Monday, August 10, 2009
Previous Posts
- The Monstrous Architecture of Revolution
- Prophet Davis
- Burn your Baedeker!
- On Canada and the Ownership of the Means of Produc...
- Gaddafi, Anti-Colonial Performance Artist
- Bronstein on the Underground, or, The Religion of ...
- On the Physical Effect of Philosophy
- The capitalist swine at our door
- Lenin's testament, or, When money will indeed be s...
- 'And he himself had become unplaced'
8 Comments:
That is a great find.
My source: Darrin McMahon, 'Edmund Burke and the Literary Cabal: A Tale of Two Enlightenments', in the Yale edition of Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (a particularly neo-con affair, particularly Conor Cruise O'Brien dyspeptic tirade against 'the tyranny of the politics of theory'). I think McMahon takes it from Roy Porter's Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World.
I was surprised to find that the current definition in the complete OED is more or less the same.
I can't log in, can you cut and paste?
Reaction dies hard, and sometimes doesn't die at all...
Sorry, I thought that link was one you didn't need to log in for. Here's the definition:
2. Sometimes used [after Ger. Aufklärung, Aufklärerei] to designate the spirit and aims of the French philosophers of the 18th c., or of others whom it is intended to associate with them in the implied charge of shallow and pretentious intellectualism, unreasonable contempt for tradition and authority, etc.
1865 J. H. STIRLING Secret of Hegel p. xxvii, Deism, Atheism, Pantheism, and all manner of isms due to Enlightenment. Ibid. p. xxviii, Shallow Enlightenment, supported on such semi-information, on such weak personal vanity, etc.
1889 CAIRD Philos. Kant I. 69 The individualistic tendencies of the age of Enlightenment.
"2. Sometimes used [after Ger. Aufklärung, Aufklärerei] to designate the spirit and aims of the French philosophers of the 18th c., or of others whom it is intended to associate with them in the implied charge of shallow and pretentious intellectualism, unreasonable contempt for tradition and authority, etc."
Many thanks to you both.
Shouldn't all contempt be unreasonable? Therein lies the real pleasure of it.
Post a Comment
<< Home