Wikipedia:JSTOR

The Wikipedia Library

JSTOR
Sign up for free access to JSTOR's online resources
(waitlist)

Userbox

Code	Result
{{Wikipedia:JSTOR/Userbox}}	This user has access to JSTOR through The Wikipedia Library.	Usage

Account Coordinators for the Wikipedia Library are: Nikkimaria and The Interior will be approving accounts and collecting email addresses.

JSTOR
Pages
Main page Approved accounts Citation examples Technical Support Experiences and feedback Metrics Declined applications e

JSTOR is one of the largest and most reputable journal archives in the world. This page is to facilitate signups for a pilot collaboration between the Wikimedia Foundation and JSTOR. This pilot provides free access to JSTOR's complete archive to 100 500 active editors for one year, in order to better support the most active and experienced authors of the encyclopedia. Active through December 2015. See blog post.

The content set currently available to the Wikipedia editors includes all of JSTOR's archival journal collections (now about ~2,000 journals) and the 19th Century British Pamphlets collection (26,000 pamphlets), but the books (~20,000) and the current journals (more recent issues for ~300 titles) are not available in the Wikipedia pilot. TWL is working with JSTOR to potentially expand the package available to editors.

Note that around a hundred universities provide free alumni access – please check if this applies to you!

To get access

1. You will need to be an active editor. If you haven't been particularly active lately, preference may be given to another request.
2. You will need to have a confirmed email address, and be willing to provide this address to someone from the Foundation and to JSTOR (unlike Wikipedia, JSTOR access requires email). The Interior is the current contact.
3. You will need to sign up here, with access given out in the order of signups. Please sign up even if the 500 person limit has been reached, so that overall interest can be measured and we can get a waitlist started. Before you post a request, please check on this page to see whether you already have access through your local public library and/or educational institution.

Please be aware

• If you are given access but fail to register an account within a reasonable time, you may be asked to relinquish it to another requester.
• There is no minimum usage requirement, but if you're not really using your account and you're willing to give it to another person on the list, please let the Foundation contact know.
• You will need to abide by the JSTOR Terms of Service, and should be comfortable with the fine print in the JSTOR Privacy Policy.

Requirements

• You do not have free online access to these JSTOR products through your local library or university
• You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia or on your home wiki linked from your application; (see Special:Preferences)
• You have an account that is a minimum of six months old
• You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
• You are active in content generation, research, or verification work

If you don't quite meet the experience requirements but think you would still be a strong candidate for access, feel free to apply and you may be considered.

Expectations

Approved editors may

• Search, view, retrieve, and display portions of restricted content
• Electronically save portions of restricted content
• Print out single copies of portions of restricted content
• Comply with any terms and conditions which appear on the particular pages of the JSTOR website they are accessing

Approved editors will not

• Share their account logins or passwords with others
• Mass scrape or mass download JSTOR content
• Systematically make printed or electronic copies of multiple extracts of restricted content available for any purpose
• Datamine metadata without permission, in order, for instance, to use metadata for auto-created stub articles
• Use the access provided through the Pilot for any commercial purpose

Private and confidential information

• You will need to have a confirmed email address to participate. You understand and agree that your name and email address may be shared with representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia Library, and JSTOR. While Wikipedia Library coordinators are volunteers (not employees or contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation or JSTOR), they have signed confidentiality agreements with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to the personal information they may handle for the Wikipedia Library.

Citation

External video

English-language tutorial from Texas A&M University Commerce

Spanish-language tutorial from Universidad de La Sabana

• Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a JSTOR article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
• Editors should not provide bare links to non-free JSTOR pages
• Editors should credit JSTOR and denote the registration requirement by adding |registration=yes and either the |via=[[JSTOR]] or |jstor= parameters to {{cite}} or {{citation}} templates as appropriate, or by using the standalone template, {{Subscription required |via=[[JSTOR]]}}

Examples

Closed access articles

• <ref>{{cite journal |last=Ziff |first=David
|title=Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant
|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]] |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=841–872 |date=April 2005
|jstor=4099480 |1=<nowiki>|registration=yes }}}}</ref>

• Ziff, David (April 2005). "Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant". Columbia Law Review. 105 (3): 841–872. JSTOR 4099480. (registration required (help)). 

• <ref>{{cite journal |last=Ziff |first=David
|title=Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant
|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]] |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=841–872 |date=April 2005
|registration=yes |jstor=4099480 }}</ref>

• Ziff, David (April 2005). "Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant". Columbia Law Review. 105 (3): 841–872. JSTOR 4099480. (registration required (help)). 

• <ref>{{cite journal |last=Ziff |first=David
|title=Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant
|journal=[[Columbia Law Review]] |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=841–872 |date=April 2005
|jstor=4099480 }}{{Subscription required |via=[[JSTOR]]}}</ref>

• Ziff, David (April 2005). "Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant". Columbia Law Review. 105 (3): 841–872. JSTOR 4099480.  – via JSTOR (subscription required)

Free-to-read article in JSTOR

• <ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jerome|first1=Fred|title=Einstein, Race, and the Myth of the Cultural Icon|journal=Isis|date=December 2004|volume=95|issue=4|pages=627–639|doi=10.1086/430653|jstor=10.1086/430653}} {{free access}}</ref>

• Jerome, Fred (December 2004). "Einstein, Race, and the Myth of the Cultural Icon". Isis. 95 (4): 627–639. doi:10.1086/430653. JSTOR 10.1086/430653. 

Waitlist

Add yourself to the bottom of this list with:

#{{user8|USERNAME|Project=code}}

e.g.,

#{{user8|Example|Project=en}}), active areas on Wikipedia, and how you would use access to JSTOR.

1. KJRehberg (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a frequent copyeditor and fact checker for as many Wikipedia articles as I can get my hands on. Having access to JSTOR would be a great resource to correct and cite even more articles, including those I have written myself. Thank you. KJRehberg (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

   @KJRehberg: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

2. Epolk (talk · contribs) I have been an editor for a decade. Per X!'s Tools I have over 17,000 edits, around 14,000 on unique pages. As the number of articles on Wikipedia have reached a critical mass, I have moved from creating and proofreading articles to creating citations for articles. The publicly available sources for searching scholarly works usually point to an abstract for an article or a pay site (e.g. JSTOR) so my ability to provide accurate and complete citations are limited. As for my areas of interest, they tend toward history and the sciences, especially zoology as this area seems to be most in need of expansion and citation of sources. Epolk (talk) 03:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

   @Epolk: {{approved}} Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

   User did not respond. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

3. CielProfond (talk · contribs) Mostly interested by astronomy, JSTOR is an awesome source of information. CielProfond (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

   @CielProfond: You haven't been very active lately, would you be able to make good use of this account? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

   @Nikkimaria: Sorry about that; I have to admit it doesn’t give me access to as many journals as I had first thought. I’m willing to give my account away or cancel it if I have to. CielProfond (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

4. JmCor (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I have been using JSTOR for about two years, under their "Shelf" system, which is limited to a maximum of three items at a time. I am mostly interested in the history of science and would use JSTOR to access articles in that area. JmCor (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

   @JmCor: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

5. MrPenguin20 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Mostly work on areas relating to politics and history, with a specific focus on Britain & the Arab world. That being said, my range is extremely broad. Whilst I previously enjoyed access through my university, the program doesn't extend to alumni. Academic sources naturally often provide information which can't be accessed freely elsewhere. Many thanks. MrPenguin20 (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

   @MrPenguin20: Pending as you don't have a valid email enabled. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

6. Almanacer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been an active editor since 2007 maintaining and verifying references, and creating and expanding articles in the humanities especially areas of controversy where a wide range of citations from academic journals are referenced. Almanacer (talk) 09:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

   @Almanacer: You haven't been very active lately, would you be able to make good use of this account? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

7. Барсов (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi, I've been mostly editing and writing Russian articles on Wikipedia. I'm interested in JSTOR, as it will help me to write more articles on the history of education science.--Барсов (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

   @Барсов: Pending as you don't have a valid email enabled. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

8. LeftAire (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've been editing since 2011, among my main articles are Ornithology and History related articles. I've requested access through OUP, but I'm thinking that I may also need full access to JSTOR; my university unfortunately doesn't have full access, especially for some of the Latin-American related articles I can potentially use. LeftAire (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

   @LeftAire: Not approved as you haven't been active lately, feel free to re-apply if you return. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

9. allixpeeke (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)), I have been active on Wikipedia for over ten years (with over 5,000 edits), on Wikiquote for over twenty-one months (with almost 14,000 edits), and on Wikidata for over twenty-one months (with over 1,000 edits).  I also edit Commons and Wikisource from time to time (and I've been known to irregularly edit Wiktionary, Wikinews, Simple, and Wikibooks, among others).

   My main focus on Wikipedia has been political philosophy, while my focus tends to be broader on Wikiquote, where I've done the majority of my editing.  As an example of something I'm currently working on on Wikiquote, I've been recently focused on figures from Colonial America.  Although I've started with Maryland, I've designs eventually cover all of the major figures of that era from all of the America colonies.  Thus, so far, I've created pages for Lord Baltimores George Calvert and Cecil Calvert; governors Leonard Calvert, Thomas Greene, William Stone, Josias Fendall, and Thomas Notley; and rebels William Davyes and John Pate.  (This is by no means to imply that Colonial America is my sole focus on Wikiquote, of course; I've created pages as diverse as the Fibonacci sequence, Jefferson in Paris, honey (the food), Honey (the band), Lady Godiva, Monday, Mother Nature, and police state, just to name only a very few.)

   Currently, I use a combination of the books I've accumulated over the years and the Internet in order to conduct research, both for Wikipedia and for Wikiquote, although I did have experience with JSTOR back in my college years.  It would certainly prove useful for my various endeavours on the various Wiki projects.

   Thanks for the consideration,
   allixpeeke (talk) 23:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

   @Allixpeeke: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

10. Neil916 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I applied and was approved in March 2015, but after I responded to an online google apps questionnaire, I never heard back. So I'll start the process again. Editing since 2006, would use access to primarily edit biology-related articles. Neil916 (Talk) 03:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

    @Neil916: I do see you on the response list, so I'll ping JSTOR to find out what happened. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

    They have contacted me and the account has been activated. Neil916 (Talk) 23:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

11. Kevin Gorman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) This is the first long chunk of time I've not had jstor access directly through academia, and it's been a killer. It makes it hard to write articles, verifying facts already present in WP articles that are reliant on jstor indexed journals in existing articles harder, and editing other existing articles harder. Not having jstor access makes many aspects of WP life significantly harder. Kevin Gorman (talk) 00:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

    @Kevin Gorman: Not approved as you haven't been active lately, feel free to re-apply if you return. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

12. Yodin (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – Editor in good standing on en.Wikipedia for many years, active in many areas. Am hoping to use JSTOR specifically in relation to the work of Birger Sjöberg. ‑‑Yodin^T 12:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

    @Yodin: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

13. Wolbo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)), experienced editor (75,000+ edits), have been largely working on tennis (history) but expanding into other areas such as Dutch history and hope to use JSTOR sources to improve articles in these areas.--Wolbo (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

    @Wolbo: {{approved}} Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

    User did not respond. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

14. k_scheik (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I frequently fact check and copy edit, having access to JSTOR would help me in my endeavors.

    @K scheik: Not approved as you haven't been active lately, feel free to re-apply if you return. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

15. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am a regular contributor, with about 87,000 edits (including deleted). I write on a variety of subjects (though lately I've been working on a variety of bird articles, and JSTOR content has actually helped me in the past in this area): I've had 10 articles, predominantly written by me, achieve good status and 3 have been promoted as featured articles – with a few in the pipeline. I often use research access to help others with their writing efforts here, as well as to check sources for verification. I also spend quite a bit of time checking claimed and suspected copyright violations, which requires access to a diversity of sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

    @Fuhghettaboutit: {{approved}} Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

    User did not respond. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

16. CatcherStorm (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I believe I meet the criterion for acceptance. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 09:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

    @CatcherStorm: Not approved as you haven't been active lately, feel free to re-apply when you return. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

17. Rybkovich (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As of December 26, 2015 I had 175 edits in past 30 days. Recently I have been doing significant expansion of legal and historical articles. Legal articles are really hard to get a hold off unless one owns expensive legal database access. Only legal libraries have that kind of access and usually they are only open during business hours. I also participate in copyright violation checking. Rybkovich (talk) 01:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

    @Rybkovich: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

18. P0mbal (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing and creating new Wikipedia pages since 2007. 271 pages created, 1024 unique pages edited. In am multilingual, but though most of my over 8000 edits have been in English, I have 19 in French, 5 in Swedish and 4 in Catalan, and can translate from most European languages. The fields covered are principally in the arts: literature, music, science and films - which interests started by the discovery of many of my ancestors who were talented in these areas. A fortuitous discovery of an advertisement in an old "Musical Times" has provided an example of how useful it would be to access a series of this publication.P0mbal (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

    @P0mbal: Pending as you have no valid email enabled. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

    @P0mbal: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

19. Coemgenus (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've been an editor for eleven years and used JSTOR frequently when I had access through schools I was then enrolled in, or through limited alumni access. I no longer have that access, but I would like to continue creating content with the help of articles available on JSTOR. I edit mostly in American history, and have written twenty featured articles, most of which required access to journals. Thank you, Coemgenus (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

    @Coemgenus: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

20. Ruby2010 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing WP for nearly 10 years. Historical articles, particularly biographies of women, are one of my major focuses. Access to articles like this would be greatly helpful for my research. Ruby 2010/2013 19:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

    @Ruby2010: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

21. Sternrentte (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been editing in WP:DE for c. 2 years mow. My major focuses are agriculture, botany, phytopathology and biographies of botanists. JSTOR access would be a great help for my WP research!.--Sternrenette (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

    @Sternrenette: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

22. akhooha (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I've done a lot of work on verifying and correcting source material as needed particularly on subjects dealing with the Middle East, Judaism, and Islam, and access to academic articles on JSTOR would greatly increase my abilities to continue this work. I've also done similar work (and written a couple of articles) for the Arabic Wikipedia under the username of أخوها. Thank you very much for your consideration.--Akhooha (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

    @Akhooha: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

23. Ardomlank (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hello! I've been editing in Russian Wikipedia for several years, though recently changed my account for privacy sake. I'm interested especially in writing on mathematical topics, but, unforntunately, many useful article are not publicly available. Ardomlank (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

    @Ardomlank: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

24. Zunkir (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Editing on WP:FR for more than ten years, on Ancient History. Access to JSTOR would be very useful to improve articles. Zunkir (talk) 22:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

    @Zunkir: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

25. Miyagawa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active on WP:EN only, for over seven years with more than 49,000 edits. Would primarily use for work on popculture and there's often some quality discussions of themes etc in these journals. Miyagawa (talk) 09:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

    @Miyagawa: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

26. scope_creep (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Active on WP:EN only, for around 10+ years, in good standing I guess. I work mostly in military history at the moment, which started the series of articles I've worked on via an article request for a German logician called Heinrich Scholz, which ultimately led to what I'm doing now. The work I'm doing now is detailed, technical and difficult, particularly trying to track salient information, separating hearsay and oft repeated information from fact. Mostly I get information from Google Book, speaking to people via email, library books, and German and American archives, but information is sparse, by the simple fact that the work was hidden by nature, e.g. German cryptology. Access to JStor would help on this, since I bump into all time, particularly today, when I was looking for information on German Naval Enigma. This is the sort of article I want to read, [ENIGMA: SEAHORSE AND OTHER KRIEGSMARINE CIPHER BLUNDERS] and also several articles within this list [Table of contents]. scope_creep (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

    @Scope creep: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

27. ArtsRescuer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email))I am a new user in WP:EN and I write every at least one arlitcle. But if give me a permission to access JSTOR i will grant countribuites to JSTOR

    Would recommend against granting access to this user due to their fishing for user rights. See [1], [2], [3], [4]. Thanks, Nakon 02:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

    The user is also misrepresenting their user group membership: [5]. Nakon 03:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

    See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArtsRescuer. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

28. Benjamin Trovato (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am trying to work up the Russian conquest of Turkestan. There appears to be no modern book and the available books (mostly nineteenth century British) have contradictions and omissions. I would like to do a journal search. Will relinquish if I cannot find anything.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

    @Benjamin Trovato: You can search journals without logging in to JSTOR at jstor.org to get a sense of what is out there - does it look like there may be useful results for you? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

    Please cancel. I could not find what I was looking for. I will keep searching and re-apply if I find something good. Thank you.Benjamin Trovato (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

29. Moondyne (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)), mostly active at Wikisource nowadays, but long term contributor at Wikipedia. Am admin here also, fwiw. Am specifically looking for http://www.jstor.org/stable/60232574 for a Wikisource transcription project, and ultimately a tie-in back here. I also see a number of other jstor items of similar vein which would be of interest. Many thanks. Moondyne (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

    Ping @Nikkimaria:. Moondyne (talk) 06:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

    @Moondyne: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

30. MediaKill13 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I registered an account last year and I am currently trying to improve WikiProject Discrimination articles, such as Xenophobia, but I am finding difficulty in getting reliable sources. Thanks. MediaKill13 (talk) 12:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

    Pinging reviewer @Nikkimaria:. MediaKill13 (talk) 10:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC) I've joined a university with access. MediaKill13 (talk) 06:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

31. otr500 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have many varied editing interests with history, that includes historical biographies as a primary, and feel access to JSTOR would be a great benefit. Otr500 (talk) 02:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
32. Salarabdolmohamadian (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)), I often edit art and literature-related articles in Persian (farsi فارسی) Wikipedia and occasionally make corrections in the English Wiki, and rarely in the French Wiki. Jstor would be a wealth of very much needed sources for the job. (I used to have access through my university and used Jstor extensively for Wiki . . . but the university is no more!)Salarabdolmohamadian (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
33. 春卷柯南 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Active writer of articles on various fields of Southeast Asia in Chinese Wikipedia, and occasionally an editor to fix errors in enwp and, at a lesser extent, Japanese Wikipedia. I have no JSTOR access via public library accounts that I'm holding (Hong Kong and Guangzhou), and gaining the right of access would be helpful for future article constructions. (Email function enabled.) Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 15:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
34. Lourdes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have created 26 articles, including 4 GAs and 5 DYKs and working on Featured Content now. This would be really helpful in researching. Lourdes 01:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
35. DoctorWho42 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), I've created about 350 articles and have 3 DYKs. While the subjects vary, I would be more interested in writing more articles on literature. Since graduating from CSUMB, I've been asking random friends with institutional access to help with research, buying back issues of old magazines for critical reception via AbeBooks (If or Galaxy Science Fiction) or cannibalizing old citations from research papers to bolster new articles, i.e. The Falling Astronauts, etc. Given much of what I need is only available via interlibrary loan or beyond paywalls, I feel like this would help my research a great deal.--☭🎆🌎🎼🎺🐦 07:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
36. Ynhockey (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – I have been editing Wikipedia on the subject of Israeli history for years, and JSTOR inevitably crops up in this topic area when looking for academic resources. I'd like to be access this resource for further improve articles on Israel's history. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 08:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
37. Coin945 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My specialty is educational video games, and I think this resource would be invaluable--Coin945 (talk) 12:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
38. Haploidavey (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)Active in ancient Roman (and sometimes ancient Greek) social and religious history, though not exclusively. Most of what I need is available on JSTOR but is restricted by paywall, and by the strictly limited allowance offered under the "shelf-space" program. I live in a small town, in Derbyshire. My local library is, quite frankly, lousy. Haploidavey (talk) 18:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
39. KAVEBEAR (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) Active in Hawaiian and Polynesia history, though not exclusively. I have created two FAs, 9 GA and countless DYKS. I write historical biographies and have readily used JSTOR in the past when I could but I no longer have free access to the site. I put researching and the best reliable sources above all so using JSTOR would help me create great articles. KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
40. LeyteWolfer (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): Thesis work on the Cold War; can update articles that I find in error or lacking while conducting my research. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 14:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
41. JFG (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) – Veteran wkipedian. Current areas of activity include spaceflight, astronomy, geopolitics and music. I am passionate about digging out precious nuggets of information to broaden the coverage of complex topics beyond what is popular in the news. — JFG ^talk 20:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
42. Pirrica (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email), I have been editing Wikipedia since 2011, expecially as WikiGnome. I'm interested in archaeology and history of art and the access to JSTOR could help me in RL in order to prepare guided tour in my town. --Pirrica (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
43. Banjo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 59k+ edits and Sysop at gl.wikipedia. Other than admin dutires, I focus my work both in translations/adaptations and improvement of GA/FA to galician wiki and improving already created content and article referencing in galician wiki. Lately focused on history related articles, but I usually work on a vast array of topics. Access to these resources would be really helpful in these tasks and in improving the general referencing of gl.wiki articles. Banjo (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
44. Mehdi ghaed (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email).most of my contribution is on Islam,Philosophy and biographied. most of Articles in Jstore is needed to imporove articles and developping them.Thanksm,sharaf (talk) 19:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
45. Nishidani (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I intend writing one article a day for the next year or so in order to cover the 500 odd tribes of aboriginal Australia with the one format, completely overhauling what little has been done, while creating over 200 tribes I calculate still have no adequate wiki page. I intend to restrict my sourcing to academic works. I've done about 30 articles over the last month, a list can be found here, cp.Jaburara Karajarri etc. Jstor appears to have many articles I require.Nishidani (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
46. VinceLeibowitz (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am working on improving various articles related to Texas history as much of the Texas project has a number of unsourced articles as well as articles with incomplete information. JSTOR is the only database that indexes articles from several journals of the South and Texas that cover various detailed aspects of county and state history, much better than the main online resources currently existing. Not avaliable at my local library.
47. InformationvsInjustice (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have been a long time editor and user, however, I recently committed myself to be a more active and more involved member of the community. I have joined the CGR Project. Along with other contributions, I'm overhauling the Romulus and Remus article. I have access to the LCL, which is great for primary sources. However, I come across so many articles of interest that are seriously lacking in modern authorities and my efforts routinely point me toward sources on JSTOR. Sometimes I can find a work-around, but it would improve my edits and make contributing so much easier. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Renewal

Please post here if your JSTOR access has expired and you would like to renew.

1. Daniele.tampieri (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). As many for users above, even my account belongs to the first 100 accounts granted with a Jstor access. And like them, I would be grateful if my full access rights could be restored. As the the Coordinators can check, I am quite active on Wikipedia, currently contributing to several entries on Mathematics, Physics and Electronics engineering: I am asking thus be granted again the access to such an important and complete source in order to rise steadily the quality and reliability standards of my contributions to Wikipedia.Daniele.tampieri (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC) It works again. Many thanks to you and to JSTOR crew! BEST, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
2. Kmhkmh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)Similar case to the ones right above, I'm mainly active on en.wp (> 10,000 edits) and de.wp (>40,000 edits). I've been using JSTOR for the past several years for Wikipedia and it has been an extremely valuable tool. I think in the past the account was extended automatically, however now it seems to have expired and I'd like to request a renewal if possible.--Kmhkmh (talk) 09:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC) update: There was no notofication or message but like in Waynejayes's case it suddenly started working again - thanks --Kmhkmh (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
3. Carlstak (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Ditto the above. I've made over 11,000 edits on English WP, and have been active in content generation, research, and verification work. My WP access to JSTOR seems to have expired too, and I'd like to have renewed access. Carlstak (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
4. Waynejayes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). Me too, I would love to have my Jstor access back, it was so useful in writing articles. Working again, thanks Wayne Jayes (talk) 12:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
5. Ancheta Wis (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I think my case is a not-yet-expired account which wasn't working last week, but which now works again after a 'renewal'. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 02:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
6. Shabidoo (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Have used jstor for articles on religion/atheism, politics and linguistics. Hope to renew it again. Shabidoo | Talk 15:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Working again, thanks