I was recently at a seminar where a number of people presented ideas on large-scale native grassland management on the Victorian Volcanic Plain. After the seminar, something that struck me was how many of these presentations (including my own) were influenced by various concepts from agriculture, especially the trend for “regenerative agriculture” or “holistic grazing”.
I’ve previously critiqued some of the claims of “regenerative agriculture” in reviewing Charles Massy’s book Call of the Reed Warbler. I examined Massy’s key supporting reference, a 1996 paper that contrasted set-stock grazing with cell grazing on three properties in the NSW Northern Tablelands. The paper indicated that pulse/cell grazing (the key ingredient of what’s now called “regenerative agriculture”) probably is a good innovation to create a more diverse and resilient pasture, or “grassland” to some people. But the paper did not show a particular benefit for native grassland, even if it is perhaps good for some native grass species (where they are present).
At the seminar, a colleague asserted the need to prevent bare ground occurring, which he argued would help to keep weeds out of the grassland. His presentation was written in collaboration with a proponent of regenerative agriculture (he finished with a slide promoting Alan Savory’s book Holistic management that is very influential in regenerative agriculture).
Preventing bare ground is the opposite of our aims in native grassland management (but exactly what regenerative grazers aim for).
Continue reading