Election Reaction Makes the Case for Partition

Posted on 2016-11-11 by

sf-antitrump-protest

Grief. Fear. Hysteria. Anger. Protests. Riots. Hate crimes. Arrests. The United States is reeling from the election of President Donald Trump. Ultra-liberal Portland and Seattle revolt as anarchists light fires and smash storefronts. Megadiverse New York City has to impose a no-fly zone over 5th Avenue. LGBT and Mexican flags wave in San Francisco outside high schools. Students in Michigan chant “Build the Wall.” Muslim women have their headscarves torn off. A White man is kicked in the head for being a suspected Trump supporter. Swastika graffiti appears anonymously on walls and doors around the country. Wow just wow, it’s the current year.

The results are still coming in from November 8th. President Trump won the electoral college while Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a margin of hundreds of thousands. There are now increasingly loud calls to scrap the electoral college for being outmoded and ‘anti-democratic’. Moreover it is the second time in recent history that a Democrat has won the popular vote while losing the election.

Of course, there is a geographic context to all of this. Clinton got far more votes than needed to win in blue states like California and New York. In the West Coast outpost of Latin America, she got around 2.5 million surplus votes, while Shekel Island and its surrounding counties (sans Staten Island) returned around 1.5 million extra ballots. In midsized swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, President Trump won by much narrower margins, boosting Clinton’s popular vote even further. And the high margin Republican states have less population to begin with, yielding less popular vote for President Trump’s total. Still, there is a clear geographic component to where Clinton won the popular vote, and that is her carrying the urban corridors of the Northeast and the West Coast, and the Deep South’s black belt. President Trump won the broader swathes of the interior and the non-urban counties.

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Ideology, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 28 Comments

Now I am become President, Leader of the Free World

Posted on 2016-11-09 by

frumpy-clintonistas-trumped

A man was just memed into the White House. Donald John Trump was elected the 45th president of the United States on November 8, 2016. There were just enough of us to pull this off. Just enough. The electoral college went to President Trump while the popular vote went to Clinton.

As I watched the polls close last night into the late hours with around two dozen goyim drawn from across the northeastern United States (and even a handful from Sweden), it became increasingly clear that we had a Brexit-style revolt on our hands. The ethnic core of the Empire had repudiated the rule of a hostile elite, and clothed a man of great contradictions, but also of great potential, in the purple. Lowland and Highland man issued forth from the rusted hills and glens to muster for the last roll call of American greatness. The polls were all wrong this year. (Your author in fact would not have been counted as a likely 2016 GOP voter, nor has he ever been contacted by pollsters).

On television, the pundits were looking increasingly distraught. Catladies, numales, and people of color wept before the world on camera. The room roared with jubilation and jeering as we realized we’d trumped these people. Some of us went up to the screen and mimed the licking of their delicious tears. Adrenaline, eudaimonia, and schadenfreude overtook the room.

But then came the numbers. I wondered aloud to my fellow travellers as we saw President Trump had leads of only a few thousand in places like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, “How many Syrians is that?” “How many Somalians?” President Trump would not have won if we’d gone four more years—those margins would have evaporated. But win he did. There were just enough White people to deliver us.

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Ideology, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Freedom, Liberty, Posterity: A Tripartite Case for Amerikaner Nationalism

Posted on 2016-11-04 by

murika25

You know the drill by now—English-speaking White Americans, some 200 million people in the United States, form a unique and diverse nation of pan-European descent that values freedom, liberty, and making each generation better than the last. Whether we call them Anglo-American, Amerikaner, or just White, our goal is to establish a national homeland for our people by any means appropriate, because the alternative is becoming a minority in our own country as a result of hostile government policies.

I spend a lot of time thinking about how to best spread this message; all of us who are active in these circles do. We have grown a lot this last year, thanks to our skillful branding, memeing, and commentary on the Trump campaign. This is effective and it will continue to be effective. If Trump wins, we get to hound his every move from the right and point out why he is insufficient. If he loses, we get to highlight how the state, the media, and the purveyors of political filth fought a crusade against the White worker and family to install Clinton in power on the backs of a coalition of the fringes.

But Trump and election cycles cannot be the center of our commentary and message. That these things are happening now and we are covering them is all and well, but ultimately we need to do more than that, and we need to do it effectively. We need to make the simple case that what we believe in is what our compatriots should believe in, and this has to be a multi-layered and multi-angle approach that incorporates both our traditions as a people and whatever new innovations are necessary to secure ourselves a place in the struggle for survival.

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Ideology, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Conservative Case for Trump: A Final Appeal

Posted on 2016-11-02 by

Well it’s come down to the wire. You were probably hoping to pull the lever for Jeb Bush right about now. Some of you are writing in John McCain to signal your piety towards the 2000-2008 Republican party line.

But that ship has sailed. You have to make a decision. For all your talk of love for country and party, you have to decide whether you want to throw your miniscule weight as a private citizen and voter behind the rightful Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump, or the long-reviled Democrat, Mrs. Bill Clinton. You have decide what you will tell your wife’s son when you look into his eyes.

I know you don’t like Trump. You think he’s not a real conservative. You think he’s a racist. Some of you think he’s actually a Democrat running a long con.

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Ideology, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 32 Comments

Skinning the Invisible Knapsack, Part 2 of 5

Posted on 2016-11-01 by

landing_of_columbus

Among schoolgoys, there is a rather vindictive prank one can do to a classmate who has left his backpack or bookbag unattended, known as skinning. The bag is emptied of its contents, turned inside out, and then zipped back up with all of its contents inside.

In 1988, Peggy McIntosh published one of the seminal works in the far-left dominated academic field which has come to be called “Whiteness Studies” in a number of circles. “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” is an excerpt taken from a working paper produced by the women’s studies department of Wellesley College, and lists 50 “daily effects of white privilege” in the first-person perspective of the author from her experiences. Though McIntosh tried to cover herself by claiming her examples shouldn’t be generalized, her work is obviously not read that way in the identity politics dominated Obama years. If even some of these privileges existed in the 1980s, you would be hard pressed to find them now. A sacred text of the anti-white/third worldist/regressive left, Invisible Knapsack could use a good skinning. Here is a critical assessment of privileges 11-20.

  1. I can be casual about whether or not to listen to another person’s voice in a group in which s/he is the only member of his/her race.

I can do this to anyone. Anyone can do this to anyone. Tuning out people you don’t want to hear from is a pretty universal thing. If I were in a panel discussion with McIntosh, I’d ignore her too even though both of us are White. Because she is espousing an ideology which is hostile to me and I do not have to accord her respect.

  1. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods which fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser’s shop and find someone who can cut my hair.

This is a peculiar complaint given the explosive growth of hip-hop and rap in the 1980s, which was contemporary to McIntosh. Certainly it is not true today that non-whites can’t be found in music sales, as non-white performers make up a large amount of the music industry. As for finding the staple foods of one’s culture, why would those automatically be there for you if you are in a foreign country (assuming she is referring to non-black minorities)? I guess from this perspective, it’s an exercise of White privilege to buy a loaf of bread instead of a bag of rice (which any supermarket sells by the way). The hair complaint is also strikingly odd, since the trope of the black barbershop is so well known. Furthermore, there exists a sizable black haircare industry that goes back decades. If memory serves correct, the first black millionaire made their fortune selling black haircare products.

Continue reading →

Posted in Ideology | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Interview on the Alt Right & Its Origins

Posted on 2016-10-30 by

blut-boden

Author’s Note:

This interview was conducted by an academic researcher who is writing a book on the Alt-Right.

1) Although the Alt-Right represents a genuinely new movement, what do you view as its most important antecedents? That is, to what extent does the Alt-Right borrow elements from earlier movements – paleoconservatism, libertarianism, Neo-Reaction, older versions of white nationalism, etc.?

I think there’s a slight generation gap on the Alt-Right. You have one wing of more Gen X people who came through right-libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, and paleoconservatism, but younger Millennials and now even a slice of Gen Z people now are coming straight through /pol/ or directly to Alt-Right outlets without having passed through anything else. (I assume your research has covered /pol/). At this point though there is considerable distance between the Alt-Right’s pro-White statism (i.e. White nationalism), and the libertarian millieu. The carry-overs are really a distrust of the Washington regime, the Leviathan on the Potomac if you will, and viewing human behavior in terms of responding to incentives. The major innovation relative to the libertarians and ancaps, however is recognizing that human behavior is also tribal, something those left behind simply do not grasp, or worse reject because they fear the intellectually troglodyte charge of racism.

Continue reading →

Posted in Ideology, Meta | Tagged , | 9 Comments

Glazer & Moynihan’s Beyond the Melting Pot

Posted on 2016-10-28 by

melting-pot

Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Beyond the Melting Pot, 2nd Edition

Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1970.

Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians and Irish of New York City was written in 1963 and revised in 1970, but its critique of American assimilation mythology is as relevant as ever. Co-authors (((Nathan Glazer))) and Daniel Patrick Moynihan note that the term “melting pot” itself was popularized by the London-born Russian Jew (((Israel Zangwill))), who in his play of the same name wrote:

“America is God’s Crucible, the great Melting-Pot where all the races of Europe are melting and reforming… Germans and Frenchmen, Irishmen and Englishmen, Jews and Russians – into the Crucible with you all! God is making the American.”

What should surprise literally no one familiar with Hebrew duplicity is that (((Zangwill))) himself was a zionist, that is to say he wanted a territorial nation-state for Jewish people established somewhere in the world (and preferably with few extant inhabitants, which is why he opposed the choice of Palestine). It would appear then that (((Zangwill))) did not really believe in his melting pot in a universal sense. And neither do the authors of Beyond the Melting Pot, who describe 1960s New York as a very identitarian place, one of both conflicting and allied power-blocs rooted in ethnic affinities. One may be left wondering if any “Americans” even lived in New York apart from a trickle of WASP transplants, given how the co-authors slice what were the city’s five largest ethnic groups. They literally have an entire section dedicated to naming the Jew, who at the time populated a fourth of the city. Is that America? Will it become America?

Continue reading →

Posted in America, Culture, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments