UK paperback

The Unspeak community

Jumping on the user-generated-content bandwagon

Gentle readers often email me with examples of Unspeak, but I don’t find the time to post about them, and sometimes even fecklessly forget to reply. Sorry about that. I am happy to announce that there is an all-new Unspeak™ Forum™, where all are welcome to post links and comments on political language, interesting stories, or anything else at all they feel like discussing with the hydra-brained Unspeak™ Community™. Register (required to keep out the spambots, I’m afraid) and introduce yourself.

9 comments
  1. 1  Sohail  May 8, 2008, 7:26 pm 

    Can anyone join?
    Sohail

  2. 2  Steven  May 8, 2008, 9:16 pm 

    Yep.

  3. 3  John Fallhammer  May 9, 2008, 4:35 pm 

    Last Friday’s issue really, but is “listen” an unspeakage for “completely ignore, while arranging vacuous PR exercises to give the impression of listening”?

  4. 4  Jeff Hussein Strabone  May 9, 2008, 5:50 pm 

    In the States, ‘listening’ has become a genre of political PR, as in the case of the ‘listening tour’. The Clintons are the earliest instance in my recollection of politicans on a listening tour.

    See this 1999 article at cnn.com for an example. In this instance, she held a listening meeting with business leaders, after which her husband said, ‘I think she’s done really well. I’m really proud of her.’ It’s nice to know that she is such a good listener in meetings with business leaders.

  5. 5  Steven  May 9, 2008, 6:13 pm 

    You know there’s a new Forum, right?

  6. 6  John Fallhammer  May 10, 2008, 8:36 am 

    I don’t want to appear ungracious, but I detest web forums and find them fundamentally unuseable. I’m sometimes surprised by how passionately I hate them.

    Would you at least promise that there will be no animated avatars, no hat-wearing smileys, and no pictures of kittens? (Though you may wish to set aside a forum for lolunspeek.)

  7. 7  Alex Higgins  May 10, 2008, 8:25 pm 

    “I’m sometimes surprised by how passionately I hate them. Would you at least promise that there will be no animated avatars, no hat-wearing smileys, and no pictures of kittens?”

    Due to a personality defect, I find pictures of kittens with captions inherently funny.

    If you put one up here saying “I can reedz Slavoj Zizek”, most people would be annoyed, but I would be amused for days.

  8. 8  leinad  May 11, 2008, 4:56 am 

    lolunspeak

    I can haz linguiztic subterfiuj?

  9. 9  Roger  May 12, 2008, 11:39 am 

    It is infuriating, but seems true, that a single lolkittypic can give a remarkable boost to a blog’s visitor statistics. It is also sad and disheartening. It may also tend to corrupt a blogmaster. For certain, McCain’s KarlRove MkII bot will already be crunching the lolunspeak possibilities for November.



stevenpoole.net

hit parade

    guardian articles


    older posts

    archives



    blogroll