The Long Journey Home

Shepard_MrBadger_chapter They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.

— Edmund Burke

“I hate that bitch!” – A “deplorable” white female store clerk


In his remarkable history of the Parish of Myddle in 1701, Richard Gough defines custom: “Custome is a law or right, not written, which being established by long use and the consent of our ancestors, hath been and is dayly practised.” The custom that has died out in the European nations – namely the custom of viewing all of existence from the perspective of Christ — will not be renewed and revitalized by Trump’s victory. That antiquated custom was dependent on a people who believed they were a people, a people with a bred-in-the-bone faith that was passed on from one generation to the next. Then of what use is the Trump victory? The Trump victory was a sign that there is still life, spiritual life, in the European people. A sizable amount of white Europeans needed to reject the combined wisdom of organized Christianity (which has become organized Jewry), the media, the academy, and the government. It was a very remarkable feat of determined, sustained resistance to the liberal propaganda machine, but lest we presume that a major battle has been won, we should note that a majority of young whites, the Millennials, voted for Hillary Clinton.

The liberals will retrench and completely thwart any good initiative that Trump makes. Already there are Marxist, left-wing riots, funded by George Soros, in our cities, and the liberal media are demanding that Trump “reach out” to the liberals whom he defeated and the minorities who fear he is going to put them all in internment camps. Why is it that when the mad-dog liberals win elections, they never talk about “reaching out”? They always scream, “Mandate!” and proceed with the ongoing march to their Jacobin-negroid dystopia?

But let me come back to my people – the white grazers who are “so far from doing harm that they suspect none.” They did themselves proud. They managed to hate where they should hate. I had a feeling Trump was going to win two days before the election. I was buying sandwiches in a local store when the woman behind the counter, whom I’ve spoken with on many occasions, ventured a completely unsolicited opinion about the upcoming election: “I hate that bitch!” One woman’s opinion? Yes, it was. But I knew there were many, many more white men and women who shared her feelings. The more-sinned-against-than-sinning white grazers could still recognize evil in its unadulterated form. That was the reason for the bitch queen’s loss. McCain could camouflage his evil under the flag, Obama could camouflage his evil with an “Ah shucks, I’m a good darkie” act, and Bill Clinton could play the good ol’ boy act when he needed to. But Hillary was too passionately, overtly demonic. And she brought down the wrath of the usually tepid and gullible white grazers.

The grazers still can be deceived by the evil one. They are still living within the mind-forged chains of democracy, and they still fear the racist label, but they did, in this last election, know enough to hate where they should hate, which is the first step toward loving where they should love. The great obstacle blocking the white grazers’ love for their people and their God, which is where their love should be directed, is intellectual Christianity.

It’s not possible for any white man to completely divest himself of his Christian blood. Therefore it is a bit of a misnomer to call men like Trump and Putin virtuous pagans. But I’m going to use that term because I want to set them apart from the intellectual Christians. There is more genuine Christianity in virtuous pagans like Putin and Trump than there is in the intellectual Christians. Trump and Putin are not full-blown Christian knights, but they still have retained the rudiments of Christian chivalry, which is and always shall be, pietas. The Evangelicals and the Roman Catholics, by denying pietas and calling it prejudice, have cut themselves off from the only way to God, through their racial hearth fire. Because of their refusal to go to Christ through their racial hearth fire, the Roman Catholics and the Evangelicals have abandoned Christ for the messiahs of color and the heathen faiths. The Roman Catholics go whoring after the negro and the Moslems, and the Evangelicals go whoring after the negro and the Jews. As regards the Roman Catholics — did not our Lord say that no man cometh unto the Father but by Him? And as regards the Evangelicals – have they ever read the Gospels? Did not our Lord, in Mark 12: 1-11, give the definitive statement about the chosen people? What did he conclude? “And have ye not read the scripture: The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: This was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes.” But if your eyes do not see with your heart, you will not be able to see. If the unrepentant Jews are the chosen people, then Christ is not the Messiah, and we must seek Him elsewhere. And the Evangelicals are doing that. They are not allowed, by the tenets of their perverted, intellectual Christianity, to have a people who are of their own race, so they have made the Jews and the negroes their people. This flight from race, from pietas, is a flight from Christ. So long as the European people flee from pietas, the love of their own, because they fear the racist label, the small victories, such as Trump’s Presidential win and the Brits’ rejection of the European Union, will come to naught.

Now we are told that white people who voted for Trump must do penance for voting for Trump by understanding the pain of the black and the white Jacobin rioters. But we must ask the same question over and over again – why should decent whites who have been spat on and demonized by the colored barbarians and the liberal elite have to understand why they must put up with inhuman, negroid barbarians and liberals who worship Satan? Many white nationalists voted for Trump, and one antique European voted for Trump (are there any more?), but did Trump ever say anything that sounded like white nationalism? Did he ever say anything about restoring Christian Europe? Of course not. Trump said nothing that was not in line with the beliefs of Democrats and Republicans in the 1950s. Both parties at that time, the Democrats more than the Republicans, were against illegal immigration, crime, and the global economy, but the dynamic of liberalism demands that men must go further and further down the slippery slope to hell. The modern day liberals have reached the inner circle of hell. And from that vantage point they view anyone who has not reached the bottom most layer of hell as outside the ken of their satanic inhumanity.

In the rural, small town where I voted, a group of mountain folk who seemed to be right out of an old movie about the Hatfields and the McCoys came into the town hall where the voting was taking place. They made it clear that they didn’t normally vote, but they were voting in this election, and they were not voting for Hillary. I link those mountain folk with the woman who said, “I hate that bitch.” They are the last vestiges of the white race. Will their hatred of Maleficent turn into a love of the God-Man? It’s certainly possible. And it will become a reality if Christian Europeans stop running from their racial identity. If they embrace their racial identity they will love and hate with all their hearts and they will come to know the Son of God in and through their people.

We would never have seen charity embodied if there had never been a European people. The liberals want to destroy the European people for that very reason. They desire a world that is devoid of charity, because all true charity comes from Him whom the liberals hate. We should always keep that liberal desire before our eyes. They want to destroy the white race, because they want to destroy every last vestige of His reign of charity. They might call their evil multiculturalism or diversity, but we know what it is in reality. It is white genocide. Most of the whites who voted for Trump, and Trump himself, do not understand the inherent evil of liberalism. Nor do the white grazers in the other European nations. It is necessary that they come to understand the difference between the white European people prior to the 20th century and the modern European people and the colored barbarians. The difference is not just between night and day, it is between heaven and hell.

Nothing that is necessary to be done shall be done by the Trump administration. The liberal-fomented hysteria over Trump’s victory is the equivalent of a man becoming hysterical because a fly has entered his house. White people should separate themselves from the people of color and they should recognize liberals for what they are – the spawn of Satan who should not be allowed to live in a white European society.(1) They should be sent to some tropical island to live with their beloved colored brethren. You can’t co-exist with creatures who are determined to destroy you. The white grazers were able to grasp the fact that Hillary wanted to destroy them. When they finally grasp the fact that a hellish legion of Hillary Clintons run the Western world, they will be on their way back to Christian Europe.

The liberals are always screaming about diversity when they mean the opposite. They want a non-diverse culture dominated by colored barbarians. All whites should support true diversity. The Christ-bearing race should diversify by separating from the colored races. If whites blend with the colored races the blending process will not elevate the colored races, it will simply debase the white race. Which is, of course, exactly what Satan wants. He wants to eradicate the image of God in man.

The liberals tell us that the blending process will produce a new and better humanity. Is that happening? Is blended Europe an improvement over white Europe? Only if rape, infanticide, murder, and pillage are better than married love, chivalry, and honor. Where is the good in the liberals’ new world? On beyond Liberaldom are the Northern lights of our very old, but eternally young, European Narnia. We have lost contact with that world because we have abandoned our racial hearth fire through which we maintained our connection to our Savior, who is Christ the Lord. It is possible for Europeans who discover that they have a people, to return home. The hatred of Maleficent is the beginning of the long journey home. +

_______________________________

(1) The filth that have crawled out from under their rocks to protest against white people who voted for a white man who didn’t profess hatred for the white race, are one in spirit with the demonic daughter of King Lear – Goneril. What Albany says of her applies to the anti-white protesters: “Wisdom and goodness to the vile seems vile; Filths savour but themselves.”

 

Posted in defense of the white race, White genocide | Tagged ,

Facing the Enemy

Dore_ResurrectionOfLazarus The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

1 Corinthians 15: 26

___

When Malcolm, in order to test Macduff, makes up a false litany of sins that he has committed and will continue to commit should he become king, he asks Macduff at the conclusion of the litany whether “such a one be fit to govern?” Macduff replies, “Fit to govern! No, not to live!” I thought of Macduff’s reply to Malcolm when I received a political pamphlet in the mail that posed the question of whether Hillary Clinton was fit to govern. But that is how far down the slippery slope we have gone. A creature who appears to have crawled out of hell is a candidate for President and will receive millions of votes. But white Americans are not alone on the slippery slope to hell. Wasn’t Angela Merkel elected Chancellor of Germany, and haven’t most European nations elected similar creatures from hell to high positions in their governments?

It’s not that a vote for Trump is a sign of moral health, because there are many reasons why a man would vote for Trump, and only one is the right reason – that a Trump victory would be a stop-gap measure to prepare whites for the real battle, which is the battle to restore Christian Europe. But the fact that a man does not vote for Hillary is a sign that there is still something to work with within that man’s soul. He has at least rejected the devil-woman, even if he hasn’t become a Christian knight.

I have never been a believer in the ‘wake-up’ theory or the ‘pendulum’ theory of history. The ‘wake-up’  theorists say that a Hillary victory will be beneficial because it will ‘wake up’ white Americans. And the ‘pendulum’ theorists claim that we need not be actors on the historical stage, we need only be spectators who watch while the great historical pendulum swings back and forth from decadence to health, and then back again from health to decadence, all without human or divine action.

I reject the ‘wake-up’ theory because I don’t see how people who did not wake up when miscegenation, abortion, and sodomy were legalized are suddenly going to ‘wake up’ when Hillary is elected President. So in my view the election of the devil-woman would be an unmitigated evil while the election of Trump would be a baby step towards His reign of charity. But a Trump victory will not be a swing-back on the historical pendulum. There is no such pendulum. A Trump victory will be a minor victory in the long war with liberalism.

It’s not a coincidence that the countries that embraced the hatred of the white race with the greatest fervor are ruled by women. There is nothing as hellish as a woman possessed by her own will, completely outside the sphere of His divine will. Such a woman (Lady Macbeth is her exemplar) will commit any crime to further her demonic will. Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton are cut from the same satanic cloth. The destruction of an entire race is nothing to them. They feed off the blood of white people; it sustains them as a narcotic sustains a drug addict.

All liberals are desperately trying to return to paganism, but the female of the species is made with moral blinders; she can see only one side of an issue, and if she has lost sight of the good, she will pursue her evil ends without mercy for her foe or any doubt about the righteousness of her cause. The post-Christian female hates the people who foisted a ‘false, oppressive religion’ on her, and she is determined to rid the earth of that abominable race.

The old Greek fable about a man’s flight from death is apropos as regards the dilemma of the modern European. I first read the fable in a novel by Thomas Mann: a servant of an Athenian nobleman, while shopping in the market place for his master, sees Death, and Death makes what the servant thinks is a threatening glance at him. The servant runs back to his master’s house and starts to pack his bags.

“Where are you going?” his master asks.

“I’m going to Crete.”

“Why?”

“Because I saw Death in the market place, and he cast a threatening look in my direction.”

So the servant flees to Crete while his master goes to the market place to look for Death. He finds him.

“Why did you look at my servant with a threatening glance?”

“That was not a threatening look, it was a look of surprise. You see, this very day I have an appointment with him in Crete.”

Life is tragic, because we are mortal men who must die. The pagans dealt with the tragedy of existence in one of two ways – either they turned to sex and blood cults, in which they kept death at bay by losing their consciousness of death in the ecstatic moment, or they sought to escape the tragedy of life by way of the philosophical abstraction. If your mind can abstract itself from the body, then it can achieve a kind of immortality of the ‘universal mind.’

And then Christ, the protagonist in the life and death drama of man vs. death, entered the picture. Christ presented man with a third option: instead of fleeing from the tragedy of life, he could look that tragedy in the face and he could triumph over death through the cross of Christ. If we go deep, if we bestir our European blood, we can still feel as our European ancestors felt when they looked at existence in and through the blood of our Savior, Jesus Christ.

For a man to actually know, in his blood, that Christ has the power to raise us from the dead is a knowledge greater than all the scientific knowledge and all the wealth of this world:

And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.

John 11: 43-44

And then the Evangelist tells us that many believed after they saw Lazarus rise from the dead, but many also went and told the Pharisees what Christ had done. It staggers the imagination. They saw Christ restore life to a dead man and their only concern was to get brownie points for squealing to the Pharisees. And what was the Pharisees’ reaction? Did they say, “Wow, we must have been mistaken about this fellow — if He can raise the dead He just might be the son of God.” No, instead they sought to destroy him, because he threatened their power:

Then the chief priests and the Pharisees called a meeting of the Sanhedrin.

 “What are we accomplishing?” they asked. “Here is this man performing many signs. If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and take away both our temple and our nation.”

Then one of them, named Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, spoke up, “You know nothing at all! You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”

He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one. So from that day on they plotted to take his life.

John 11: 47-53

Hasn’t Christ’s conflict with the Pharisees become our conflict? The European people saw with their hearts and believed in Christ. From that day forth throughout all their history as the people of God, their battle has been against the forces of unbelief from without, the colored barbarians, and the forces of unbelief from within, the Pharisees of intellectual Christianity, liberalism, and Judaism. Once the Pharisaical element from within became predominant over the Europeans with hearts of flesh, the flood gates that kept the colored barbarians out were opened by the Pharisaical rulers of the white nations.

The Pharisees of the West, having rejected Christ, must return to the pagan escapes from existence. Through the colored hordes they have returned to the sex and blood cults of the non-Christian faiths, and through philosophical abstraction they have returned to the universal mind of the pagan philosophers. All this is because they do not believe that Christ is risen. But St. Paul got it right. If Christ be not risen, we are of all men most to be pitied, for neither sex and blood cults nor philosophical speculation can save us from death.

Liberalism is based on the proposition that the European people can avoid the tragedy of life by fleeing to a utopian island of Crete where a horde of colored noble savages dwell with liberals who are their enlightened benefactors. If a European of the old stock rises up and demands that we should remain in the market place and face death, because our Lord has triumphed over death, that same European becomes an anathema and is purged from Liberaldom. He shall not be allowed to enter into the liberals’ Cretan paradise.

One thing is needful, that we cling to the European line of resistance to liberalism. It is through the European hearth fire that we come to know the God who raised Lazarus from the dead and who will raise us from the dead. The liberals will always attack any European who actually believes he has a people whom he should love above all other peoples. And the liberals take it one step further: They will attack any white man who does not hate white people. That is the real reason, the only reason, that Trump has earned the hatred of the liberals. He has never attacked the colored people, but he has not repudiated white people, and that is what all white people are supposed to do. They must hate themselves.

This is a very important election, because white people need a rearguard to cover their retreat. But win or lose, there is only one course for white people to follow. Our people are being attacked by the combined forces of the liberals and the colored barbarians. At some point we must turn and face them, just as Christ faced death. The Christ-bearing people must be like unto their Lord, and not like unto the servant who fled to Crete. +

Posted in defense of the white race, restoration of European civilization, resurrection | Tagged

Heaven’s Gate and the Liberals’ Hell

Dore_The_Last_JudgmentThy bosom is endeared with all hearts,

-William Shakespeare

___________________

Last week an old friend confided to me that if Trump lost the election she didn’t feel that there would be any point to anything. There would be nothing left to hope for in this world. One person does not constitute an overwhelming majority opinion, but I attach great significance to anecdotal evidence. I’m sure my friend’s feelings are the feelings of many decent white folk who would like to feel there still might be a chance to live in a nation rather than a hell hole.

I fear for my friend and others like her if Trump loses. Born and bred in a democracy, the white grazers, who are my people, would never consider stepping outside of the chains of democracy and fighting liberalism undemocratically. They would never take gun, knife, bow, or sword in hand to strike out against the satanic fiends who run the government. For them democracy is destiny. Whatever cannot be done democratically cannot and should not be done. But should we acquiesce to the destruction of our people because the liberals and the colored barbarians vote for our destruction? Remember, legalized abortion came about through the democratic process. And white genocide has come upon us through the democratic process.

I think Donald Trump will win the popular vote among white males. But will he get enough white female votes to offset all the illegal aliens and dead people who will vote for Hillary? I hope so, but we can’t count on that. We must be prepared to use whatever means are necessary to preserve our people. And it will be necessary to fight, both spiritually and physically. This is not just a European American problem, it is a European problem. All over the world it is open season on white people. In Germany, France, Holland, Belgium, and Scandinavia the white grazers have said that they would rather see their women and children raped and murdered before their eyes than to be called racists. Why do white people have such a despicable fear of the racist label?

After all the excuses are made – 1) the churches have been preaching universalism for centuries, 2) the liberals will punish all those who deviate from liberalism, and 3) we must not oppose democracy – the startling, terrible fact remains: the Europeans do not love their own enough to fight for them. If they loved much, they would not be cowed by their local clergyman, by the liberal powers that be, or by the democratic process. They would fight. Is it possible to rekindle a dead ember and make it a blazing fire again? No, it is not. The European people have become, collectively, a dead ember. But they are human beings, are they not? Can’t we hope that they, unlike dead wood, can be enflamed with a passionate love for their people? It doesn’t seem very likely, does it? “Mustn’t be passionate, mustn’t be prejudiced,” is the constant refrain of the churchmen. “Whites are evil, the black is sacred,” is the holy litany of the churchmen and the secular liberals. And the bulk of the European people believe the churchmen and the liberals. All revolutions succeed when the ruling class starts to believe either all or part of the revolutionaries’ propaganda. Louis XVI looked on the French monarchy from a Utopian standpoint and found it wanting, so he was weak in defense of the monarchy. But did Louis look at his opponents and see them for what they were? No, he did not. He did not see that they were satanic fiends who had to be killed in order to stop the slaughter of millions in the present and tens of millions in the future. When the spirit is blighted by churchmen who seek to kill the passionate, bred-in-the-bone Christianity of the Europeans and exchange it for a satanic, intellectual pseudo-Christianity, the European becomes a walking dead man. “He did not die, but nothing of life remained.”

A Trump victory, a Le Pen victory, or a BNP victory will be meaningless if it does not come with a passionate, violent hatred for the liberal ruling class and the abominable negroid-Moslem hell that they have shoved down the throat of the white man. The few remaining decent white women fear for their safety, because they know white men won’t fight for them. And the white sluts proudly proclaim they would rather be raped than be racist. Our children have nothing to look forward to but death by drugs or death at the hands of the liberals’ beloved negroid-Moslem gods. This is the world the false Aslans have built. To speak of co-existing with the liberals who have built and sustain this world is a hideous blasphemy.

The modern Europeans’ quest to blend with and then be absorbed by the colored races is the logical consequence of intellectual Christianity. If you take the racial hearth fire out of the European’s existence, the hearth fire that enkindles all his passions for good or evil, you destroy the European’s soul. Intellectual Christianity is a return to pagan philosophy. It holds out the hope that a man can avoid the crucifixion by abstracting himself from existence. He does not need to overcome the tragedy of life by accepting his cross, he can circumvent tragedy by denying the cross and living life in the abstract. How can human beings bred under such a system, particularly Europeans who once saw a great light, ever be anything other than burned out embers?

“I begin to think,” said Estella, in a musing way, after another moment of calm wonder, “that I almost understand how this comes about. If you had brought up your adopted daughter wholly in the dark confinement of these rooms, and had never let her know that there was such a thing as the daylight by which she has never once seen your face—if you had done that, and then, for a purpose, had wanted her to understand the daylight and know all about it, you would have been disappointed and angry? ”

Miss Havisham, with her head in her hands, sat making a low moaning, and swaying herself on her chair, but gave no answer.

“Or,” said Estella, “—which is a nearer case—if you had taught her, from the dawn of her intelligence, with your utmost energy and might, that there was such a thing as daylight, but that it was made to be her enemy and destroyer, and she must always turn against it, for it had blighted you and would else blight her; —if you had done this, and then, for a purpose, had wanted her to take naturally to the daylight and she could not do it, you would have been disappointed and angry?”

Miss Havisham sat listening (or it seemed so, for I could not see her face), but still made no answer.

“So,” said Estella, “I must be taken as I have been made. The success is not mine, the failure is not mine, but the two together make me.”

Great Expectations by Charles Dickens

Is there such a thing as daylight? The European no longer believes there is such a thing. The poets who have fought their way back to the light – a vision of the one true knight who overcame the darkness of this world through His divinely human charity – speak with one voice. Shakespeare speaks of the great lover who is “the grave where buried love doth live…” Dostoevsky tells us of the great lover who was rejected by the intellectual Christians, the Grand Inquisitors of Pharisaical Christianity. And C. S. Lewis, through Puddleglum, tells us of the Overworld, the world of passion and light that has been nearly blotted out of existence by the darkness of intellectual Christians determined to return to the darkness of paganism.

The white man cannot do it. He cannot return to paganism. If he tries to become one with the colored races he will become nothing. The colored heathens love their Egyptian night, but what of the European? Has he made a happy return to Babylon? If he has, then why are his children drug-soaked zombies and why does he want to be annihilated by the colored races? (1)

What do we know about the Man of Sorrows who once stood at the center of Western civilization? If we listen to the Gnostic men, the men who preside over their own mind-forged, sacred rites, we know nothing of Him. He can be made into anything the Gnostic men choose to make of Him. Pope Francis now tells us that He is like unto Allah, the mind-forged god of the Moslems. The Gnostic men can liken Christ to Allah because in their minds He is an evolving abstract God who can adapt Himself to their intellectual whims. But can the Man of Sorrows, “who is the grave where buried love doth live,” become reconciled to modern Gnosticism? No, He can’t. Nor can our people, the antique Europeans, be reconciled to modern Europe, which has no room for a flesh and blood Savior.

The liberals have entered the colored swine and are determined to go over the cliff. Those of us who have not lost the moral vision of that lost world of Christian Europe, a world more remote to modern Europeans than the fictional lost world of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, need to stand between the swine and the white grazers to stop the grazers from going off the cliff with the liberals and the colored swine. It all seems futile, but our Lord did not act according to what seems, so neither shall we. What else can we do? If we love much, we must cling to Him who is the grave where buried love doth live. All the drug-soaked crippled European children, crippled by the liberals’ hellish vision called ‘diversity,’ need to see a living sign of contradiction to liberalism. They need to see a non-diverse, undemocratic Europe.

The Europeans who see that vision need to be what their ancestors were – the Christ-bearers. Through Europe and in Europe – that is our hope. The Man of Sorrows dwells therein, the Savior who opened heaven’s gate for His people. +

_______________________________

(1) The betrayal of the white race, the hatred of white pietas, was made possible by abstract, Gnostic niceness. An article written for children in a publication called Children’s Digest, an offshoot of Parents magazine, illustrates the great betrayal. In the October 1962 issue we find an article called, “The Test of Friendship.” The story tells of white settlers who let the Indians keep their child overnight to show the Indians they trusted them. Of course in the story the child comes back safe and sound, laden with gifts from her Indian brothers: “Here is your beautiful child. We have dressed her in our best clothes and have given her many gifts. But the best gift you have given us. It is proof that in your heart as well as on your lips you have friendship for your Indian brothers.” Isn’t that nice? The truth is not so nice – when the fiancé of Ethan Edwards’ niece in the movie The Searchers asks what the Indians did to his intended before they murdered her, Ethan says, “Don’t ever ask me, as long as you live, don’t ever ask me.” But such horrors are commonplace now. Pope John sanctified colored barbarianism when he showered “loving forgiveness” on the black savages who tortured and murdered his own nuns and priests.

First the intellectual Christians aborted the living God and replaced Him with an abstract God. Then they aborted the European people and replaced them with the savages of color. From those first two abortions came every evil under the sun – legalized abortion, legalized sodomy, and the creation of the kingdom of Satan on earth. Now the liberals want to elect Maleficent as President in order to ensure that there will be no difference between this earth and hell.

Posted in Christ the Hero, democracy, Grazers | Tagged ,

Remembering Christian Europe

FezziwigsBall Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember?

________________

Although there is no provision for political parties in the United States Constitution there has been a kind of tacit agreement amongst the liberal ruling elites that there shall be only two competing parties, both of which are liberal. At every election, they fume and fuss over minor differences and predict the end of the world if the opposing party wins. Dickens has described this phenomenon in The Pickwick Papers, in the chapter about the two political parties called the Blues and the Buffs who are located in the fictional English town called Eatanswill:

It appears, then, that the Eatanswill people, like the people of many other small towns, considered themselves of the utmost and most mighty importance, and that every man in Eatanswill, conscious of the weight that attached to his example, felt himself bound to unite, heart and soul, with one of the two great parties that divided the town—the Blues and the Buffs. Now the Blues lost no opportunity of opposing the Buffs, and the Buffs lost no opportunity of opposing the Blues; and the consequence was, that whenever the Buffs and Blues met together at public meeting, town-hall, fair, or market, disputes and high words arose between them. With these dissensions it is almost superfluous to say that everything in Eatanswill was made a party question. If the Buffs proposed to new skylight the market-place, the Blues got up public meetings, and denounced the proceeding; if the Blues proposed the erection of an additional pump in the High Street, the Buffs rose as one man and stood aghast at the enormity. There were Blue shops and Buff shops, Blue inns and Buff inns—there was a Blue aisle and a Buff aisle in the very church itself.

The Pickwick Papers by Charles Dickens

The liberals’ hatred for Trump has reached epic proportions. He is hated more than Richard Nixon was hated (the liberals never forgave Nixon for successfully prosecuting Alger Hiss), and he is hated more than Ronald Reagan was hated. Why is Trump hated more than any Republican candidate for president has ever been hated? Has he preached segregation? No, he hasn’t. Has he called for the expulsion of all Mexicans and Moslems from the country? No, he hasn’t, although he has called for the restriction of Moslem terrorists and Mexican murderers and rapists. Has Trump threatened to put a stop to the demonic movements called ‘gay rights’ and feminism? No, he has not. What has he done? He has called for the end of a global economy that is controlled “by a handful of global special interests rigging the system.” Trump’s attack on globalism certainly sets him apart from all the other presidential candidates and has earned him the hatred of the mainstream Republicans as well as the Democrats. But there is something deeper behind the liberals’ hatred of Trump, something that has to do with what Trump has not done. If Trump had attacked the global economy in the name of the negro, or in the name of some other non-white minority, the liberals who are all globalists (with the exception of the Ralph Nader types) would still have opposed Trump, but not with the vehemence with which they now oppose him. What the liberals hate about Trump is that he has not demonized the white race; he has included white people in his idea of a nation. In the name of white Americans and colored Americans he has attacked globalism. Trump, more the pity, is not a racist, but the liberals have given him the racist label, because they do not believe in genuine diversity; they believe in the dominance of the colored barbarians and the extermination of the demon white race, always excluding themselves, of course, because they have risen to the heights of Atticus Finch-dom and become spiritually colored and therefore part of the chosen people.

Behind all the Eatanswill bickering of the Republicans and Democrats there is one central principle that they all agree upon: The white race is evil and must be exterminated. The Republicans generally (Bush was more of a democratic mindset) advocate a slower liquidation of the white race while the Democrats always want to proceed at the fastest pace possible, which is why the Obama’s advisors have had him support the Black Lives Matter, White Lives Don’t organization, and in a similar vein they have advised him to go after Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who is trying to stop the flood of Aztec marauders into his nation. But despite differences about the timetable for the complete elimination of the white race, the Republicans and Democrats have been in virtual lockstep in their commitment to diversity, which means white genocide. Trump threatened to delay, not to derail, their plans because he is a 1950s liberal who wants all Americans to share in the American dream. But what is the American dream? The American dream is rooted in Jacobinism; it is part of the “Ye Shall Be as Gods” utopian heresy of all the anti-European ideologies that have been created by the minds of men to destroy the Christ-bearing people. A Trump victory will only benefit white people if it starts the white grazers on a journey back to their true roots. If they go back to the world where European men and women loved and hated with all their hearts, they will discover that faith, hope, and charity are more important than liberty, equality, and fraternity.

The late John Tyndale used to tell Britons that it was the eleventh hour, that they must act now to elect a BNP candidate or Britain was finished. But what happens when the eleventh hour passes and you have failed to win an electoral victory? Your people despair and die because you have put all your hope in the democratic process. Instead of trying to change men’s hearts, you have tried to manipulate men’s minds and you have failed miserably.

We are being told that this election is our eleventh hour. “If Trump doesn’t win, it’s over.” It’s been over for quite some time. And by ‘it,’ I mean the liberals’ attempt to become as gods through the democratic process. Instead of becoming as gods, they have become devils. What else can you call a people who have done what liberals have done: legalized abortion, legalized sodomy, and created a state religion dedicated to the deification of the noble black savage? Will a Trump victory put an end to American Jacobinism? No, it will not, unless that victory is also the beginning of the Europeans’ revolt against all things democratic and modern. And if the demon witch-woman should win the election, “it” is not over for white people. They still have the same war to fight, a war against the mind-forged hell created by liberals in the name of their colored gods.

There is nothing European about democracy. The European people, when they were a people, often elected their local magistrates, judges, etc., but when they did so they were voting for white people who would lead white people. They were not voting for a cabal of traitors whose express purpose was to exterminate the white race. Will whites ever become aware of the liberals’ intent? It does not appear that they will. But we do know, from the Europeans’ past that God does work through human hearts. So we can’t definitely say it’s over so long as there are white hearts.

I wasn’t able to get much information about the one piece of positive information that has come out of Germany in recent years. I read that someone or some group, I don’t know who or which, had planned the assassination of Angela Merkel. I also heard that the planned attack had been stopped before it started, which is a tragedy. But my heart soared to hear that some Germans have had enough. To shed blood is indeed a terrible thing, but there is a war going on right now, a vicious war of rape, rapine, and slaughter. And the Angela Merkels and the Pope Francises of the Western world are the leaders of the enemies’ shock troops. The blood of millions of white victims, innocent white victims, is on their hands. It is far more terrible to allow that bloodletting to go unchallenged than to kill the men and women who have ordered the bloodletting.

The darkness of Babylon once enveloped the entire earth. Then the Light came into the world, and one people, as a people, made that light part of their world. And they spread that light all over the world. A man who says anything good about colonialism (witness Pope Francis’s recent rant against colonialism) is deemed a moral reprobate by the liberal powers that be. But from a Christian standpoint, a non-utopian standpoint, would there ever have been any light in the non-European nations if the Europeans had not entered those nations? And where is the light now that the Europeans have left the colored nations? And likewise, where is the light in Europe now that the European people have invited the colored Babylonians into their nations? There is no light; the darkness of Babylon has enveloped Europe and the world once again. The liberals, for the last century, have been trying to get the European people to accept the darkness of Babylon as the only reality. “There never was a light, and even if there was a light that light was evil, only darkness is good.” They have all but succeeded in making the European people believe that lie. But there is always one, who will become many, who does not believe the lie:

Of course a lot of things darted into Jill’s head at once: Experiment House, Adela Pennyfather, her own home, radio-sets, cinemas, cars, airplanes, ration-books, queues. But they seemed dim and far away. (Thrum—thrum—thrum—went the strings of the Witch’s instrument.) Jill couldn’t remember the names of the things in our world. And this time it didn’t come into her head that she was being enchanted, for now the magic was in its full strength, and of course, the more enchanted you get, the more you feel that you are not enchanted at all. She found herself saying (and at the moment it was a relief to say):

“No, I suppose that other world must be all dream.”

“Yes, it is all a dream,” said the Witch, always thrumming.

“Yes, all a dream,” said Jill.

“There never was such a world,” said the Witch.

“There never was any world but yours,” said they.

Puddleglum was still fighting hard. “I don’t know rightly what you all mean by a world,” he said, talking like a man who hasn’t enough air. “But you can play that fiddle till your fingers drop off, and still you won’t make me forget Narnia; and the whole Overworld too. We’ll never see it again, I shouldn’t wonder. You may have blotted it out and turned it dark like this, for all I know. Nothing more likely. But I know I was there once. I’ve seen the sky full of stars. I’ve seen the sun coming up out of the sea of a morning and sinking behind the mountains at night. And I’ve seen him up in the midday sky when I couldn’t look at him for brightness.”

The Silver Chair by C. S. Lewis

It only takes one man who has not forsaken his European home, which is in his blood, to start a European counter-revolution. No electoral victory will have any significance if it does not signify an awareness, on the part of the European people, that their ancestral home and their racial hearth fire is their strength and their hope, because that home and that hearth fire is connected to their God. We are told that human beings have no instincts. But we do have instincts. And tragically the only people whose instincts connect them to Christ have abandoned their instincts in order to be absorbed by the colored races who have a blood connection to Satan. For what is voodoo, what is the religion of the Aztecs, the Hindus, or any of the other religions of the colored heathens, but religions of Satan? The liberals must have no blood connection to their people because the Christ, the Son of the living God, lives in the blood of the European people. It is better, the liberals cry, to live a second-hand life and worship the dark races who have a flesh-and-blood connection to the devil. One thinks of the swine in the Gospel every time the liberals invoke their negro gods. They are fleeing from the Son of God in order to plunge over the cliff with the colored swine. Scott captured the essence of the pagan’s pride of race when he described Saladin’s boast, to a Christian knight, of his proud descent from the devil:

Naturally unsusceptible, however, of fear, he crossed himself, and stoutly demanded of the Saracen an account of the pedigree which he had boasted. The latter readily complied.

“Know, brave stranger,” he said, “that when the cruel Zohauk, one of the descendants of Giamschid, held the throne of Persia, he formed a league with the Powers of Darkness, amidst the secret vaults of Istakhar, vaults which the hands of the elementary spirits had hewn out of the living rock, long before Adam himself had an existence. Here he fed, with daily oblations of human blood, two devouring serpents, which had become, according to the poets, a part of himself, and to sustain whom he levied a tax of daily human sacrifices…

The Talisman by Walter Scott

It is of absolute importance, it is of eternal moment, that the European people should return to their racial home and become, once again, the Christ-bearing people. Liberaldom was built to destroy the image of God in man. It is the task of the true European to destroy Liberaldom. If an electoral victory in the upcoming election constitutes a baby step toward the destruction of Liberaldom, then that will be to the good. But win or lose, it is the destruction of Liberaldom and the renewal of the European people’s covenant with the Son of God that is all in all. +

Posted in black faith, Christian Europe, counterrevolution | Tagged , ,

Light and Darkness

dore_st_john_at_patmos_and_vision_of_death Liberalism represents an attempt to superimpose on reality an artificiality, to substitute that which is sham for that which is real. In its determination to obliterate distinctiveness (Aldous Huxley said somewhere that “Good is that which makes for unity. Evil is that which makes for separateness”) and reduce everybody and everything to a grey uniformity, Liberalism reveals that it amounts to nothing less than a war against Life itself. Liberal intellectuals are all intellect and no instinct. They have no ‘ground’ and no compass to guide them. This is why they habitually use words and expressions without any meaning, because they have no meaning in themselves. They perform cerebral circles in a spiritual desert and end by dying of thirst. And this is excellent, except that tens of millions of white people are persuaded to accept them as guides; and along with their ‘guides’ are led deeper and ever deeper into the waterless deserts of Liberalism, there to perish with them.

Due directly to Liberalism, we are the only race in the whole world that is being taught to despise itself.

–Anthony Jacob, White Man Think Again!

______

That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.

-Shakespeare, Richard II


  Certain 20th century conservatives have made reference to the cultural war, and they are right — there is a cultural war that is raging. But it is not the cultural war that the 20th century conservatives thought was taking place. The 20th century conservatives, the TCCers, thought that the cultural war was between the liberal left which supported the dechristianization of Europe through the various radical -isms – Jacobinism, socialism, and communism – and the conservative right, which supported the Greco-Roman, Christian traditions of Europe. The problem with the TCCers’ assessment of the cultural war was that they overestimated the power of their own intellects and they underestimated the subtlety of the devil. The devil is quite capable of getting the zealous anti-Christian liberals to take the direct path to hell while, at the same time, getting the liberal conservatives to take the indirect route to hell that is disguised with the false outer façade of the heavenly city. What the TCCers failed to comprehend was that rationalism, whether it was rooted in the thought patterns of the ancient Greeks, the medieval scholastics, the 18th century philosophers, or the 19th and 20th century scientists, was part and parcel of the wizardry of liberalism. No matter that a man professed an intellectual preference for theological Christianity or a philosophy of the ancients, so long as his professed admiration was of the mind and not the heart, that conservative was part of the wizardry of Liberalism, which gets its inspiration and ethos from the devil.

Chateaubriand, who was a befuddled atheist before the French Revolution (his family was wiped out by the Jacobins) and a committed Christian after the Revolution, cut to the heart of the Europeans’ fall from grace when he delineated the eternal conflict between the devil’s appeal to rational wizardry and Christ’s appeal to the human heart:

…Adam wanted to know every thing at once. Observe, too, what is very important: man had it in his power to destroy the harmony of his being in two ways, either by wanting to love too much, or to know too much. He transgressed in the second way; for we are, in fact, far more deeply tinctured with the pride of science than with the pride of love; the latter would have deserved pity rather than punishment, and if Adam had been guilty of desiring to feel rather than to know too much, man himself might, perhaps, been able to expiate his transgression, and the Son of God would not have been obliged to undertake so painful a sacrifice. But the case was different. Adam sought to embrace the universe, not with the sentiments of his heart, but with the power of thought, and advancing to the tree of knowledge, he admitted into his mind a ray of light that over-powered it. The equilibrium was instantaneously destroyed, and confusion took possession of man. Instead of that illumination which he had promised himself, a thick darkness overcast his sight, and his guilt, like a veil, spread out between him and the universe. His whole soul was agitated and in commotion; the passions rose up against the judgment, the judgment strove to annihilate the passions, and in this terrible storm the rock of death witnessed with joy the first of shipwrecks. –The Genius of Christianity

The culture of magic is Satan’s world. When the European conservative talks about our Greco-Roman/Judeo-Christian democratic traditions, he is not being true to the European tradition. He is merely adhering to another part of the “pride of science” alchemist tradition of the anti-European, utopian element of the European people. “You shall be as gods,” is the promise of Satan. He is forever encouraging mortal man to turn to a system which contains God, instead of looking to the vision of God that the antique Europeans held in their hearts. That there is a deeper magic than the devil’s intellectual magic, a magic of the human heart, is what the Europeans, in union with St. John, who placed his head on Christ’s sacred heart at the last supper, and in union with St. Paul, whose heart saw Christ on the road to Damascus, discovered when they eschewed the magic of the devil for the love of the God-Man. “The love that once was there,” the love that comes from human hearts linked to His divinely human heart, is what is missing in modern conservatism. We can’t love a system. Only intellectual wizards such as the neo-cons and their liberal cousins in the mad-dog liberal ranks and in the liberal-conservative ranks can get excited about “our democratic traditions,” or “the workers’ paradise,” or “free market capitalism,” or any other of the –isms of liberalism. But we can love our people, through whom we learn to love the Savior, who is Christ the Lord. Look through all the conservative anthologies of the 20th century, and you won’t see the only real conservative of the 20th century, which was and is, Anthony Jacob. He didn’t love an –ism, he loved his people. Like Burke, who thought that whatever –ism went against the heart and soul of his people was evil, Jacob championed his people over systems. At the heart of all good governments is a particular, racially distinct people whose hearts are connected to His heart. All true conservatism then, according to Burke and according to Jacob, had to be rooted, not in the wizardry of Satan, but in the hearts of the people of Europe who had given their hearts to Christ. Burke and Jacob stand with those other great European poets such as Shakespeare, Scott, and Dostoevsky. They loved much, and gave of their heart’s blood in an effort to turn their people’s heart back to His Europe and away from the wizardry of Satan’s universalist death trap, which is often camouflaged by intellectual systems that promise paradise and leave us bereft of faith, hope, and charity.

If Trump wins the upcoming Presidential election it will be no more than an irritating mosquito bite on the body of Liberaldom, but it will mean something infinitely more if the Trump victory is a sign that a significant amount of white grazers have stopped listening to the voice of Satan as it comes to them through the churches, the government, and the mass media.(1)

The reason that it is so hard to get a grazer to resist liberalism by standing with the Christian Europeans of old Europe is because the modern Christians in the Roman Catholic and Evangelical Protestant ranks always side with the liberals. And they always side with the liberals because they are “deeply tinctured with the pride of science,” which is the eternal Achilles heel of fallen man. From that sin comes negro worship and the hatred of all things human – the European hearth fire and the virtues that go with that hearth fire, which consists of the love of one’s own, heroism, and the charity that never faileth. A world without the hearth fire virtues is not a culture, it is the absence of a culture. Whites who try to blend with the anti-cultures of the colored heathens soon become non-persons. They are not pagan enough to become colored, but they are not white enough to be Christian Europeans. They live in limbo. If and when Christian Europeans make their presence known as men who fight for charity’s sake against Satan and his minions, then, and only then, will the European counter-revolution begin.

How did it come about that everything stemming from Christian Europe is deemed evil, even by such “Christians” as Pope Francis, and everything stemming from modern Liberaldom is good? Is a society that legalizes sodomy and abortion better than a society that abhors such practices and makes laws against them? Is a society that worships negroes and encourages the extermination of white people better than a society that separates whites from blacks and supports the white race? Ah, there’s the rub! The liberals do claim that a society that worships blacks and hates whites is a superior culture. Every evil under the sun must be allowed to the liberal ruling elite, because they promote anti-racism. And white racism (not black, brown, red, or yellow racism, which is lauded) is the original sin in the liberals’ twisted theology. Pride of science, which views the natural world and the lord of the natural world, the negro, as superior to the Christian God is not seen as sinful, it is seen as the way to the kingdom of heaven on earth. That kingdom of heaven on earth is always in the future. It will come about when what the liberals call white racism, and what we call pietas, vanishes from the earth. When the white grazers finally realize that it is their loved ones, their kith and kin, whom the liberals want to murder, will they fight back or will they submit to the slaughter? They are submitting to the slaughter of whites in South Africa and in the city streets of the United States, so what makes us think that whites in other nations won’t submit to their own extermination? The whites’ shameful conquest of themselves began when they preferred Christian wizardry to the love of Christ Jesus. Such an assertion is always guaranteed to elicit a sneer from the liberal and the neo-pagan, but what or who, if not Christ, is the last refuge of the European people? If we don’t love where we should love, we will not hate enough to fight for our people. Dylan Thomas’s rage against the dying of the light was magnificent, but that rage must be directed against the liberal wizards in church and state, and the demon whom they serve, in the name of the Light of the world, if we are ever going to see the Europe we love flourish again on this earth.

Within the Catholic ranks there are warring groups of Catholics who play the ‘revelations from Mary’ game. The traditionalists refer to a revelation from Mary in which she condemns Vatican II, and the Vatican II-ers counter with a revelation from Mary in which she says we must support Vatican II. And in the ranks of the evangelicals the unrepentant Jews have somehow become the chosen people of God whom Christians are supposed to support without question because such support will bring about the coming of the Messiah. Excuse me, but I thought the Messiah had already come. As to His second coming, didn’t He say, “That day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.”

What is going on within the Christian ranks? Why are Christians looking for a sign? I maintain it is because they have left the Christ, who can only be known in and through His people, the antique Europeans, to go whoring after false messiahs who can be made into the servants of some type of esoteric system that makes the Son of God more compatible with the minds of men who can’t abide the European Christ. In the modern church of Gnosticism I hear the voices of the acid-tongued rabble who said, “Thou that destroyest the temple and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God come down from the cross.” And I hear the mocking voices of the chief priests, the scribes, and the elders mocking Him and saying, “If He be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe Him. He trusted in God, let him deliver Him now, if He will have Him: for He said, I am the Son of God.”

Christ has come down from His cross, but not as the wizards wanted Him to come down from the cross. He has come down from the cross to enter the hearts of men. He has come down from the cross to abide with us at our familial and racial hearth fire. Is it His fault that the men of science did not recognize Him and then, because of their loneliness, they anointed the negro as the Savior of the world? No, it is not His fault, it is ours. Peter was forgiven for denying his Lord thrice, so will we be forgiven if we turn away from the false messiahs of modernity and turn to the Man of Sorrows who has been waiting outside on the doorstep of our racial home for an invitation to return to His people who once saw a great light. +

________________________

(1) Isak Dinesen once remarked that a man was never completely reprehensible if he was at least a man. That is Donald Trump. He is not a Christian hero from a Walter Scott novel, which is a great pity, because nothing good will happen to the European people until we once again start producing Ivanhoes and Quentin Durwards. But Trump is a man with some small vestiges of pietas left in his heart, which makes him a better man than all the presidential candidates this nation has put forward since the death of Teddy Roosevelt. Again, Trump has some good instincts – I intend to vote for him – but I wonder if a few good instincts will allow him to withstand the wickedness and snares of the devil. All the forces of hell have been loosed upon him. All the hell hounds came out to attack Reagan when he ran, but the attack on Reagan was nothing compared to the attack on Trump. One thinks of Maleficent in Disney’s (the real Walt Disney) movie Sleeping Beauty, who says, “Now deal with me and all the forces of hell.” We have reached a point in our nations’ history and in the history of the European people when we are quite literally acting out Disney’s Sleeping Beauty. Hillary Clinton is Maleficent, and she has called down all the forces of hell on Donald Trump, who wants to awaken the white grazers from their death-in-life sleep. But Donald Trump is not a Christian knight as Prince Phillip was, so he lacks the shield of virtue and the sword of truth. We, the Christian remnant, must supply that shield and that sword. God bless Donald Trump in the day of battle, in the name of Christ the Lord. Amen.

Posted in blood faith, Europe as the Christ-bearer | Tagged ,

The Lost European Chord

dore_babylon_fallen-jpg In which the old man launches forth into his favorite theme…

– The Pickwick Papers

Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Matthew 23: 38-39

 ___________________________________

That the French Revolution was a magnificent event that gave birth to a new era of liberty, equality, and fraternity is an article of faith for all modern liberals. It also was and is an article of faith for the intellectual Christians such as Priestly, Price, and Belloc. But from a genuine Christian standpoint there can be no compromise with the apologists for the French Revolution. Nor can there be any tolerance for those who want to find a middle ground: “There were some excesses, but there were also some good things…” No, either Burke was right when he warned us that the French Revolution was from hell, or the liberals were right when they said the French Revolution would usher in a new age of peace and brotherhood.

…if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the alembic of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness, by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and amongst many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take place of it.

– Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France

Of course Burke, not the liberals, was right, but the liberals’ Jacobin ideals and not Burke’s faith have been institutionalized throughout the European nations. And the uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition that has taken the place of the Christian faith of the European people is negro worship. There are other articles of faith that go along with negro worship, such as the love of all the colored races and a preference for all the heathen faiths over the Christian faith, but negro worship is the cornerstone of the liberals’ faith, just as the worship of Jesus Christ was the cornerstone of the antique Europeans’ faith. Intellectual Christians who try to oppose Islam without opposing negro worship – “I oppose the Islamic invasion but I am not a racist” – and neopagans who oppose negro worship but sneer at the Christian faith of the antique Europeans are both doomed to failure, because both groups are trying to fight liberalism while retaining part of the liberals’ faith. The intellectual Christians want to blend Christianity and negro worship while the neopagans want to eliminate Christ and replace Him with their minds. The intellectual Christians are like the devotees of the mystery religions who made a rational decision to give themselves up to cosmic enthusiasm, much like the hippies of the 1960s and 1970s who wanted to get “lost in your rock and roll and drift away.” And the neopagans are like unto the Greek philosophers who thought they could dispense with the gods and make reason their god. The French Revolution started out as a rationalist rebellion against God and then, when rational atheism alone proved uninspiring, the Jacobins incorporated the rationalistic enthusiasm of the nature-based mystery religions into their system:

The conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every external sign of rational devotion, was intrusted to the genius of the painter David; and had it not been that the daring blasphemy of the purpose threw a chill upon the sense of ridicule, it was scarcely matched as a masquerade, even by the memorable procession conducted by the notorious Orator of the Human Race. There was a general muster of all Paris, (June 8,) divided into bands of young women and matrons, and old men and youths, with oaken boughs and drawn swords, and all other emblems appertaining to their different ages. They were preceded by the representatives of the people, having their hands full of ears of corn, and spices, and fruits; while Robespierre, their president, clad in a sort of purple garment, moved apart and alone, and played the part of Sovereign Pontiff.

– Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon Buonaparte, Volume 2

The combination of mystery, nature, and rationalism has been proof, so far, against all European counter-attacks. It is this old man’s contention that the Europeans have not been able to launch an effective counter- attack against the liberals because they have not put on the full armor of God. They have not used the shield of virtue, which is pietas, the passionate love of one’s own, nor have they wielded the sword of truth, which is faith in the vision of Jesus Christ bequeathed to us by our non-diverse, racist European ancestors.

There is a great divide separating us from the antique Europeans. Those ancient Europeans were a people, while the modern Europeans are a legion of Humpty Dumpties. “When I use a word, it means anything I want it to mean,” was Humpty Dumpty’s assertion. Such is the suicidal nominalism of the intellectual Christians. If you want to abandon Christ and your people in order to appease the liberal powers that be and still have a clear conscience, you simply invent a new Christianity. In the new Christianity a man’s sanctity is measured by the extent to which he loves and adores the black race. He doesn’t actually have to love blacks as human beings, he just needs to love the blacks in the abstract. And in that other hole-and-corner of Liberaldom, the neopagans hold onto their version of Humpty Dumpty logic. They love white brain cells while hating individual white people who believed that the foolishness of Jesus Christ was wiser than the brain cells of the philosophers, scientists, psychiatrists, anthropologists and all the other cosmic, universalist thinkers. It is this thing called intelligence that is the dividing line between the Humpty Dumptians of modernity and the antique Europeans. Does reason need to be illuminated by the human heart? No, it does not, say all the modern Humpty Dumptians, from the mad-dog liberals to the intellectual Europeans in the traditionalist and neopagan camps. But if human reason is self-illuminated, is it not illuminated by Satan? The light that shineth in darkness comes from His divinely human heart.

Europeans saw that light when their hearts were connected to His heart. The story of Christ’s nativity speaks to us still. The star of Bethlehem, that great light, came to earth through the heart of Christ. No man cometh unto the Father except through Christ. And no man cometh to Christ unless he comes by way of the human heart. The racial war is not, at least it should not be, a war about intelligence. The Europeans are not the Christ-bearing race because they are smarter than other races, they are the Christ-bearing race because their reason was illuminated by a heart-to-heart connection to Jesus Christ. The intellectual sneer at the sacred connection between the Christ Child and the European people is the mark of Satan, whether the sneer comes from the mad-dog liberal or from the neopagan. We are not the people of the blasphemous sneer, we are the people of the Christian hearth and the Christmas feast. Say not that the struggle does not availeth, it does availeth when it is grounded in His divine charity.

The proof that it is the heart that illuminates reason and not the reverse can be seen in the reality of our lives. Why did Reverend Price exult at the humiliation and execution of the King and Queen of France while the same spectacle made Edmund Burke weep? Why do our modern liberals exult at the presence of blacks and Moslems in formerly white nations while white Europeans of the old stock are sickened by the change? And why does the neopagan see nothing but a Jewish conspiracy in the faith that the European people gave their hearts and souls to? The answer is that reason can see only what the heart feels. The liberal hates, in his heart, the white Christ-bearing race so he exults in the triumph of the black barbarians over the white race. And the neopagan, in his heart of hearts, loves the idea of a world dominated by his giant brain. He hates all those who would put limits on his powers by bowing down to a sickening, weak-kneed God with Jewish antecedents.

The appeal to reason has not stopped legalized abortion, it has not stopped the liberals’ attack on the white race, and it has not stopped the neopagans’ assault on Christ-centered Europeans. We can’t reason the baby killers, the white-hating liberals, or the anti-Christian neopagans out of their maniacal hatred of all things Christian and European. Does that mean we give up? No, it means we give up rational debate and cling to what we know to be true — the antique Europeans’ vision of the living God, who presides over the hearth fires of the European people who have asked Him to abide with them, is the only life-sustaining vision that is worth fighting for. And it is the only vision that is grounded in reality. There is no truth or virtue in liberalism or neopaganism. Freud, Darwin, Marx, and company were men whose evil hearts darkened their reason and made them the instruments of Satan, just as the men of intellect, the Übermensches Nietzsche dreamt of, have cast their lot with the angel who would not serve. Is it really better to reign in hell than serve in heaven? That is only desirable to those who have never been touched by the Christ story. But of course that is the problem — the European people have become warring camps of Humpty Dumptians who have put their reason at the service of hearts that have rejected the Light of the world. Are there no Europeans willing to put on the whole armor of God and venture forth against the Humpty Dumptians of the hardened hearts? “Did not our hearts burn within us by the way?” But first we must have hearts of flesh. And then, and only then, will we find that “Lost Chord” of the European people – “that grand Amen” – which is preceded by the heartfelt prayer, “Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.” +

Posted in antique Christianity, Jacobinism, rationalism | Tagged ,

A Tale of Two Towers

two_towers

Of all the men who have ever taken pen in hand to put on paper what their heart felt, Shakespeare stands above them all. But he, even he, felt completely unequal to the task. In many of his sonnets he expresses frustration over his inability to adequately express his heart’s deepest sentiments. I think all the other truly great artists of the West, men such as Michelangelo and Handel, must have felt as Shakespeare felt – that what they wrote, painted, or composed was a mere stammering compared to the vision that was in their hearts. How could it be otherwise for fallen man? His heart sees the eternal light for one blessed moment, and then the things of this world darken that light and he sees through a glass darkly. And we lesser men, who are not Shakespeare, Michelangelo, or Handel, still have a vision of the light, and we still, like the great artists, try to stammer out our heart’s vision. Every human personality has a vision in his heart that is inspired by his God. Our vision as a people is contained within our race, because our race makes us a people with a local habitation and a name rather than an airy nothing or a formless universal that can be abstracted out of existence. The European people responded to Christ’s charity, and as a result His divinely human heart humanized their hearts. From the moment He came to their hearth fires, the European people’s stammerings reflected, collectively, the image of God. If we approach the European people in the spirit of a doctor who is just looking for disease, we will find nothing but disease in the European people. But if we look at their culture “feelingly” and not with the spirit of a dissector, we will see the face of God in the collective stammerings of their hearts.

We cannot reach out to His divinely human heart if we don’t have human hearts. “Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O Lord.” If we don’t plumb the depths, if we forsake the tragedy of life for a Thomistic-Buddhistic escape into the land of the abstracted intellect, we will never transcend the tragedy of existence by fighting through the ever-moaning battle in the mist, as our Lord did. Instead we will forever seek to escape existence rather than conquer it through His Holy Cross. Having forsaken the Cross, we will never know the glory of the Resurrection.

The shadow of death hung over the European people until they saw “a great light.” Those people, those hearts who saw Christ through a glass darkly, were and are the Church of Christ. The false Aslans are the men of religion who have sought to make a church out of their man-made, mind-forged systems. At this point in the European peoples’ history the light seems all but extinguished and the shadows of death loom large. What else can we call the European nations that have become havens for the heathen faiths and the dark-skinned devils, other than the charnel houses of death? The liberals worship darkness and not the light. For this reason they have systematically attacked the people who saw a great light and infused that vision into their culture.

Will we ever again see the animation in the eyes of a European that stems from the light of a Christ-centered heart? Yes, we will, but first we will suffer as Job and King Lear suffered. Is that tragic? Yes, it is. But at least at the end of that tragic drama, the drama of the Europeans’ struggle against liberalism, there is light instead of darkness.

What vision of God do we see in the collective face of the people of color? We see the face of Satan. Yet the liberals want to blend with and worship those people. It’s no coincidence that the first atheist government within the heart of Christendom, the French Jacobin government, countenanced the massacre of whites in Haiti. The liberals’ utopia will always be built on blood, the blood of the white man. And the Christian utopians, the men who have forsaken the God of their ascending race for the great, gnostic god of the universal mind, often exceed their secular liberal brethren in their zealous hatred of the white race. In fact the hatred of the white Christ-bearing race has now become the secular liberals’ and the churchmen’s sign of election.

This fear of being racist (see The Fear of Racism) has paralyzed the European people. And it is not just the Western European people. I have heard the ‘We are not racist’ affirmation from stalwart eastern Europeans who courageously oppose Islam, but then quake before the racist label. I place the blame for this outrage on the unChristian Christian clergy. The better Europeans will oppose their liberal governments, albeit they will only oppose them democratically, but they will not oppose their church. They need to look past the church organizations who collectively represent the false Aslan, to the true church — the antique Europeans of provincial, racist Europe, whose stammerings from the heart bear witness to the living God.

Many years ago I saw the Scott Monument in Edinburgh. I suppose there are many monuments and sculptures more aesthetically pleasing to the eye, but the monument was a piece of moral beauty such as I had never seen before. It was such a moving tribute to one of Christian Europe’s greatest poets. Each carved niche of the monument contained one of the characters in Scott’s works or one of Scotland’s poets. It seemed to me then, and even more so now, that the monument captured the spirit of Scott. By placing the characters from his novels and other beloved Scottish poets in the niches of the monument, the man who made the monument was paying tribute to the stammerings of Scott’s great heart. The inner man, the vision that is in a man’s heart, is all in all. For me Walter Scott and the other great European poets such as Shakespeare pull back that veil, just for a moment, which separates this world from the next. And they bring us to that other world by way of the human heart. They reject intellectual systems and cosmic-mysticism for the one sure mysticism that St. Paul enjoins us to practice – the charity connected to His divine charity. I have no doubt that the Brits will soon tear down the Scott Monument, but haven’t the British people already done something worse than tear down a monument? They, like all the people of modern Europe, have forsaken the antique Europeans’ vision of the heart, as articulated and exemplified by Sir Walter Scott.

I frequently hear liberals and liberal conservatives saying that the Europeans must be diverse because the essence of a democratic society is diversity. Everyone, regardless of race, color, or creed must be welcome in nations that respect their democratic institutions and traditions. But we should not respect our democratic institutions and traditions, because they are not of Europe, they are not part of the European peoples’ heart. If you have a cancer in your body, you don’t strive to keep the cancer alive in your body because it is now part of your body’s history. You acknowledge that it’s there, but you strive to purge it from your body. The Moslems and the colored hordes are now part of the European people’s history, but that does not mean they must be preserved and protected (let alone worshipped) as if they are our people. They should be purged from the European nations because they are a cancerous non-Christian disease that will kill every last vestige of the light that shineth in darkness.

Let us not get lost in the theories of the secular and Christian utopians. Despite all the liberals’ raptures about the wonders of a world purged of white people and dominated by colored people, we see nothing but death, decay, and debauchery in the brave new world of techno-barbarian liberals and their colored barbarian gods. Is this the promised end? The antique Europeans saw beauty on a cross. Where is the moral beauty in the liberals’ brave new world?

George Meikle Kemp, the architect of the Scott Monument, was born in Midlothian, the scene of one of Scott’s greatest novels, and in his early years he was a shepherd on his father’s farm:

I gaze on thee, and one sweet memory tells
Of that strange lad who, all a summer’s day,
Herded his sheep upon the Pentland fells,
And read the mighty minstrel’s border lay:
And who, to echoes of the city bells
Blending with clash of arms and fierce foray,
Beheld thee there upon the hillside lone–
Brandished his crook and froze thee into stone!

-Ebenezer Charlton Black

Black’s ode to the architect who poured out his heart’s stammerings to the Scottish bard he loved captures the essence of Christian Europe. We are the provincial people who love a provincial God born in a manger. So long as we remain faithful to our provincial God, by loving Him in and through our kith and kin, we triumph over death and decay. But if we continue to aid the liberals in their attempt to rebuild the Tower of Babel, we will perish in darkness.

Two monuments, the one built by a loving heart in honor of a provincial poet who speaks to us all because he stayed with the provincial hearth-fire virtues, and the other tower built by blasphemers who sought to destroy the provincial virtues in order to satisfy their desire to become as gods. We shall not follow in their train. We shall place our hearts and our swords at the service of Scott’s provincial Europe. +

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, democracy | Tagged