Rule Of Law Abandoned For Bradley Manning

Nathan Fuller, good article.

But then again we should all have known what that Pathetic Nation is Capable of.

It started 2 World Wars to become the Empire, to continue raping, pillaging and plundering when the English Empire finaly went broke fighting those 2 wars against a superior army, to save itself or its Aristocratic Masters from economic ruin.

We have had nothing but lies out of that Nation of Morrons, so what do you expect. And this is what the Yanks are still desperately trying to hide, that they have always been behind evil, thats why their so religious, they are devils hidding in the house of GOD.

Students guide to World History 1789-1979.
“The bulk of industry was in the hands of the 'big four' - Britain, Germany, France and the United States. They had controlled 80% of the world's manufacturing output in 1870 and still controlled 72% of it in 1914. Even within this privileged group there was extreme uneveness: France fell badly behind the others in the 1870's; and between 1870 and 1914, while Britain's manufacturing output doubled, that of Germany increased fivefold, and that of the United States sevenfold. The astonishing progress in the United States meant that by 1900 the industrial centre of gravity of the world had shifted away from Europe.

RANK IN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION, -1900
1860 Britain France U.S.A. Germany
1870 Britain U.S.A. France Germany
1880 U.S.A. Britain Germany France
1890 U.S.A. Britain Germany France
1900 U.S.A. Germany Britain France and take note that WW1 and WW2 soon followed to restore France and England to their rightful places.

Within Europe, unevenness of development can be further observed by means of two interesting comparisons. Thus, the relatively 'old' industrial country, France, whose industrial 'take-off' began in the 1830's, was being overhauled by Russia, whose 'take-off' did not begin until the 1880's: in the period 1870~1914, France's coal production grew from 13 to 40 million tons, but Russia's from less than one million to 36 million; France's pig-iron production grew from 1.2 to 4.6 million tons, but Russia's from .5 to 3.6 million. Even more significant was the success of Germany in overhauling the pioneer of the Industrial Revolution, Britain. While Britain's coal producction grew from 112 to 292 million tons between 1870 and 1914, Germany's grew from 34 to 277 million tons. The corresponding figures for pig-iron were: Britain's from 6 to 11 million tons; Germany's from 1.3 to 14.7 million tons. Moreover, by 1914 Germany was producing 14 million tons of steel compared to Britain's 6.5 million tons. Germany was making much more effective use than Britain of the new industries of the 'Second Industrial Revolution', especially steel, chemicals and electricity.

The U.S is the home of Marilyn Monroe and Hollywood, so what can we expect.

roma

The Yanks are and always were low lifes, Bradley Manning apparently gave Wikileaks the opportunity to expose them for what they always were and will be.

Let me clarify, Americans as individuals are the same as us and every other human being, but as a Nation, to feed their Gentry/Aristocracy they are brain dead fools.

Now if you can't get that Roma, your obviously a Yank and maybe not a very smart one either, madly Patriotic but thats about it and, its nothing to be proud of. Fools are Fools.

Perhaps with the exception of @Roma one wonders how any of the comments relate to the article.
@Jackal huh ? Even the internal logic is non sec. How does coal or pig iron production prove your conclusion (rant) as for the ad hominem well that that uses the consistently absurd non sec reasoning
@TVOTW888 - unspeakably bizarre.

Nathan not a bad article,
It seems to me what we have here is a pot-pourri of factors. The primary one is political egos and individuals' needs to maintain power.
i.e. Obama needs the Military vote, needs to keep the soldiers at wars. Imagine the problems if 500000+ military people came home ?
- All those people what, sitting home doing nothing?
- No O/S bonuses etc. Financial hardship?
- no need for so many bureaucrats
- no need for so many support staff.
- no need for so many generals etc.
- no more cushy jobs as advisors to the military manufacturing complex corps (MMCC)
- no need for as much weaponry
- like the (MMCC) would allow such a cut in profits
- more pressure by the corporates on the government to defend 'America's interests'
- did I mention all the industries who benefit from these wars and occupations.
-more money spent on changing government to one that was more Hawkish one
- then the party(ies) hierarchy would loose power
- oh yes all the people employed in those industries /activities.
Much better they make an example of BM rather than have the above and
- scrutiny that could lead to criticism like.
Which numb nut put an unstable (inappropriate) person into that environment in the first place much less didn't properly supervise him.
I'd argue the Military lapsed on their duty of care.
If they actually looked at the cause that precipitated BM's mass mental meltdown ...goodness knows where it might lead...Best they don bureaucratic arse protecting undies and distract the public from realising they, BM, JA, government integrity, democracy it's self are the real victims.
Nothing binds a bureaucracy more than career self preservation.

Examinator
You over educated boof, if you can't understand something as simple as that then you are the one that needs a shrink.

Who are you trying to impress with all that garbage you wrote.

@Examinator huh ?

@jackal01 This is one Yank who understands perfectly the point you are making. A good number of us aren't as stupid as our so-called leaders would like us to be (or the rest of the world might think), but, when we speak out here in the Land of the Free, we are labeled—derogatorily I might add— lefty communists, un-American, unpatriotic, socialist, Marxists, (and even Fascists in the same breath, which proves your point about our general moronic state!). In this way, the military industrial complex (and corporations now legally defined as "people") in control and power can maintain its status quo of fostering perpetual money-making war while denigrating anyone against such policies as some sort of dirty hippie who "hates America." Many of us voted for Obama and the so-called "hope" and "change" he proposed, but are bitterly disappointed by his treatment of the Bradley Manning case in particular, and the ongoing debacle that is Gitmo—among other about-faces. But currently, Obama is the lesser of two evils: the Romney/Ryan clown act is Bush/Cheney on steroids and most assuredly even more dangerous because of their stupidity!). I despair, not only for my own country in which we "little people" are mere pawns in a global chess game, but, for the rest of the world having to bear the burden of a rich and powerful nation that has lost its moral compass. Our voices, though many, are lost in the wilderness of Fox News, SuperPAC billions buying elections, and jingoism—just the way "they" like it.