Publication Ethics

@C0PE

Helping Editors of scholarly journals prevent and manage publication misconduct

10000 members worldwide
Joined March 2009

@C0PE is blocked

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @C0PE.

  1. Meet the speakers read the agenda & register today for the 2016 European Conference in Belgium 31 Oct - 1 Nov

  2. Author of rejected paper publicly names and criticises peer reviewer. Case with advice from Forum

  3. Can you spot a fake peer reviewer? Watch Alison McCook as she looks at the trend of fake .

  4. A shady market in scientific papers mars Iran’s rise in science | Science | AAAS

  5. If you're hearing conflicting claims, ask first "Is it peer reviewed?". Find out what that means.

  6. Despite being optional, 80% of reviewers at choose to make their reviews open. V. encouraging.

  7. "Who owns peer reviews?" comment on our discussion document and contribute to best practice.

  8. We're celebrating the end (almost) of with this video on by some of the participants:

  9. Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers - we need your feedback as we update our guidelines.

  10. Who reviews the reviewers? Kristen Overstreet explores the problem of vetting reviewers

  11. September COPE Digest out now packed with peer review cases, videos, podcast & the monthly news roundup.

  12. Interesting case cited by of lab colleagues collectively wanting credit for a single peer review

  13. Examining researcher attitudes to peer review in scholarly communication

  14. "Who Owns Peer Reviews" discussion with Pete Binfield and Elizabeth Moylan

  15. It's here! , focusing on reviewer recognition. See for timetable of events

  16. Publication Ethics followed and
  17. Authorship dispute with institutional investigation. Could this claim be made anonymously?

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·