets the record straight.

 Thanks for the email. So glad to have a chance to respond to these baseless accusations!

I'll send some links to allay your fears because I can assure you the whole thing is a media beef up. Not true. NO DEALS! Liberals can say what they like but that doesn't make it true. Both Labor and Liberal are lying! I've been told they're running scared because the Greens have a chance to win some seats from both sides in Melbourne, just on our primary votes without need of preferences.

 Although the Greens have practically nothing in common with the Liberals, we are issues based. So if we have been fighting for an issue like voting reform and the Liberals put forward a Bill that is our policy...no matter the outcome for us but for the greater good of all Australians, we will of course always vote for it.

Interesting that until earlier this year voting reform was also Labor policy but suddenly they've changed their minds...probably because, if the Bill is passed, it might lead to an early election and ALP believe they have more chance of winning a later election. This voting reform Bill has been refined over the past 10 years and has been Greens policy for 14 years.

Liberals have many bad policies which prevent us from preferencing them. Labor, by the way, preferences the Liberals over the Greens nearly all the time! 

Here are some links to verify my response.

As I said, thank you very much for giving me a chance to respond.

http://greens.org.au/no-deal

http://greens.org.au/senate-voting-reform-rightfully-gives-power-back-voters

And the list is a whole lot longer than this.  ALP sold soul over TPP, Forests, Farming land & rights, Endangered species, Criminalising whistle blowing on detention centers etc .

Do yourselves a favour and listen to Senator Scott Ludlam on voting reform. He does us proud! http://scott-ludlam.greensmps.org.au/content/speeches-parliament/reforming-senate-voting

Clothes needed for Aboriginal women in Northern Territory to start social enterprise.

Tanya Egerton

March 2016

·

 

Support Aboriginal women in the remote Northern Territory of Jilkminggan and help them launch their own social enterprise. Simply choose any of the items from the list below and bring them into one of the drop off points during March.

Your donation will go toward setting up a pop-up Op-Shop in Jilkminggan, all funds from goods sold will be used to kick-start small businesses focused around sewing and print making, at the newly established Arts Centre.

We really want to gather items that people in the community NEED and LOVE, here are a few tips.

• It gets HOT, really HOT, so we prefer clothing and material made from natural fibres.

• Brightly coloured and bold pattered prints are popular with both men and women.

• Culturally sensitive clothing for women and girls, they love long skirts, loose fitting t-shirts, knee-length shorts, singlets and dresses.

• Men mostly wear long pants, denim jeans, knee-length shorts, buttoned up shirts and loose fitting tees, they love sports wear and polo shirts too!

• Kids clothing, baby goods... new born - teens! Summer styles.

• Sewing materials, fabric, clothing and homewares patterns for sewing.

Share this message and spread the word!

Drop off points Sydney:
Toni&Guy Bondi Beach - Bondi Beach
Fresh Fox Boutique - Freshwater
TONI&GUY Newtown - 188 King St, Newtown
T&G Paramatta - 314 Church St, Parramatta
T&G Cronulla - 125 Cronulla St, Cronulla
T&G Bondi Junction - LEVEL 1, 197 OXFORD STREET, BONDI JUNCTION
T&G Randwick - 135 BELMORE ROAD, RANDWICK
T&G North Sydney - 208 BLUES POINT ROAD, MCMAHONS POINT

Drop off point Newcastle :
Suki Hairdressing : Suite 1B/2 Ocean St Newcastle

Drop off points Brisbane:
T&G Brisbane: 150 EDWARD ST , BRISBANE
T&G The Valley: SHOP 8, 1000 ANN STREET, FORTITUDE VALLEY

Drop off point Perth:
T&G Subiaco: 304 HAY STREET, SUBIACO

Drop off point Melbourne:
T&G Georges : 195 Little Collins St, Melbourne

If you are not near a drop pff point and would like to send items direct, please send to: Enterprise Learning Projects - 9 Pearce St, Katherine NT 0850

Supporting Enterprise Learning Projects

#fashion4futures

Greens might lose out on a structural reform of voting so maybe they're doing it because it's the right thing to do rather than the self-interested thing to do

Sebastian Andrei Tudor I've come across this post which sums it up nicely... "Firstly, the proposed optional preferential voting (OPV) isn't first past the post (FTTP) because it allows people to pick their favorite top 3, top 5, top 20 parties and then stop whenever. Secondly, the current system is being rorted with micro parties preferencing ideologically diametrically opposed parties on the proviso that the other micro party does likewise. This sees votes for socialist parties go to theocratic parties and vice-versa. And no- people rarely if ever search ahead to see who is preferencing what. Antony Green has some great analysis showing this. http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2016/02/would-electoral-reform-deliver-the-coalition-a-senate-majority-at-a-double-dissolution.html   Thirdly, the rorting is producing ridiculous outcomes. As much as I've come to appreciate Ricky Muir's presence in parliament, having someone get elected off 0.51% of the vote is a sign something is wrong with the system. Fourthly, the guarantee that there will be some above-the- line votes that can be directed wherever has incentivised parties to create misleadingly named parties similar to opposing party names in order to redirect them to another party via automatic preferences. (eg Green Future party directing preferences to the Liberals) Fifthly, should the public turn out to treat this like a FTTP vote the proportionally representative system of the Senate should mitigate the worst aspects of FTTP. Advertising and election strategy can also be adjusted to promote a 1,2 vote. or a 1,2,3 vote. (eg Greens, Labor or Socialists, Greens, Labor) Sixthly, the writer is a micro party member and clearly partisan. He uses every opportunity to attack the Greens and the Democrats, for example he blames them for the failed republic referendum instead of Howard and uses bizarre segues to irrelevant matters like Kevin Rudd’s emissions trading scheme and Julia Gillard’s Malaysia solution. Seventhly- if analysis shows that the Greens might lose out on a structural reform of voting *and they still support the reform* then maybe, just maybe, they're doing it because it's the right thing to do rather than the self-interested thing to do." http://greens.org.au/sa/policies/electoralreform http://greens.org.au/news/nsw/senate-voting-reform-%E2%80%93-greens-plan-protect-small-parties-voters%E2%80%99-decide-preferences http://greens.org.au/policies/constitutional-reform-and-democracy

We humans are just great big, clever, stupid, rubbish creators and destroyers of everything.

Years ago, maybe 7 years ago, Dr. Charlie Teo was warning us about mobile phones and radiation.

Hell...years before then...we Greenies... hippies...alternatives...whatever, knew there was a likely problem...even if it was just because computers and mobile phones were new technologies and we were racing headlong towards it. 

Once again human beings were going all out and grabbing something new with both hands well before we really understood what impact it might have on our health, or more importantly, on the health of our children....just like we did with cigarettes, asbestos, chemical insecticides, fungicides, radiation, plastics, fossil fuels, GM and a whole lot of things that we adopted way to quickly and enthusiastically and recklessly and that we now know make us and the planet sick. 





ANYWAY....as we humans have ALWAYS done, we've thrown caution to the wind and become completely dependent on satellites and computer technologies....completely dependent... and our little ones use phones ALL THE DAMN TIME!

I was telling, warning people about this even before Dr Charlie was poo pooed for being a naysayer and people were treating me as though I was an absolute idiot.

Dear God almighty! We humans are just great big, clever, stupid, rubbish creators and destroyers of everything....AAhhhh!

Here's a nice picture of the Earth... except it's not. It's a computer image of the junk that humans have left in orbit around the earth up 'til now and it's growing each day. Humans aren't satisfied with destroying the Earth. We want to destroy space as well.

Scientists have absolutely no idea what to do about this growing problem and it's going to get worse and worse as the bits of junk run into each other and create ever tinier and ever more deadly pieces of debris travelling at 8,000 miles per hour....preventing any kind of space vehicle leaving or entering Earth's atmosphere. Aren't we the clever ones?

My imagine runs amok. Will it create a cloud in space...around the Earth....blocking the sunlight?

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/3568512.htm

http://www.theguardian.com/…/the-debate-about-mobile-phones…

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/4407325.htm

That crazy deliberately misleading GM article with Richard Di Natale in the Farm Weakly: Pulleeese

About that crazy deliberately misleading interview by the Farm Weakly with Greens leader Richard Di Natale on GM GM crops: Greens consider policy change - Agriculture - General - Politics - Farm Weekly farmweekly.com.au Bob Phelps from Gene Ethics had this to say about the article on Richard Di Natale and GM from Sept 2015! Hi all: Pro-GM journo Colin Bettles created a phony story of division among The Greens on GM policy this week. He claims Greens' leader Richard Di Natale has no personal objection to GM crops (see the clips and here) because GM techniques are also used in research and medicine. http://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/general/politics/greens-mull-rethink-on-gm-crop-policy/2750469.aspx?storypage=0. Bettles failed to report that the interview was conducted months ago, before The Greens reviewed and reconfirmed existing GMO policy. See: http://greens.org.au/policies/genetically-manipulated-organisms The Australian also promoted its pro-GM editorial policy by following Bettles' story (see attached). But the following Greens statement was unreported by any media: Hi folks, I was asked a couple of questions on GMOs in a wide ranging interview a few months ago, ahead of the The Australian Greens National Conference, which were reported this week. To be clear, we have not changed our policy. A high evidence threshold must be met to demonstrate that there are not any negative impacts of GMOs before we would consider supporting their use. The best evidence available tells us that GMOs have not yet been proven universally safe for our environment, agricultural systems or human health. The evidence that worries me most is the risk GMOs pose to our natural environment, the increased use of herbicides that often accompany GMO use, the contamination of neighbouring (non-GMO) crops and the lack of strong food labelling requirements to protect consumers rights - not to mention the appalling behaviour of agri-giants like Monsanto! In recent times, our Greens MPs particularly Senator Rachel Siewert have been very vocal about our concerns that regulators haven't been properly scrutinising new GM technologies. We will continue to advocate for strong regulations of GMO use in Australia.  Here's the official response from Richard Di Natale's office: "The precautionary principle guiding The Greens’ GMO policy was reconfirmed recently at the party’s 2015 National Conference. The Greens’ policies are reviewed on a regular basis, via a grassroots process. No further review of national policy, including GMO policy, is scheduled at this time. The Greens are proud of the work our MPs and supporters have done over many years advocating for appropriate regulation of GMOs. Australian Greens Agriculture spokesperson Rachel Siewert introduced a bill in 2010 to ensure GM foods were appropriately labelled. Only a few weeks ago the Greens spoke out about concerns that regulators weren’t scrutinising new GM technologies. While genetic modification can be an important medical technology, the Greens have concerns about GM application in agriculture. Caution in regard to GMO is appropriate and necessary. Regulation of GMOs should always be evidence based and in the best interests of consumers and the environment. The Greens understand the ongoing issues around preserving farmers’ choice, clear labelling so consumers know what food they’re buying, liability and the commercial ownership of intellectual property for specific GM seed products. The 2015 National Conference confirmed the Greens’ commitment to a safe food future including taking a precautionary approach to GMOs." WA organic farmer Steve Marsh AND to those who say the Greens are silent on GMOs and the relating court cases to do with contamination among other things: WRONG AGAIN. Greens are nearly always there but the media blocks us and environmental groups fear being political so they shy away from us. It's incredibly hard to be heard. Bob Phelps from Gene Ethics recognises our support and we are very grateful to him. Rachel Siewert is an excellent commentator on things GM. There was a landmark case in WA back in 2014 and the ABC reported her comment. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-29/greens-unhappy-with-gm-decision-affecting-organic-farmer/5485796 But according to ECO Watch you wouldn't know the Greens existed! AND that's just plan CRAZY considering the Greens are the only ones fighting against GM in parliament! Some people are never, ever happy....or they just can't see help when it comes their way! http://ecowatch.com/2016/02/12/monsanto-lawsuit-gmo-contamination/