If Brexit was an uppercut to the system then Trump's victory was a roundhouse to its jaw and all the liberal classes can look forward to now is having The Donald kick their teeth out and humiliate them from the highest office on earth, they know it, we know it, Donald Trump knows it. Most satisfying of all is that they know we weren't tricked, it isn't that we're just misguided and too thick to understand, no, we do understand and we want to see them hurt, to see them in pain. For example:
''Our tailored social media feeds not only hid from us the confused, angry people we needed to try and reason with, but it gave us a warped view of their motives. And this is where it gets particularly scary: Trump voters are fully aware he is sexist and xenophobic, they just don't care''.
So wrote Christopher Hooton in the Left Wing 'broadsheet press' outlet , The Independent. Hooton belongs to the most tragic demographic on earth, the 'White Liberal Male' and his tragedy is compounded by the fact that Hooton is gullible enough to think the modern left, and the liberal project in general, are all about 'fair play' and, well, being an open minded liberal who takes on-board all opinions and world views. For Hooton the problem is a failure of the liberal classes to listen, it's the mad, naive notion that the system to which he belongs and makes his living, isn't obsessively and blatantly hostile toward white people. Like a good white man from another age his article is trying to find a middle ground which no longer exists, he's saying ''Whoa! this thing got crazy, everybody take a step back and a deep breath!''. Hooton continues....
If they (populists) only care about lying directly to the voter, be it through Facebook Lives or alt-right puppet blogs that look as legit through the window of social media as the broadsheet press?
On this front, vast swathes of the media were effectively neutralised; but much of the snark and hyperbole directed at Trump supporters could have been avoided.
Again, we see that good-guy Hooton is on the fence, however, as somebody who actually runs an ''Alt-Right puppet blog'' I can say that 'we' neutralised the MSM by making the MSM itself the subject of scrutiny and ridicule. We make ourselves 'legit' by exposing the lies and moral cancer of the 'lugenpresse' which is now seen as ethically illegitimate. And I'm going to do it again now....
The US election is finally upon us. A billion God Emperor memes, and even more anti-Trump hit-piece articles in the MSM, the Republican party shredded, Hillary's seemingly endless list of crimes and dodgy dealings, The Wall, the ban on Muslims...it's all led to this, we're here. As with the Brexit referendum it's worth having a 'live' post up which can be updated as news comes in, along with adding any vids or Tweets of interest as the drama unfolds.
The meteoric rise of Donald Trump is one of the most astonishing political events in living memory. He burst onto the scene last June when he announced that he was running for president with his now famous anti illegal immigration speech in which he dared to make reference to the disproportionate number of crimes committed by illegal alien mestizos, or "dreamers" as the left absurdly calls them . The mainstream media and political establishment clutched their pearls and gasped that a man running for president might publicly utter such a hate fact. From that moment on he has been derided and pilloried by the entire Democratic, Republican, financial and media establishments. Yet, despite all of forces and vast resources arrayed against him, he just continues to grow stronger and stronger. Donald Trump has a simple message that strongly resonates with the majority of the American public who are among the most patriotic, and by implication nationalist, in the world. It is time to stop submitting to the will of the rootless globalist elites and put America First. He promises to crack down on illegal immigration, to end Washington corruption, to keep muslims out, to represent the people rather than special interests, and to renegotiate or end international trade agreements and stop the flow of well paid industrial jobs out of America. This is a hugely popular message that the American people have been waiting decades to hear, and has them flooding into Trump rallies in their tens of thousands. Trump, for his part, is working like a machine making constant media appearances and speaking at three rallies per day. Clinton, by contrast, is pursuing one of the mot pitiful campaign strategies in history. She has no vision for the future, other than that she would like to see a borderless hemisphere from Alaska to Brazil, .a 550% increase in Syrian immigration and an amnesty for illegal immigrants. These policies are so unpopular that she scarcely dare mention them in public, so the vast majority of her campaign consists of endlessly repeating, "Donald Trump is a big meanie. He makes girls cry. Sexism, racism, misogyny wah wah!". In addition, Hillary's massive unpopularity and health problems have prompted her campaign team to keep her out of the public eye as much as possible.
Hillary has more or less sat this election out and left it to her surrogates in the liberal media, i.e. all of it, to campaign on her behalf, and campaign they have. The extent of the bias and dishonesty displayed by the American media is like nothing I have ever witnessed. The BBC will at least tell you the basic facts with a left-liberal spin, so you filter out the leftist spin they will at least give you a reasonable idea of what is going on in the world. In this election the American news media has sunk to new lows by either mis-reporting or completely failing to report the facts. They are clearly rattled, as they never did anything like this in the last election. In the first debate Trump destroyed Hillary on trade and the economy. At the very end of the debate Hillary deployed her trademark "Trump is a big meanie" card by bringing up a former Miss Universe who, twenty years later, remains distraught about the fact that Trump had the temerity to call her fat when she got fat. Women's fragile self esteem must be protected from reality at all costs. Needless to say the news media made no mention of Trump's devastating economic arguments instead focusing all of their attention on the more pressing issue of the two decade old hurt feelings of a portly beauty queen.
Similarly, when Trump unveiled his contract with America in Gettysburg including such groundbreaking measures as a ban on former politicians becoming lobbyists, a ban on foreign entities paying lobbyists and a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on congressmen and senators. This was huge news of great importance and interest to the public, but the media failed to report on it at all. Instead, the only point they reported from this speech was a footnote in which Trump confirmed he would sue the women who falsely accused him of sexual misconduct. Absolutely incredible.
The media's misleading reporting about the sises of the crowds at the parties' rallies, inflating Hillary's and diminishing Trump's, has become a running joke. Even more disgraceful has been the massaged and perhaps even downright fraudulent polls which claimed that Hillary was up to 12 points ahead when all of the evidence on the ground pointed to an entirely different state of affairs, as detailed in the two discussions between Stefan Molyneux and Bill Mitchell here and here. However, as the election approaches the media tell us that the polls have miraculously changed and that the parties are now neck and neck in the hope that they will not be left looking utterly ridiculous come election day. The entire mainstream media might be in the bag for Hillary, but Trump is winning the internet by a massive margin. Thanks to YouTube he can get his speeches directly to the public in their entirety without having to go through a media gatekeeper. His Alt Right troll army mercilessly ridicules the liberals and cucks and the penetrating analysis offered by the likes of Stefan Molyneux, Styxhexenhammer and Fash The Nation puts the middlebrow musings of the mainstream media to shame. I think we are witnessing the precise moment in history when the internet became more powerful than the mainstream media, when a guy with a webcam could be as persuasive as a multi billion dollar news network. No wonder the establishment are terrified. Whether Trump wins or loses, 2016 will be remembered as the year that establishment republicanism died. By withdrawing their support for Trump, thus tacitly endorsing Clinton, they have removed all doubt that they have more in common with the Democratic establishment than they do with their own base. If Trump wins after repeated electoral failures by the cuckservatives he will prove that they are redundant. If Trump loses, and if he does lose it will be narrowly, the Republican base will never forgive the party leadership for deliberately sabotaging his bid and subjecting them to four or eight years of Hillary Clinton. In spite of all of the naysayers who dismiss Trump as a Zionist puppet or not a full blooded nationalist, a Trump victory would be the greatest strike against globalism since the end of World War Two. However, a Trump victory is not in itself, enough to halt America's decline. He has already shifted his focus from deporting all illegal aliens to deporting criminal illegal aliens. Even if the wall is built and non white immigration is all but stopped it will not be enough to halt America' demographic death spiral. Already, the majority of babies born in the US are non white. Trump has no plans to reverse this. As the TV pundits gleefully point out, if the hispanics don't decide this election, they will decide the next one.
One week out from the US election and camp Hillary is in disarray, the latest revelations of missing emails and yet more corruption and a new investigation by the FBI is starting to take its toll in the polls. But this is no time for complacency, Trump is not assured a win, the fact is we need everybody we can muster, whether living in the US or not, to engage the liberals, especially American liberals, on social media and to capitalize on the latest Clinton scandal.
This Week the Daily Mirror carried an article with this headline:
Under the banner accompanying the headline was this photo:
Whenever healthy white men look upon such a bunch of men set to invade the civilization we've built, something is 'triggered' and it's not just the racial cuckoldry which is taking shape, it's also the sense, and let us be honest about it, that these refugees are simply loathsome trash, it isn't just their race, it's simply the way they are too.
I first came across the term ''White Privilege'' about five years ago in an article in the Telegraph which was a response to Laurie Penny's (surprise surprise) attempt to bring the idea into popular discourse in Britain. It was one of those occasions when you knew instantly an idea or policy is bad news, understanding the term itself and the theory of White Privilege was to be made aware that the enemy had been working on a new weapon which was in the process of being tweaked and polished before being rolled out onto the meta-political battlefield. ...And now it has. White Privilege Theory emanates from the ''Social Science'' wing of modern leftist thought, this is the field of study which has given us the tragic and insane ''Social Justice Warrior''. The standard response to White Privilege theory of the Ethno-Nationalist is to reject the entire premise out of hand, non-whites cannot be oppressed by whites if they are no longer living in our countries. Furthermore, the existence of White Privilege Theory as a valid subject within academia undermines the premise of the theory because if the society was directed toward ''privileging'' whites above everyone else then why haven't whites shutdown such studies?.
Some idle speculation on a recent murder in my home town.....
On Monday a murder took place here in the North East of England which has left many of the locals, myself included, somewhat baffled. Newcastle and the North East are 'rough' and relatively poor but murder is exceptionally rare, and the manner of Jodie Wilkinson's murder must qualify as unique, according to the BBC:
''Jodie Wilkinson, 27, died in hospital after being attacked by a group of up to 11 men in the city's Stanhope Street on Monday afternoon, police said. A 25-year-old man who was with her at the time was also injured and needed hospital treatment. Police said those arrested, a man aged 43, two aged 25, and three others aged 22, 20 and 18, were being questioned.''
Fiend, I defy thee! with a calm, fixed mind, All that thou canst inflict I bid thee do; Foul Tyrant both of Gods and Human-kind, One only being shalt thou not subdue....
Thou art omnipotent. O'er all things but thyself I gave thee power, And my own will.... I curse thee! let a sufferer's curse Clasp thee, his torturer, like remorse; 'Till thine Infinity shall be A robe of envenomed agony; And thine Omnipotence a crown of pain, To cling like burning gold round thy dissolving brain
Here in post-Brexit Britain the liberal intelligentsia have developed a canny little trick to misinform the British public, indeed, this is becoming the standard line of the lefty hive-mind everywhere, whether Owen Jones in The Guardian or a chubby YouTube cuck. The line being peddled is that the millions of working class Whites who voted to leave the EU were mistakenly 'lashing out' at immigrants, it is the ''Don't blame the migrants and refugees'' argument. What flows from that is a tedious debate on the economics of mass immigration, if working class Whites have suffered financially, they argue, then it should be the Tories and big business who are to blame, not the migrants themselves. The solution is more ''equality'' and jobs, raising the minimum wage and so on.
I recently came across a fascinating video which goes into some detail on the increasing levels of internet censorship, who is doing it and why, what their long term aims are and who ((They)) deem to be the gravest threat to their scheming. It's depressing but I don't know how much longer blogs such as this one will be able to survive. As is explained in the video, they are using the comments section of the New York Times as a test ground, words or phrases which they deem ''Hate'' will be written into Google's programming and then the machine will be set loose to simply Shut Down or de-list anything which transgresses the new speech codes. Most of the time when we think of censorship we think of the cops kicking your door down and dragging you off to Right Think camp, but the future is shaping up to be even worse, you'll be unable to publish a Thought Crime on the internet in the first place and because it's private companies doing this and not governments, there's nothing you can do about it, you don't get to vote Google out. And make no mistake, it is the 'Far Right' that is the problem for these people, as is explained in this excellent production......
According to the Jewish media, the sexual revolution which burgeoned in the 1960s was a time of much-needed freedom from prudish oppression. The dawn of free love, ‘flower power’, and hippy culture was a symbol of times changing towards equality and mass acceptance of diversity. The revolution was cleverly marketed. With the concurrent (Jewish) inventions of the pill and condom, gays and straights, men and women alike, were now ready to be liberated from societal judgement on their sexual habits. A human being could now choose to have casual sex with someone, without fear of being judged and ostracised. To most people, this must have sounded wonderful. However, the reality of such liberalisation of traditions has proved quite the contrary – at least, for those who care for the future of the White race. A few statistics make this sobering fact clear. The average age of the (primarily White) population is quickly rising while (White) birth rates slump to an all-time low. Meanwhile marriage rates are down to their lowest levels since 1862, and the divorce rate creeps steadily upwards. The environments in which children could be raised and thrive are therefore far fewer than in past generations, because those environments have historically been the preserve of married, monogamous couples. The problem is – clearly – that people aren't getting married much anymore. And when they are, it doesn’t last long. What has happened to marriage since its heyday, and what part did the sexual revolution play in its decline? To formulate an answer to such a broad question, it is necessary to first review how the revolution came to pass: what could a revolution stand to offer either sex, and how did its leaders bring it about? The sexes are innately dimorphous, and so sexual liberation, as promised by the revolution’ proponents, would necessarily stand to mean a different thing for men and women. F. Roger Devlin aptly outlines the two divergent ideals of sexual freedom as envisaged by both the male and female imperatives in his polemical essay 'Sexual Utopia In Power' (which I heartily recommend). First, the male vision:
