(✿◡‿◡)

floralpapi:

thecelestialchild:

So Giuliana Rancic was warned not to say her comment. They did 3 takes. She said it 3 times. Fuck her apology.

source lmao this is so wild 

theastrarium:

In Memory of those who died in the Salem Witch Hysteria of March 1692 - April 1963 Bridget Bishop An older woman, Bishop had a reputation for gossiping and promiscuity, 
but when it came to witchcraft, she insisted to her judicial accusers 
that “I have no familiarity with the devil.” Nevertheless, Bishop was 
the first convicted witch hanged on what later became known as Gallows 
Hill. Sara Good After her first marriage to an indentured 
servant left her deep in debt, Good married a laborer who worked in 
exchange for food and lodging, and the two eked out a meager existence 
in Salem Village. She was among the first suspects identified by the 
female children when they were questioned by magistrates in February 
1692. Good protested her innocence, but officials insisted upon 
questioning her young daughter, and the child’s timid answers were 
construed as proof of Good’s guilt. Good was pregnant at the time of her
 conviction, and officials stayed her execution until she could give 
birth. The infant died in prison, and in July 1692, Good herself was 
hanged. Defiant to the end, Good’s  final words were  a warning to her 
tormentors: “If you take my life away, God will give you blood to 
drink!” Elizabeth How The Ipswich woman was a kind soul who 
tenderly took care of her husband John How, who was blind. Nevertheless,
 something about her aroused others’ ire. Neighbors accused her of 
causing both their cows and their young daughter to die after they 
quarreled with her, and when she sought to become a member of a local 
church congregation, neighbors and kin opposed her. They subsequently 
experienced a spate of injured animals and other bad luck, which they 
interpreted as supernatural acts of revenge. In court, her own 
brother-in-law, Captain John How, accused her of killing his sow and 
inflicting upon him a painful numbness in his hand that made it 
impossible for him to work. She was also accused of sending her spectral
 form to attack a young girl and attempt to drag her into Salem pond. 
“God knows, I am innocent of anything of this nature,” she testified. 
But even though other witnesses vouched for her character, she was 
convicted and executed. Susannah Martin A widow in her late 
sixties, Martin was the wife of a blacksmith and the mother of eight. In
 the 1670s, she previously was accused of witchcraft and infanticide, 
but her husband had successfully countered the charges by suing her 
accusers for slander.  By 1692, however, he had died, and when 15 of her
 neighbors accused her of bewitching them or causing their farm animals 
to die, she had to confront the charges alone. Some historians have 
speculated that the accusations against Martin were linked to an 
inheritance dispute in which she was involved. Deeply religious, she 
comforted herself by reading “her worn old Bible” in jail as she awaited
 execution. Rebecca Nurse An elderly woman in ill health and a
 respected member of the church, Nurse was among the second wave of 
suspects accused by the children.  In her initial court hearing, Nurse 
protested her innocence, but when her youthful accusers cried out in 
fake pain and performed contortions to suggest that they were being 
tormented by her, prosecutors took her impassive reaction as a sign of 
guilt. She was bound over for trial and executed. Sarah Wildes
 As a young woman, Wildes was considered glamorous and forward, and 
rumor had it that she had once engaged in illicit sex.  The accusations 
of witchcraft against her actually began decades before the Salem witch 
trials, when she married a widower, John Wildes, which raised the ire of
 his first wife’s family. The sister of Wildes’ first wife, Mary 
Reddington, accused Sarah Wildes of bewitching her, prompting John 
Wildes to threaten a slander suit unless she stopped. When one of Sarah 
Wildes’ new stepchildren, Jonathan Wildes, began to behave strangely, 
some took it for demonic possession, and the suspicions against Sarah 
Wildes continued to simmer. In 1692, things finally boiled over. Wildes’
 son Ephraim was a local constable in Topsfield, and protested her 
innocence when she was arrested by his superior, Marshal George Herrick.
 One witness fingered her as being part of a coven of specters who 
whispered at the foot of a dying child’s bed, while others accused her 
of telekinetically sabotaging their ox cart after they borrowed her plow
 without her permission. Yet another testified that after quarreling 
with Wildes, she felt an apparently spectral cat walk across her in the 
middle of the night. Bizarre as the case against her was, Wildes was 
convicted and executed. Rev. George Burrough The only Puritan
 minister to be indicted and executed in the witch trials, Burrough was 
accused by Andover and Salem Village residents of being a ringleader and
 priest of the devil in the witch coven. Part of the evidence against 
Burrough was his exceptional physical strength, which was viewed as a 
sign of satanic assistance. Puritan inquisitor Rev. Cotton Mather, who 
suspected Burrough of being a Baptist and deviating from Puritan 
practices, attended his trial and urged the jury to convict him, which 
it did. When Burrough was on the ladder to the scaffold, he gave an 
impassioned speech protesting his innocence, and concluded by reciting 
the Lord’s Prayer—which, supposedly, witches were unable to do. His 
conspicuous religious fervency prompted some of the onlookers to shed 
tears and wonder if a terrible mistake had been made. Martha Carrier
 This victim of the witch hunt is best remembered, perhaps, for being 
denounced by one of the inquisitors, Rev. Cotton Mather, as a “rampant 
hag.” The daughter of one of the founding families of Andover, MA, 
Carrier was married to a servant and the mother of four children.  She 
was an independent, strong-willed person who didn’t like to defer to 
those who imagined themselves as her betters, and their dislike may have
 led to her becoming a target of the accusations. Carrier was fearless 
enough to denounce her youthful accusers. “It is a shameful thing that 
you should mind these folks that are out of their wits,” she admonished 
the court.  Unfortunately, that didn’t save her from execution. George Jacobs, Sr.
 A twice-married father of three in his early seventies, Jacobs was 
accused by one of his servants, Sarah Churchill, and by his own 
granddaughter, Margaret.  Both of them had been fingered as witches and 
may have been trying to save their necks by implicating others.  Others,
 however, soon came forward to join them, including women who claimed 
that Jacobs’ spectral projection had beaten them with a walking stick.  
But the most damning evidence, in the minds of his inquisitors, was a 
slight protuberance on his right shoulder that they believed to be the 
“witch’s teat” that the devil gave to those who’d made a covenant with 
him. Jacobs offered an unusual defense, arguing that although he was 
innocent, the devil may have taken his form to commit mischief. The 
court, however, decided that such shape-shifting could only have 
occurred with his consent, and he was condemned to death and executed. John Proctor
 After inheriting a substantial fortune from his father,  Proctor went 
on to become a successful farmer, entrepreneur, and tavern keeper.  
Unfortunately for him, he made the mistake of criticizing the young 
girls who were accusing witches, saying that if they were to be 
believed, “we should all be devils and witches quickly,” and recommended
 that they be whipped or even hung for their lies. After being falsely 
accused by their servant Mary Warren, Proctor and his wife were arrested
 in 1692. The sheriff went to their house and seized their goods and 
provisions, and sold off his cattle, leaving the Proctors’ children 
without a means of support.   Proctor petitioned the court to move his 
trial to Boston, or at the very least, to change the magistrates, 
because the locals “have already undone us in our estates, and that will
 not serve their turns without our innocent blood.”  It was to no avail.
 Proctor was convicted and executed in August 1692. His wife was spared 
because she was pregnant. Martha Cory Another respected 
church member who was among the second wave of suspects accused by the 
children.  She was hanged in September 1692. Mary Esty Some 
historians’ accounts alternately spell her name as Easty or Eastey. The 
sister of fellow defendant Rebecca Nurse, Esty insisted in court that “I
 am clear of this sin” and that she had prayed against the devil “all my
 days.” Her demeanor was so convincing that even her questioner, 
magistrate John Hawthorne, was moved to turn to Esty’s accusers and ask,
 “Are you certain this is the woman?” They responded by writhing and 
screaming in feigned demonic possession, but nevertheless, Esty was 
released from jail.  In the days that followed, however, one of her 
accusers appeared to fall ill, and two of the others claimed that they 
had seen Esty’s specter tormenting her. Esty was arrested once again, 
and this time she was convicted and hanged. Ann Pudeator The 
twice-widowed mother of six, who worked as a midwife and nurse, 
inherited property from her second husband. In male-dominated colonial 
New England society, a self-sufficient professional woman was contrary 
to what was perceived as the rightful order of things, and that may have
 made her a target for witchcraft allegations.  The testimony of 
witnesses—including a girl who claimed Pudeator had tortured her by 
impaling a voodoo doll, and another who accused her of shape-shifting 
into a bird—was augmented by a constable’s discovery of “curious 
containers of various ointments” in her home.  (The latter, apparently, 
were either foot oil or grease that Pudeator used to make soap.) Despite
 her protestations of innocence, she was condemned to death and hanged. Samuel Wardell
 Born in Boston, Wardell was a carpenter who followed his brother 
Benjamin to Salem to build houses.  He was one of the few, and perhaps 
the only, defendant who actually had dabbled in magic, when he 
occasionally amused his neighbors by playing at telling their fortunes, a
 practice that was outlawed as black magic by the Puritans. 
Nevertheless, Wardell’s bigger crime may have been marrying a younger 
widow, Sarah Hawkes, in 1673. Her sizable inheritance—combined with his 
carpentry work—made the couple conspicuously affluent in a society where
 petty resentments and envy often blossomed into suspicions that someone
 had satanic assistance. After his arrest in 1692, Wardell—perhaps in an
 effort to save himself—conceded that he had agreed to a contract with 
the devil, who had promised to make him wealthy, and even confessed to 
evil deeds that he hadn’t been accused of. He later tried to recant, but
 it was too late. In September 1692, he was hanged. Alice Parker
 The wife of John Parker of Salem, she was arrested in May 1692 after 
being accused by the same servant who fingered John Proctor and his 
wife. Accused of “sundry acts of witchcraft, she was tried in September 
1692, and convicted and hanged shortly afterward. Mary Parker
 A wealthy widow from Andover, she apparently was unrelated to Alice 
Parker but was related to one of the other suspects, Frances Hutchins. 
Parker and her daughter Sarah were arrested and accused of witchcraft as
 well. When she entered the courtroom at her trial in September 1692, 
several of the young female accusers fell into writhing spells, even 
before her name was announced. Once witness testified that she had seen 
Mary Parker’s spirit, perched high on a beam above the court, at one of 
the hearings in Salem.  Parker was convicted and hanged shortly 
afterward. John Willard Willard, a sheriff’s officer who 
lived in Salem, was ordered to bring in several of the accused. He 
declined, apparently out of a belief that they were innocent. As a 
result, he was himself accused. After initially escaping arrest in Salem
 by fleeing to Nashawag, about 40 miles away, he was taken into custody 
and put on trial in August 1692. The girls who claimed to have been 
afflicted by witchcraft testified that a spectral being that they called
 “the shining man” had materialized and prevented Willard’s specter from
 cutting one of their throats. Willard was found guilty and hanged 
shortly afterward. Wilmot Redd Also known as Wilmet Reed, she
 was the only Marblehead resident to be condemned for witchcraft.  Known
 locally as “Mammy,” Redd was an eccentric with a volatile temper, and 
liked to argue with her neighbors. Among other crimes, she was accused 
of sending her spectral doppelganger to Salem to torment one of the 
young girls who instigated the witch hunt. She was arrested, brought to 
Salem for trial, and then hanged in September 1692, in the final wave of
 executions. Margaret Scott Born in England in 1615, Scott 
moved to New England with her parents at a young age and married a 
struggling tenant farmer, Benjamin Scott. The couple had seven children,
 only three of whom lived to adulthood. After her husband died in 1670, 
Scott lived off his meager savings until they were exhausted. In her old
 age, she was forced to beg for support from her neighbors and passersby
 to survive, which made her a target of resentment and probably led to 
her arrest.  At Scott’s trial, witnesses testified that she had visited 
them in spectral form and choked and pinched them. She was found guilty 
and hanged in September 1692, in the final wave of executions. Ann Foster
 In 1692, when a woman named Elizabeth Ballard came down with a fever 
that baffled doctors, witchcraft was suspected, and a search for the 
responsible witch began. Two afflicted girls from Salem village, Ann 
Putnam and Mary Walcott, were taken to Andover to seek out the witch, 
and fell into fits at the sight of Ann Foster. Ann, 72, a widow of seven
 years, was arrested and taken to Salem prison. A careful reading of the
 trial transcripts reveals that Ann resisted confessing to the ‘crimes’ 
she was accused of, despite being “put to the question” (i.e. tortured) 
multiple times over a period of days. However, her resolve broke when 
her daughter Mary Lacey, similarly accused of witchcraft, accused her 
own mother of the crime in order to save herself and her child. The 
transcripts reveal the anguish of a mother attempting to shield her 
child and grandchild by taking the burden of guilt upon herself. 
Convicted, Ann died in the Salem jail after 21 weeks on December 3, 
1692, before the trials were discredited and ended. Source: Wikipedia & National Geographic

theastrarium:

In Memory of those who died in the Salem Witch Hysteria of March 1692 - April 1963

Bridget Bishop
An older woman, Bishop had a reputation for gossiping and promiscuity, but when it came to witchcraft, she insisted to her judicial accusers that “I have no familiarity with the devil.” Nevertheless, Bishop was the first convicted witch hanged on what later became known as Gallows Hill.

Sara Good
After her first marriage to an indentured servant left her deep in debt, Good married a laborer who worked in exchange for food and lodging, and the two eked out a meager existence in Salem Village. She was among the first suspects identified by the female children when they were questioned by magistrates in February 1692. Good protested her innocence, but officials insisted upon questioning her young daughter, and the child’s timid answers were construed as proof of Good’s guilt. Good was pregnant at the time of her conviction, and officials stayed her execution until she could give birth. The infant died in prison, and in July 1692, Good herself was hanged. Defiant to the end, Good’s  final words were  a warning to her tormentors: “If you take my life away, God will give you blood to drink!”

Elizabeth How
The Ipswich woman was a kind soul who tenderly took care of her husband John How, who was blind. Nevertheless, something about her aroused others’ ire. Neighbors accused her of causing both their cows and their young daughter to die after they quarreled with her, and when she sought to become a member of a local church congregation, neighbors and kin opposed her. They subsequently experienced a spate of injured animals and other bad luck, which they interpreted as supernatural acts of revenge. In court, her own brother-in-law, Captain John How, accused her of killing his sow and inflicting upon him a painful numbness in his hand that made it impossible for him to work. She was also accused of sending her spectral form to attack a young girl and attempt to drag her into Salem pond. “God knows, I am innocent of anything of this nature,” she testified. But even though other witnesses vouched for her character, she was convicted and executed.

Susannah Martin
A widow in her late sixties, Martin was the wife of a blacksmith and the mother of eight. In the 1670s, she previously was accused of witchcraft and infanticide, but her husband had successfully countered the charges by suing her accusers for slander.  By 1692, however, he had died, and when 15 of her neighbors accused her of bewitching them or causing their farm animals to die, she had to confront the charges alone. Some historians have speculated that the accusations against Martin were linked to an inheritance dispute in which she was involved. Deeply religious, she comforted herself by reading “her worn old Bible” in jail as she awaited execution.

Rebecca Nurse
An elderly woman in ill health and a respected member of the church, Nurse was among the second wave of suspects accused by the children.  In her initial court hearing, Nurse protested her innocence, but when her youthful accusers cried out in fake pain and performed contortions to suggest that they were being tormented by her, prosecutors took her impassive reaction as a sign of guilt. She was bound over for trial and executed.

Sarah Wildes
As a young woman, Wildes was considered glamorous and forward, and rumor had it that she had once engaged in illicit sex.  The accusations of witchcraft against her actually began decades before the Salem witch trials, when she married a widower, John Wildes, which raised the ire of his first wife’s family. The sister of Wildes’ first wife, Mary Reddington, accused Sarah Wildes of bewitching her, prompting John Wildes to threaten a slander suit unless she stopped. When one of Sarah Wildes’ new stepchildren, Jonathan Wildes, began to behave strangely, some took it for demonic possession, and the suspicions against Sarah Wildes continued to simmer. In 1692, things finally boiled over. Wildes’ son Ephraim was a local constable in Topsfield, and protested her innocence when she was arrested by his superior, Marshal George Herrick. One witness fingered her as being part of a coven of specters who whispered at the foot of a dying child’s bed, while others accused her of telekinetically sabotaging their ox cart after they borrowed her plow without her permission. Yet another testified that after quarreling with Wildes, she felt an apparently spectral cat walk across her in the middle of the night. Bizarre as the case against her was, Wildes was convicted and executed.

Rev. George Burrough
The only Puritan minister to be indicted and executed in the witch trials, Burrough was accused by Andover and Salem Village residents of being a ringleader and priest of the devil in the witch coven. Part of the evidence against Burrough was his exceptional physical strength, which was viewed as a sign of satanic assistance. Puritan inquisitor Rev. Cotton Mather, who suspected Burrough of being a Baptist and deviating from Puritan practices, attended his trial and urged the jury to convict him, which it did. When Burrough was on the ladder to the scaffold, he gave an impassioned speech protesting his innocence, and concluded by reciting the Lord’s Prayer—which, supposedly, witches were unable to do. His conspicuous religious fervency prompted some of the onlookers to shed tears and wonder if a terrible mistake had been made.

Martha Carrier
This victim of the witch hunt is best remembered, perhaps, for being denounced by one of the inquisitors, Rev. Cotton Mather, as a “rampant hag.” The daughter of one of the founding families of Andover, MA, Carrier was married to a servant and the mother of four children.  She was an independent, strong-willed person who didn’t like to defer to those who imagined themselves as her betters, and their dislike may have led to her becoming a target of the accusations. Carrier was fearless enough to denounce her youthful accusers. “It is a shameful thing that you should mind these folks that are out of their wits,” she admonished the court.  Unfortunately, that didn’t save her from execution.

George Jacobs, Sr.
A twice-married father of three in his early seventies, Jacobs was accused by one of his servants, Sarah Churchill, and by his own granddaughter, Margaret.  Both of them had been fingered as witches and may have been trying to save their necks by implicating others.  Others, however, soon came forward to join them, including women who claimed that Jacobs’ spectral projection had beaten them with a walking stick.   But the most damning evidence, in the minds of his inquisitors, was a slight protuberance on his right shoulder that they believed to be the “witch’s teat” that the devil gave to those who’d made a covenant with him. Jacobs offered an unusual defense, arguing that although he was innocent, the devil may have taken his form to commit mischief. The court, however, decided that such shape-shifting could only have occurred with his consent, and he was condemned to death and executed.

John Proctor
After inheriting a substantial fortune from his father,  Proctor went on to become a successful farmer, entrepreneur, and tavern keeper.   Unfortunately for him, he made the mistake of criticizing the young girls who were accusing witches, saying that if they were to be believed, “we should all be devils and witches quickly,” and recommended that they be whipped or even hung for their lies. After being falsely accused by their servant Mary Warren, Proctor and his wife were arrested in 1692. The sheriff went to their house and seized their goods and provisions, and sold off his cattle, leaving the Proctors’ children without a means of support.   Proctor petitioned the court to move his trial to Boston, or at the very least, to change the magistrates, because the locals “have already undone us in our estates, and that will not serve their turns without our innocent blood.”  It was to no avail. Proctor was convicted and executed in August 1692. His wife was spared because she was pregnant.

Martha Cory
Another respected church member who was among the second wave of suspects accused by the children.  She was hanged in September 1692.

Mary Esty
Some historians’ accounts alternately spell her name as Easty or Eastey. The sister of fellow defendant Rebecca Nurse, Esty insisted in court that “I am clear of this sin” and that she had prayed against the devil “all my days.” Her demeanor was so convincing that even her questioner, magistrate John Hawthorne, was moved to turn to Esty’s accusers and ask, “Are you certain this is the woman?” They responded by writhing and screaming in feigned demonic possession, but nevertheless, Esty was released from jail.  In the days that followed, however, one of her accusers appeared to fall ill, and two of the others claimed that they had seen Esty’s specter tormenting her. Esty was arrested once again, and this time she was convicted and hanged.

Ann Pudeator
The twice-widowed mother of six, who worked as a midwife and nurse, inherited property from her second husband. In male-dominated colonial New England society, a self-sufficient professional woman was contrary to what was perceived as the rightful order of things, and that may have made her a target for witchcraft allegations.  The testimony of witnesses—including a girl who claimed Pudeator had tortured her by impaling a voodoo doll, and another who accused her of shape-shifting into a bird—was augmented by a constable’s discovery of “curious containers of various ointments” in her home.  (The latter, apparently, were either foot oil or grease that Pudeator used to make soap.) Despite her protestations of innocence, she was condemned to death and hanged.

Samuel Wardell
Born in Boston, Wardell was a carpenter who followed his brother Benjamin to Salem to build houses.  He was one of the few, and perhaps the only, defendant who actually had dabbled in magic, when he occasionally amused his neighbors by playing at telling their fortunes, a practice that was outlawed as black magic by the Puritans. Nevertheless, Wardell’s bigger crime may have been marrying a younger widow, Sarah Hawkes, in 1673. Her sizable inheritance—combined with his carpentry work—made the couple conspicuously affluent in a society where petty resentments and envy often blossomed into suspicions that someone had satanic assistance. After his arrest in 1692, Wardell—perhaps in an effort to save himself—conceded that he had agreed to a contract with the devil, who had promised to make him wealthy, and even confessed to evil deeds that he hadn’t been accused of. He later tried to recant, but it was too late. In September 1692, he was hanged.

Alice Parker
The wife of John Parker of Salem, she was arrested in May 1692 after being accused by the same servant who fingered John Proctor and his wife. Accused of “sundry acts of witchcraft, she was tried in September 1692, and convicted and hanged shortly afterward.

Mary Parker
A wealthy widow from Andover, she apparently was unrelated to Alice Parker but was related to one of the other suspects, Frances Hutchins. Parker and her daughter Sarah were arrested and accused of witchcraft as well. When she entered the courtroom at her trial in September 1692, several of the young female accusers fell into writhing spells, even before her name was announced. Once witness testified that she had seen Mary Parker’s spirit, perched high on a beam above the court, at one of the hearings in Salem.  Parker was convicted and hanged shortly afterward.

John Willard
Willard, a sheriff’s officer who lived in Salem, was ordered to bring in several of the accused. He declined, apparently out of a belief that they were innocent. As a result, he was himself accused. After initially escaping arrest in Salem by fleeing to Nashawag, about 40 miles away, he was taken into custody and put on trial in August 1692. The girls who claimed to have been afflicted by witchcraft testified that a spectral being that they called “the shining man” had materialized and prevented Willard’s specter from cutting one of their throats. Willard was found guilty and hanged shortly afterward.

Wilmot Redd
Also known as Wilmet Reed, she was the only Marblehead resident to be condemned for witchcraft.  Known locally as “Mammy,” Redd was an eccentric with a volatile temper, and liked to argue with her neighbors. Among other crimes, she was accused of sending her spectral doppelganger to Salem to torment one of the young girls who instigated the witch hunt. She was arrested, brought to Salem for trial, and then hanged in September 1692, in the final wave of executions.

Margaret Scott
Born in England in 1615, Scott moved to New England with her parents at a young age and married a struggling tenant farmer, Benjamin Scott. The couple had seven children, only three of whom lived to adulthood. After her husband died in 1670, Scott lived off his meager savings until they were exhausted. In her old age, she was forced to beg for support from her neighbors and passersby to survive, which made her a target of resentment and probably led to her arrest.  At Scott’s trial, witnesses testified that she had visited them in spectral form and choked and pinched them. She was found guilty and hanged in September 1692, in the final wave of executions.

Ann Foster
In 1692, when a woman named Elizabeth Ballard came down with a fever that baffled doctors, witchcraft was suspected, and a search for the responsible witch began. Two afflicted girls from Salem village, Ann Putnam and Mary Walcott, were taken to Andover to seek out the witch, and fell into fits at the sight of Ann Foster. Ann, 72, a widow of seven years, was arrested and taken to Salem prison. A careful reading of the trial transcripts reveals that Ann resisted confessing to the ‘crimes’ she was accused of, despite being “put to the question” (i.e. tortured) multiple times over a period of days. However, her resolve broke when her daughter Mary Lacey, similarly accused of witchcraft, accused her own mother of the crime in order to save herself and her child. The transcripts reveal the anguish of a mother attempting to shield her child and grandchild by taking the burden of guilt upon herself. Convicted, Ann died in the Salem jail after 21 weeks on December 3, 1692, before the trials were discredited and ended.


Source: Wikipedia & National Geographic

zzabahs:

Lmao

poetic:

Your grandma keeps it real.

poetic:

Your grandma keeps it real.

In my own case, I had to train myself out of that phony smile, which is like a nervous tic on every teenage girl. And this meant that I smiled rarely, for in truth, when it came down to real smiling, I had less to smile about. My ‘dream’ action for the women’s liberation movement: a smile boycott, at which declaration all women would instantly abandon their ‘pleasing’ smiles, henceforth smiling only when something pleased them.
Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case For Feminist Revolution (The Women’s Press, 1979), p89 (via radtransfem)

ooooooooooo

momteeth:maliara:Martin Soto Climent

momteeth:

maliara:

Martin Soto Climent
homme-boy:

🌿 

ily <3

homme-boy:

🌿

ily <3